USDA Economic Research Service Briefing Room
" "  
Link: Bypass USDA Left navigation.
Search ERS

Browse by Subject
Diet, Health & Safety
Farm Economy
Farm Practices & Management
Food & Nutrition Assistance
Food Sector
Natural Resources & Environment
Policy Topics
Research & Productivity
Rural Economy
Trade and International Markets
Also Browse By


or

""

 


 
Briefing Rooms

India: Issues and Analysis

Contents
 

Biotechnology Regulatory Policy
Wheat Market Efficiency in India
Economics of Cotton Quality in India
Economics of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Barriers
Developing Country Chain Retail Study

Biotechnology Regulatory Policy

In the United States and some other parts of the world, agricultural biotechnology has allowed the development of innovative plant technologies that have reduced production costs and improved farmer incomes, enhanced quality attributes desired by end-users, and provided environmental benefits in the form of reduced pesticide use. In India, however, only one of the many available genetically modified (GM) genes—the Bt gene used in cotton—has been approved for cultivation by the Government of India. The adoption of hybrid Bt cotton has contributed to the rapid growth in Indian cotton yields and output since the early 2000s. So far, however, the Government has struggled to build consensus for a more transparent, science-based regulatory framework to govern agricultural biotechnology, thus slowing the development and spread of new GM varieties, compared with efforts of some other countries.

Using funds from USDA's Emerging Markets Program, ERS has contributed to research on various aspects of biotechnology regulation in India, including India's regulatory system for GM crops, the costs of GM crop regulation compared with those of other countries, and the impacts of Bt cotton adoption on seed markets and the use of pesticides in India. Published research from this project includes:

  • The Limits of Intellectual Property Rights: Lessons from the Spread of Illegal Transgenic Seeds in India,PDF file N. Lalitha, C. Pray, and B. Ramaswami, Discussion Paper 08-06, Indian Statistical Institute, Planning Unit, Delhi, March 2008.
  • "Pesticide Use Pattern among Cotton Cultivators in Gujarat," N. Lalitha and B. Ramaswami, in Frontiers of Agricultural Development in Gujarat, R.H. Dholakia, editor, Centre for Management in Agriculture, Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad, 2007, pp 77-98.
  • "India: Confronting the Challenge—The Potential of Genetically Modified Crops for the Poor," B. Ramaswami and C. Pray, in The Gene Revolution: GM Crops and Unequal Development, S. Fukuda-Parr, editor, Earthscan, London, 2007, pp 156-174.
  • "Benefits and Costs of Biosafety Regulation in India and China," C. Pray, J. Huang, R. Hu, Q. Wang, B. Ramaswami, and P. Bengali, in Regulating Agricultural Biotechnology: Economics and Policy, R.E. Just, J.M. Alston, and D. Zilberman, editors, Springer, New York, 2006.
  • Costs and Enforcement of Biotechnology Regulations in India and China,PDF file C. Pray, B. Ramaswami, J. Huang, P. Bengali, R. Hu, and H. Zhang, International Journal of Technology and Globalization, 2006, 2 (1/2), pp137-157.
  • The Cost of Biosafety Regulation: The Indian Experience,PDF file with C. Pray and P. Bengali, Quarterly Journal of Agriculture, 2005, 44 (3), pp. 267-289.

Wheat Market Efficiency in India

Wheat and rice are India's major food staples, and the Government intervenes heavily in production and marketing to help ensure adequate domestic supplies and stable producer and consumer prices. Concern with inefficiency of public food grain operations and the rising cost of the food grain subsidy, including the cost of price support operations, subsidized distribution, and food security stockholding, has stimulated debate on reform of India's longstanding policy interventions in the wheat and rice sectors. An important part of the debate centers on increasing the role of the private sector in wheat and rice marketing but, after decades of government intervention, there has been little private investment in private grain marketing and infrastructure. (For more information on India's food grain subsidy, see the Policy chapter.)

