January 1988 - November 1994
Quick Bibliography Series: QB 95-02
129 citations from AGRICOLA
Joe Makuch
Water Quality Information Center
**************************************************************
This electronic bibliography is intended primarily to
provide awareness of investigations and discussions of a topic
and is not intended to be in-depth and exhaustive. The inclusion
or omission of a particular publication or citation should not be
construed as endorsement or disapproval.
Send suggestions for electronic bibliographies related to water
resources and agriculture to wqic@nal.usda.gov
To locate a publication cited in this bibliography, please
contact your local, state, or university library. If you are
unable to locate a particular publication, your library can
contact the National Agricultural Library (please see "Document
Delivery Services" at http://www.nal.usda.gov/ddsb).
****************************************************************
SEARCH STRATEGY
Set Items Description
S1 703 DAIR?/TI,DE,ID AND (WASTE? OR EFFLUENT? ? OR
MANURE? ? OR SLURR?)/TI,DE,ID
S2 659 S1 NOT SH=(Q101 OR Q100 OR Q105)
S3 492903 PY=(1988 OR 1989 OR 1990 OR 1991 OR 1992 OR
1993 OR 1994)
S4 194 S2 AND S3
S5 192 RD S4 (unique items)
Dairy Farm Manure Management
1 NAL Call. No.: FICHE S-72
Acidogenic fermentation of dairy manure.
Krones, M.J.; Johnson, A.T.; Hao, O.J.
St. Joseph, Mich. : The Society; 1988.
American Society of Agricultural Engineers (Microfiche
collection) (fiche no. 88-6612): 12 p. ill; 1988. Paper
presented at the 1988 Winter Meeting of the American Society
of Agricultural Engineers. Available for purchase from: The
American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Order Dept., 2950
Niles Road, St. Joseph, Michigan 49085. Telephone the Order
Dept. at (616) 429-0300 for information and prices. Includes
references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy farms; Liquid manures; Anaerobic digestion;
Analysis; Biogas; Methane production
2 NAL Call. No.: TD930.A32
Anaerobic-aerobic biological treatment of a mixture of cheese
whey and dairy manure.
Lo, K.V.; Liao, P.H.
Essex : Elsevier Science Publishers; 1989.
Biological wastes v. 28 (2): p. 91-101; 1989. Includes
references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Cheesemaking; Whey; Dairy cattle; Cattle manure;
Mixtures; Waste treatment; Anaerobic treatment; Aerobic
treatment; Biological treatment; Digesters; Methane
production; Treatment; Efficiency
3 NAL Call. No.: FULD1780 1992.S664
Analysis of the long-run financial impact of the 'Dairy Rule'
on dairies in the Lake Okeechobee drainage basin.
Smithwick, Robert P.,
1992; 1992.
ix, 98 leaves : ill. ; 29 cm. Typescript. Vita. Includes
bibliographical references (leaves 94-97).
Language: English; English
Descriptors: Dairy laws; Dairy waste
4 NAL Call. No.: 275.29 T313
Animal waste management.
Sweeten, J.M.; Baird, C.; Manning, L.
College Station, Tex. : The Service; 1991 Sep.
Leaflet L - Texas Agricultural Extension Service, Texas A & M
University System (5043): 4 p.; 1991 Sep. Includes
references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Texas; Animal wastes; Feedlots; Dairy farms;
Waste disposal; Regulation; Runoff; Water pollution; Water
quality
5 NAL Call. No.: S67.P82
Beef and dairy cattle research report 1990.
Chapman, H.D.; Griffin, C.D.
Baton Rouge, La.? : The Service; 1990 Jun.
Publication - Louisiana Cooperative Extension Service v.): 35
p.; 1990 Jun. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Louisiana; Beef cattle; Dairy cattle; Research
projects; Parasites; Breeding; Cattle feeding; Forage; Cattle
diseases; Animal wastes; Marketing
6 NAL Call. No.: A00033
Biofirm will treat dairy waste.
San Francisco, Calif. : Deborah J. Mysiewicz; 1991 Apr15.
BioEngineering news v. 12 (16): p. 4; 1991 Apr15.
Language: English
Descriptors: Oregon; Dairy effluent; Waste utilization;
Biogas; Anaerobic digestion
7 NAL Call. No.: 290.9 AM32T
Biogas production after solid-liquid separation of dairy
manure. Haugen, V.J.; Lindley, J.A.
St. Joseph, Mich. : American Society of Agricultural
Engineers; 1988 Dec. Transactions of the ASAE v. 31 (6): p.
1782-1786; 1988 Dec. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy effluents; Biogas slurry; Energy sources;
Digesters; Methane production
8 NAL Call. No.: TD930.A32
Biogas production from dairy manure: the effects of
temperature perturbations. Chayovan, S.; Gerrish, J.B.;
Eastman, J.A.
London : Elsevier Applied Science Publishers; 1988.
Biological wastes v. 25 (1): p. 1-16; 1988. Includes
references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy wastes; Waste utilization; Methane
production; Digesters; Repletion; Timing; Heating; Scheduling;
Storage; Fuel consumption; Cyclic fluctuations; Efficiency
9 NAL Call. No.: QC73.6.E5
Biogas production from diary manure using continuous mix and
no-mix mesophilic reactors.
Ghaly, A.E.
New York, N.Y. : Taylor & Francis; 1989.
Energy sources v. 11 (4): p. 221-235. ill; 1989. Includes
references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Methane production; Dairy industry; Animal
manures; Anaerobic digesters; Biodegradation
10 NAL Call. No.: TD930.A32
Bulk density and thermal properties of Moroccan dairy cattle
manure. Achkari-Begdouri, A.; Goodrich, P.R.
Essex : Elsevier Applied Science Publishers; 1992.
Bioresource technology v. 40 (3): p. 225-233; 1992. Includes
references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Morocco; Dairy cattle; Cattle manure; Bulk
density; Specific heat; Thermal conductivity; Aerobic
treatment; Anaerobic treatment; Total solids; Concentration;
Regression; Equations
11 NAL Call. No.: SF191.D3
Center stage: ecology.
Sauber, C.M.
Minnetonka, Minn. : Miller Publishing Company; 1989 Aug.
Dairy herd management v. 26 (8): p. 10-12, 14. ill; 1989 Aug.
Language: English
Descriptors: Florida; California; Oregon; Washington; Texas;
Dairy farming; Manures; Waste disposal; Water pollution; Law
enforcement; Regulations; Licenses and permits
12 NAL Call. No.: 421 J828
Colonization and response of Culicoides variipennis (Diptera:
Ceratopogonidae) to pollution levels in experimental dairy
wastewater ponds. Mullens, B.A.; Rodriguez, J.L.
Lanham, Md. : The Entomological Society of America; 1988 Nov.
Journal of medical entomology v. 25 (6): p. 441-451. ill; 1988
Nov. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: California; Culicoides variipennis; Aquatic
organisms; Incidence; Dairy effluents; Water pollution; Animal
manures
13 NAL Call. No.: 44.8 J822
Components of dairy manure management systems.
Van Horn, H.H.; Wilkie, A.C.; Powers, W.J.; Nordstedt, R.A.
Champaign, Ill. : American Dairy Science Association; 1994
Jul. Journal of dairy science v. 77 (7): p. 2008-2030; 1994
Jul. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Cattle manure; Dairy farms; Application to land;
Dairy cows; Excretion; Waste treatment; Waste disposal; Waste
utilization; Energy balance; Water use; Ammonia; Methane;
Nitrogen; Phosphorus
Abstract: Dairy manure management systems should account for
the fate of excreted nutrients that may be of environmental
concern. Currently, regulatory oversight is directed primarily
at the assurance of water quality; N is the most monitored
element. Land application of manure at acceptable fertilizer
levels to crops produced on the farm by hauling or by pumping
flushed manure effluent through irrigation systems is the
basis of most systems. Nutrient losses to surface and
groundwaters can be avoided, and significant economic value
can be obtained from manure as fertilizer if adequate crop
production is possible. Dairies with insufficient crop
production potential need affordable systems to concentrate
manure nutrients, thereby reducing hauling costs and possibly
producing a salable product. Precipitation of additional
nutrients from flushed manures with sedimented solids may be
possible. Composting of separated manure solids offers a
possible method to stabilize solids for distribution, but,
most often, solids separated from dairy manures are fibrous
and low in fertility. Manure solids combined with wastes from
other sources may have potential if a marketable product can
be produced or if sufficient subsidy is received for
processing supplementary wastes. Solutions to odor problems
are needed. Energy generated from manure organic matter, via
anaerobic digestion, reduces atmospheric emissions of methane
and odorous compounds. Use of constructed wetlands or
harvesting of photosynthetic biomass from wastewater has the
potential to improve water quality, making extensive recycling
possible.
14 NAL Call. No.: 290.9 Am32P
Constructed wetland site design and installation.
Ulmer, R.; Cathcart, T.; Strong, L.; Pote, J.; Davis, S.
St. Joseph, Mich. : American Society of Agricultural
Engineers,; 1992. Paper / (92-4528): 8 p.; 1992. Paper
presented at the "1992 International Winter Meeting sponsored
by the American Society of Agricultural Engineers," December
15-18, 1992, Nashville, Tennessee. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy effluent; Waste water treatment; Wetlands;
Construction; Lagoons
15 NAL Call. No.: 1.98 Ag84
Constructed wetlands clean up: they could be an inexpensive,
low-tech cure for farm pollution headaches.
Becker, H.
Washington, D.C. : Agricultural Research Service, United
States Department of Agriculture; 1993 Dec.
Agricultural research /. p. 20; 1993 Dec.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy farming; Waste water; Water management;
Wetlands
16 NAL Call. No.: 290.9 Am32P
Constructed wetlands for dairy wastewater treatment.
Davis, S.H.; Ulmer, R.; Strong, L.; Cathcart, T.; Pote, J.;
Brock, W. St. Joseph, Mich. : American Society of Agricultural
Engineers,; 1992. Paper / (92-4525): 11 p.; 1992. Paper
presented at the "1992 International Winter Meeting sponsored
by the American Society of Agricultural Engineers," December
15-18, 1992, Nashville, Tennessee. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Mississippi; Cabt; Dairy effluent; Waste water
treatment; Wetlands; Construction; Nitrification; Biochemical
oxygen demand; Dissolved oxygen
17 NAL Call. No.: QD415.A1J62
Continuous production of biogas from dairy manure using an
innovative no-mix reactor.
Ghaly, A.E.; Ben-Hassan, R.M.
Clifton, N.J. : Humana Press; 1989 Jan.
Applied biochemistry and biotechnology v. 20/21: p. 541-559;
1989 Jan. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Methane production; Dairy wastes; Anaerobic
digesters
18 NAL Call. No.: SF221.B26
Cost and economic feasibility of dairy waste management:
central Texas representative dairies.
Allen, G.; Lovell, A.; Schwart, B.; Lacewell, R.; Schmucker,
J.; Leatham, D.; Richardson, J.
College Station, Tex. : The Service; 1991 May28.
Balanced dairying : Economics - Texas Agricultural Extension
Service v. 11 (4): 8 p.; 1991 May28.
Language: English
Descriptors: Texas; Dairy farming; Waste disposal; Water
pollution; Groundwater pollution; Water quality; Waste
treatment; Cost benefit analysis; Statistics
19 NAL Call. No.: HD1773.A2N6
Cost comparisons of alternative methods for processing
recycled waste newspapers into farm-animal bedding.
Beierlein, J.G.; McSweeny, W.C.; Woodruff, B.A.
Ithaca, N.Y. : The Northeastern Agricultural and Resource
Economics Association; 1991 Oct.
Northeastern journal of agricultural and resource economics v.
20 (2): p. 208-213; 1991 Oct. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Pennsylvania; Litter; Newspapers; Recycling;
Waste disposal; On-farm processing; Chopping; Cost
effectiveness analysis; Transport costs; Dairy farms
20 NAL Call. No.: 421 J822
Costs of existing and recommended manure management practices
for house fly and stable fly (Diptera: Muscidae) control on
dairy farms. Lazarus, W.F.; Rutz, D.A.; Miller, R.W.; Brown,
D.A.
Lanham, Md. : Entomological Society of America; 1989 Aug.
Journal of economic entomology v. 82 (4): p. 1145-1151; 1989
Aug. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Maryland; New York; Farm dairies; Musca
domestica; Stomoxys calcitrans; Insect control; Manures; Waste
disposal; Production costs; Regression analysis
Abstract: Costs of fly control practices were estimated for
26 New York and Maryland dairy farms. Objectives were to
characterize existing practices, compare them with the cost of
more frequent and complete manure removal to reduce fly
breeding, and to compare costs of manure removal and
insecticide application. Information was collected in scouting
visits and personal interviews of farm operators. Equipment,
labor, and bedding costs were included for manure removal.
Insecticide application cost included chemicals and labor for
application. A typical farm with a stanchion barn had manure
removal costs of $0.348 per cow per day. Recommended changes
would increase costs by 0.016-0.033 per cow per day.
Insecticide costs averaged $0.021 per cow per day. It may be
possible to eliminate many of the insecticide applications on
the farms by using the recommended 7-d manure removal
practice. Even if insecticides are not eliminated entirely,
increased manure removal costs would be offset by some
reduction in insecticide cost. This also would have the
additional benefit of greatly slowing the development of
insecticide resistance by the flies.
21 NAL Call. No.: 100 C12CAG
Cultural management of bluetongue virus vectors.
Mullens, B.A.; Rodriguez, J.L.
Oakland, Calif. : Division of Agriculture and Natural
Resources, University of California; 1990 Jan.
California agriculture v. 44 (1): p. 30-32. ill; 1990 Jan.
Language: English
Descriptors: California; Dairy cattle; Bluetongue virus;
Disease vectors; Culicoides variipennis; Breeding; Habitats;
Dairy farming; Waste waters; Ponds; Surveys
22 NAL Call. No.: 57.8 C734
Dairy farmers shift to composting.
Rynk, R.
Emmaus, PA : JG Press, c1981-; 1994 Apr.
BioCycle v. 35 (4): p. 58-59; 1994 Apr.
Language: English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Cabt; Canada; Cabt; Composting; Cattle
manure; Dairy farms; On-farm processing; Surveys
23 NAL Call. No.: SB197.B7
Dairy farming and river quality.
Schofield, K.; Whitelaw, K.; Merriman, R.P.
Hurley, Berkshire : The Society; 1989.
Occasional symposium - British Grassland Society (23): p.
196-198; 1989.
Language: English
Descriptors: Wales; Dairy farming; Agricultural wastes; Water
pollution; Rivers; Water composition and quality
24 NAL Call. No.: 44.8 J822
Dairy manure and plant nutrient management issues affecting
water quality and the dairy industry.
Lanyon, L.E.
Champaign, Ill. : American Dairy Science Association; 1994
Jul. Journal of dairy science v. 77 (7): p. 1999-2007; 1994
Jul. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Cabt; Cattle manure; Water pollution;
Pollution control; Dairy farms; Cattle feeding; Production
costs; Environmental policy
Abstract: Specific requirements for dairy manure management
to protect water quality from nutrient pollution depend on the
organization of individual farms. Further, the management
requirements and options are different for point (farmstead)
and nonpoint (field-applied) sources of pollution from farms.
