Preoxygenation for tracheal suctioning in intubated, ventilated newborn infants

Pritchard M, Flenady V, Woodgate P

Background - Methods - Results - Characteristics of Included Studies - References - Data Tables & Graphs


Cover sheet

Title

Preoxygenation for tracheal suctioning in intubated, ventilated newborn infants

Reviewers

Pritchard M, Flenady V, Woodgate P

Dates

Date edited: 19/11/2002
Date of last substantive update: 21/10/2000
Date of last minor update: 20/09/2002
Date next stage expected / /
Protocol first published:
Review first published: Issue 3, 2001

Contact reviewer

Margo A Pritchard
Perinatal Research Centre
Royal Women's Hospital
Bowen Bridge road
Herston
Brisbane AUSTRALIA
4029
Telephone 1: 61 7 3636 5172
Facsimile: 61 7 3636 1769
E-mail: margo_pritchard@health.qld.gov.au

Contribution of reviewers

Vicki Flenady and Paul Woodgate prepared the protocol. Margo Pritchard and Vicki Flenady conducted the search, extracted and entered data, and compiled the review. All reviewers assessed trial quality, checked data and edited the review.

Intramural sources of support

Perinatal Research Centre, Royal Women's Hospital, Queensland, AUSTRALIA
Centre for Clinical Studies - Women's and Children's Health, Mater Mothers' Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, AUSTRALIA

Extramural sources of support

Department of Health and Ageing, Commonwealth Government, Canberra supporting Centre for Clinical Studies, Mater Hospital, Brisbane, AUSTRALIA

What's new

This updates the review, "Preoxygenation for tracheal suctioning in intubated, ventilated newborn infants", published in The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2001.

No new trials were identified in the search dated September 2002, and as a result no substantive changes were made in the review.

Dates

Date review re-formatted: / /
Date new studies sought but none found: 20/09/2002
Date new studies found but not yet included/excluded: / /
Date new studies found and included/excluded: / /
Date reviewers' conclusions section amended: / /
Date comment/criticism added: / /
Date response to comment/criticisms added: / /

Text of review

Synopsis

There is not enough evidence to show the effects of giving oxygen before tracheal suctioning for preterm babies receiving mechanical ventilation.

A baby born too early (before 34 weeks) often has immature lungs. This is a major cause of breathing failure and death. Mechanical ventilation (machine assisted breathing) keeps the baby breathing and reduces the risk of lung injury and disease. Endotracheal suctioning (removing unwanted fluid through the windpipe) is a routine part of mechanical ventilation, but can have serious complications of pneumothorax (air in the lung cavity) and bradycardia (slow heart rate). Giving oxygen just before suctioning (preoxygenation) may minimise the risk of these complications. The review of trials did not find enough evidence on the effects of preoxygenation. More research is needed.

Abstract

Background

Endotracheal suctioning for mechanically ventilated infants is routine practice in neonatal intensive care. However, this practice is associated with serious complications including lobar collapse, pneumothorax, bradycardia and hypoxemia. Increasing the inspired oxygen immediately prior to suction (preoxygenation) has been proposed as an intervention to minimise the risk of complications.

Objectives

To compare the effects of preoxygenation with no preoxygenation for endotracheal suctioning on ventilated newborn infants. To conduct sub group analyses by i) different populations of newborn infants; by gestational age <30 weeks, <34 weeks and <37 weeks and by disease; infants with chronic lung disease compared to those without and; ii) by different techniques of endotracheal suctioning; with or without disconnection from the ventilator, increased mechanical ventilation, use of manual ventilation and chest wall vibrations or percussion.

Search strategy

The standard search strategy of the Neonatal Review Group was used. This included searches of electronic databases; Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials; Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2002); MEDLINE (1966 - September 2002); and CINAHL (1982 - September 2002) using MeSH term infant-newborn and text terms oxygen* and suction*, preoxygenation, pre-oxygenation and premature and also previous reviews including cross references, abstracts in conferences and symposia proceedings, expert informants, and journal hand searching in the English language.

Selection criteria

Random or quasi random controlled trials of mechanically ventilated neonates in which endotracheal suctioning with preoxygenation was compared to suctioning without preoxygenation.

