USDA Economic Research Service Briefing Room
" "  
Link: Bypass USDA Left navigation.
Search ERS

Browse by Subject
Diet, Health & Safety
Farm Economy
Farm Practices & Management
Food & Nutrition Assistance
Food Sector
Natural Resources & Environment
Policy Topics
Research & Productivity
Rural Economy
Trade and International Markets
Also Browse By


or

""

 


 
Briefing Rooms

Global Food Markets: International Trade Policy

Contents
 

ERS analyzes data collected by different national (U.S. trade data from the U.S. Department of Commerce) and international organizations (the World Trade Organization, United Nations trade data, and consumer expenditures and other economic indicators from the World Bank) to examine how various trade regulations impact global food markets.

After a period of slow growth during 1996-2002, global trade of bulk, intermediate, and consumer-oriented food products has expanded. Similarly, with the exception of fresh high-value products, U.S. exports of bulk and high value-products products are surging. Even as U.S. exports of high-value products have been growing, however, imports of similar products have remained high, resulting in a negative U.S. trade balance (see ExcelExcel file table). While trends in global food demand promote processed food sales, food trade is impacted both by consumer demand and by coordination between local food manufacturers and retailers.

Global trade of food products

 

U.S. exports of food products

Although there are a number of factors that impact global food trade, trade policy and barriers to international food trade remain an import feature of global food markets. Tariffs on agricultural products (see ExcelExcel file table) are generally higher than on other products. Tariff protection is highly uneven across both countries and products, with many countries having a large proportion of their agricultural tariffs set at low or duty-free levels while maintaining high tariffs, often in excess of 100 percent (referred to as megatariffs), on import-sensitive products. While agreeing to reduce tariffs as required by the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture, World Trade Organization (WTO) member countries tended to cut their tariffs on fully processed products by smaller amounts than on semiprocessed or primary products, a practice known as tariff escalation (see ExcelExcel file table).

In addition to tariffs, WTO member countries use sanitary and phytosanitary and other technical measures to affect the trade flow of food products. WTO members also have a number of instruments at their disposal to further regulate the flow of imports. These include safeguard mechanisms allowed under the WTO Agreement on Safeguards and those allowed under the Special Safeguards (SSG) provision of the Agreement on Agriculture, as well as other contingency protection measures such as anti dumping (AD) and countervailing duties (CVD).

Safeguards are specifically designed to protect domestic industries from injuries due to import surges. If increased imports threaten or cause "serious injury" to a domestic industry, the importing country can impose various remedial measures. Agriculture accounts for more than one-quarter of all safeguard and countervailing duty investigations initiated in the WTO. Anti-dumping measures are used for agricultural products; however, they are not as prevalent as they are in other sectors, such as metals and chemical products.

The Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture also allows those countries that converted nontariff barriers on agricultural commodities to tariffs to make use of Special Safeguards, provided they reserved this right in their tariff schedules. SSGs are activated when either a sudden surge in imports or drop in price exceed preset trigger levels. While 39 WTO members have reserved the right to use SSGs on numerous tariff lines (see ExcelExcel file table), SSG implementations have primarily been on a few commodities by a few countries (see ExcelExcel file table). The right to use special agricultural safeguards will lapse if there is no agreement for continued use in the current Doha Round of WTO negotiations.

Special safeguard investigations by sector

AD and CVD measures are meant to offset "unfair trade" created by foreign firms dumping goods in the international market (AD) or by foreign governments subsidizing exports (CVD). Before a country can impose either AD or CVD measures, they must show that the dumped or subsidized imports cause, or threaten to cause, material injury to the domestic industry. Although the number of CVD investigations has declined somewhat since 1994, AD investigations have risen sharply as the use of trade remedy measures by WTO members has increased. Fully processed agricultural products account for a bulk of the total measures against agricultural products.

Countries using anti-dumping/countervailing duty laws

 

Anti-dumping investigations by product type

 

Countervailing duty investigations by sector

For More Information, See:

 

For more information, contact: Anita Regmi

Web administration: webadmin@ers.usda.gov

Updated date: March 27, 2008