A formal management process can guide decisions about existing
crop nutrient utilization potential, provide a framework for
tracking nutrients supplied to crops, and identify future
requirements for dairy manure management to protect water
quality. Farm managers can use the process to plan daily
activities, to assess annual nutrient management performance,
and to chart future requirements as herd size increases.
Agronomic measures of nutrient balance and tracking of inputs
and outputs for various farm management units can provide the
quantitative basis for management to allocate better manure to
fields, to modify dairy rations, or to develop alternatives to
on-farm manure application. Changes in agricultural production
since World War II have contributed to a shift from land-based
dairy production to a reliance on capital factors of
production supplied by the dairy industry. Meanwhile,
management of dairy manure to meet increasingly stringent
water quality protection requirements is still a land-based
activity. Involving the dairy industry and off-farm
stakeholders as participants in the management process for
field, farm, and regional dairy production can be the basis
for decision-making to reconcile the sometimes conflicting
demands of production and water quality protection.
25 NAL Call. No.: 275.29 F66C
Dairy manure management: strategies for recycling nutrients to
recover fertilizer value and avoid environmental pollution.
Van Horn, H.H.; Nordstedt, R.A.; Bottcher, A.V.; Hanlon, E.A.;
Graetz, D.A.; Chambliss, C.F.
Gainesville, Fla. : The Service; 1991 Dec.
Circular - Florida Cooperative Extension Service (1016): 18
p.; 1991 Dec. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Florida; Dairy herds; Dairy effluent; Cattle
manure; Manure spreaders; Waste disposal; Waste treatment
26 NAL Call. No.: 100 ID14
Dairy waste management system planning--estimating storage.
Falk, D.E.; Ohlensehlen, R.M.
Moscow, Idaho : The Station; 1989 Jun.
Bulletin - Idaho Agricultural Experiment Station v.): 16 p.
ill; 1989 Jun. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy farming; Animal wastes; Management;
Systems; Farm planning; Farm storage; Water pollution; Odor
abatement; Investment; Costs; Design criteria; Handling; Waste
water treatment; Biological techniques; Anaerobic treatment;
Lagoons
27 NAL Call. No.: aZ5071.N3
Dairy waster: management alternatives for pollution control
January 1980-May 1991.
Dombrowski, J.E.
Beltsville, Md. : The Library; 1991 Jul.
Quick bibliography series - U.S. Department of Agriculture,
National Agricultural Library (U.S.). (91-126): 13 p.; 1991
Jul. Bibliography.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy wastes; Pollution; Control; Bibliographies
28 NAL Call. No.: TD420.A1P7
Dairy wastewater treatment and reuse.
Hadjivassilis, I.
Oxford : Pergamon Press; 1991.
Water science and technology : a journal of the International
Association on Water Pollution Research and Control v. 24 (1):
p. 83-87; 1991. Paper presented at the "First IAWPRC East
African Regional Conference on Industrial Wastewaters,"
October 25-28, 1989, Nairobi, Kenya. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Cyprus; Dairy industry; Industrial wastes; Waste
water treatment; Water reuse; Activated sludge; Irrigation
water
29 NAL Call. No.: 56.9 SO32
Dairy-siting criteria and other options for wastewater
management on high water-table soils.
Allen, L.H. Jr
S.l. : The Society; 1988.
Proceedings - Soil and Crop Science Society of Florida v. 47:
p. 108-127. ill., maps; 1988. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Florida; Dairy wastes; Waste waters; Ssoil types;
Soil properties; Site requirements; Waste water treatment;
Water table; Water composition and quality; Eutrophication;
Phosphorus
30 NAL Call. No.: S671.A66
Design of a semi-liquid dairy cattle manure spreader/injector.
Lague, C.
St. Joseph, Mich. : American Society of Agricultural
Engineers; 1991 Nov. Applied engineering in agriculture v. 7
(6): p. 655-660; 1991 Nov. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Manure spreaders; Injectors; Cattle manure;
Structural design
Abstract: Existing solid and liquid manure spreaders are not
well adapted for surface spreading or direct subsurface
injection of semiliquid dairy cattle manure. By taking into
account the characteristics of this type of manure, a machine
for either spreading or injecting semi-liquid manure was
designed and constructed. Its manure handling system consisted
of a tiltable tank connected to a vibrating distribution
manifold that directed the manure to the spreading or
injection devices. Manure was fed to the injectors by gravity
via 152 mm (6 in.) diameter hoses. The 305 mm (12 in.) wide
injectors were operated at depths not exceeding 203 mm (8 in.)
in order to reduce draft requirements. Results from
preliminary field testing of the prototype are reported along
with the design modifications that were recommended following
these tests.
31 NAL Call. No.: S441.S855
Development of an environmentally safe and economically
sustainable year-round minimum tillage forage production
system using farm animal manure as the onyl fertilizer.
Johnson, J.C. Jr
1988-; 1990.
Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) or
Agriculture in Concert with the Environment (ACE) research
projects. 22 p.; 1990. SARE Project Number: LS-90-205. Record
includes 3 1/2 floppydisk and papers and articles released or
published as a result of project.
Language: English
Descriptors: Georgia; Cabt; Cynodon dactylon; Zea mays; Secale
cereale; Minimum tillage; Cattle manure; Application rates;
Soil fertility; Use efficiency; Nitrogen; Phosphorus;
Potassium; Calcium; Magnesium; Crop yield; Soil depth; Dairy
farming
32 NAL Call. No.: 56.9 SO32
Distributions of residual soil phosphorus along transects for
three dairies in Okeechobee County, Florida.
Burgoa, B.; Bottcher, A.B.; Mansell, R.S.; Allen, L.H. Jr S.l.
: The Society; 1991.
Proceedings - Soil and Crop Science Society of Florida v. 50:
p. 137-144; 1991. Paper presented at the "Symposium on
Reality of Sustainable Agriculture in Florida, September
26-28, 1990, Daytona Beach, FLorida. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Florida; Soil pollution; Water pollution; Dairy
effluent; Dairy wastes; Phosphorus
33 NAL Call. No.: 44.8 J822
DXMAS: an expert system program providing management advice to
dairy operators.
Schmisseur, E.; Gamroth, M.J.
Champaign, Ill. : American Dairy Science Association; 1993
Jul. Journal of dairy science v. 76 (7): p. 2039-2049; 1993
Jul. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Expert systems; Dairy farming; Farm management;
Decision making; Information systems; Culling; Cattle manure;
Replacement; Crops; Financial planning
Abstract: An expert system, or knowledge-based, microcomputer
program, DXMAS, was designed and developed to diagnose dairy
management problems of dairy farmers of Tillamook County,
Oregon and, as appropriate, to advance potential farm
reorganization and expansion options. The program provokes
management action by projecting lost income opportunities
attributed to major management problems and missed
reorganization and expansion opportunities. The DXMAS program
analyzes annual economic and production performance data
provided by dairy operators and has demonstrated the ability,
in field testing of nine different dairy operations, to
emulate dairy management experts in the diagnoses of 95
individual dairy management problems. In those field tests,
the DXMAS program identified a variety of management problems
and estimated annual lost income opportunities ranging from
$25 to $450 per milk cow. Field testing suggested that the
DXMAS program can provide a wide range of expert management
advice to dairy operators.
34 NAL Call. No.: 290.9 AM32T
Effect of anaerobic digestion on nutrient availability from
dairy manure. Dahlberg, S.P.; Lindley, J.A.; Giles, J.F.
St. Joseph, Mich. : American Society of Agricultural
Engineers; 1988 Jul. Transactions of the ASAE v. 31 (no.4): p.
1211-1216; 1988 Jul. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: North Dakota; Triticum aestivum; Anaerobic
digesters; Cattle; Manures; Nutrient availability; Nitrogen;
Soils
35 NAL Call. No.: 10 J822
Effect of incorporating rolled barley in autumn-cut ryegrass
silage on effluent production, silage fermentation and cattle
performance. Jones, D.I.H.; Jones, R.; Moseley, G.
Cambridge : Cambridge University Press; 1990 Dec.
The Journal of agricultural science v. 115 (pt.3): p. 399-408;
1990 Dec. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Wales; Steers; British friesian; Hereford;
Crossbreds; Liveweight gain; Unrestricted feeding; Barley;
Feed supplements; Lolium multiflorum; Lolium perenne;
Nutritive value; Ryegrass silage; Dairy wastes; Effluents;
Pollution
36 NAL Call. No.: TD930.A32
Effect of the organic volumetric loading rate on soluble COD
removal in down-flow anaerobic fixed-bed reactors.
Sanchez, E.P.; Weiland, P.; Travieso, L.
Barking, Essex, England : Elsevier Applied Science ; New York,
NY : Elsevier Science Publishing Co., 1991-; 1994.
Bioresource technology v. 47 (2): p. 173-176; 1994. Includes
references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Piggery effluent; Beef cattle; Cattle manure;
Dairy cattle; Torula; Yeasts; Wastes; Anaerobic digesters;
Chemical oxygen demand; Models
37 NAL Call. No.: TD930.A32
Effects of dairy manure application rate and timing, and
injector spacing and type on corn silage production.
Safley, L.M. Jr; Westerman, P.W.; King, L.D.
Essex : Elsevier Science Publishers; 1989.
Biological wastes v. 28 (3): p. 203-216; 1989. Includes
references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy cattle; Cattle manure; Liquid manures;
Application to land; Application rates; Application date; Soil
injection; Zea mays; Maize silage; Crop yield; Nitrogen;
Recovery
38 NAL Call. No.: TD930.A32
Effects of diet and storage time on the concentration of
sulphide in dairy-cow slurry.
Stevens, R.J.; Laughlin, R.J.; Frost, J.P.
Essex : Elsevier Science Publishers; 1993.
Bioresource technology v. 45 (1): p. 13-16; 1993. Includes
references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy cows; Cattle slurry; Hydrogen sulfide;
Concentration; Cattle feeding; Wastes; Storage; Duration;
Effects
39 NAL Call. No.: SF55.A78A7
The effects of operational and financial factors on the
economics of biogas production from dairy cow feces and
wastewater.
Kobayashi, S.; Masuda, Y.
Suweon, Korea : Asian-Australasian Association of Animal
Production Societies, c1988-; 1993 Mar.
Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences v. 6 (1): p.
139-145; 1993 Mar. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy cows; Biogas; Feces; Waste water; Cattle
feeding; Animal wastes; Factor analysis; Economic evaluation
40 NAL Call. No.: TD930.A32
Effects of total ammonia on anaerobic digestion and an example
of digestor performance from cattle manure-protein mixtures.
Robbins, J.E.; Gerhardt, S.A.; Kappel, T.J.
Essex : Elsevier Science Publishers; 1989.
Biological wastes v. 27 (1): p. 1-14; 1989. Includes
references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy cattle; Cattle manure; Cattle slurry;
Protein; Mixtures; Waste treatment; Anaerobic digestion;
Ammonia; Concentration; Digesters; Performance; Acetates;
Utilization
41 NAL Call. No.: QL536.J686
Efficacy and longevity of Bacillus sphaericus 2362
formulations for control of mosquito larvae in dairy
wastewater lagoons.
Mulla, M.S.; Axelrod, H.; Darwazeh, H.A.; Matanmi, B.A.
Lake Charles, La. : The Association; 1988 Dec.
Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association v. 4 (4):
p. 448-452; 1988 Dec. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Culex; Bacillus sphaericus; Larvae; Dairy cattle;
Waste waters; Lagoons; Biological control
42 NAL Call. No.: QL536.J686
Efficacy of a juvenile hormone mimic, pyriproxyfen (S-31183),
for mosquito control in dairy wastewater lagoons.
Mulligan, F.S. III; Schaefer, C.H.
Lake Charles, La. : The Association; 1990 Mar.
Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association v. 6 (1):
p. 89-92; 1990 Mar. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: California; Culex quinquefasciatus; Larvae;
Insect control; Juvenile hormones; Synthetic hormones;
Pyridines; Lagoons; Waste waters; Dairies
43 NAL Call. No.: QL536.J686
Efficacy of new insect growth regulators against mosquito
larvae in dairy wastewater lagoons.
Mulla, M.S.; Darwazeh, H.A.
Lake Charles, La. : The Association; 1988 Sep.
Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association v. 4 (3):
p. 322-325; 1988 Sep. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Culex quinquefasciatus; Culex peus; Larvae;
Methoprene; Dairies; Waste waters; Lagoons; Insect control
44 NAL Call. No.: S494.5.E547
Electric energy management on dairy farms.
Brooks, L.A.
Amsterdam : Elsevier; 1989.
Energy in world agriculture v. 3: p. 93-120; 1989. In the
series analytic: Energy in World Agriculture / edited by K.L.
McFate. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy farming; Dairy equipment; Electricity;
Electrical energy; Milking; Milking machines; Milk production;
Farm buildings; Ventilation; Fans; Fodder crops; Storage;
Equipment; Silage; Electric heaters; Heat exchangers; Manures;
Dairy effluent; Handling; Pumps
45 NAL Call. No.: 1 Ag84Ab no.664-64
Environmental concerns associated with livestock, dairy, and
poultry production.. Issues for the 1990's, environment
Christensen, L. A.; Krause, Kenneth R.,
United States, Dept. of Agriculture, Economic Research Service
Washington, D.C.? : U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Economic
Research Service,; 1993.
1 sheet (2 p.) ; 28 x 22 cm. (Agriculture information bulletin
; no. 664-64). Caption title. At head of title: Issues for
the 1990's: environment. November 1993. Includes
bibliographical references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Animal waste; Agricultural pollution; Nonpoint
source pollution
46 NAL Call. No.: S605.5.I45 1986
Environmental consequences of the structure of agriculture:
the case of southeastern Pennsylvania farms.
Sachs, C.; Bowser, T.
Santa Cruz, CA : Agroecology Program, University of
California; 1988. Global perspectives on agroecology and
sustainable agricultural systems : proceedings of the sixth
international scientific conference of the International
Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements. p. 159-170b;
1988. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Pennsylvania; Environmental impact; Agricultural
structure; Ecosystems; Cattle farming; Beef cattle; Dairy
cattle; Poultry farming; Production; Regional development;
Water pollution; Animal manures; Pollutants; Nutrient
excesses; Water quality; Watersheds
47 NAL Call. No.: SF191.D3
Environmental count down.
Sauber, C.M.
Minnetonka, Minn. : Miller Publishing Co; 1988 Jun.
Dairy herd management v. 25 (6): p. 10-12, 14, 16-17; 1988
Jun. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: California; Dairy wastes; Environmental
pollution; Waste disposal; Water composition and quality;
Environmental protection
48 NAL Call. No.: QH540.J6
The environmental impact of bovine somatotropin use in dairy
cattle. Johnson, D.E.; Ward, G.M.; Torrent, J.
Madison, Wis. : American Society of Agronomy; 1992 Apr.
