Status Report on NAFTA Cross-Border Trucking Demonstration Project
On February 6, 2009, we issued a status report on the NAFTA Cross-Border Trucking Demonstration Project, in keeping with legislation enacted in May 2007. By law, we are required to issue a final report 60 days after the conclusion of the project, which was initiated on September 6, 2007. This report describes the status of the project at the conclusion of the first year. It also responds to a question for the record from our March 2008 testimony before the Senate on the withdrawal of Trinity Industries de Mexico from the project.
FHWA's Oversight of Design and Engineering Firms' Indirect Costs Claimed on Federal-Aid Grants
On February 5, 2009, we issued our audit report on the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) implementation of Section 307 of the National Highway Systems Designation Act (NHSDA). Section 307 of NHSDA requires the use of the Federal Acquisition Regulation as criteria to determine cost allowability when performing indirect cost rate audits of design and engineering (D&E) firms. Indirect rates are comprised of costs such as executive compensation; employee fringe benefits and wages; facilities charges; and insurance, legal, consultant, and travel costs. Indirect cost rate claims from 21 of our sample of 41 D&E firms included unallowable costs-some expressly unallowable-totaling about $15.7 million. About $10.7 million of the $15.7 million were unallowable executive compensation and about $5 million were other unallowable costs. Of the total, state DOT contracts were charged about $5.5 million, of which about $4.4 million-the Federal share-was reimbursed with Federal-aid funds. Based on the sample test results, we projected that, overall, D&E firms overcharged state DOT contracts for unallowable executive compensation of $41.2 million (the Federal share charged to state DOT contracts is $32.9 million). Lack of accountability at D&E firms and insufficient transaction testing by Certified Public Accountant (CPA) firms were the immediate causes of unallowable costs we found. Further, FHWA and state DOT oversight did not ensure effective monitoring of D&EĀ firms' indirect cost rate claims or indirect cost rate audits performed by CPA firms.
FRAUD ALERT: Fraudulent DOT Procurement Letter Makes Unauthorized Request For Contractor Financial Information
|