Data collection & analysis

Standard methods of the Cochrane Collaboration and the Neonatal Review Group were used, including independent assessment of trial quality and extraction of data by the authors. Data were analysed using relative risk (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for data measured on a continuous scale with the use of 95% confidence intervals. Meta-analysis was conducted using a fixed effects model.

Main results

One cross-over trial involving outcomes for 16 preterm neonates was included in this review (Walsh 1987). Preoxygenation, prior to an endotracheal suctioning procedure involving two suctions, resulted in a statistically significant reduction in infants with hypoxemia (TcPO2 <40 mmHg) at the end of the first suction (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.05, 0.69), at the end of the second suction (RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.08, 0.66) and also at 120 seconds after the second suction (RR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01, 0.69). Mean TcPO2 was statistically significantly higher in the preoxygenation group at the end of the first suction (MD 25.00 mmHg, 95%CI 14.20, 35.80), second suction (MD 24.80, 95% CI 14.80, 34.80) and also at 120 seconds after the second suction (MD 29.10, 95% CI 14.96, 43.24). The time taken to return to baseline oxygenation status was shorter than the group not receiving preoxygenation (MD -2.12 minutes, 95% CI -3.82, -0.42).

Reviewers' conclusions

No recommendations for practice can be confidently made from the results of this review. Although preoxygenation was shown to decrease hypoxemia at the time of suctioning, other clinically important short and longer-term outcomes including adverse effects were unable to be assessed. Further studies are needed to adequately assess the effects of this widely practiced procedure.

Background

Assisted mechanical ventilation is the mainstay of management of a variety of conditions affecting the neonate, however, there are a number of potential hazards associated with this life saving intervention. The presence of an endotracheal tube causes soft tissue irritation and increased secretions which increases the likelihood of tube blockage and lobar collapse. Endotracheal suctioning aims to reduce the problems resulting from build-up of secretions and tube obstruction such as discomfort, hypoxemia, hypercapnia and lobar collapse. The practice of endotracheal suctioning is therefore routine practice in neonatal intensive care.

However there are a number of complications associated with this procedure which have been well documented (Downs 1978; Vaughan 1978; Simbruner 1981; Hill 1982; Perlman 1983, Alpan 1984; Drew 1986; Prendiville 1986; Macpherson 1988; Mehrabani 1991; Shorten 1991), and include hypoxemia, bradycardia, tachycardia, atelectasis, pneumonia, fluctuations in blood pressure and intracranial pressure, localised trauma to the airway, sepsis and tube dislodgement.

Protocols for endotracheal care vary widely between institutions and are not, in general, based on sound evidence. Practices vary in relation to the use of normal saline instillation, chest wall vibrations and percussion, adaptors to enable closed methods of suction, increasing of ventilatory pressures and rate, manual ventilation, number of operators, suctioning frequency, and preoxygenation (Turner 1983; Tolles 1990).

Preoxygenation is a technique of increasing inspired oxygen immediately prior to the suction procedure to increase arterial oxygen saturation. It has been suggested that preoxygenation may minimise the hypoxemia and other adverse effects associated with endotracheal suctioning (Young 1984; Cheng 1989). However, this intervention may cause hyperoxia which is associated with oxygen free radical damage and there is emerging data to suggest that oxygen free radical damage is associated with major morbidity (periventricular leukomalacia, retinopathy of prematurity, chronic lung disease) with the potential for major long term sequelae (Tolles 1990; Taylor 1999; Inder 2000).

Objectives

The primary objective is to compare the effects of preoxygenation with no preoxygenation for endotracheal suctioning in ventilated newborn infants.

Sub-group analyses are planned to determine whether the results differ by:

Population (newborn infants) :
• by gestational age <30 weeks, <34 weeks and <37 weeks; and
• by disease, infants with chronic lung disease compared to those without.

Intervention (different techniques of endotracheal suctioning):
• with or without disconnection from the ventilator;
• increased mechanical ventilation; and
• use of manual ventilation and chest wall vibrations or percussion.

Criteria for considering studies for this review

Types of studies

All trials using random or quasi-random patient allocation, in which preoxygenation prior to tracheal suctioning was compared to suctioning without preoxygenation.

Types of participants

Newborn infants receiving ventilatory support via an endotracheal tube who received endotracheal suctioning.

Types of interventions

Preoxygenation immediately prior to endotracheal suctioning.