Journal of environmental quality v. 21 (2): p. 157-162; 1992
Apr. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy cows; Somatotropin; Hormone supplements;
Genetic engineering; Environmental impact; Milk production;
Cattle manure; Methane production; Nitrogen; Phosphorus; Feed
requirements; Energy requirements; Erosion; Dairy farming;
Water use
Abstract: The environmental impact of bovine somatotropin
(bST) use in dairy cattle (Bos taurus) was analyzed with the
following assumptions: base herd (1989) of 10.1 X 10(6) cows,
milk production 6475 kg of 3.5% fat per 305 d; bST herd of
8.96 X 10(6) cows, 3.5 kg/d increase during 215 d treatment
period; 100% adoption rate, 60 d dry period, 40% replacement
rate; all formulated diet from: alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)
hay, corn (Zea mays L.) silage, cracked corn, soybean [Glycine
mar (L.) Merr.] meal, and supplement to satisfy level of
production. Using these assumptions, the analysis indicates
that the current U.S. milk supply could be produced by 11%
fewer cows fed 9% less feed produced on 6% less land, and soil
loss would be 5% less. Fossil fuel requirements would be 6%
less and irrigation water use would be reduced by 9%. Output
of the greenhouse gas methane would be decreased 9%; manure
production and outputs of N and P declined by 10, 8, and 10%,
respectively.
49 NAL Call. No.: TD930.A32
Evaluation of recycled wastewater for dairy flush systems.
Ramsey, D.S.; Megehee, D.B.
London : Elsevier Applied Science Publishers; 1988.
Biological wastes v. 26 (1): p. 59-64; 1988. Includes
references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy wastes; Bacteria; Waste waters; Flushing;
Recycling; Microbial water relations; Solar radiation;
Predation; Water reuse
50 NAL Call. No.: 290.9 AM32P
Experience with three anaerobic digestion systems on
commercial dairies. Koelsch, R.K.; Fabian, E.E.; Guest, R.W.;
Campbell, J.K.
St. Joseph, Mich. : The Society; 1989.
Paper - American Society of Agricultural Engineers (89-6550):
17 p.; 1989. Paper presented at the 1989 International Winter
Meeting, December 12-15, 1989, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy wastes; Anaerobic digestion
51 NAL Call. No.: S441.S855
Farmer-to-farmer compost exchange.
Conkling, D.
1988-; 1992.
Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) or
Agriculture in Concert with the Environment (ACE) research
projects. 32 p.; 1992. SARE Project Number: ANE92.10. Record
includes 3 1/2 floppy disk. Includes Appendices.
Language: English
Descriptors: Connecticut; Cabt; Composts; Leaves; Animal
wastes; Dairy farms; Low input agriculture; Sustainability
52 NAL Call. No.: QL536.J686
Fate and persistence of Bacillus sphaericus used as a mosquito
larvicide in dairy wastewater lagoons.
Matanmi, B.A.; Federici, B.A.; Mulla, M.S.
Lake Charles, La. : The Association; 1990 Sep.
Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association v. 6 (3):
p. 384-389; 1990 Sep. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: California; Culex; Bacillus sphaericus; Ovicides
and larvicides; Lagoons; Waste water; Dairy wastes; Biological
control; Persistence
53 NAL Call. No.: S671.A22
Feedlot runoff control--demonstration site: dairy lot.
Lorimor, J.
Ames, Iowa : Cooperative Extension Service, Iowa State U
niversity; 1993 Jun. AE / (3077a): 2 p.; 1993 Jun.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy effluent; Feedlot effluent; Runoff; Manures
54 NAL Call. No.: 58.8 J82
The fertilizer value of agricultural manure: simple rapid
methods of assessment.
Piccinini, S.; Bortone, G.
London : Academic Press; 1991 Jul.
Journal of agricultural engineering research v. 49 (3): p.
197-208; 1991 Jul. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Italy; Pig manure; Dairy cattle; Cattle manure;
Chemical analysis; Analytical methods; Equations; Accuracy;
Instruments
Abstract: This paper presents the results of a series of
analytical tests performed on pig and dairy cattle manure in
order to establish the extent of the correlation between: dry
matter (TS) and specific gravity (SG); TS and total Kjeldhal
nitrogen (TKN) and total phosphorus (Pt); SG and TKN and Pt.
In addition, two N-meters for field use were also used to
estimate the ammonium (NH4-H) content. All the variables (TS,
SG, TKN, Pt, NH4-N) show a high index of correlation for both
the pig and dairy cattle slurry and the linear relations
applied proved adequate in all cases. Though the precision of
the equations is not very high, the estimate for TKN and Pt
content, obtained from the relationship between the SG and
these elements is nevertheless acceptable for practical farm
use of animal manure.
55 NAL Call. No.: QH540.J6
First-year nutrient availability from injected dairy manure.
Motavalli, P.P.; Kelling K.A.; Converse, J.C.
Madison, Wis. : American Society of Agronomy; 1989 Apr.
Journal of environmental quality v. 18 (2): p. 180-185; 1989
Apr. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Wisconsin; Dairy wastes; Cattle manure;
Injections; Broadcasting; Nitrogen; Phosphorus; Potassium; Zea
mays; Nutrient uptake; Nutrient availability; Crop yield
Abstract: Estimates of N, P, and K availability to corn (Zea
mays L.) from injected dairy manure on three field sites in
south central Wisconsin were make using a fertilizer
equivalence approach. Nutrient uptake from treatments of a
control, three rates of manure (approx. 53, 97, and 138 Mg
ha-1 yr-1 on a wet basis), and three rates of broadcast
fertilizer were evaluated. Crop nutrient recoveries of
fertilizer N, P, and K were generally higher than crop
recoveries of manure total N, P, and K. Estimates of first
year N, P, and K availability showed substantial variability
across rate, location, and year with standard deviations
oftern about 50% of the mean. Ranges for N, P, or K
availability were 12 to 63, 12 to 89, and 24 to 153%,
respectively. These data do not identify those factors
responsible for differences in nutrient availability from one
site-year to another. Biological or chemical availability
indices of a 1-wk anaerobic incubation at 40 degrees C or a
16-h autoclaving in 0.01 M CaCl2 solution were evaluated as
measures of N availability and compared with field results.
Correlations between measured changes in NH4-N from these
indices, as well as total Kjeldahl N and inorganic N levels in
the top 30 cm of soil 4 to 6 wk after treatment application,
and N uptake indicated inoganic N levels to be a better index
of N availability than the other indices examined. However, to
determine nutrient availability on a routine basis, more
reliable biological or chemical indices are necessary. A
simple model may help to simulate environmental effects and
the contribution of residual nutrients in the soil.
56 NAL Call. No.: 290.9 AM32P
Forage crop ranking for phosphorus recycling on Lake
Okeechobee area dairies. Dinkler, H.D.; Fluck, R.C.
St. Joseph, Mich. : The Society; 1990.
Paper - American Society of Agricultural Engineers (90-2025):
19 p. maps; 1990. Paper presented at the "1990 International
Summer Meeting sponsored by the American Society of
Agricultural Engineers," June 24-27, Columbus, Ohio. Includes
references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Florida; Farm dairies; Phosphorus; Pollution;
Recycling; Waste disposal; Fodder crops; Legislation
57 NAL Call. No.: TP248.13.S68
Galactosyl--a biocatalyst for hydrolysis of whey lactose.
Samoshina, N.M.; Lotmentseva, E.Yu; Nakhapetyan, L.A.
New York, N.Y. : Allerton Press; 1989.
Soviet biotechnology (3): p. 41-46; 1989. Translated from:
Biotekhnologiya (3), 1989, p. 305-310. (TP248.2.B57).
Includes references.
Language: English; Russian
Descriptors: Fungi; Beta-galactosidase; Immobilization; Whey;
Lactose; Hydrolysis; Enzyme activity; Dairy effluent; Waste
treatment; Heat stability; Glucose syrups; Galactose; Ph
Abstract: A study has been made of the properties of
immobilized fungal beta-galactosidase (the trademarked
preparation Galactosyl). The pH optima at different
temperatures, the temperature optimum for enzyme action, pH-
stability, and thermostability were determined. Preparation
kinetic constants were calculated. Effective biocatalyst
activity was found to depend on degree of substrate
hydrolysis. The Galactosyl preparation was shown to be a high-
activity biocatalyst suitable for producing glucose-galactose
syrup from dairy industry wastes.
58 NAL Call. No.: S1.N32
Goodbye corn, hello profits.
McNamara, K.
Emmaus, Pa. : Regenerative Agriculture Association; 1988 Feb.
The New farm v. 10 (2): p. 36-37. ill; 1988 Feb.
Language: English
Descriptors: Wisconsin; Dairy farming; Forage crops; Liquid
manures; Protein content; Mixed pastures
59 NAL Call. No.: S1.N32
'Grass farming' beats corn!.
Cramer, C.
Emmaus, Pa. : Rodale Institute; 1990 Sep.
The New farm v. 12 (6): p. 10-16. ill; 1990 Sep.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy cows; Grazing; Grasses; Pastures; Legumes;
Liquid manures
60 NAL Call. No.: S605.5.A43
Ground water contamination from agricultural sources:
implications for voluntary policy adherence from Iowa and
Virginia farmers' attitudes. Halstead, J.M.; Padgitt, S.;
Batie, S.S.
Greenbelt, Md. : Institute for Alternative Agriculture; 1990.
American journal of alternative agriculture v. 5 (3): p.
126-133; 1990. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Iowa; Virginia; Groundwater pollution;
Contamination; Agricultural chemicals; Dairy wastes; Water
quality; Farmers' attitudes; Questionnaires; Interviews; Farm
management; Public opinion; Risk; Health hazards;
Environmental impact; Economic impact; Crop production; Dairy
farming; Agricultural policy; Programs; Incentives
Abstract: Contamination of ground water from agricultural
sources has been documented in a majority of the contiguous
United States. In this study, we examine the potential for
voluntary adoption of management practices that reduce risk of
ground water contamination and discuss how farm operators'
attitudes regarding the environment might affect the success
of voluntary programs. Farmers' behavior and attitudes in
Rockingham County, Virginia, and Big Spring Basin, Iowa,
reveal that both groups consider the ground water issue to be
a serious problem to which they are contributing. This
awareness is a significant first step in prompting
consideration of management practices that reduce the threat
to ground water quality. We also found that the worst
offenders"--that is, farmers applying nitrogen well above
agronomic recommendations--were those with the least concern
about the problem. If major shifts in farming practices are to
occur voluntarily, major incentives or disincentives are
needed Even though the concern about ground water quality is
high, the documented risks perceived by farmers are not
strongly convincing. The economic incentives for change are
questionable at best. Voluntary adoption of best management
practices is only one of several policy options. Ultimately,
policies designed to reduce ground water contamination may
need a mix of strategies, including economic incentives and
disincentives, zoning and land use restrictions, environmental
regulations, and bans on agricultural chemicals.
61 NAL Call. No.: S1.N32
He turns risk into opportunity.
Cramer, C.
Emmaus, Pa. : Regenerative Agriculture Association; 1989 Jan.
The New farm v. 11 (1): p. 36-39. ill; 1989 Jan.
Language: English
Descriptors: Minnesota; Dairy farming; Small farms; Milk
quality; Appropriate technology; Rotary hoes; Weed control;
Cattle manure; Soil fertility; Farm management
62 NAL Call. No.: 281.9 M5842
Impact of Michigan dairy manure handling alternatives.
Garsow, J.D.; Connor, L.J.; Nott, S.B.
East Lansing, Mich. : The Department; 1992 Jun.
Agricultural economics report - Michigan State University,
Department of Agricultural Economics (561): 36 p.; 1992 Jun.
Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Michigan; Animal manures; Dairy farms; Handling;
Regulations; Air pollution; Economic impact; Capital; Farm
comparisons; Dairy industry; Farm budgeting
63 NAL Call. No.: 44.8 J822
Impact of Texas water quality laws on dairy income and
viability. Leatham, D.J.; Schmucker, J.F.; Lacewell, R.D.;
Schwart, R.B.; Lovell, A.C.; Allen, G.
Champaign, Ill. : American Dairy Science Association; 1992
Oct. Journal of dairy science v. 75 (10): p. 2846-2856; 1992
Oct. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Texas; Dairy farms; Dairy wastes; Water quality;
Law; Profitability; Estimated costs; Cash flow; Farm
indebtedness; Risk; Survival; Mathematical models
Abstract: A dairy waste management spreadsheet was developed
and applied along with partial budgets and whole firm, Monte
Carlo simulations for Texas dairies to evaluate the impact
that Texas water quality laws have on dairy profitability and
survival. Results showed that representative 300- and 720-cow
dairies will incur additional annual costs of $60 and $81 per
cow, respectively. Compliance with water quality laws reduces
net farm income by 27 and 63% for 720-cow dairies with low and
high debt positions, respectively. The probability of survival
of the dairies with low debt was not affected by compliance.
The probability of survival of firms with high debt positions
decreased by 47 percentage points. Under the conditions
modeled, net farm income for representative 300-cow dairies
would be negative after compliance with water quality laws.
64 NAL Call. No.: 290.9 Am32P
Impact of water quality laws on dairy profitability.
Leatham, D.J.; Schmucker, J.F.; Lacewell, R.D.; Schwart, R.B.;
Lovell, A.; Allen, G.
St. Joseph, Mich. : American Society of Agricultural
Engineers,; 1991. Paper / (914019): 11 p.; 1991. Paper
presented at the "1991 International Summer Meeting sponsored
by the American Society of Agricultural Engineers," June
23-26, 1991, Albuquerque, New Mexico. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Texas; Cabt; Dairy wastes; Waste water; Runoff;
Water quality; Legislation
65 NAL Call. No.: HD1751.A37 no.93-4
Impacts of dairy waste management regulations.
Outlaw, Joe L.
Agricultural and Food Policy Center (Tex.)
College Station, Tex. : Agricultural and Food Policy Center,
Dept. of Agricultural Economics, Texas Agricultural Experiment
Station, Texas Agricultural Extension Service, Texas A&M
University,; 1993; Z TA225.7 P758 NO.93-4.
iii, 42 leaves : ill. ; 28 cm. (AFPC working paper ; 93-4.).
May 1993. Includes bibliographical references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairying; Dairy waste; Dairy laws
66 NAL Call. No.: 275.29 F22
Impacts of EPA dairy waste regulations on farm profitability.
Knutson, R.D.; Outlaw, J.L.; Miller, J.W.
Oak Brook, Ill. : Farm Foundation; 1993.
Increasing understanding of public problems and policies. p.
199-206; 1993. Paper presented at the 43rd National Public
Policy Education Conference held September 12-15, 1993
Clearwater Beach, Florida. p. 17-32.
Language: English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Cabt; Dairy farms; Dairy wastes;
Regulations; Economic impact; Profitability; Environmental
policy; Federal government; Government organizations
67 NAL Call. No.: 41.8 Am3
Isolation of multiple Salmonella serovars from a dairy two
years after a clinical salmonellosis outbreak.
Gay, J.M.; Hunsaker, M.E.
Schaumburg, Ill. : The Association; 1993 Nov01.
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association v. 203
(9): p. 1314-1320; 1993 Nov01. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: California; Cabt; Dairy cows; Calves; Farm
dairies; Salmonella; Serotypes; Salmonellosis; Outbreaks;
Persistence; Feces; Waste water; Isolation
68 NAL Call. No.: 275.29 W27P
Keys to dairy manure management for water quality.