Recent ERS research has focused on the Indian wheat economy, examining the supply, demand, and trade implications of alternative policy reform options. An ongoing study is examining the private wheat marketing system in India, including estimates of wheat marketing costs and the potential for gains in marketing efficiency.

Reference

Indian Wheat and Rice Sector Policies and the Implications of Reform, ERS, Economic Research Report, May 2007.

Top of page

Economics of Cotton Quality in India

India is among the world's largest producers of cotton and textiles, and these sectors are increasingly competitive in global markets following the removal of international trade restrictions that existed under the Multi-Fiber Arrangement, recent reforms to domestic textile policies, and rapid gains in cotton production due to adoption of hybrid Bt cotton. Although higher cotton output has led to sharply higher exports of raw cotton, the demand for more high quality cotton—free from trash and contaminates—from some Indian textile and garment manufacturers has led to more imports of quality cotton from the United States and other suppliers. Reflecting the traditional lack of attention to quality in India's domestic market, the International Textile Manufacturer's Federation has found Indian cottons to be among the most contaminated in the world. Ongoing ERS research is examining the role of quality characteristics in India's cotton market and the extent to which the marketing system is adjusting to quality needs of the increasingly export-oriented textile sector.

References

Growth Prospects for India's Cotton and Textile Industries, ERS, Cotton and Wool Outlook special report, June 2005.

The Forces Shaping World Cotton Consumption After the Multifiber Arrangement, ERS,
Cotton and Wool Outlook special report, April 2005.

Top of page

Economics of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Barriers

Sanitary and phytosanitary barriers to trade have become an important aspect of bilateral and multilateral trade relations in agriculture, increasing the importance of improved information for public and private decisionmakers on the economic implications of these policies for producers and consumers. To demonstrate how the economic implications of SPS policies can be assessed, ERS is developing two comprehensive case study assessments of the economic costs and benefits of SPS policies in U.S.-India agricultural trade. One case study will address the Indian SPS measures affecting imports of U.S. wheat; the other will analyze the U.S. SPS measures governing imports of Indian mangoes.

Indian SPS measures for wheat include zero tolerance limits for two pathogens and an insect pest and limits on weed seeds that currently prevent U.S. wheat shipments to India. Current U.S. concerns with Indian mangoes involve the presence of certain insects associated with mangoes, as well as bacterial and fungal pathogens that require Indian mangoes to undergo irradiation prior to shipment to the United States to mitigate any potential infestations. This research is being conducted in cooperation with Virginia Polytechnic and State University (Virginia Tech) and with funding support from USDA's Emerging Markets Program.

Developing Country Chain Retail Study

Responding largely to the opportunity afforded by rising incomes and urbanization, domestic and multinational chain retailers are expanding their share of food sales in many developing countries, with potentially significant implications for food demand and trade. In some cases, chain retailers introduce supply chain efficiencies that can influence demand patterns by reducing consumer prices for some foods. Because developing country consumers often spend relatively large shares of income on food and are relatively responsive to price changes, significant food cost reductions could trigger economywide impacts on investment, output, and demand.

In other cases, chain retailers may focus on introducing enhancements in food quality, safety, and shopping convenience that appeal particularly to higher income consumers. Finally, there may be direct influences on demand for imported food, as chain retailers strive to improve the diversity, quality, and safety of their offerings; reduce the cost of imported foods due to greater supply chain efficiencies; and provide a more viable platform than do traditional unorganized retailers for promoting new products. To the extent that investment in chain retailing in developing countries strengthens food demand, including demand for imported foods, these investments complement, rather than compete with, efforts to expand U.S. exports.

Ongoing ERS research is examining the implications of modern food retailing for food demand and trade across several developing and transition countries, including India, Brazil, China, Indonesia, and Russia. These countries provide a useful diversity of economic and policy environments for study of the modern chain food retailing phenomenon.

 

For more information, contact: Maurice R. Landes

Web administration: webadmin@ers.usda.gov

Updated date: January 12, 2009