Richmond Restaurant Stays High and Dry
Full Mitigation Best Practice Story
Richmond City, Virginia
Richmond, VA - When the owners of a new Buffalo Wild Wings Grill and Bar franchise considered opening in the historic Shockoe Bottom entertainment district, they knew the area was prone to flooding. Their decision to make the building flood resistant soon paid off.
The new restaurant opened a little more than a year before Tropical Storm Gaston came on August 30, 2004. The flood reached 8 to 10 feet above street level in some areas. It damaged 48 businesses and left many people homeless.
But Buffalo Wild Wings sustained only minor water damage and was ready to reopen in four days. Their initial investment of $130,000 protected over a million dollars in capital and untold revenue.
The owners had decided to build up the floor 5 feet. They took the fuse boxes, the hot water heater and the air conditioner compressor from the original ground floor and moved them to the modified floor, the top floor and the roof.
Renovating the entire building cost about $1.3 million, with the floor modification accounting for about 10 percent of the total, according to Steve Green, the manager on duty when the flood hit. “That 10 percent saved the other 90,” he said. “We decided to go with a concrete floor in the bar, even though the standard for [a] Buffalo Wild Wings (franchise) is a wood floor,” said Green. “If we had wood floors, there definitely would have been more damage.”
The restaurant just had to hose the mud off the concrete floor in the bar and clean the carpet in the main dining room to get back in business. “The total cost to get the restaurant ready for business after the flood was less than $5,000, and most of that was for labor,” Green said.
Although the restaurant fared well, Green personally did not. “I lost my car, and so did my assistant manager,” he said. Other establishments near Buffalo Wild Wings did not fare well, either. A popular pizza place, just a block away, is in near ruins after the flood.
“I think they were underinsured,” Green said. “It’s going to be tough for them (to recover).”
Activity/Project Location
| Geographical Area: |
Single County in a State |
| FEMA Region: |
Region III |
| State: |
Virginia |
| County: |
Richmond City
|
| City/Community: |
Richmond
|
Key Activity/Project Information
| Sector: |
Private |
| Hazard Type: |
Flooding
|
| Activity/Project Type: |
Elevation, Structural;
Elevation, Utilities
|
| Activity/Project Start Date: |
01/2002 |
| Activity/Project End Date: |
01/2003 |
| Funding Source: |
Property Owner, Commercial
|
| Funding Recipient: |
Property Owner - Residential |
Activity/Project Economic Analysis
| Cost: |
$130,000.00 (Estimated)
|
Activity/Project Disaster Information
| Mitigation Resulted From Federal Disaster? |
Unknown |
| Value Tested By Disaster? |
Yes |
| Tested By Federal Disaster #: |
No Federal Disaster specified
|
| Year First Tested: |
2004 |
| Repetitive Loss Property? |
Unknown |
Show Main PointsHide Main Points
Main Points
- Property owner knew that property in historic district was prone to flooding; elevated business and utilities 5 feet.
- They took the fuse boxes, the hot water heater and the air conditioner compressor from the original ground floor and moved them to the modified floor, the top floor and the roof.
- The restaurant just had to hose the mud off the concrete floor in the bar and clean the carpet in the main dining room to get back in business.
|
Attachments
|
No Attachments are available
|
Last Updated: Sep 13, 2007
Previous Page