Hermanson, R.E.
Pullman, Wash. : The Service; 1992 Jun.
Extension bulletin - Washington State University, Cooperative
Extension Service (1658): 7 p.; 1992 Jun. Includes
references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy wastes; Cattle manure; Farm management;
Feces collection; Waste treatment; Water quality
69 NAL Call. No.: TD930.A32
Low-temperature digestion of dairy and swine manure.
Safley, L.M. Jr; Westerman, P.W.
Barking, Essex, England : Elsevier Applied Science ; New York,
NY : Elsevier Science Publishing Co., 1991-; 1994.
Bioresource technology v. 47 (2): p. 165-171; 1994. Includes
references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Cattle manure; Dairy cattle; Pig manure;
Anaerobic digestion; Methane production; Temperature
70 NAL Call. No.: S544.3.N7A45
Manage animal manure for its fertilizer value.
Klausner, S.; Tillapaugh, B.
Batavia, N.Y. : Agricultural Div. of Coop Extension, Four
Western Plain Counties, N.Y. State; 1988 Apr.
Ag impact v. 15 (4): p. 2; 1988 Apr. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: New York; Cattle manure; Dairy wastes; Fertilizer
application; Soil testing
71 NAL Call. No.: 290.9 AM32P
Management and policy effects on potential groundwater
contamination from dairy waste.
Heatwole, C.D.; Diebel, P.L.; Halstead, J.M.; Batie, S.S.;
Kramer, R.A.; Taylor, D.B.
St. Joseph, Mich. : The Society; 1989.
Paper - American Society of Agricultural Engineers (89-4090):
p. 1-19; 1989. Paper presented at the 1989 International
Summer Meeting jointly sponsored by the American Society of
Agricultural Engineers, and the Canadian Society of
Agricultural Engineering, June 25-28, 1989, Quebec, Canada.
Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy wastes; Groundwater; Water pollution;
Economic impact
72 NAL Call. No.: TD420.A1P7
Management of dairy waste: a low cost treatment system using
phosphorus-adsorbing materials.
Masters, B.K.
Oxford : Pergamon Press; 1993.
Water science and technology : a journal of the International
Association on Water Pollution Research and Control v. 27 (1):
p. 159-169; 1993. In the series analytic: Appropriate waste
management technologies / edited by G. Ho and K. Mathew.
Proceedings of the International Conference, held November
27-28, 1991, Perth, Australia. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Western australia; Dairy wastes; Water pollution;
Nutrients; Waste treatment; Anaerobic digestion; Aerobic
treatment; Filters; Phosphorus; Adsorption
73 NAL Call. No.: aS622.S6
Managing runoff to protect lake.
Boggs, L.
Washington, D.C. : The Service; 1988 May.
Soil & water conservation news - U.S. Deptartment of
Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service v. 9 (2): p. 8-9. ill;
1988 May.
Language: English
Descriptors: Florida; Water pollution; Feedlot effluent; Dairy
effluents; Inland lagoons; Lakes; Computer software; Usda;
Eutrophication; Phosphorus
74 NAL Call. No.: S544.3.N7N45
Manure management on dairy farms: are we accountable?.
Leonard, N.
Belmont, N.Y. : Cooperative Extension Association of Allegany
County, 1988-; 1993 Sep.
News & views /. p. 3-4; 1993 Sep.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy farms; Cattle manure; Farm management;
Water quality
75 NAL Call. No.: 1.98 AG84
Manure without pollution.
Comis, D.
Washington, D.C. : The Service; 1989 Oct.
Agricultural research - U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Agricultural Research Service v. 37 (10): p. 10-12. ill; 1989
Oct.
Language: English
Descriptors: Cattle manure; Dairy wastes; Liquid manures;
Fertilizers; Fertigation; Rotations; Fields; Sustainability
76 NAL Call. No.: TP360.B57
Mesophilic anaerobic digestion of a mixture of cheese whey and
dairy manure. Lo, K.V.; Liao, P.H.; Chiu, C.
Essex : Elsevier Applied Science Publishers; 1988.
Biomass v. 15 (1): p. 45-53; 1988. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: British Columbia; Whey; Dairy effluents;
Anaerobic digesters; Methane production; Waste treatment;
Chemical oxygen demand
77 NAL Call. No.: 58.8 J82
Mesophilic anaerobic digestion of dairy cow slurry on a farm
scale: energy considerations.
Pain, B.F.; Phillips, V.R.; West, R
London : Academic Press; 1988 Feb.
Journal of agricultural engineering research v. 39 (2): p.
123-135; 1988 Feb. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy effluents; Cattle slurry; Anaerobic
digesters; Small farms; Energy recovery; Methane; Waste heat
utilization; Electricity; Agricultural engineering; Energy
balance
78 NAL Call. No.: 58.8 J82
Mesophilic anaerobic digestion of dairy cow slurry on a farm
scale: maintenance requirements and reliability.
Chapman, J.M.; Phillips, V.R.; Pain, B.F.
London : Academic Press; 1990 Dec.
Journal of agricultural engineering research v. 47 (4): p.
277-285; 1990 Dec. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy cows; Cattle slurry; Anaerobic digesters;
Maintenance; Requirements; Reliability; Costs
79 NAL Call. No.: TD930.A32
Methane production from fresh versus dry dairy manure.
Chen, T.H.; Steinberg, M.P.
London : Elsevier Applied Science Publishers; 1988.
Biological wastes v. 24 (4): p. 297-306; 1988. Includes
references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Africa; Cattle manure; Dairy effluents; Drying;
Biological value; Methane production; Digesters; Production
potential; Bioassays; Quantitative analysis
80 NAL Call. No.: S451.P4P45
Murky water--how we farm our land has far-reaching effects.
Weidner, K.
University Park, Pa. : Pennsylvania State University; 1988.
PennState agriculture. p. 2-11. ill; 1988.
Language: English
Descriptors: Pennsylvania; Dairy farming; Crop enterprises;
Manure spreading; Pollution by agriculture; Water composition
and quality
81 NAL Call. No.: 44.8 SO12
The National Rivers Authority's regulatory role in the dairy
industry. Taylor, D.
Cambridge : The Society; 1992 May.
Journal of the Society of Dairy Technology v. 45 (2): p.
53-55; 1992 May. Paper given at the symposium "The Dairy
Industry - Clean and Green, October 22, 1991, London.
Language: English
Descriptors: Great Britain; Dairy effluent; Regulations; Water
pollution
82 NAL Call. No.: Videocassette no.1618
Naturally fertile fields increasing dairy profits through
proper manure management.
United States, Soil Conservation Service, United States, Dept.
of Agriculture, Video and Teleconference Division
Washington, D.C. : The Division,; 1992.
1 videocassette (15 min.) : sd., col. ; 1/2 in. 92SCS-34.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy cattle; Fertilizers
Abstract: Shows how to recycle dairy cattle manure.
83 NAL Call. No.: 290.9 AM32T
Nitrogen concentration variability in dairy-cattle slurry
stored in farm tanks.
Patni, N.K.; Jui, P.Y.
St. Joseph, Mich. : American Society of Agricultural
Engineers; 1991 Mar. Transactions of the ASAE v. 34 (2): p.
609-615; 1991 Mar. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Ontario; Cattle slurry; Dairy wastes; Farm
storage; Losses; Nitrogen content; Ph; Temperature; Tanks
Abstract: Spatial and temporal variability in the
concentration of total Kjeldahl and ammonia (NH3 + NH4+)
nitrogen (TKN and AMN, respectively) was studied in 8 to 10%
total solids content dairy-cattle manure slurry and its
centrifuged supernatant during undisturbed storage in covered,
reinforced concrete, farm storage tanks. Slurry was stored in
two winter-filled tanks for 285 days, and in two additional
summer-filled tanks for 146 days. Although concentration
variability with time and space was small relative to the
initial concentrations, slurry at depths of less than 1 m had
consistently lower concentrations than at greater depths,
particularly after the initital two months of storage. Mass
balance for nitrogen (N) indicated a 9% loss in three of the
four tanks. A lower loss (4% N) in the fourth tank was
accompanied by a decrease in acetic acid concentration and a
rise in slurry pH, at all depths, which was not observed in
the other tanks. The lower loss of N from this tank than from
the other tanks probably occurred to satisfy chemical
equilibria that required a greater retention of ammonia (NH3)
by the carbon dioxide (CO2) release from acetic acid
breakdown. Considerations other than TKN and AMN concentration
changes and equilibrium relations may also be important
factors for N retention in slurry stored in farm tanks.
84 NAL Call. No.: 56.9 SO3
Nitrogen fertilizer and dairy manure effects of corn yield and
soil nitrate. Jokela, W.E.
Madison, Wis. : The Society; 1992 Jan.
Soil Science Society of America journal v. 56 (1): p. 148-154;
1992 Jan. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Vermont; Zea mays; Sandy loam soils; Cattle
manure; Dairy cattle; Ammonium nitrate; Nitrogen; Nutrient
sources; Application rates; Application date; Crop growth
stage; Crop yield; Dry matter accumulation; Grain; Maize
silage; Nutrient uptake; Nutrient availability; Soil analysis;
Nitrate; Nutrient content; Losses from soil systems; Nitrate
nitrogen; Soil solution; Soil depth; Seasonal variation;
Precipitation
Abstract: Manure from livestock is an important source of N
for crop production in many areas, but efficient management of
manure is critical to improve the economics of manure use and
to minimize the impact on water quality. A field study was
conducted on an Enosburg fine sandy loam (sandy over loamy,
mixed, nonacid, mesic Mollic Haplaquent) in northwestern
Vermont to evaluate the effect of dairy-manure and N-
fertilizer application on corn (Zea mays L.) yields and soil
profile NO3 in a silage production system. Treatments
consisted or a factorial arrangement of manure (0 and 9 Mg
ha-1, dry-matter basis), N rate (56 and 112 kg ha-1 as
NH4NO3), and time of N application (planting or six-leaf
stage), as well as 0 and 168 kg N ha-1 rate at planting (with
and without manure). Yields and N uptake were increased by N
fertilizer and by manure. Without manure, grain and silage
yields were increased by fertilizer N to the 112 kg ha-1 rate
in all years; with manure, N fertilizer did not increase
yields significantly. Time of application had little or no
effect on yield. Plant uptake of N followed a similar pattern
but with somewhat wore pronounced effects. A presidedress soil
reflected N availability, as indicated relative yields. Manure
application rates were equivalent, in terms of yield response,
to 73 to 122 kg fertilizer N ha-1 in individual years, which
represented 27 to 44% of the total manure N in the year of
application. Sampling of the 1.5-m soil profile before
planting and after harvest showed increases in soil NO3 that
were related to the amounts of manure and fertilizer N
applied. Some decreases in NO3 were measured from fall to
spring sampling times, but net losses were minimal where <60
kg ha-1 NO3-N was present in the fall. Application of manure
resulted in similar or slightly lower soil profile NO3 than
agronomincally equivalent rates of fertilizer N.
85 NAL Call. No.: 10 J822
Nitrogen in the excreta of dairy cattle: changes during short-
term storage. Whitehead, D.C.; Raistrick, N.
Cambridge : Cambridge University Press; 1993 Aug.
The Journal of agricultural science v. 121 (pt.1): p. 73-81;
1993 Aug. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: England; Dairy cattle; Feces; Urine; Storage; Air
pollution; Ammonium; Cattle slurry; Hydrolysis; Nitrogen;
Urea; Volatilization
86 NAL Call. No.: S590.C63
Nitrogen recovery by orchardgrass from dairy manure applied
with or without fertilizer nitrogen.
Kanneganti, V.R.; Klausner, S.D.
New York, N.Y. : Marcel Dekker; 1994.
Communications in soil science and plant analysis v. 25
(15/16): p. 2771-2783; 1994. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dactylis glomerata; Cattle manure; Application to
land; Nitrogen fertilizers; Application rates; Nutrient
uptake; Crop yield; Forage; Dry matter accumulation
87 NAL Call. No.: S590.C63
Nitrogen recovery by timothy from surface application of dairy
cattle slurry. Anderson, M.A.; McKenna, J.R.; Martens, D.C.;
Donohue, S.J. New York, N.Y. : Marcel Dekker; 1993.
Communications in soil science and plant analysis v. 24
(11/12): p. 1139-1151; 1993. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Maine; Phleum pratense; Silt loam soils; Cattle
slurry; Surface treatment; Application rates; Application
date; Nitrogen; Nutrient uptake; Crop yield
88 NAL Call. No.: 56.9 SO3
Nitrous oxide production from injected liquid dairy manure.
Comfort, S.D.; Kelling, K.A.; Keeney, D.R.; Converse, J.C.
Madison, Wis. : The Society; 1990 Mar.
Soil Science Society of America journal v. 54 (2): p. 421-427.
ill; 1990 Mar. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Liquid manures; Dairy wastes; Slurries; Soil
injection; Nitrous oxide; Losses from soil systems; Nitrogen
transfer; Denitrification; Nitrification; Anaerobic
conditions; Inorganic compounds; Carbon dioxide; Nitrapyrin;
Acetylene
Abstract: Injection of liquid organic wastes into soil
promotes conditions that may be conducive to denitrification
by creating in anaerobic environment abundant in inorganic N
and readily oxidizable C. To quantify gaseous N loss, we
measured N2O emissions from simulated waste injections applied
to soils in large wooden containers (71 by 42 by 44 cm). These
containers were equipped with headspace covers for gas
entrapment, soil-atmosphere wells, C2H2-dispersion tubes, soil
moisture-temperature cells, and end-entry doors for soil
sampling. Soil type was a Plano silt loam (fine-silty, mixed,
mesic Typic Argiudoll) packed to a bulk density of 1.1 Mg m-3
and maintained at a constant temperature of 12.0 +/- 1.4
degrees C. Liquid dairy manure was injected into the soil at
rates commonly used for crop production (79 000 L ha-1). The
nitrification inhibitor nitrapyrin [2-chloro-6-
(trichloromethyl) pyridine] was used to further evaluate
nitrification-denitrification losses. Nitrous oxide emissions,
with and without C2H2 treatment, were estimated by passing air
across the soil surface above an injection zone and trapping
emitted N2O onto a molecular sieve. The largest emission of
N2O occurred shortly after injection, followed by a shift to
N2. Maximum gaseous-N loss occurred 5 d after injection and
corresponded with maximum CO2 concentrations in the soil
atmosphere. Nitrapyrin was effective in controlling
nitrification, but did not consistently influence the rate of
denitrification. When we simulated 190 mm of precipitation at
25 d after injection, increases in N2O production were
minimal, possibly due to a limitation in readily oxidizable C.
Total measured gaseous-N loss in the presence of C2H2 over 40
d accounted for 2.5 to 3.2% of the slurry's NH4-N, or 1.0 to
1.3% of the total N added.
89 NAL Call. No.: 44.8 J822
Nutrition management of dairy cows as a contribution to
pollution control. Tamminga, S.
Champaign, Ill. : American Dairy Science Association; 1992
Jan. Journal of dairy science v. 75 (1): p. 345-357; 1992 Jan.
Paper presented at the symposium "Nutritional Factors
Affecting Animal Water and Waste Quality", August 27, 1990.
