HOT TOPICS >> New survey • Spring will come • Raw milk • Global warming? • Plant potatoes

Ask Our Experts > Green Transportation

These days, we’re all feeling more pain at the pump. Even before summer began in 2008, we’d already seen new records for the price of oil (a few cents short of $140 a barrel) and the price of gas (national average of more than $4 per gallon).

Just as you would suspect, as goes the price of oil, so goes the price of gas. According to the Energy Information Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy, the cost of crude oil accounts for 73 percent of the per-gallon price of gasoline. Here are a few of the many factors behind the recent surge in oil prices:

Supply versus demand. Here in the United States, the world’s most oil-addicted nation, demand has actually declined by about 1 percent. But growth in worldwide demand has more than offset that tiny dip. From 1990 to 2006, oil consumption from China and India has increased 216 percent and 114 percent, respectively. That pace is ahead of production, which is declining, particularly in non-OPEC countries (such as Mexico and Russia) that produce about 60 percent of global supplies. If and when “peak oil” will arrive remains hotly debated, but it’s crystal clear that the era of easy and cheap oil is over.

No new refineries. There hasn’t been a new oil refinery built in the United States since 1976. Why? They take billions of dollars and a decade or more to bring up to speed. With rising demand for alternatives to gas, and growing public pressure about global warming, oil companies are uneasy about investing in new refineries.

The decline of the dollar. Worldwide, oil is traded in dollars. With the greenback on a sharp decline against other currencies, foreign investors can buy more oil, which further fuels the fire of oil prices. As oil becomes more valuable, some investors buy it rather than stocks or property. In short, oil is the new gold.

Big oil “biggers” its profits? In 2007, the top five oil companies combined reported $123 billion in profits. A growing number of people, beyond environmentalists, are clamoring for a variety of responses, such as a windfall tax, an end to federal subsidies that support the oil industry, and/or requiring investment in renewable energy. For its part, big oil says its profits are not that different from other industries and it is doing everything it can to keep gas affordable.

Blame us treehuggers? Oil companies and their friends like to blame rising gas prices on environmental groups and their allies because they resist drilling in public lands such as the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). But America simply can’t drill its way to energy independence: Even the Bush administration’s research states that opening up ANWR would only lower gas prices by 1 cent ... in about 20 years.

What you can do. Realize that globally we still have relatively affordable gas: We pay less than half what British, French and German drivers pay. Nevertheless, the bar for U.S. gas prices has been raised — $4-per-gallon gas is no longer a distant possibility. Some analysts predict oil prices of more than $200 a barrel by 2012, which could translate to $7-per-gallon gas. If you have an SUV and don’t really need it, sell it now. Next time you’re car shopping, choose the most fuel-efficient vehicle you can afford that meets your everyday needs. Don’t fall for dealer gimmicks that pay for your gas when you buy a gas guzzler — you won’t save money over the long term. And support higher fuel economy standards, increased investment in public transportation and a national, urgent emphasis on developing renewable energy.

— John Rockhold, managing editor

72 Comments

  • okfrank 1/9/2009 11:33:34 PM

    willia79 I enjoy your input even if it is heavy-handed. I have learned a lot from your comments. If you're still following you put down Hydrogen as too expensive to isolate and kind of skipped the comment about nuclear energy to create more cheap hydrogen. I have read that it is a viable cheap way to extract hydrogen if done on a large scale of course and that by building nuclear facilities for that sole purpose we could achieve competitive results. Now with frequent breaktrhroughs in science the nuclear waste issue could eventually be solved by new and more efficient ways to access hydrogen. Let's hope. Because you were right we can't use food sources for fuel if people are starving. Michael McCarthy was onto something but probably should not put windmills and Nuclear energy in the same sentence. How many wind farms would you need to equal the power of one nuclear energy plant?

  • homefried1 11/14/2008 12:47:08 PM

    Gas went up because OPEC and the other arabs wanted Republicans to lose the election.

