Higher Energy Consumption Forecast Increases Carbon Dioxide Emissions
CO2 emissions from the combustion of fossil fuels are proportional to fuel
consumption. Among fossil fuel types, coal has the highest carbon content,
natural gas the lowest, and petroleum in between. In the AEO2006 reference
case, the shares of these fuels change slightly from 2004 to 2030, with
more coal and less petroleum and natural gas. The combined share of carbon-neutral
renewable and nuclear energy is stable from 2004 to 2030 at 14 percent.
As a result, CO2 emissions increase by a moderate average of 1.2 percent
per year over the period, slightly higher than the average annual increase
in total energy use (Figure 107). At the same time, the economy becomes
less carbon intensive: the percentage increase in CO2 emissions is one-third
the increase in GDP, and emissions per capita increase by only 11 percent
over the 26-year period.
The factors that influence growth in CO2 emissions are the same as those
that drive increases in energy demand. Among the most significant are population
growth; increased penetration of computers, electronics, appliances, and
office equipment; increases in commercial floorspace; growth in industrial
output; increases in highway, rail, and air travel; and continued reliance
on coal and natural gas for electric power generation. The increases in
demand for energy services are partially offset by efficiency improvements
and shifts toward less energy-intensive industries. New CO2 mitigation
programs, more rapid improvements in technology, or more rapid adoption
of voluntary programs could result in lower CO2 emissions levels than projected
here.
Emissions Projections Change With Economic Growth Assumptions
The high economic growth case assumes higher growth in population, labor
force, and productivity than in the reference case, leading to higher industrial
output, higher disposable income, lower inflation, and lower interest rates.
The low economic growth case assumes the reverse. The spread in GDP projections
increases over time, with GDP in the alternative cases varying by about
15 percent from the reference case in 2030.
Alternative projections for industrial output, commercial floorspace, housing,
and transportation influence the demand for energy and result in variations
in CO2 emissions (Figure 108). Emissions in 2030 are 10 percent lower in
the low growth case and 10 percent higher in the high growth case. The
strength of the relationship between economic growth and emissions varies
by end-use sector. It is strongest for the industrial sector and, to a
lesser extent, the transportation sector, where economic activity strongly
influences energy use and emissions, and where fuel choices are limited.
It is weaker in the commercial and residential sectors, where population
and building characteristics have large influences and vary less across
the three cases.
In the electricity sector, changes in electricity sales across the cases
affect the amount of new, more efficient generating capacity required,
reducing the sensitivity of energy use to GDP. However, the choice of coal
for most new baseload capacity increases CO2 intensity in the high growth
case while decreasing it in the low case, offsetting the effects of changes
in efficiency across the cases.
Technology Advances Could Reduce Carbon Dioxide Emissions
Future CO2 emissions depend, in part, on the timing, effectiveness, and
costs of new energy technologies. The reference case assumes continuing
improvement in energy-consuming and producing technologies. The high technology
case assumes earlier introduction, lower costs, and higher efficiencies
for energy technologies in the end-use sectors, as well as improved costs
and efficiencies for advanced fossil-fired and new renewable generating
technologies in the electric power sector [94]. As in the reference case,
however, technology adoption is assumed to be consistent with past patterns
of market behavior.
Energy use grows more slowly in the high technology case, with prospects
for greater energy savings constrained by gradual turnover of energy-using
equipment and buildings. Increased use of renewables and less new coal-fired
generating capacity accompany the efficiency improvements in the high technology
case. As a result, CO2 emissions in 2030 are 9 percent lower in the high
technology than in the reference case, while total energy consumption is
only 8 percent lower (Figure 109).
In contrast, the 2005 technology case assumes that only the equipment and
vehicles available in 2005 will be available through 2030, with no further
improvements in efficiency for new building shells and electric power plants.
Consequently, more energy is used, and CO2 emissions in 2030 are 9 percent
higher than in the reference case, with the difference quantifying the
effects of technology improvement assumptions on the reference case projections.