Literature review. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Netherlands; Dairy cows; Agricultural wastes;
Feeding standards; Pollution; Nitrogen; Feces; Urine; Diet;
Phosphorus; Methane; Nutrient requirements; Literature reviews
Abstract: Dairy production causes unavoidable losses in
respiration, feces, and urine, which may become an
environmental burden as contributors to the "greenhouse"
effect (CO2, CH4) or to the pollution of air (NH3), soil
surface, and sub-soil water (NO3, P). Losses in respirations
can be reduced by increasing feed quality and level of
production. Increased feed quality can reduce losses in
methane, whereas an increased level of production decreases
the relative losses in maintenance. Fecal and urinary losses
can be reduced by minimizing the intake of N and P relative to
energy. Further reductions can result from increasing feed
quality and level of production, from matching or
synchronizing die availability of N and energy in the rumen,
and from shifting the site of digestion of protein and starch
from the rumen to the small intestine. Improved feed quality
will reduce endogenous protein losses. In order to exploit
fully the potential of nutritional management in pollution
control, computer simulation models describing dairy
production in a dynamic way are needed.
90 NAL Call. No.: QH540.J6
The origin and identification of macropores in an earthen-
lined dairy manure storage basin.
McCurdy, M.; McSweeney, K.
Madison, Wis. : American Society of Agronomy; 1992 Jan.
Journal of environmental quality v. 22 (1): p. 148-154; 1992
Jan. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Wisconsin; Dairy wastes; Animal manures; Storage;
Waste disposal; Groundwater pollution; Macropores; Leaching;
Contaminants; Liners; Physicochemical properties; Macropore
flow
Abstract: Earthen-lined basins have been used to store dairy
manure in Wisconsin since the early 1970s. Monitoring data
indicate that many of these basins are leaking, but little
effort has been directed toward explaining the mechanisms
responsible for leakage. Morphological and micromorphological
techniques were used to identify macropores in the sidewall of
an earthen-lined manure storage basin. Laboratory and field
dye studies provided evidence of contaminant movement via
macropores. Results indicate that physicochemical and
biological mechanisms were responsible for creating macropores
capable of providing pathways for preferential flow. These
mechanisms, and the resulting macropores, can significantly
affect the long-term viability of earthen-lined manure storage
basins.
91 NAL Call. No.: QL461.E532
Ovipositional response of Musca sorbens Wiedemann (Diptera:
Muscidae) to residues of digested ground corn in feces of
dairy cows.
Lee, C.N.; Toyama, G.M.
Lanham, Md. : Entomological Society of America; 1991 Oct.
Environmental entomology v. 20 (5): p. 1447-1450; 1991 Oct.
Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Hawaii; Musca sorbens; Cattle manure; Feces
composition; Maize; Oviposition
Abstract: Feces that contained residues of digested dairy
feed supplements were offered as ovipositional substrates to
caged Musca sorbens Wiedemann to determine preference. Results
showed preference for residues of digested ground corn.
Ovipositional preference for residues of digested ground corn
over those from coarser rolled corn suggested a relationship
between surface areas exposed to digestive fluids and
intensity of ovipositional preference. Feces of cows that were
fed complete rations formulated without corn were
ovipositionally unattractive to caged M. sorbens.
92 NAL Call. No.: 58.8 J82
Passive separation and the efficiency of anaerobic digestion
of cattle slurry. Schofield, C.P.; Rees, Y.J.
London : Academic Press; 1988 Jul.
Journal of agricultural engineering research v. 40 (3): p.
175-186. ill; 1988 Jul. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy wastes; Cattle slurry; Anaerobic digesters;
Separation; Waste treatment; Methane production; Efficiency;
Settlement
93 NAL Call. No.: QC73.6.E5
Performance evaluation of a continuous-flow no-mix anaerobic
reactor operating on dairy manure.
Ghaly, A.E.; Echiegu, E.A.
Washington, DC : Taylor & Francis; 1992 Apr.
Energy sources v. 14 (2): p. 113-134; 1992 Apr. Includes
references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy wastes; Animal manures; Animal wastes;
Anaerobic digestion; Equipment; Biogas; Production; Biomass;
Chemical oxygen demand; Time; Hydraulics; Ph; Nitrogen;
Temperature; Evaluation
94 NAL Call. No.: 290.9 AM32P
Performance evaluation of a no-mix continuous flow anaerobic
digester operating on dairy manure.
Ghaly, A.E.; Echiegu, E.A.
St. Joseph, Mich. : The Society; 1989.
Paper - American Society of Agricultural Engineers (89-4097):
p. 1-28; 1989. Paper presented at the 1989 International
Summer Meeting jointly sponsored by the American Society of
Agricultural Engineers, and the Canadian Society of
Agricultural Engineering, June 25-28, 1989, Quebec, Canada.
Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Anaerobic digesters; Dairy wastes; Methane
production
95 NAL Call. No.: TD930.A32
Performance of a dairy manure anaerobic lagoon.
Safley, L.M. Jr; Westerman, P.W.
Essex : Elsevier Science Publishers; 1992.
Bioresource technology v. 42 (1): p. 43-52; 1992. Includes
references.
Language: English
Descriptors: North Carolina; Dairy cattle; Cattle manure;
Anaerobic treatment; Lagoons; Performance; Methane production
96 NAL Call. No.: TD930.A32
Performance of a low temperature lagoon digester.
Satley, L.M. Jr; Westerman, P.W.
Essex : Elsevier Applied Science Publishers; 1992.
Bioresource technology v. 41 (2): p. 167-175; 1992. Includes
references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy cattle; Cattle manure; Liquid wastes;
Lagoons; Digesters; Performance; Biogas; Methane production;
Anaerobic digestion
97 NAL Call. No.: TD172.J61
Pesticides, food contaminants, and agricultural wastes.
Khan, S.U.
New York, N.Y. : Marcel Dekker; 1993.
Journal of environmental science and health : Part B :
Pesticides, food contaminants, and agricultural wastes v. B28
(1): p. 1-18; 1993. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Georgia; Atrazine; Coastal plain soils; Dairy
effluent; Cattle manure; Nutrient content; Application rates;
Runoff; Flow; Leaching; Leachates; Losses from soil systems;
Rain; Water flow; Application to land
98 NAL Call. No.: 4 AM34P
Plant nutrient flow in the managed pathways of an intensive
dairy farm. Bacon, S.C.; Lanyon, L.E.; Schlauder, R.M. Jr
Madison, Wis. : American Society of Agronomy; 1990 Jul.
Agronomy journal v. 82 (4): p. 755-761. maps; 1990 Jul.
Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Pennsylvania; Dairy farming; Intensive livestock
farming; Intensive cropping; Farm management; Farm inputs;
Nitrogen; Phosphorus; Potassium; Nitrogen economy; Farmyard
manure; Nutrient cycles; Quantitative analysis
Abstract: The magnitude, and spatial and temporal patterns of
nutrient flow in the managed pathways of a farm are related to
farm management decisions and interact with the biological
processes of the farm. These descriptions of nutrient flow can
be part of a nutrient management process that is consistent
with the specifics of individual farm operations and
particular farm performance goals. Nutrient flow in the
managed pathways of a Pennsylvania dairy farm was measured at
farm, field, and livestock unit boundaries using on-farm
equipment scales, farm records, and material sampling and
analysis. Farm nutrient inputs of N, P, and K were twofold or
more greater than outputs of these nutrients in the managed
pathways. The temporal distribution of flows was closely
related to the livestock activities on the farm. Manure
storage capacity and crop developmental stage were significant
factors influencing the timing of nutrient flows to and from
the fields. Nutrient inputs and outputs in the managed flows
at the boundary for the set of all fields were approximately
equal except for the negative calculated crop available N
balance. However, the range in balances for individual fields
was large. Manure N and potential biological N fixation were
not used efficiently on this farm due primarily to the
volatilization of N from manure and the application of manure
to alfalfa. Additions of nutrients to the farm in the managed
flows decreased by 26, 60, and 43% for N, P, and K,
respectively, in the 2nd yr of the study due primarily to less
purchased animal feeds.
99 NAL Call. No.: 290.9 AM32T
Plugging effects from livestock waste application on
infiltration and runoff. Roberts, R.J.; Clanton, C.J.
St. Joseph, Mich. : American Society of Agricultural
Engineers; 1992 Mar. Transactions of the ASAE v. 35 (2): p.
515-522; 1992 Mar. Literature review. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Infiltration; Permeability; Rain; Runoff; Soil
water; Dairy wastes; Pig slurry; Literature reviews
Abstract: A rainfall simulator was used on repacked Waukegan
silt loam and Hubbard loamy sand soil columns to determine the
combined effect of rainfall and livestock waste application on
infiltration and runoff. Dairy and swine waste slurries were
either surface-applied or incorporated. Livestock waste
application noticeably reduced the amount of runoff during a
series of artificial rainfall events for all cases with the
exception of swine waste incorporated into the silt loam soil.
Loamy sand exhibited short-term plugging when both wastes were
surface-applied with no incorporation. Surface-application of
dairy waste on the silt loam soil apparently prevented
formation of a surface seal and improved the infiltration
capacity. of the soil. Less surface-scaling in waste-applied
columns may be attributed to increased organic matter on the
surface of the soil that aided aggregate stability. Also. the
waste particles protected the surface from the energy of the
impacting raindrops.
100 NAL Call. No.: 290.9 Am32T
Production and characteristics of manure from lactating dairy
cows in Florida. Morse, D.; Nordstedt, R.A.; Head, H.H.; Van
Horn, H.H.
St. Joseph, Mich. : American Society of Agricultural Engineers
1958-; 1994 Jan.
Transactions of the ASAE v. 37 (1): p. 275-279; 1994 Jan.
Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Florida; Cabt; Dairy cows; Manures; Total solids;
Feed intake; Phosphorus; Excretion
Abstract: Total quantities of urine and feces excreted daily
were collected from 12 lactating Holstein dairy cow averaging
567 kg (1250 lb) on fixed feed intake averaging 20 kg (44 lb)
of dry matter per day, or 16 kg (36 lb) of dry matter per day
per 454 kg (1000 lb) of body weight. Amounts of total and
volatile solids, acid detergent lignin phosphorus in feces,
and phosphorus in urine were determined Cows excreted an
average of 44.6 kg (98.1 lb) of raw waste, 6.08 kg (13.1 lb)
of total solids in feces, and 0.16 kg (0.3 lb) of fixed solids
in feces daily, expressed per 454 kg (1000 lb) of body weight.
Total solids of feces represented 36.4% of the daily diet dry
matter intake. These values are greater than table values
developed by previous researchers and used to design dairy
farm facilities. Feces to urine ratio (w/w) ranged from 1.4:1
to 1.9:1. Fecal grab samples (n = 383)from cows on commercial
dairies, for which estimated daily intake of feed was
available, had greater acid detergent lignin content (16.9 vs.
13.8%) and about 60% more than cows on the total collection
trial (4.2 vs. 2.6%), perhaps due to some ingestion of sand on
pasture. For all fecal samples fixed solids percentages were
much less than table values developed by previous researchers.
Differences may be due, in part, to improved genetic potential
of cows, because of increased feed intake, climate, or
intensive management practices. Our research also confirmed
that the quantity of phosphorus (P) excreted in feces was
variable, but depended on intake of dietary P.
101 NAL Call. No.: SF191.D3
Profit tips.
Annexstad, J.
Minnetonka, Minn. : Miller Publishing Co; 1988 Apr.
Dairy herd management v. 25 (4): p. 8-9. ill; 1988 Apr.
Language: English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Dairy farming; Profitability; Nematode
control; Culling; Cattle manure; Coccidiosis; Disease control
102 NAL Call. No.: S1.N32
Profitable farming: the next generation.
Kendall, D.
Emmaus, Pa. : Regenerative Agriculture Association; 1988 Jul.
The New farm v. 10 (5): p. 36-38; 1988 Jul. Includes
references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairying; Organic farming; Cattle manure;
Rotations; Crop yield; Alternative farming
103 NAL Call. No.: TD930.A32
Psychrophilic digestion of dairy cattle and pig manure: start-
up procedures of batch, fed-batch and CSTR-type digesters.
Zeeman, G.; Sutter, K.; Vens, T.; Koster, M.; Wellinger, A.
London : Elsevier Applied Science Publishers; 1988.
Biological wastes v. 26 (1): p. 15-31. ill; 1988. Includes
references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy cattle; Pigs; Farmyard manure;
Psychrophilic bacteria; Anaerobic digesters; Fermentation;
Temperatures; Biogas slurry; Methane
104 NAL Call. No.: 421 J828
A quantitative survey of Culicoides variipennis (Diptera:
Ceratopogonidae) in dairy wastewater ponds in southern
California.
Mullens, B.A.
Lanham, Md. : The Entomological Society of America; 1989 Nov.
Journal of medical entomology v. 26 (6): p. 559-565. ill; 1989
Nov. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: California; Culicoides variipennis; Larvae;
Disease vectors; Dairy cattle; Dairy wastes; Ponds; Bluetongue
virus
105 NAL Call. No.: S601.A34
Reducing energy inputs to a simulated dairy farm.
Vinten-Johansen, C.; Lanyon, L.E.; Stephenson, K.Q.
Amsterdam : Elsevier; 1990 Jul.
Agriculture, ecosystems and environment v. 31 (3): p. 225-242;
1990 Jul. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy farming; Energy intake; Energy
requirements; No-tillage; Manure spreading; Energy
consumption; Linear programming; Reduction
106 NAL Call. No.: QL461.E532
Relationship of microhabitat to incidence of house fly
(Diptera: Muscidae) immatures and their parasitoids at dairy
farms in central New York. Smith, L.; Rutz, D.A.
Lanham, Md. : Entomological Society of America; 1991 Apr.
Environmental entomology v. 20 (2): p. 669-674; 1991 Apr.
Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: New York; Dairy farms; Musca domestica; Stomoxys
calcitrans; Ova; Larvae; Pupae; Microhabitats; Manures;
Muscidifurax raptor; Pteromalidae; Spalangia; Phygadeuon;
Parasites of insect pests; Biological control agents
Abstract: Weekly observations were made on the presence of
housefly, Musca domestica L., and stable fly, Stomoxys
calcitrans (L.), eggs, larvae, and pupae, during 21 wk at nine
dairies in Cayuga County, New York. Laboratory-reared fly
pupae were exposed at each site to monitor parasitoid
activity. Incidence of fly immatures was significantly related
to substrate, moisture, and location, but not to indoor or
outdoor exposure. Incidence was greatest at wet sites,
particularly in manure, bedding, and feed, and lowest at dry
sites. Locations with the highest incidence were lean-to,
silo, calf pen, outdoor manure pile, outdoor manure ramp, and
manure lagoon. Incidence of Muscidifurax raptor Girault and
Sanders, Urolepis rufipes (Ashmead), Spalangia cameroni
Perkins (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) and total parasitism were
positively associated with the presence of fly immatures, but
Phygadeuon fumator Gravenhorst (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae)
was independent. With respect to substrate, moisture, and
exposure, parasitism was generally distributed in a pattern
similar to that of the flies. However, incidence of parasitism
was greater, relative to that of fly immatures, in grass and
earth substrates, but lower in wet manure and feed. With
respect to location, parasitism was high at manure ramps and
low in calf pens and in manure sheds, relative to fly
immatures. The guild of parasitoids attacking synanthropic
muscoid pupae appears to cover all appropriate host
microhabitats at dairies in central New York.