  • Russ Ackerman 9/5/2008 11:28:30 AM

    Let's face it. The American dollar controls all other currencies. When the Federal Reserve prints more money to "help" a failing economy they are actually devalueing our dollar and the rest of the world even more. The Federal Reserve is NOT a part of the US Government but a private organization of bankers profiting off of our pain. They are acting against the constitution and the money they print is really NOT legal currency in the United States. We were illegally taken off the gold standard which is our monetary system under the constitution. The Federal Reserve is actually the cause of inflation and our failing economy!

    Don't believe me, "Google" Federal Reserve and do your own research.

  • Fornell 9/1/2008 9:10:43 AM

    I very much agree with Jim Price although my memory does not hold such great examples. The price of gasoline is relevant to the price of everything else. We just don’t like it. Do you really think that you should be able to fill up your tank for twenty bucks? Then drive around whenever and wherever you want and then just fill up the tank again for twenty bucks? That would be like stealing (getting something for nothing). If that were the case your mortgage payment should be $500.00 a month and the total at the grocery checkout $75.00.

  • chrissyl. 8/30/2008 12:11:27 AM

    Next time you pull up to a takeout window for that $2.50 8oz cup of coffee, complain about it and tell them its highway robbery. They would like to tell you "then don't buy it". Then don't. Go put that $2.50 in your car to go where ever you are going. Stop complaining and do something small that makes a difference.

  • JIM PRICE 8/27/2008 12:34:32 AM

    Hey I forgot to mention the real cause of why you can't afford gas or food or the mortgage or any thing else. Each time your annual income went up you got bounced into a higher tax bracket. Your government took more and more. Did you ever ask how much tax is taken for gasoline. Your government takes 4 or 5 times more than the oil companies make on each gallon. Taxes are supposed to be voluntary but when did you write a check to the IRS or any other government agency with a self satisfied smile on your face.

    Think about that for a minute and stop crying about how expensive gas is.

    -------------jim-----------

  • JIM PRICE 8/27/2008 12:20:01 AM

    When I was 10 years old in 1953 I distinctly remember buying a loaf of bread for 21 cents. I got mad when coke went from 5 cents to 6 cents. That meant I had to find an extra bottle to cash in (1 penny deposit on each bottle). I am sure that gasoline was selling for 21 cents a gallon. One hundred dollars a week was pretty good wages when minimum pay was 75 cents an hour. 1 hundred dollars times 50 weeks works out to $5000 per year. Some one said we should swap wheat for oil. Well in 1953 bread cost two silver dimes and gasoline cost two silver dimes.

    Today, with the silver market so high, gasoline still costs two silver dimes per gallon and guess what? A loaf of bread still costs two silver dimes. Today a decent wage is 100 thousand a year, your car gets 30 mpg instead of 15 mpg.

    The net value of bread is the same. The net value of gasoline has doubled because you can go twice as many miles on a gallon of gas. The only thing that changed is you don't have silver dimes and you don't have gold dollars but you do need more and more of the pretty green pieces of paper that Uncle Sam keeps printing.

    Incidently, gasoline doesn't have lead in it anymore. Considering all these points, the car producers and the gasoline producers are doing a good job. Four dollar gasoline that takes your car twice as far is a bargain.

    Your Mint keeps on printing more and more paper. I think that is not a bargain.

    ------------jim--------

  • len buckholtz 8/26/2008 10:04:48 AM

    ahh gas prices. fun thing.
    supply & demand.
    so WHERE is the demand so high that prices have soared?

    greed; we have an undercurrent of 20,000,000 or so illegals in the usa. half are adults, and about half have cars.
    5,000,000 cars that USUALLY would not be on the road, but are now. and if each of them uses say, 10 gal a week, we have FIFTY MILLION GALLONS A WEEK being used, along with the smog, the rubber that abrades into the air, the antifreeze and other chemicals that are being used up, ad infinitum.

    there you go.

    the smog & the gas prices and the prices of other 'commodities' all part & parcel of the greed of the foreign govt deporting their own people to the usa because they are lower class & uneducated/ unskilled.

    and americans are too dumb to see it.

    but, tmen does see it.
    cool, huh!