Types of outcome measures

Primary outcomes:
• Severe retinopathy of prematurity (Stage III and IV)
• Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) (Stages 1 to 1V)
• Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) (Grades 3 and 4)
• Intraventricular haemorrhage (Grades 1 to 4)
• Cerebral cystic formations (Periventricular leukomalacia, porencephalic cysts)

Secondary outcomes:
• Chronic lung disease [infant receiving any respiratory support (supplemental oxygen or any form of assisted ventilation) for a chronic pulmonary disorder i) on the day they reached 36 weeks' post menstrual age; and ii) at 28 days postnatal age].
• Hypoxemia ( TcPO2 <50 mmHg or SaO2 <90%)
• Hyperoxemia (TcPO2 >95 mmHg or Sao2 >98%)
• Blood pressure change (percentage change from the baseline to during suction)
• Bradycardia (decrease in heart rate to < 30% of baseline, or <100 beats per minute)

Search strategy for identification of studies

The standard search strategy of the Neonatal Review Group was used. This included searches of the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2002), MEDLINE (1966 - September 2002), CINAHL (1982 - September 2002) using MeSH term infant-newborn and text terms oxygen*, suction*, preoxygenation, pre-oxygenation and premature and also previous reviews including cross references, abstracts in conferences and symposia proceedings, expert informants, journal hand searching in the English language. The search for this update was carried forward to include Issue 2, 2002 of the Cochrane Library, and up to September 2002 of MEDLINE and Cinahl.

Methods of the review

Standard methods of the Cochrane Collaboration as discussed in the Cochrane Reviewer's Handbook (Clarke 2002) and the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group were used.

Methods used for assessing data quality:
Four major sources of potential bias and methods of avoidance of these biases were considered when assessing trial quality; 1) Selection bias - blinding of randomization; 2) Performance bias - blinding of intervention; 3) Attrition bias - complete follow-up; 4) Detection bias - blinding of outcome assessment. The Cochrane Neonatal Group bases its quality assessments on systematic assessment of the opportunity for each of these biases to arise. Thus, the reviewers judged from the report of the trial whether each of the criteria (methods of avoidance) was met. Each criterion was given a rating of either A if Yes (Adequate), B if Can't Tell (Unclear), or C if No (Inadequate). The quality assessment rating included in the Table of Included Studies refers to blinding of randomization alone.

The methodological quality of each trial was reviewed by each author who then compared and resolved differences. Additional information was sought for all identified potentially eligible studies on randomization method. However, at the time of the review no correspondence was received.

Methods used to collect data from included studies:
Each author independently extracted data, then compared and resolved differences.

Methods used to analyze the data:
Relative risk (RR) was computed for categorical data and Mean difference (MD) for data measured on a continuous scale, with 95% confidence intervals (CI) presented for all reported outcomes.

Description of studies

Three studies were identified. Two trials (Cabal 1979, Graff 1987) are awaiting further clarification from the authors on the method of allocation to treatment and are not included in this review. Therefore, this review includes one trial (Walsh 1987).

The included study utilised a cross-over design and involved 21 infants. Participants were preterm infants with gestational age 31.4 (± 2.5) weeks, birthweight 1586 (± 682) grams and postnatal age at enrolment 4 (± 4.5) days [(Mean (SD)]. All infants were mechanically ventilated for respiratory distress with FiO2 > 0.30.

In this study, two suctioning procedures were compared. Procedure A included the following sequence of events: chest vibration using a hand held vibrator for two minutes, instillation of normal saline, reconnection to ventilator for 30 seconds, endotracheal tube suctioning with infant's head to one side, returned to ventilator for 30 seconds, second endotracheal suctioning with head on the opposite side, and then returned to ventilator. Procedure B included the same sequence of events as described in procedure A with the addition of preoxygenation which involved an increase in FiO2 until TcPO2 reached between 90 -100 mmHg and stabilised for two minutes. Following suction the FiO2 was gradually reduced to base line setting. Each infant was studied for one suction in each of the two procedures.

The trial measured effects of preoxygenation prior to suctioning on hypoxemia and bradycardia. Transcutaneous oxygen (TcPO2) values were reported at ten time points over a suctioning procedure. In this review, data is presented for three of these measurement points, chosen because of clinical relevance. These points are: 1) end of first endotracheal suction 2) end of second endotracheal suction and 3) at 120 seconds from the end of second suction.