107 NAL Call. No.: 421 J828
Response of Culicoides variipennis (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae)
to water level fluctuations in experimental dairy wastewater
ponds.
Mullens, B.A.; Rodriguez, J.L.
Lanham, Md. : The Entomological Society of America; 1989 Nov.
Journal of medical entomology v. 26 (6): p. 566-572; 1989 Nov.
Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: California; Culicoides variipennis; Larvae;
Responses; Water; Disease vectors; Dairy cattle; Dairy wastes;
Ponds; Bluetongue virus
108 NAL Call. No.: 290.9 AM32T
Retention and loss of nitrogen and solids from unlined earthen
manure storages.
Culley, J.L.B.; Phillips, P.A.
St. Joseph, Mich. : American Society of Agricultural
Engineers; 1989 Mar. Transactions of the ASAE v. 32 (2): p.
677-683. ill; 1989 Mar. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy effluents; Storage; Soil contamination;
Nitrogen; Groundwater pollution
109 NAL Call. No.: TD930.A32
Rheological properties of Moroccan dairy cattle manure.
Achkari-Begdouri, A.; Goodrich, P.R.
Essex : Elsevier Applied Science Publishers; 1992.
Bioresource technology v. 40 (2): p. 149-156; 1992. Includes
references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Morocco; Dairy cattle; Cattle manure; Animal
wastes; Anaerobic digestion; Rheological properties
110 NAL Call. No.: SF221.B26
Size and waste management costs.
Schwart, B.; Schmucker, J.; Lacewell, R.; Leatham, D.; Lovell,
A.; Allen, G. College Station, Tex. : The Service; 1991 Jan29.
Balanced dairying : Economics - Texas Agricultural Extension
Service v. 11 (1): 4 p.; 1991 Jan29. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Texas; Dairy farming; Waste disposal; Waste
treatment; Cost benefit analysis; Water pollution; Groundwater
pollution; Water quality; Statistics
111 NAL Call. No.: 56.8 SO3
Soil sampling and nutrient variability in dairy animal holding
areas. Anderson, D.L.; Hanlon, E.A.; Miller, O.P.; Hoge, V.R.;
Diaz, O.A. Baltimore, Md. : Williams & Wilkins; 1992 Apr.
Soil science v. 153 (4): p. 314-321; 1992 Apr. Includes
references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Florida; Spodosols; Sandy soils; Surface layers;
Soil testing; Sampling; Assessment; Nutrient content;
Phosphorus; Potassium; Calcium; Aluminum; Iron; Sodium; Soil
organic matter; Soil ph; Soil variability; Spatial variation;
Nutrient availability; Nutrient retention; Movement in soil;
Spodic horizons; Dairy wastes; Population density; Topography;
Water pollution
112 NAL Call. No.: SF967.M3N32
Straw flow litter for dairy cows: experimental tests with
different slopes and different quantities of straw.
Chiappini, U.; Zappavigna, P.
Arlington, Va. : The Council; 1994.
Annual meeting /. p. 262-269; 1994. Meeting held on January
31-February 2, 1994, Orlando, Florida. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy cows; Straw; Litter; Thickness; Floors;
Slopes; Hygiene; Animal behavior; Cattle manure; Density;
Volume
113 NAL Call. No.: 44.8 J822
Survival of coliform bacteria in static compost piles of dairy
waste solids intended for freestall bedding.
Mote, C.R.; Emerton, B.L.; Allison, J.S.; Dowlen, H.H.;
Oliver, S.P. Champaign, Ill. : American Dairy Science
Association; 1988 Jun. Journal of dairy science v. 71 (6): p.
1676-1681; 1988 Jun. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Farm dairies; Cattle manure; Solid waste;
Composts; Coliform bacteria; Coliform count; Litter; Loose
housing
114 NAL Call. No.: TD930.A32
Thermophilic methane production from dairy cattle waste.
Wohlt, J.E.; Frobish, R.A.; Davis, C.L.; Bryant, M.P.; Mackie,
R.I. Essex : Elsevier Applied Science Publishers; 1990.
Biological wastes v. 32 (3): p. 193-207; 1990. Includes
references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy cattle; Waste treatment; Anaerobic
digesters; Methane production; Chemical composition
115 NAL Call. No.: TP1.P7
Treatment of dairy farm wastewaters in engineered reed bed
systems. Biddlestone, A.J.; Gray, K.R.; Job, G.D.
New York, N.Y. : Elsevier Science Publishers; 1991 Oct.
Process biochemistry v. 26 (5): p. 265-268; 1991 Oct.
Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy effluent; Dairy wastes; Waste water;
Biological treatment; Phragmites australis; Lagoons
116 NAL Call. No.: SF5.A8 1990
Treatment of dairy wastewater by modified reactor of anaerobic
filter. Lung, S.P.; Tseng, S.K.; Suang, Y.Y.
Chunan, Miaoli, Taiwan : The Organization Committee, Fifth
AAAP Animal Science Congress; 1990.
Proceedings, the 5th AAAP Animal Science Congress, May 27-June
1, 1990, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China. v. 3 p. 209; 1990.
Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Waste water treatment; Dairies; Anaerobic
treatment
117 NAL Call. No.: TD930.A32
Treatment of milking centre waste in sequencing batch
reactors. Lo, K.V.; Tam, J.P.; Liao, P.H.; Bulley, N.R.
London : Elsevier Applied Science Publishers; 1988.
Biological wastes v. 25 (3): p. 193-208; 1988. Includes
references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy effluents; Waste water treatment; Systems;
Equipment; Temperature relations; Operating time; Efficiency
118 NAL Call. No.: 290.9 AM32P
Triple crop forage production utilizing animal waste.
Butler, J.L.; Johnson, J.C. Jr; Newton, G.L.
St. Joseph, Mich. : The Society; 1989.
Paper - American Society of Agricultural Engineers (89-1059):
9 p.; 1989. Paper presented at the "1989 International Summer
Meeting jointly sponsored by the American Society of
Agricultural Engineers and the Canadian Society of
Agricultural Enigeering, June 25-28, Quebec, Canada. Includes
references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Georgia; Fodder crops; Dairy effluent; Waste
disposal
119 NAL Call. No.: SF191.D3
Turning dairy wastes into power and profits.
Williams, G.B.
Minnetonka, Minn. : Miller Publishing Company; 1989 Apr.
Dairy herd management v. 26 (4): p. 46, 48. ill; 1989 Apr.
Language: English
Descriptors: Arizona; Dairy wastes; Cattle manure; Methane
production; Waste utilization; University research; Savings
120 NAL Call. No.: 41.8 V643
Update on dairy cow housing with particular reference to
flooring. Barnes, M.M.
London : Bailliere Tindall; 1989 Sep.
British veterinary journal v. 145 (5): p. 436-445. ill; 1989
Sep. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy cows; Cattle housing; Floors; Concrete;
Design; Cattle manure; Animal feeding
121 NAL Call. No.: TD930.A32
Use of mineral amendements to reduce ammonia losses from
dairy-cattle and chicken-manure slurries.
Termeer, W.C.; Warman, P.R.
Essex : Elsevier Science Publishers; 1993.
Bioresource technology v. 44 (3): p. 217-222; 1993. Includes
references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy cattle; Poultry manure; Slurries; Minerals;
Amendments; Ammonia; Losses; Volatilization; Manures; Storage;
Application
122 NAL Call. No.: 275.29 N811NC
Utilization of dairy manure as fertilizer.
Barker, J.C.
Raleigh, N.C. : North Carolina Agricultural Extension Service;
1988 Oct. North Carolina dairy extension newsletter. p. 3-5;
1988 Oct.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy farming; Manure spreading
123 NAL Call. No.: QH540.J6
Vegetative filter treatment of dairy barnyard runoff in cold
regions. Schellinger, G.R.; Clausen, J.C.
Madison, Wis. : American Society of Agronomy; 1992 Jan.
Journal of environmental quality v. 21 (1): p. 40-45; 1992
Jan. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Vermont; Dairy wastes; Farmyards; Runoff;
Biological treatment; Waste water treatment; Filter beds;
Festuca; Poa; Lolium; Nutrient content; Phosphorus; Nitrogen
content; Escherichia coli; Streptococcus; Water quality
Abstract: A vegetative filter strip was installed to treat
barnyard runoff from an active dairy farm in Vermont. Runoff
from a concrete surfaced barnyard flowed through a detention
pond, then onto a vegetative filter strip measuring 22.9 m by
7.6 m with a 2% slope. The water input and surface and
subsurface outputs for the strip were continuously monitored
from December 1984 through May 1986. Of the total barnyard
runoff entering the strip, 65% left as surface runoff and 27%
was measured as subsurface outflow. The average hydraulic
loading rate was 14.7 cm wk-1 and the average overland flow
detention time was 15 min. The filter strip did not
significantly (P < 0.05) reduce solids, P, N and bacteria
concentrations in the surface output. Over the period of study
the mass retention was 33% total suspended solids, 12% total P
and 18% total Kjeldahl N. Mass retention was highest during
the growing season and was poorest during snowmelt periods. It
was concluded that poor filter strip performance was due to an
excessive hydraulic loading rate resulting in an inadequate
detention time for proper treatment. A preferential flow path
from the level lip spreader to the subsurface drain tiles may
have contributed to the poor subsurface treatment performance.
124 NAL Call. No.: Z7914.W37W37 1994
Waste treatment dairy, poultry, meat and seafood industry
(Jul.72-present).. Citations from the Food Science & Tecnology
Abstracts
United States, National Technical Information Service
Springfied, VA : NTIS,; 1994.
1 v. (unpaged) ; 28 cm. (Published search). Cover title.
"Jan 94"--P. [5]. AT head of title: Citations from the Food
Science & Technology Abstracts. Includes index. PB94-865367.
Language: English
Descriptors: Waste products; Agricultural wastes
125 NAL Call. No.: 290.9 Am32P
Wastewater treatment alternatives for a small dairy.
Ritter, W.F.
St. Joseph, Mich. : American Society of Agricultural
Engineers,; 1991. Paper / (916578): 16 p.; 1991. Paper
presented at the "1991 Winter Meeting sponsored by the
American Society of Agricultural Engineers," December 17-20,
1991, Chicago, Illinois. Includes references.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy wastes; Costs; Waste water treatment
126 NAL Call. No.: 79.9 C122
Weed seed and dairy manure.
Cudney, D.W.; Schultz, T.A.; Wright, S.D.
Fremont, Calif. : California Weed Conference; 1991.
Proceedings - California Weed Conference (43rd): p. 62-63;
1991. Meeting held January 21-23, 1991, Santa Barbara,
California.
Language: English
Descriptors: Cattle manure; Dairy cattle; Weeds; Seeds; Weed
biology
127 NAL Call. No.: 100 C12CAG
Weed seed in dairy manure depends on collection site.
Cudney, D.W.; Wright, S.D.; Shultz, T.A.; Reints, J.S.
Oakland, Calif. : Division of Agriculture and Natural
Resources, University of California; 1992 May.
California agriculture v. 46 (3): p. 31-32. ill; 1992 May.
Language: English
Descriptors: Manures; Weeds; Seed dispersal; Composting; Dairy
cattle
128 NAL Call. No.: 290.9 Am32P
Wetland for treating liquid dairy waste design and monitoring.
Lanier, A.L.; Fox, D.; Smith, D.W.
St. Joseph, Mich. : American Society of Agricultural
Engineers,; 1991. Paper / (914020): 9 p.; 1991. Paper
presented at the "1991 International Summer Meeting sponsored
by the American Society of Agricultural Engineers," June
23-26, 1991, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Language: English
Descriptors: California; Cabt; Dairy wastes; Waste water
treatment; Wetlands
129 NAL Call. No.: S1.N32
Wetlands that work for you.
Bowman, G.; Wetlands that work for you
Emmaus, Pa. : Rodale Institute; 1992 Nov.
The New farm v. 14 (7): p. 50-53; 1992 Nov.