  • Myra 8/24/2008 9:36:31 PM

    To All:

    If you want to blame big oil, then consider that the largest oil companies in the world are not in the US, Britain, Germany, Mexico, etc. The largest oil companies in the world are governments in the middle east where gas is 25 cents per gallon. Those are the governments that have finally figured out they make more money with high oil prices than they did at $8.00 per barrel. Yes ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips, and others benefit from the high prices, but consider they pay the same price for diesel as everyone else. The cost of diesel to drill a new well has more than doubled in the past year. I work in the oilfield and see daily what the cost increases have been. Until recently I drove 150 miles one way when I went to work. Many of us working in the oil field don't have the luxury of living close to where we work. My cost to go to work almost tripled in the past year. What I charge for my services followed suit. That drives the prices even higher.

    If we would have had the stomach from the 70's on to pursue alternative energy sources we wouldn't be in this shape. Instead it was easier for everyone to go back to oil and natural gas when prices came down. We've created our own mess and now all anyone wants to do is cry about it. Now that I finally own my house and land I intend to bite the hand that feeds me. I can't wait to get started on my solar and wind projects.

    The debate here is the common one. Those who defend the prices and those who rant and rave about the oil companies. Placing blame does no good. Punishing ExxonMobil and others does no good. Start trading a bushel of wheat for a barrel of oil and see what happens to the prices. That will get in the pockets of the "Big Oil Companies" that count, Saudia Arabia, Russia, etc.

  • Linda 8/23/2008 10:31:25 PM

    aaron
    Not everyone has the ability NOT to use gas. I take care for my mom who has a disability. I can not take her on my bike, bus or train, she has to be driven. When they have cars that can drive over 100 miles on one charge I will switch until then I will fill up the car I have.

  • aaron 8/23/2008 3:15:38 PM

    What I find so ironic is that everyone views gasoline as an essential commodity (like food). I have lived my entire life without spending money at a gas station (except for snacks). I've ridden my bicycle to school, to work, to vacations, and to the hardware store.
    The reason that people are in this pickle is because of 100 Americans have spent 100 years consuming a NON-RENEWABLE resource. This means the oil you use in your car can never be used for an ambulance, a construction truck, or a fire truck. Gasoline is going to keep getting more expensive and parents are just beginning to reach the point of having to tell the young ones "Sorry you can't go out, we've used up all the gas."
    So with all due respect, please don't call yourself an environmentalist if you're still spending money at the gas station.

  • r klaumann 8/23/2008 10:19:12 AM

    i think people forget that it was 911 that started the war, when a no name person came to usa and gave us a bloody nose on our own land , and the hundreds of people that have died because of this person , it dosnt matter who was in office it was all comeing to a head and was going to happen ..... it's real simple i dought that 2 out of 10 people in the states could stop and think on how to grow there own food, hunt, fish, to live we as a nation have become lazy and forgot the simple things in life as farming, self suffiant life style we have become dependnt on others for our food and energy time to wake up and smell the roses people we need to stand up and stop big oil and others from controling are lifes and take are freedom of life back and get back to are roots but hey thats just this country boys opnion shrugs shoulders ?????

  • JIM PRICE 8/22/2008 4:27:16 PM

    Why do hydrogen fuel proponents say that the exhaust from a hydrogen fueled engine produces pure h2o as the exhaust? If the source of the oxygen was pure O2 then I would agree.
    But if the source is atmospheric O2 (18-21 %) + atmospheric
    nitrogen (78 - 80 %)then when you burn hydrogen in air inside an internal combustion engine the exhaust is nox+h2o.
    The last time I checked that combination was nitric acid in vapor form. Do we really need more acid rain? Can someone tell me if I am right or wrong?

  • Richard Burk 8/22/2008 2:40:47 PM

    Another aspect...

    The US should end the concept of allowing the oil companies to put their oil up on the commodities market and force them to keep it in house and thus keep fair market prices the norm, which would cause the price of oil to drop back down to the ~$30/barrel range. Oil companies would still be able to make their $10billion/quarter and 9% profits but the consumer would not be penalized by a subjective trading system that trades on fears rather than logic and rational thought.

    Then the US could institute higher gas taxes like most other advanced countries in the EU and elsewhere and then allow that tax to be used purely as incentives to small companies ( < 150 employees ) and academic institutions to come up with alternative solutions to resolve our energy needs in a both renewable and sustainable way.