The number of infants with hypoxemia (defined as TcPO2 <40 mmHg) and mean TcPO2 were measured at these points. Other outcomes include TcPO2 recovery (time taken for TcPO2 to return to baseline values) and the numbers of infants experiencing bradycardia (heart rate < 100 beats per minute during the suctioning procedure).

For further details see characteristics of included studies.

Methodological quality of included studies

The included trial (Walsh 1987) is considered to be of poor quality: blinding of randomization and outcome assessment are unknown; of the 21 infants enrolled in this study five were excluded from analysis; three infants had only one procedure performed and two were considered too ill to receive the full suction procedure.

Results

One study contributed data to this review (Walsh 1987). This study reported outcomes of oxygenation status and bradycardia over the suction episode.

Oxygenation:
Preoxygenation prior to suctioning resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the number of infants with hypoxemia (TcPO2 <40 mmHg) at the end of the first suction (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.05, 0.69) and at the end of the second suction (RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.08, 0.66) and also at 120 seconds post second suction (RR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01, 0.69).

The mean TcPO2 was statistically significantly higher in the preoxygenation group at the end of first suction (MD 25.00 mmHg, 95%CI 14.20, 35.80), second suction (MD 24.80, 95% CI 14.80, 34.80) and at 120 seconds after the second suction (MD 29.10, 95% CI 14.96, 43.24). Episodes of hyperoxia were not reported.

Recovery time (time taken to return to baseline oxygenation status) was shorter than in the group not receiving preoxygenation (MD -2.12 minutes, 95% CI -3.82, -0.42).

Bradycardia:
No episodes of bradycardia were experienced by infants during the suction procedure in either of the study groups.

Due to insufficient data, this review was unable to assess the effects of preoxygenation on other important outcomes (retinopathy of prematurity, intraventricular haemorrhage, chronic lung disease, hyperoxia, blood pressure) or on specified sub-groups (gestational age groups, acute or chronic neonatal respiratory failure, use of different suctioning techniques)

Discussion

Although this review shows some benefit in terms of oxygenation status at the time of suction, these results should be interpreted with caution as the only eligible study has major limitations. The limitations include: 1) the small number of infants studied in the single included trial 2) limited generalisability - the included study was published 14 years ago 3) poor quality of the included study and 4) limited short-term and no long-term outcomes assessed. The suction procedure used in this trial involved two minutes of chest vibration using a hand held vibrator, instillation of normal saline into the endotracheal tube and disconnection of the ventilator circuit. This regimen for endotracheal suctioning is no longer considered routine practice in many neonatal intensive care units.

There have been many changes in clinical care since the trial included in this review was undertaken. Many of these changes may render the results of this review redundant and difficult to generalize to today's population of ventilated infants. Changes in neonatal care over this time include the use of humidification, exogenous surfactant, physiotherapy, new ventilation modes and a move towards individualised rather than routine care procedures including endotracheal suctioning.

The use of systems which enable delivery of some ventilatory support during suction (usually by an adapter allowing suctioning without disconnection from the ventilator) are now widely available for use in most countries. In this review, subgroup analysis of disconnection from the ventilator could not be undertaken due to insufficient data. The effects of tracheal suctioning without disconnection in intubated ventilated neonates are addressed as the primary objective in another Cochrane Neonatal Review (Woodgate 2002). The effects of other techniques used with preoxygenation for endotracheal suctioning were also not able to be assessed in this review. These techniques include the use of saline instillation, one or two operators, use of manual ventilation, and use of chest wall vibration or percussion.

This review demonstrates benefit in terms of hypoxemia at the time of endotracheal suctioning with preoxygenation. Hypoxemia and its relationship with other alterations in systemic and cerebral hemodynamic changes during endotracheal suctioning may place the preterm infant at risk of intraventricular hemorrhage and possible long term sequelae. The potentially serious side effects of hyperoxemia which may be associated with the technique of preoxygenation is of concern and could not be addressed in this review. The cross-over design of this study precludes the meaningful exploration of long-term outcomes. As the population of infants included in this review may differ substantially from today's intensive care nursery populations, the generalisability of these findings is somewhat limited. The decision whether or not to use preoxygenation for tracheal suctioning in preterm ventilated infants cannot be adequately answered by this review.