Language: English
Descriptors: Dairy wastes; Biological treatment; Waste water
treatment; Wetlands; On-farm processing
AUTHOR INDEX
Achkari-Begdouri, A. 10, 109
Agricultural and Food Policy Center (Tex.) 65
Allen, G. 18, 63, 64, 110
Allen, L.H. Jr 29, 32
Allison, J.S. 113
Anderson, D.L. 111
Anderson, M.A. 87
Annexstad, J. 101
Axelrod, H. 41
Bacon, S.C. 98
Baird, C. 4
Barker, J.C. 122
Barnes, M.M. 120
Batie, S.S. 60, 71
Becker, H. 15
Beierlein, J.G. 19
Ben-Hassan, R.M. 17
Biddlestone, A.J. 115
Boggs, L. 73
Bortone, G. 54
Bottcher, A.B. 32
Bottcher, A.V. 25
Bowman, G. 129
Bowser, T. 46
Brock, W. 16
Brooks, L.A. 44
Brown, D.A. 20
Bryant, M.P. 114
Bulley, N.R. 117
Burgoa, B. 32
Butler, J.L. 118
Campbell, J.K. 50
Cathcart, T. 14, 16
Chambliss, C.F. 25
Chapman, H.D. 5
Chapman, J.M. 78
Chayovan, S. 8
Chen, T.H. 79
Chiappini, U. 112
Chiu, C. 76
Christensen, L. A. 45
Clanton, C.J. 99
Clausen, J.C. 123
Comfort, S.D. 88
Comis, D. 75
Conkling, D. 51
Connor, L.J. 62
Converse, J.C. 55, 88
Cramer, C. 59, 61
Cudney, D.W. 126, 127
Culley, J.L.B. 108
Dahlberg, S.P. 34
Darwazeh, H.A. 41, 43
Davis, C.L. 114
Davis, S. 14
Davis, S.H. 16
Diaz, O.A. 111
Diebel, P.L. 71
Dinkler, H.D. 56
Dombrowski, J.E. 27
Donohue, S.J. 87
Dowlen, H.H. 113
Eastman, J.A. 8
Echiegu, E.A. 93, 94
Emerton, B.L. 113
Fabian, E.E. 50
Falk, D.E. 26
Federici, B.A. 52
Fluck, R.C. 56
Fox, D. 128
Frobish, R.A. 114
Frost, J.P. 38
Gamroth, M.J. 33
Garsow, J.D. 62
Gay, J.M. 67
Gerhardt, S.A. 40
Gerrish, J.B. 8
Ghaly, A.E. 9, 17, 93, 94
Giles, J.F. 34
Goodrich, P.R. 10, 109
Graetz, D.A. 25
Gray, K.R. 115
Griffin, C.D. 5
Guest, R.W. 50
Hadjivassilis, I. 28
Halstead, J.M. 60, 71
Hanlon, E.A. 25, 111
Hao, O.J. 1
Haugen, V.J. 7
Head, H.H. 100
Heatwole, C.D. 71
Hermanson, R.E. 68
Hoge, V.R. 111
Hunsaker, M.E. 67
Job, G.D. 115
Johnson, A.T. 1
Johnson, D.E. 48
Johnson, J.C. Jr 31, 118
Jokela, W.E. 84
Jones, D.I.H. 35
Jones, R. 35
Jui, P.Y. 83
Kanneganti, V.R. 86
Kappel, T.J. 40
Keeney, D.R. 88
Kelling K.A. 55
Kelling, K.A. 88
Kendall, D. 102
Khan, S.U. 97
King, L.D. 37
Klausner, S. 70
Klausner, S.D. 86
Knutson, R.D. 66
Kobayashi, S. 39
Koelsch, R.K. 50
Koster, M. 103
Kramer, R.A. 71
Krause, Kenneth R., 45
Krones, M.J. 1
Lacewell, R. 18, 110
Lacewell, R.D. 63, 64
Lague, C. 30
Lanier, A.L. 128
Lanyon, L.E. 24, 98, 105
Laughlin, R.J. 38
Lazarus, W.F. 20
Leatham, D. 18, 110
Leatham, D.J. 63, 64
Lee, C.N. 91
Leonard, N. 74
Liao, P.H. 2, 76, 117
Lindley, J.A. 7, 34
Lo, K.V. 2, 76, 117
Lorimor, J. 53
Lotmentseva, E.Yu 57
Lovell, A. 18, 64, 110
Lovell, A.C. 63
Lung, S.P. 116
Mackie, R.I. 114
Manning, L. 4
Mansell, R.S. 32
Martens, D.C. 87
Masters, B.K. 72
Masuda, Y. 39
Matanmi, B.A. 41, 52
McCurdy, M. 90
McKenna, J.R. 87
McNamara, K. 58
McSweeney, K. 90
McSweeny, W.C. 19
Megehee, D.B. 49
Merriman, R.P. 23
Miller, J.W. 66
Miller, O.P. 111
Miller, R.W. 20
Morse, D. 100
Moseley, G. 35
Motavalli, P.P. 55
Mote, C.R. 113
Mulla, M.S. 41, 43, 52
Mullens, B.A. 12, 21, 104, 107
Mulligan, F.S. III 42
Nakhapetyan, L.A. 57
Newton, G.L. 118
Nordstedt, R.A. 13, 25, 100
Nott, S.B. 62
Ohlensehlen, R.M. 26
Oliver, S.P. 113
Outlaw, J.L. 66
Outlaw, Joe L. 65
Padgitt, S. 60
Pain, B.F. 77, 78
Patni, N.K. 83
Phillips, P.A. 108
Phillips, V.R. 77, 78
Piccinini, S. 54
Pote, J. 14, 16
Powers, W.J. 13
Raistrick, N. 85
Ramsey, D.S. 49
Rees, Y.J. 92
Reints, J.S. 127
Richardson, J. 18
Ritter, W.F. 125
Robbins, J.E. 40
Roberts, R.J. 99
Rodriguez, J.L. 12, 21, 107
Rutz, D.A. 20, 106
Rynk, R. 22
Sachs, C. 46
Safley, L.M. Jr 37, 69, 95
Samoshina, N.M. 57
Sanchez, E.P. 36
Satley, L.M. Jr 96
Sauber, C.M. 11, 47
Schaefer, C.H. 42
Schellinger, G.R. 123
Schlauder, R.M. Jr 98
Schmisseur, E. 33
Schmucker, J. 18, 110
Schmucker, J.F. 63, 64
Schofield, C.P. 92
Schofield, K. 23
Schultz, T.A. 126
Schwart, B. 18, 110
Schwart, R.B. 63, 64
Shultz, T.A. 127�
Smith, D.W. 128
Smith, L. 106
Smithwick, Robert P., 3
Steinberg, M.P. 79
Stephenson, K.Q. 105
Stevens, R.J. 38
Strong, L. 14, 16
Suang, Y.Y. 116
Sutter, K. 103
Sweeten, J.M. 4
Tam, J.P. 117
Tamminga, S. 89
Taylor, D. 81
Taylor, D.B. 71
Termeer, W.C. 121
Tillapaugh, B. 70
Torrent, J. 48
Toyama, G.M. 91
Travieso, L. 36
Tseng, S.K. 116
Ulmer, R. 14, 16
United States, Dept. of Agriculture, Economic Research Service
45
United States, National Technical Information Service 124
United States, Soil Conservation Service, United States, Dept.
of Agriculture, Video and Teleconference Division 82
Van Horn, H.H. 13, 25, 100
Vens, T. 103
Vinten-Johansen, C. 105
Ward, G.M. 48
Warman, P.R. 121
Weidner, K. 80
Weiland, P. 36
Wellinger, A. 103
West, R 77
Westerman, P.W. 37, 69, 95, 96
Wetlands that work for you 129
Whitehead, D.C. 85
Whitelaw, K. 23
Wilkie, A.C. 13
Williams, G.B. 119
Wohlt, J.E. 114
Woodruff, B.A. 19
Wright, S.D. 126, 127
Zappavigna, P. 112
Zeeman, G. 103
SUBJECT INDEX
Accuracy 54
Acetates 40
Acetylene 88
Activated sludge 28
Adsorption 72
Aerobic treatment 2, 10, 72
Africa 79
Agricultural chemicals 60
Agricultural engineering 77
Agricultural policy 60
Agricultural pollution 45
Agricultural structure 46
Agricultural wastes 23, 89, 124
Air pollution 62, 85
Alternative farming 102
Aluminum 111
Amendments 121
Ammonia 13, 40, 121
Ammonium 85
Ammonium nitrate 84
Anaerobic conditions 88
Anaerobic digesters 9, 17, 34, 36, 76, 77, 78, 92, 94, 103,
114
Anaerobic digestion 1, 6, 40, 50, 69, 72, 93, 96, 109
Anaerobic treatment 2, 10, 26, 95, 116
Analysis 1
Analytical methods 54
Animal behavior 112
Animal feeding 120
Animal manures 9, 12, 46, 62, 90, 93
Animal waste 45
Animal wastes 4, 5, 26, 39, 51, 93, 109
Application 121
Application date 37, 84, 87
Application rates 31, 37, 84, 86, 87, 97
Application to land 13, 37, 86, 97
Appropriate technology 61
Aquatic organisms 12
Arizona 119
Assessment 111
Atrazine 97
Bacillus sphaericus 41, 52
Bacteria 49
Barley 35
Beef cattle 5, 36, 46
Beta-galactosidase 57
Bibliographies 27
Bioassays 79
Biochemical oxygen demand 16
Biodegradation 9
Biogas 1, 6, 39, 93, 96
Biogas slurry 7, 103
Biological control 41, 52
Biological control agents 106
Biological techniques 26
Biological treatment 2, 115, 123, 129
Biological value 79
Biomass 93
Bluetongue virus 21, 104, 107
Breeding 5, 21
British Columbia 76
British friesian 35
Broadcasting 55
Bulk density 10
Cabt 16, 22, 24, 31, 51, 64, 66, 67, 100, 128
Calcium 31, 111
California 11, 12, 21, 42, 47, 52, 67, 104, 107, 128
Calves 67
Canada 22
Capital 62
Carbon dioxide 88
Cash flow 63
Cattle 34
Cattle diseases 5
Cattle farming 46
Cattle feeding 5, 24, 38, 39
Cattle housing 120
Cattle manure 2, 10, 13, 22, 24, 25, 30, 31, 33, 36, 37, 40,
48, 54, 55, 61, 68, 69, 70, 74, 75, 79, 84, 86, 91, 95, 96,
97, 101, 102, 109, 112, 113, 119, 120, 126
Cattle slurry 38, 40, 77, 78, 83, 85, 87, 92
Cheesemaking 2
Chemical analysis 54
Chemical composition 114
Chemical oxygen demand 36, 76, 93
Chopping 19
Coastal plain soils 97
Coccidiosis 101
Coliform bacteria 113
Coliform count 113
Composting 22, 127
Composts 51, 113
Computer software 73
Concentration 10, 38, 40
Concrete 120
Connecticut 51
Construction 14, 16
Contaminants 90
Contamination 60
Control 27
Cost benefit analysis 18, 110
Cost effectiveness analysis 19
Costs 26, 78, 125
Crop enterprises 80
Crop growth stage 84
Crop production 60
Crop yield 31, 37, 55, 84, 86, 87, 102
Crops 33
Crossbreds 35
Culex 41, 52
Culex peus 43
Culex quinquefasciatus 42, 43
Culicoides variipennis 12, 21, 104, 107
Culling 33, 101
Cyclic fluctuations 8
Cynodon dactylon 31
Cyprus 28
Dactylis glomerata 86
Dairies 42, 43, 116
Dairy cattle 2, 5, 10, 21, 36, 37, 40, 41, 46, 54, 69, 82,
84, 85, 95, 96, 103, 104, 107, 109, 114, 121, 126, 127
Dairy cows 13, 38, 39, 48, 59, 67, 78, 89, 100, 112, 120
Dairy effluent 6, 14, 16, 25, 32, 44, 53, 57, 81, 97, 115,
118
Dairy effluents 7, 12, 73, 76, 77, 79, 108, 117
Dairy equipment 44
Dairy farming 11, 15, 18, 21, 23, 26, 31, 33, 44, 48, 58, 60,
61, 80, 98, 101, 105, 110, 122
Dairy farms 1, 4, 13, 19, 22, 24, 51, 62, 63, 66, 74, 106
Dairy herds 25
Dairy industry 9, 28, 62
Dairy laws 3, 65
Dairy waste 3, 65
Dairy wastes 8, 17, 27, 29, 32, 35, 47, 49, 50, 52, 55, 60,
63, 64, 66, 68, 70, 71, 72, 75, 83, 88, 90, 92, 93, 94, 99,
104, 107, 111, 115, 119, 123, 125, 128, 129
Dairying 65, 102
Decision making 33
Denitrification 88
Density 112
Design 120
Design criteria 26
Diet 89
Digesters 2, 7, 8, 40, 79, 96
Disease control 101
Disease vectors 21, 104, 107
Dissolved oxygen 16
Dry matter accumulation 84, 86
Drying 79
Duration 38
Economic evaluation 39
Economic impact 60, 62, 66, 71
Ecosystems 46
Effects 38
Efficiency 2, 8, 92, 117
Effluents 35
Electric heaters 44
Electrical energy 44
Electricity 44, 77
Energy balance 13, 77
Energy consumption 105
Energy intake 105
Energy recovery 77
Energy requirements 48, 105
Energy sources 7
England 85
Environmental impact 46, 48, 60
Environmental policy 24, 66
Environmental pollution 47
Environmental protection 47
Enzyme activity 57
Equations 10, 54
Equipment 44, 93, 117
Erosion 48
Escherichia coli 123
Estimated costs 63
Eutrophication 29, 73
Evaluation 93
Excretion 13, 100
Expert systems 33
Factor analysis 39
Fans 44
Farm budgeting 62
Farm buildings 44
Farm comparisons 62
Farm dairies 20, 56, 67, 113
Farm indebtedness 63
Farm inputs 98
Farm management 33, 60, 61, 68, 74, 98
Farm planning 26
Farm storage 26, 83
Farmers' attitudes 60
Farmyard manure 98, 103
Farmyards 123
Feces 39, 67, 85, 89
Feces collection 68
Feces composition 91
Federal government 66
Feed intake 100
Feed requirements 48
Feed supplements 35
Feeding standards 89
Feedlot effluent 53, 73
Feedlots 4
Fermentation 103
Fertigation 75
Fertilizer application 70
Fertilizers 75, 82
Festuca 123
Fields 75
Filter beds 123
Filters 72
Financial planning 33
Floors 112, 120
Florida 11, 25, 29, 32, 56, 73, 100, 111
Flow 97
Flushing 49
Fodder crops 44, 56, 118
Forage 5, 86
Forage crops 58
Fuel consumption 8
Fungi 57
Galactose 57
Genetic engineering 48
Georgia 31, 97, 118
Glucose syrups 57
Government organizations 66
Grain 84
Grasses 59
Grazing 59
Great Britain 81
Groundwater 71
Groundwater pollution 18, 60, 90, 108, 110
Habitats 21
Handling 26, 44, 62
Hawaii 91
Health hazards 60
Heat exchangers 44
Heat stability 57
Heating 8
Hereford 35
Hormone supplements 48
Hydraulics 93
Hydrogen sulfide 38
Hydrolysis 57, 85
Hygiene 112
Immobilization 57
Incentives 60
Incidence 12
Industrial wastes 28
Infiltration 99
Information systems 33
Injections 55
Injectors 30
Inland lagoons 73
Inorganic compounds 88
Insect control 20, 42, 43
Instruments 54
Intensive cropping 98
Intensive livestock farming 98
Interviews 60
Investment 26
Iowa 60c
Iron 111
Irrigation water 28
Isolation 67
Italy 54
Juvenile hormones 42
Lactose 57
Lagoons 14, 26, 41, 42, 43, 52, 95, 96, 115
Lakes 73
Larvae 41, 42, 43, 104, 106, 107
Law 63
Law enforcement 11
Leachates 97
Leaching 90, 97
Leaves 51
Legislation 56, 64
Legumes 59
Licenses and permits 11
Linear programming 105
Liners 90
Liquid manures 1, 37, 58, 59, 75, 88
Liquid wastes 96
Literature reviews 89, 99
Litter 19, 112, 113
Liveweight gain 35
Lolium 123
Lolium multiflorum 35
Lolium perenne 35
Loose housing 113
Losses 83, 121
Losses from soil systems 84, 88, 97
Louisiana 5
Low input agriculture 51
Macropore flow 90
Macropores 90
Magnesium 31
Maine 87
Maintenance 78
Maize 91
Maize silage 37, 84
Management 26
Manure spreaders 25, 30
Manure spreading 80, 105, 122
Manures 11, 20, 34, 44, 53, 100, 106, 121, 127
Marketing 5
Maryland 20
Mathematical models 63
Methane 13, 77, 89, 103
Methane production 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 17, 48, 69, 76, 79, 92, 94,
95, 96, 114, 119
Methoprene 43
Michigan 62
Microbial water relations 49
Microhabitats 106
Milk production 44, 48
Milk quality 61
Milking 44
Milking machines 44
Minerals 121
Minimum tillage 31
Minnesota 61
Mississippi 16
Mixed pastures 58
Mixtures 2, 40
Models 36
Morocco 10, 109
Movement in soil 111
Musca domestica 20, 106
Musca sorbens 91
Muscidifurax raptor 106
Nematode control 101
Netherlands 89
New York 20, 70, 106
Newspapers 19
Nitrapyrin 88
Nitrate 84
Nitrate nitrogen 84
Nitrification 16, 88
Nitrogen 13, 31, 34, 37, 48, 55, 84, 85, 87, 89, 93, 98, 108
Nitrogen content 83, 123
Nitrogen economy 98
Nitrogen fertilizers 86
Nitrogen transfer 88
Nitrous oxide 88
No-tillage 105
Nonpoint source pollution 45
North Carolina 95
North Dakota 34
Nutrient availability 34, 55, 84, 111
Nutrient content 84, 97, 111, 123
Nutrient cycles 98
Nutrient excesses 46
Nutrient requirements 89
Nutrient retention 111
Nutrient sources 84
Nutrient uptake 55, 84, 86, 87
Nutrients 72
Nutritive value 35
Odor abatement 26
On-farm processing 19, 22, 129
Ontario 83
Operating time 117
Oregon 6, 11
Organic farming 102
Outbreaks 67
Ova 106
Ovicides and larvicides 52
Oviposition 91
Parasites 5
Parasites of insect pests 106
Pastures 59
Pennsylvania 19, 46, 80, 98
Performance 40, 95, 96
Permeability 99
Persistence 52, 67
Ph 57, 83, 93
Phleum pratense 87
Phosphorus 13, 29, 31, 32, 48, 55, 56, 72, 73, 89, 98, 100,
111, 123
Phragmites australis 115
Phygadeuon 106
Physicochemical properties 90
Pig manure 54, 69
Pig slurry 99
Piggery effluent 36
Pigs 103
Poa 123
Pollutants 46
Pollution 27, 35, 56, 89
Pollution by agriculture 80
Pollution control 24
Ponds 21, 104, 107
Population density 111
Potassium 31, 55, 98, 111
Poultry farming 46
Poultry manure 121
Precipitation 84
Predation 49
Production 46, 93
Production costs 20, 24
Production potential 79
Profitability 63, 66, 101
Programs 60
Protein 40
Protein content 58
Psychrophilic bacteria 103
Pteromalidae 106
Public opinion 60
Pumps 44
Pupae 106
Pyridines 42
Quantitative analysis 79, 98
Questionnaires 60
Rain 97, 99
Recovery 37
Recycling 19, 49, 56
Reduction 105
Regional development 46
Regression 10
Regression analysis 20
Regulation 4
Regulations 11, 62, 66, 81
Reliability 78
Replacement 33
Repletion 8
Requirements 78
Research projects 5
Responses 107
Rheological properties 109
Risk 60, 63
Rivers 23
Rotary hoes 61
Rotations 75, 102
Runoff 4, 53, 64, 97, 99, 123
Ryegrass silage 35
Salmonella 67
Salmonellosis 67
Sampling 111
Sandy loam soils 84
Sandy soils 111
Savings 119
Scheduling 8
