CFDA Numbers: |
84.031
- Higher Education_Institutional Aid 84.031B - Strengthening HBCU's and Strengthening Historically Black Graduate Institutions 84.031N - Strengthening Alaska Native and Native Hawaaiian-Serving Institutions 84.031T - Strengthening Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities 84.120A - Minority Science and Engineering Improvement |
Goal 8: To improve the capacity of Minority-Serving Institutions, that traditionally have limited resources and serve large numbers of low-income and minority students, to improve student success and to provide high quality educational opportunities for their students. |
Objective 8.1 of 3: Improve the academic quality of participating Institutions. |
Indicator 8.1.1 of 1: Academic Quality: The percentage of Title III and Title V project goals relating to the improvement of academic quality that are met or exceeded will increase or be maintained over time. | |||||||||||||||||
Targets and Performance Data | Assessment of Progress | Sources and Data Quality | |||||||||||||||
|
Explanation: In order to better measure the success of these programs new GPRA indicators were developed in 2002 based on the new Annual Performance Report (APR). The APR was designed with extensive consultation with the grant community. These indicators provide program success information across the diverse types of institutions as well as across the seven different programs within this one GPRA program report. February 2003 will be the first time that data will be available for these indicators. |
Additional Source Information: Data are collected from the Annual Performance Reports submitted by grantees. Frequency: Annually. Data Available: February 2004 Validated By: On-Site Monitoring By ED. Data supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Limitations: Data are self-reported. |
Objective 8.2 of 3: Improve the institutional management and fiscal stability of the participating Institutions. |
Indicator 8.2.1 of 1: Institutional Management and Fiscal Stability: The percentage of Title III and Title V project goals relating to the improvement of institutional management and fiscal stability that are met or exceeded will increase or be maintained over time. | |||||||||||||||||
Targets and Performance Data | Assessment of Progress | Sources and Data Quality | |||||||||||||||
|
Explanation: In order to better measure the success of these programs new GPRA indicators were developed in 2002 based on a new Annual Performance Report (APR). The APR was designed with extensive consultation with the grant community. These indicators provide program success information across the diverse types of institutions as well as across the seven different programs within this one GPRA program report. February 2003 will be the first time that data will be available for these indicators. |
Additional Source Information: Data are collected from the Annual Performance Reports submitted by grantees. Frequency: Annually. Data Available: February 2004 Validated By: On-Site Monitoring By ED. Data supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Limitations: Data are self-reported. |
Objective 8.3 of 3: Improve the student services and student outcomes of the participating Institutions. |
Indicator 8.3.1 of 1: Student Services and Student Outcomes: The percentage of Title III and Title V project goals relating to the improvement of student services and student outcomes that are met or exceeded will increase or be maintained over time. | |||||||||||||||||
Targets and Performance Data | Assessment of Progress | Sources and Data Quality | |||||||||||||||
|
Explanation: In order to better measure the success of these programs new GPRA indicators were developed in 2002 based on the new Annual Performance Report (APR). The APR was designed with extensive consultation with the grant community. These indicators provide program success information across the diverse types of institutions as well as across the seven different programs within this one GPRA program report. February 2003 will be the first time that data will be available for these indicators. |
Additional Source Information: Data are collected from the Annual Performance Reports submitted by grantees. Frequency: Annually. Data Available: February 2004 Validated By: On-Site Monitoring By ED. Data supplied by institutions, which certify the accuracy of the data. Limitations: Data are self-reported. |