Reviewers' conclusions

Implications for practice

No recommendations for practice can be confidently made due to the major limitations of this review. Although the results of this review indicate preoxygenation decreases hypoxemia at the time of suctioning, the relationship of this short-term outcome to clinically relevant longer-term outcomes could not to be assessed. Furthermore, the small numbers of infants studied and concerns about generalisability and methodological quality of the included study prohibits practice recommendations. Studies which investigate procedures involving significant alterations in oxygenation must include an adequate assessment of not only beneficial effects of the procedure, but also adverse outcomes such as retinopathy of prematurity before practice recommendations can be safely made.

Implications for research

Further studies investigating the role of endotracheal suctioning in the care of mechanically ventilated infants and the different methods used need to be undertaken. These methods include the use of normal saline instillation, the frequency of suctioning, the use of closed suction techniques, the use of chest wall vibrations and the use of preoxygenation. Participants in these studies must be representative of the current population of ventilated newborns and enable adequate assessment of the effects on preterm infants, particularly the extremely low birthweight population. Future studies should use a randomised controlled trial methodology and be designed appropriately to adequately assess clinically important differences in short and long term outcomes such as hyperoxia, hypoxia, retinopathy of prematurity, cerebral cystic lesions, intraventricular haemorrhage, and developmental outcomes.

Acknowledgements

The reviewers would like to acknowledge David Henderson-Smart (Australasian Regional Coordinator for the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group) for assistance with this review.

Potential conflict of interest

None

Characteristics of included studies

Study Methods Participants Interventions Outcomes Notes Allocation concealment
Walsh 1987 Concealment at randomization- can't tell; Blinding of intervention- no; Completeness of followup-no; Blinding of outcome assessment - can't tell. 21 preterm infants born at 27 to 35 weeks gestation receiving tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation for respiratory distress with Fi02 >0.3.  Experimental(B). 
FiO2 increased until TcPO2 was between 90-100 mmHg. Infant left to stabilise for two minutes. Chest vibration, instillation of normal saline, suctioning with head to the left, reconnection of ETT for 30 seconds, second suction with head to the right, returned to ventilator. 
Control(A). As in Experimental group but without preoxygenation.
Hypoxemia:
Mean TcPO2 and hypoxaemia (TcPO2<40 mmHg) at ten different time points during the suctioning procedure and
TcPO2 recovery: time (in minutes) to return to baseline.
Bradycardia (HR < 100bpm).
Pre-trial power calculations-not stated. 
Cross-over study design used.
5 post randomization exclusions. 
B
ETT- endotracheal tube
TcPO2 - transcutaneous oxygen tension
FiO2 - fraction of oxygen in expired air
mmHg -millimeters of mercury (1 mmHg = 0.1333 kPa.)

References to studies

References to included studies

Walsh 1987 {published data only}

Walsh C, Bada H, Korones S, Carter M, Wong S, Arheart K. Controlled supplemental oxygenation during tracheobronchial hygiene. Nurs Res 1987;36:211-215.

References to studies awaiting assessment

Cabal 1979 {published data only}

Cabal L, Devaskar S, Siassi B, Plajstek C, Waffarn F, Blanco C, Hodgman J. New endotracheal tube adaptor reducing cardiopulmonary effects of suctioning. Crit Care Med 1979;7:552-555.

Graff 1987 {published data only}

Graff M, France J, Hiatt M, Hegyi T. Prevention of hypoxia and hyperoxia during endotracheal suctioning. Crit Care Med 1987;15:1133-1135.

* indicates the primary reference for the study

Other references

Additional references

Alpan 1984

Alpan G, Glick B, Peleg O, Amit Y, Eyal F. Pneumothorax due to endotracheal tube suction. Am J Perinatol 1984;1:345-348.

Cheng 1989

Cheng M, Williams PD. Oxygenation during chest physiotherapy of very low birth weight infants: Relations among fraction of inspired oxygen levels, number of hand ventilations and transcutaneous oxygen pressure. J Pediatr Nurs 1989;4:411-418.

Clarke 2002

Clarke M, Oxman AD, editors. Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook 4.1.5 [Updated April 2002]. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2002. Oxford: Update Software. Updated quarterly.

Downs 1978

Downs J, Goldberg A. Pulmonary Disease of the Fetus, Newborn and Child. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1978.

