ATSDR
Environmental Medicine | CSEM | GREM | Continuing Education | Patient Education | PEHT | Community
Case Contents
Cover Page
Goals and Objectives
Case Study, Pretest
Definition of Clusters
Evaluating a Cluster
Case Definition
Case Confirmation
Population Denominator
Review the Literature
Exposure Assessment
Risk Communication
Web Resources
Suggested Reading
Answers
Exposure History Form
 
Environmental Medicine
CSEM
GREM
PEHT
Continuing Education
Online Registration
Patient Education
Community Education
 
ATSDR Resources
ATSDR en Español
Case Studies (CSEM)
Exposure Pathways
HazDat Database
Health Assessments
Health Statements
Interaction Profiles
Interactive Learning
Managing Incidents
Medical Guidelines
Minimal Risk Levels
Priority List
ToxFAQs™
ToxFAQs™ CABS
Toxicological Profiles
Toxicology Curriculum
 
External Resources
CDC
eLCOSH
EPA
Healthfinder®
Medline Plus
NCEH
NIEHS
NIOSH
OSHA

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry 
Case Studies in Environmental Medicine (CSEM) 

Disease Clusters: An Overview
Develop Biologically Plausible Hypotheses

On completion of the exposure assessment, the public health department will decide whether the available information is sufficient to generate a biologically plausible hypothesis to explain the cluster.

To generate a biologically plausible hypothesis, the public health department conducts structured interviews with each affected individual. By means of standardized, structured questionnaires, each patient is asked about medical history, family history, work history, hobbies and other activities, lifestyle, historical exposures, and risks of exposures. Some cluster investigations also delve into acquaintanceship patterns. The interview results are carefully reviewed in an effort to find patterns suggesting possible similarities linking the affected cases that can form the basis of exposure hypotheses. Once common factors are identified among the cases, a comparison of the affected individuals to randomly selected groups of others from the denominator population can then test the significance of such patterns.

Biologic plausibility might also depend on whether there is evidence of shared exposure to a chemical capable of causing the disease of concern, whether the exposures had been of sufficient magnitude to cause adverse effects, and whether all affected individuals had been exposed. Additionally, the temporal relationship between exposure and effect should be evaluated in terms of what information is known. Many diseases such as cancers develop only after a delay (or latency period) lasting years or, more often, decades. (Latency period is the duration of time from first exposure to first symptoms or signs of a disease.) For that reason, it would not be biologically plausible to link very recent exposure to the onset of cancer.

Clinicians in communities affected by disease clusters have an important role in understanding and translating the science of cluster investigations and an equally important role in reporting possible disease clusters to the local public health units in their practice communities.

The physician's responsibility is to

  • Suspect a cluster of disease based on clinical observation.
  • Complete an exposure history.
  • Confirm case(s) through accurate clinical and laboratory diagnosis.
  • Act as a sentinel in reporting cases to the local public health department.
  • Educate patients about occurrence of disease.

The first line for contact is the public health department. The public health department can initiate

  • active surveillance,
  • exposure assessments, and
  • development of local registries.

Previous Section

Next Section

Revised 2000-08-30.