    Why arent solar thermal solutions in more use? Why dont we have several 100x100 mile square PV arrays around the US producing all of our energy needs? Why dont we use solar thermal chimney solutions to generate power? Why dont we have a program to replenish our trees so that folks can use heat to warm their homes? Why dont we improve building codes so that homes are built with maximum insulation and adequate air flow so that homes require no energy other than perhaps passive solar to heat and cool their homes?

    If we ran our nation off of renewable and sustainable fuels then likely we would already be driving electric cars for our regular in town commuting needs and only mostly "rent" cars or other transportation for non-local transportation needs. Better city, business, communication, and transportation planning would go a long way to reducing our energy needs as well as improving our ailing economy.

  • Richard Burk 8/22/2008 2:27:57 PM

    continued....

    But they figured out that open market trading would make them so much more money, and hence the $10 billion profits a quarter for ExxonMobil.

    Why then can the oil giants report such a low profit of 9%? Well they know how to sell high and buy low on the open markets. They have entire trading operations that do this everyday. Likely they actually make a greater profit because of knowing how to trade so well versus keeping everything in house. If they kept everything in house then they would be risking monopolistic prosecution. This allows them to avoid such prosecution. Otherwise keeping it inhouse and selling it at such prices today, then they would really be making alot of profit ($100's of billions per quarter). Instead they are able to keep their profit margin donw around 9% which is better than what well managed bank would earn (1%) or a well managed grocery store (1%).

  • Richard Burk 8/22/2008 2:22:21 PM

    Another aspect...

    The profits that oil companies make is reported only on the parts that they have to report to the US IRS. They make hand over fist more when you look at the world wide company.

    Once an oil well is sunk and producing, it is essentially a fixed maintenance cost per well. The transportation and distribution remain constants as well. Oil companies are so large that they trade currency on the open market 10s and 100s of millions of dollars at a time. They actually make money on the markets with currency trading, a tidy profit I might add. So essentially they are able to negate the cost of the transporation of the oil locally to world wide distribution. The world wide distribution is what speculators on the open market are really buying. That oil is transported to the refineries around the world. Once it reaches the local transportation to the refineries then the oil must be sold. You cant actually buy oil on the open market and then hold on to it for years. You have to sell it. That is why it is a commodity and futures market. Now the refinery buys the oil from the local transporation or from the world wide distributor (depending upon the refinery and its physical location). They refine it and sell it to distributors that then send it to gas stations around the nation. Like car dealers, they dont mark down the transportation charge the closer to the refinery the gas station is. Otherwise everybody would live along the coast lines and very few people would live rurally unless they could afford a very high premium on the cost of the gas.

    Out of this process, the high cost of oil comes after pumping the oil and before refining it. Oil companies purposefully wanted oil to be traded on the open market because they knew that they could make much more money off of it that way. It didnt always get traded. It used to be kept in house and the oil companies owned the oil from oil well to gas pump. But they figured out that open market t

  • Richard Burk 8/22/2008 2:03:59 PM

    Another aspect...

    When you have people running our government that believe that government is bad then the result is bad government. With the Republicans (I consider the Clintons as republican in policies as well as Obama) running the executive branch unimpeded except for Jimmy Carter since 1968, is it no wonder that the good government aspects started by FDR through Johnson have been lost? When you have people that believe in good government running government, you will receive a good result. When those running government dont believe in good government, you have terrible and potentially devastating results. We, the US public, are reaping what we sow.

    Further, our US foreign policies going back to Kennedy and likely back into the 1800's have been equally terrible and devastating. Starting wars with countries because be can, fighting wars using the most terrifying and devastating technologies available or inventing them; we once again reap what we sow.

    Further declaring that certain countries are an axis of evil doesnt endear the US to the rest of the world. Standing up and saying either your with us or against us is terrible policy. Essentially the neutral nation of Switzerland became an enemy state because they remained neutral given our fabulous foreign policies and cowboy justice.

    Torturing prisoners and then denying we do it with evidence in hand that we do, why the hell would anybody want to give us a break on the cost of oil. Why would they want to trade for oil in US Dollars if they could avoid it?