Drew 1986

Drew JH, Paddoms K, Clabburn SL. Endotracheal tube mangement in newborn infants with hyaline membrane disease. Austral J Physiother 1986;32:3-5.

Hill 1982

Hill A, Perlman JM, Volpe JJ. Relationship of pneumothorax to occurrence of intraventricular hemorrhage in the premature newborn. Pediatrics 1982;69:144-149.

Inder 2000

Inder TE, Volpe JJ. Mechanisms of perinatal brain injury. Semin Neonatol 2000;5:3-16.

Macpherson 1988

Macpherson TA, Shen-Schwarz S, Valdes-Dapena M. Prevention and reduction of iatrogenic disorders in the newborn. In: Guthrie RD, editor(s). Neonatal Intensive Care. 1988:271-292.

Mehrabani 1991

Mehrabani D, Gowan CW Jr, Kopleman AE. Association of pneumothorax and hypotension with intraventricular haemorrhage. Arch Dis Child 1991;66:48-51.

Perlman 1983

Perlman JM, Volpe JJ. Suctioning in the preterm infant: Effects on cerebral blood flow velocity, intracranial pressure and arterial blood pressure. Pediatrics 1983;72:329-334.

Prendiville 1986

Prendiville A, Thomson A, Silverman M. Effect of tracheobronchial suction on respiratory resistance in intubated preterm babies. Arch Dis Child 1986;61:1178-1183.

ROP Committee 1984

International Committee for the Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity. An international classification of retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatrics 1984;74:127-133.

Shorten 1991

Shorten DR, Byrne PJ, Jones RL. Infant responses to saline instillations and endotracheal suctioning. J Obstet Gynaecol Neonatal Nurs 1991;20:464-469.

Simbruner 1981

Simbruner G, Coradello H, Fodor M, Havelec L, Lubec G, Pollak A. Effect of tracheal suction on oxygenation, circulation an lung mechanics in newborn infants. Arch Dis Child 1981;56:326-330.

Taylor 1999

Taylor DL, Edwards AD, Mehmet H. Oxidative metabolism, apoptosis and perinatal brain injury. Brain Pathol 1999;9:93-117.

Tolles 1990

Tolles CL, Stone KS. National survey of neonatal endotracheal suctioning practices. Neonatal Netw 1990;9:7-14.

Turner 1983

Turner B. Endotracheal suction in premature infants. J Calif Perinat Assoc 1983;3:104.

Vaughan 1978

Vaughan RS, Menke JA. Pneumothorax: A complication of endotracheal suctioning. J Pediatr 1978;92:633-634.

Woodgate 2002

Woodgate PG, Flenady VJ. Tracheal suctioning without disconnection in intubated ventilated newborns (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2002. Oxford: Update Software.

Young 1984

Young CS. Recommended guidelines for suction. Physiotherapy 1984;70:106-108.

Other published versions of this review

Pritchard 2001

Pritchard M, Flenady V, Woodgate P. Preoxygenation for tracheal suctioning in intubated, ventilated newborn infants (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2001. Oxford: Update Software.

Comparisons and data

01 Suctioning with preoxygenation vs without preoxygenation
01.01 Hypoxemia end of first suction (TcPO2 <40mmHg)
01.02 Hypoxemia end of second suction (TcP02 <40mmHg)
01.03 Hypoxemia 120 seconds post-suction (TcP02 <40mmHg).
01.04 TcPO2 end of first suction (mmHg).
01.05 TcPO2 end of second suction (mmHg)
01.06 TcPO2 120 seconds post-suction (mmHg)
01.07 Recovery time in minutes
01.08 One or more episodes of bradycardia
 

Notes

Published notes

Amended sections

None selected

Contact details for co-reviewers

Dr Paul G Woodgate, MB BS FRACP MMedSc
Consultant Neonatologist
Department of Neonatology
Mater Mother's Hospital
Raymond Terrace
South Brisbane
Brisbane
Queensland AUSTRALIA
4101
Telephone 1: +61 7 3840 1911
Facsimile: +61 7 3840 1949
E-mail: PWOODGAT@mater.org.au

Vicki J Flenady
Centre for Clinical Studies-Women's and Children's Health
Mater Hospital
South Brisbane
Queensland AUSTRALIA
4101
Telephone 1: +61 7 3840 1591
Facsimile: +61 7 3840 1588
E-mail: vflenady@mater.org.au