Seasonal variation 84
Secale cereale 31
Seed dispersal 127
Seeds 126
Separation 92
Serotypes 67
Settlement 92
Silage 44
Silt loam soils 87
Site requirements 29
Slopes 112
Slurries 88, 121
Small farms 61, 77
Sodium 111
Soil analysis 84
Soil contamination 108
Soil depth 31, 84
Soil fertility 31, 61
Soil injection 37, 88
Soil organic matter 111
Soil ph 111
Soil pollution 32
Soil properties 29
Soil solution 84
Soil testing 70, 111
Soil variability 111
Soil water 99
Soils 34
Solar radiation 49
Solid waste 113
Somatotropin 48
Spalangia 106
Spatial variation 111
Specific heat 10
Spodic horizons 111
Spodosols 111
Ssoil types 29
Statistics 18, 110
Steers 35
Stomoxys calcitrans 20, 106
Storage 8, 38, 44, 85, 90, 108, 121
Straw 112
Streptococcus 123
Structural design 30
Surface layers 111
Surface treatment 87
Surveys 21, 22
Survival 63
Sustainability 51, 75
Synthetic hormones 42
Systems 26, 117
Tanks 83
Temperature 69, 83, 93
Temperature relations 117
Temperatures 103
Texas 4, 11, 18, 63, 64, 110
Thermal conductivity 10
Thickness 112
Time 93
Timing 8
Topography 111
Torula 36
Total solids 10, 100
Transport costs 19
Treatment 2
Triticum aestivum 34
U.S.A. 22, 24, 66, 101
University research 119
Unrestricted feeding 35
Urea 85
Urine 85, 89
Usda 73
Use efficiency 31
Utilization 40
Ventilation 44
Vermont 84, 123
Virginia 60
Volatilization 85, 121
Volume 112
Wales 23, 35
Washington 11
Waste disposal 4, 11, 13, 18, 19, 20, 25, 47, 56, 90, 110,
118
Waste heat utilization 77
Waste products 124
Waste treatment 2, 13, 18, 25, 40, 57, 68, 72, 76, 92, 110,
114
Waste utilization 6, 8, 13, 119
Waste water 15, 39, 52, 64, 67, 115
Waste water treatment 14, 16, 26, 28, 29, 116, 117, 123, 125,
128, 129
Waste waters 21, 29, 41, 42, 43, 49
Wastes 36, 38
Water 107
Water composition and quality 23, 29, 47, 80
Water flow 97
Water management 15
Water pollution 4, 11, 12, 18, 23, 24, 26, 32, 46, 71, 72,
73, 81, 110, 111
Water quality 4, 18, 46, 60, 63, 64, 68, 74, 110, 123
Water reuse 28, 49
Water table 29
Water use 13, 48
Watersheds 46
Weed biology 126
Weed control 61
Weeds 126, 127
Western australia 72
Wetlands 14, 15, 16, 128, 129
Whey 2, 57, 76
Wisconsin 55, 58, 90
Yeasts 36
Zea mays 31, 37, 55, 84
*******************************************************************
SEARCH STRATEGY
Set Items Description
S1 703 DAIR?/TI,DE,ID AND (WASTE? OR EFFLUENT? ? OR
MANURE? ? OR SLURR?)/TI,DE,ID
S2 659 S1 NOT SH=(Q101 OR Q100 OR Q105)
S3 492903 PY=(1988 OR 1989 OR 1990 OR 1991 OR 1992 OR
1993 OR 1994)
S4 194 S2 AND S3
S5 192 RD S4 (unique items)
********************************************************************
NAL DOCUMENT DELIVERY SERVICES
June 1993
United States Department of Agriculture
National Agricultural Library
Public Services Division
Document Delivery Services Branch
Beltsville, Maryland 20705-2351
The National Agricultural Library has established document delivery service
policies for three user categories. They are 1) individuals; 2) libraries,
other information centers, and commercial organizations; and 3) foreign
libraries, information centers, and commercial organizations. Available
services for each user category are given below. For information
on electronic access for interlibrary loan requests, the "Interlibrary Loan"
file.
1) DOCUMENT DELIVERY SERVICES TO INDIVIDUALS
The National Agricultural Library (NAL) supplies agricultural
materials not found elsewhere to other libraries.
Filling requests for materials readily available from other sources diverts
NAL's resources and diminishes its ability to serve as a national source for
agricultural and agriculturally related materials. Therefore, NAL is viewed as
a library of last resort. SUBMIT REQUESTS FIRST TO LOCAL OR STATE LIBRARY
SOURCES PRIOR TO SENDING TO NAL. In the United States, possible sources are
public libraries, land-grant university or other large research libraries
within a state. In other countries submit requests through major university,
national, or provincial institutions.
If the needed publications are not available from these sources,
submit requests to NAL with a statement indicating their
non-availability. Submit one request per page following the
instructions for libraries below.
NAL'S DOCUMENT DELIVERY SERVICE INFORMATION FOR THE LIBRARY
The following information is provided to assist your librarian in
obtaining the required materials.
LOAN SERVICE -- Materials in NAL's collection are loaned only to
other U.S. libraries. Requests for loans are made through local
public, academic, or special libraries.
The following materials are not available for loan: serials (except USDA
serials); rare, reference, and reserve books; microforms; and proceedings of
conferences or symposia. Photocopy or microform of non-circulating
publications may be purchased as described below.
DOCUMENT DELIVERY SERVICE -- Photocopies of articles are available for a fee.
Make requests through local public, academic, or special libraries. The
library will submit a separate interlibrary loan form for each article or item
requested. If the citation is from an NAL database (CAIN/AGRICOLA,
"Bibliography of Agriculture,"
or the NAL Catalog) and the call number is given, put that call
number in the proper block on the request form. Willingness to pay charges
must be indicated on the form. Include compliance with copyright law or a
statement that the article is for "research purposes only" on the interlibrary
loan form or letter. Requests cannot be processed without these statements.
Please read copyright notice below.
CHARGES:
* Photocopy, hard copy of microfilm and microfiche - $5.00 for
the first 10 pages or fraction copied from a single article or
publication. $3.00 for each additional 10 pages or fraction.
* Duplication of NAL-owned microfilm - $10.00 per reel.
* Duplication of NAL-owned microfiche - $5.00 for the first
fiche and $ .50 for each additional fiche per title.
BILLING - Charges include postage and handling, and are subject to change.
Invoices are issued quarterly by the National Technical Information Service
(NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161. Establishing a deposit
account with NTIS is encouraged. DO NOT SEND PREPAYMENT.
Send Requests to:
USDA, National Agricultural Library
Document Delivery Services Branch, ILL, PhotoLab
10301 Baltimore Blvd., NAL Bldg.
Beltsville, Maryland 20705-2351
Contact the Head, Document Delivery Services Branch in writing or
by calling (301) 504-5755 with questions or comments about this
policy.
3) DOCUMENT DELIVERY SERVICES AVAILABLE TO FOREIGN LIBRARIES,
INFORMATION CENTERS AND COMMERCIAL ORGANIZATIONS.
The National Agricultural Library (NAL) accepts requests from
libraries and other organizations in accordance with the national
and international interlibrary loan code and guidelines.
In its national role, NAL supplies copies of agricultural materials not found
elsewhere. Filling requests for materials readily available from other sources
diverts NAL's resources and diminishes its ability to serve as a national
source for agricultural and agriculturally related materials. Therefore, NAL
is viewed as a library of last resort.
Submit requests to major university libraries, national or
provincial institutions or network sources prior to sending
requests to NAL. If the needed publications are not available from these
sources, submit requests to NAL with a statement indicating their
non-availability.
AGLINET -- Requesters in countries with an AGLINET library are
encouraged to make full use of that library and its networking
capabilities. As an AGLINET participant, NAL provides free
document delivery service for materials published in the United
States to other AGLINET participants.
REQUESTS -- Submit requests on the American Library Association
(ALA) or the International Federation of Library Associations and
Institutions (IFLA) interlibrary loan form or via electronic mail
or telefacsimile (see over for more details). Include the complete name of the
person authorizing the request on each form; the standard bibliographic source
which lists the title as owned by NAL; and the call number if the citation is
from an NAL database(CAIN/AGRICOLA, "Bibliography of Agriculture", or the NAL
catalog).
DOCUMENT DELIVERY SERVICE -- Submit a separate completed
interlibrary loan form for each article requested. Indicate
willingness to pay charges on the form, and compliance with
copyright law or include a statement that the article is for
"research purposes only". Requests cannot be processed without
these statements. Please read copyright notice below.
CHARGES:
* Photocopy, hard copy of microfilm and microfiche - $5.00 for
the first 10 pages or fraction copied from a single article or
publication. $3.00 for each additional 10 pages or fraction.
* Duplication of NAL-owned microfilm - $10.00 per reel.
* Duplication of NAL-owned microfiche - $5.00 for the first
fiche and $ .50 for each additional fiche per title.
BILLING - Charges include postage and handling, and are subject to change.
Invoices are issued quarterly by the National Technical Information Service
(NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161. Establishing deposit
account with NTIS is encouraged. Annual billing is available to foreign
institutions on request by contacting NAL at the address below. DO NOT SEND
PREPAYMENT.
Send Requests to:
USDA, National Agricultural Library
Document Delivery Services Branch, ILL, PhotoLab
10301 Baltimore Blvd., NAL Bldg.
Beltsville, Maryland 20705-2351
Contact the Head, Document Delivery Services Branch at (301)
504-5755 with questions or comments about this policy.
ELECTRONIC MAIL ACCESS FOR INTERLIBRARY LOAN (ILL) REQUESTS
June 1993
The National Agricultural Library (NAL), Document Delivery Services Branch
accepts ILL requests from libraries via several electronic services. All
requests must comply with established routing and referral policies and
procedures. The transmitting library will pay all fees incurred during the
creation of requests and communication with NAL. A sample format for
ILL requests is printed below along with a list of the required data/format
elements.
ELECTRONIC MAIL - (Sample form below)
SYSTEM ADDRESS CODE
====================================================
INTERNET. . . . . LENDING@NALUSDA.GOV
EASYLINK. . . . . 62031265
ONTYME. . . . . . NAL/LB
TWX/TELEX . . . . Number is 710-828-0506 NAL LEND.
This number may only be used for
ILL requests.
FTS2000 . . . . . A12NALLEND
OCLC . . . . . . NAL's symbol AGL need only be entered
once, but it must be the last entry in
the Lender string. Requests from USDA
and Federal libraries may contain AGL
anywhere in the Lender String.
SAMPLE ELECTRONIC MAIL REQUEST
=================================================================| AG
University/NAL ILLRQ 231 4/1/93 NEED BY: 6/1/93 |
| |
| Interlibrary Loan Department |
| Agriculture University |
| Heartland, IA 56789 |
| |
| Dr. Smith Faculty Ag School |
| |
| Canadian Journal of Soil Science 1988 v 68(1): 17-27 |
| DeJong, R. Comparison of two soil-water models under |
| semi-arid growing conditions |
| Ver: AGRICOLA |
| Remarks: Not available at IU or in region. |
| NAL CA: 56.8 C162 |
| |
| Auth: C. Johnson CCL Maxcost: $15.00 |
| |
| MORE |
| |
=================================================================
TELEFACSIMILE - Telephone number is 301-504-5675. NAL accepts ILL requests via
telefacsimile. Requests should be created on standard ILL forms and then faxed
to NAL. NAL does not fill requests via Fax at this time.
REQUIRED DATA ELEMENTS/FORMAT
1. Borrower's address must be in block format with at least two blank lines
above and below so form may be used in window envelopes.
2. Provide complete citation including verification, etc.
3. Provide authorizing official's name (request will be
rejected if not
included).
4. Include statement of copyright compliance if applicable.
Please read copyright notice below.
5. Indicate willingness to pay applicable charges.
6. Include NAL call number if available. Contact the Document Delivery
Services Branch at (301) 504-6503 if additional
information is required.
****************************************************************
Photocopy Warning:
NOTICE WARNING CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS
The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs
the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material.
Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are
authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific
conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be "used for any
purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research." If a user makes a
request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess
of "fair use," that user may be liable for copyright infringement.
This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in
its judgement, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright
law.
37 C.F.R. 201.14
****************************************************************
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits
discrimination in its programs on the basis of race, color,
national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political
beliefs, and marital or familial status. (Not all prohibited
bases apply to all programs). Persons with disabilities who
require alternative means for communication of program
information (braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should
contact the USDA Office of Communications at (202) 720-5881
(voice) or (202) 720-7808 (TDD). To file a complaint, write the Secretary of
Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 20250, or call
(202) 720-7327 (voice) or (202) 720-1127 (TDD). USDA is an equal employment
opportunity employer.
Return to Bibliographies
Return to the Water Quality Information Center at the National Agricultural
Library.
Last update: April 27, 1998
The URL of this page is http://www.nal.usda.gov/wqic/Bibliographies/qb9502.html
J. R. Makuch /USDA-ARS-NAL-WQIC/
jmakuch@nal.usda.gov