  • neosapiens 8/22/2008 1:53:32 PM

    Teddy, The profits of the oil companies are simple to understand: The oil they produce domestically costs them next to nothing (thanks to the generous taxpayer), and they mark up the oil that the do buy and sell it all for as much as their customers are willing to pay. The gap between domestic cost and world market price is pure gravy. And, if you think about it, any business that sets a profit margin of say, 10% of sales, will have triple the dollar amount of profits if the price triples as long as the profit margin stays the same, so even the profits on the oil they buy goes up when the price of oil goes up.

    Of course, there is an argument there for recovering the subsidies that they received, but that's a slippery slope. I'd rather get that money back with a carbon tax than to set a precedent like punishing businesses for success. I happen not to be really comfortable with the fat profits of the oil companies, but I respect the way the system works. Going forward, there's no excuse for subsidies to fossil fuel businesses.

  • Richard Burk 8/22/2008 1:50:03 PM

    Another aspect, around 1996-2000 oil on the seas went from about a 60 day supply down to a 21 day supply. I dont know what the supply on the seas is today, but as the supply on the seas shrinks the cost of oil naturally increases because the supply is smaller.

    Further with the booming economy of China and of India as well as other developing third world economies ramping up their usage of oil, and with world oil availability remaining essentially stagnant for the last few years, the cost of oil would naturally go up as a result.

    Why is there an assertion of "peak" oil? Simple oil fields go dry. As each oil field goes dry there is less oil for the world to consume. Sure we can explore and drill in more places around the world, that takes time and money as those locations that are currently tapped were the easy locations. The remaining locations are more costly in terms of finding and drilling. Hence cost goes up.

    There are the oil shale deposits in the US that could be tapped in the upper mid-west and western US that contain more "oil" by conservative estimates that would dwarf the oil remaining around the world that is barely being scratched. There are new technologies that are making the cost of capturing that oil competitive or even cheaper than prices we pay today. Oil companies own these rights but arent going after them. Why? The technologies are being proven every day and improved upon everyday in Alberta, Canada with their oil sands technologies. The very same technologies and better could be applied to our oil sands and allow us cheap energy for generations.

  • Richard Burk 8/22/2008 1:38:47 PM

    Reasons for high gas.

    1. Nixon brokered all oil be traded using the US Dollar only around the world, therefore oil is naturally pinned to the US Dollar making the US Dollar a "global" currency. That way he could take us off the gold standard. With Iraq and Saddam selling oil for non-US Dollars, that was an affront to the US Dollar as it automatically began devaluing the US Dollar. Now Iran runs their own Oil Bourse and trades mostly with Euro's, thus the talk of invading Iran once Iran announced that they would do this. The talk of war with Iran increased as time drew closer. Once Iran announced and has opened their trading floor, oil prices per barrel practically doubled from $70/barrel to 140/barrel. The US Dollar has a corresponding though unequal devaluation. The world is still trying to figure out what it means. With Iran and China as oil trading partners and a 30+ year oil deal worked out, China will continue to receive "cheap" oil and likely is able to trade using its own currency which I believe is still pegged to the US Dollar, though the market does seek to adjust the value of Chinese currency. I believe that Venezuela is about to or else has decided to trade oil for non-US Dollars which is why there is talk of attacking them or assassinating their leader.

    That is one aspect.

  • Carl Street 8/22/2008 12:56:47 PM

    In 1948 gold was $35 an ounce and gas was 18 cents a gallon so one ounce of gold bought roughly 200 gallons of gas

    In 2008 gold is $950 an ounce and gas is $4.75 a gallon so one ounce of gold still buys roughly 200 gallons of gas

    BTW, the figures are similar for nearly every other commodity...

    That's what I like about mathematics -- it cuts right through all the B.S. Anyone who still believes the government is NOT debauching the currency MUST be an illiterate "graduate" of government schools.