Sulfur Dioxide Emissions Fall Sharply in Response to Tighter Regulations
EPAs CAIR regulation, promulgated in March 2005, caps emissions of SO2 for the District of Columbia and 28 eastern and midwestern States that
were determined by the EPA to contribute to nonattainment of the NAAQS
for PM2.5 and ozone. CAIR is scheduled to supersede Title IV of the Clean
Air Act through the use of a cap and trade approach. Phase I of CAIR comes
into effect in 2010 for SO2. Phase II takes effect in 2015. States can
achieve the required emissions reductions by using one of two compliance
options: meet the States emissions budget by requiring power plants to
participate in an EPA-administered interstate cap and trade system that
caps emissions in two stages; or meet an individual State emissions budget
through measures of the States choosing.
Power companies are projected to add flue gas desulfurization equipment
to 141 gigawatts of capacity in order to comply with State or Federal initiatives.
As a result of those actions and the growing use of lower sulfur coal,
SO2 emissions drop from 10.9 million short tons in 2004 to 3.7 million
short tons in 2030 (Figure 110). The SO2 emissions allowance price rises
to nearly $890 per ton in 2015 and remains between $880 and $980 per ton
from 2015 through 2030. The reference case projections indicate that the level
of SO2 reductions called for in CAIR can be achieved without significantly
raising electricity prices, which are determined by many factors, including
natural gas prices, environmental compliance costs, and the status of electricity
deregulation activities.
Nitrogen Oxide Emissions Fall As New Regulations Take Effect
In the reference case, NOx emissions from electricity generation in the
U.S. power sector fall as new regulations take effect. The required reductions
are intended to reduce the formation of ground-level ozone, for which NOx emissions are a major precursor. Together with VOCs and hot weather, NOx emissions contribute to unhealthy air quality in many areas during the summer
months.
EPAs CAIR will apply to NOx emissions from 28 eastern and midwestern States
and the District of Columbia. Each State will be subject to two NOx limits
under CAIR: a 5-month summer season limit and an annual limit. These caps
are expected to stimulate additions of emission control equipment to some
existing coal-fired power plants.
National NOx emissions fall from 3.7 million short tons in 2004 to 2.2
million short tons in 2030 in the reference case (Figure 111). The largest
decrease occurs in 2009, when Phase I of CAIR is implemented, and there
is a smaller reduction in 2015 with the start of Phase II caps. Between
2009 and 2030, NOx allowance prices range from roughly $2,000 to $2,500
per ton, and they are expected to be highly volatile as the emission caps
tighten. These projections are indicative of the general range and direction
of the allowance prices. Power companies are expected to add selective
catalytic reduction equipment to 118 gigawatts of coal-fired capacity in
order to comply with both Federal and State initiatives; however, as with
the requirements for SO2 compliance, the CAIR NOx caps are not expected
to lead to significantly higher electricity prices for consumers.
New Environmental Regulations Reduce Mercury Emissions
EPAs CAMR regulation, also promulgated in March 2005, establishes a cap
and trade program to reduce mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants
in the United States. In addition to nationwide caps, each new and existing
coal-fired power plant must meet mercury emissions standards based on coal
type. Emissions of mercury must be reduced in two phases: the national
Phase I mercury cap is 38 short tons in 2010, and the Phase II cap is 15
short tons in 2018.
Emissions of mercury depend on a variety of site-specific factors, including
the amounts of mercury and other compounds (such as chlorine) in the coal,
the boiler type and configuration, and the presence of pollution control
equipment, such as fabric filters, electrostatic precipitators, flue gas
desulfurization, and selective catalytic reduction equipment.
The AEO2006 reference case assumes that States will comply with CAMR regulations.
As a result, mercury emissions decline from 53.3 short tons in 2004 to
15.3 short tons in 2030 (Figure 112). National emissions will be slightly
higher than the Phase II cap in 2018 due to the use of banked allowances
from earlier years. Electricity generators are expected to retrofit about
126 gigawatts of coal-fired capacity with ACI technology in order to comply
with the CAMR caps. Mercury allowance prices increase steadily from 2010
on, to about $62,000 per pound in 2030. As with the CAIR requirements for
SO2 and NOx compliance, the CAMR mercury caps are not expected to lead
to significantly higher electricity prices for consumers.
Market Trends Notes
|