  • ccm989 8/22/2008 9:55:04 AM

    OPEC recently announced that it was cutting oil production and Russia has invaded Georgia. Both events have triggered a $5 per barrel spike in the price of oil. It is also clear that drilling more in the US is neither a cheap nor immediate solution to the energy problem. We need a source of energy that is clean, reliable and not located in politically hostile areas of the world. A related Mother Earth News article suggests solar thermal energy. It sounds very do-able! And solar thermal energy can be done on a large scale to produce megawatts of energy the whole country demands. However, demand for energy and all natural resources will continue to skyrocket unless immediate steps to stop the booming US population increase are taken.
    The US Census Bureau recently said they estimated the population would increase by 100,000,000 in America by 2039. That is only 30 years away. What are we doing to control this cancerous growth? If the US Census Bureau is right and we do nothing, we are all in very big trouble. Remember the movie Solent Green? We need population control put in place now before it is too late.

  • willia79 8/20/2008 3:09:30 PM

    RW Caremore,

    I know a great deal more about the topic than you could surmise. Oil is in much greater demand in countries that are modernizing like China and India. This is the first time in History, get this now moron, History that the price of oil is being driven by demand and not supply disruptions. All other high oil price regimes in history were driven by supply disruptions not increased demand. The perfect storm you speak of is true. I chose to point out something that many of you red diaper doper babies choose to ignore is the fact that oil all around the world is traded in US dollars. Fact, plain and simple, put that in your hippy peace pipe and smoke it. If the value of a dollar goes down then the price of oil has to go up. When I first started working for BP in Alaska oil was less than $30 per barrel. The US dollar was worth more than the EURO and 1.40 Canadian. The increased demand has driven the price of oil up. but about 40 % of that price can be attributed to devaluation of the us dollar. Frankly that is the only thing that the US government has any measure of control over is the value of the currency, and they have chosen to turn their back on it. Speculations is driven by the fact that traders know that the US dollar ain't worth squat so they hedge their money into something that is appreciating not depreciating. Look at the price oil and the price of gold, speculators have driven both way up due to weak dollar policy.

    I know all too well about all the major oil fields in decline. I am a GEOLOGIST who works in oil EXPLORATION, and development. Every barrel of oil that comes out of the ground is one that is not coming back. No I did not sign a petition to eliminate water from the atmosphere you double digit IQ lennonist.

    Toss out names like McCarthy all you want but those that ask the government to control commodity prices are asking for Communism. Slice it any way you want it Commy Caremore, still communism. Go ba

  • willia79 8/20/2008 2:51:08 PM

    Teddy boy,

    Of course I do not believe everything our goverment does gets us in trouble but when it comes to our government trying to control energy and commodity prices it usually ends bad. Gas price fixing of the 70's, sure it was cheaper but you couldn't get it half the time. I'm all for alternative energy to come in and compete with oil but not under massive tax payer funded subsidies. Let it stand on its own legs, not the backs of tax payers. I wish the free market set interest rates in the US but we have a dictatorship that sets them. The fed answers to know one. Would you agree that we are experiencing a severe bought of inflation? This has been brought about by ridiculously low interest rates, making money almost free to borrow. This is the cause of the current housing fiasco, high oil prices, high food prices etc. What did our government do when the stock market fell hard due to the housing fall out, they lowered rates to help the stock market further fueling inflation. We have a very flawed mentality in this country when it comes to central bank management. The goal of any central bank is to try and ensure price stability by fighting inflation but the fed has turned it's back on inflation and we the people pay for it with higher gas prices, food etc. When the government reports the inflation rate they remove food and energy. Neither Democrat nor Republican gets it either. Ron Paul and a few other marginalized individuals get it but the media machine just buries them.

  • willia79 8/20/2008 1:58:46 PM

    Teddy Boy and all other delusional people,

    First off I do not think that the Fed should control interest rates but they do and I can't do much about it other than voice my opinion, and yes Ron Paul is right about a great many things when it comes to our broken fiscal policy. The Fed Manipulates interest to try and manipulate our economy. The lower the interest rates to make more money available to the market. Every time interests are lowered the value of the dollar decreases. Interest rates are not the only factor affecting the value of currency on the open market but it is a very big factor. If anyone has paid attention to the value of the US dollar in recent days it has appreciated against almost all foreign currencies to the tune of about 10 %. When oil hit is max of almost $150 per barrel the US $ was only 0.63 Euro. Now oil (8-20-2008) is $115 per barrel and the US dollar is 0.69 Euro. If the dollar was worth what is was before Bush took office (1 to 1)then the price of oil would be around $65 to $70 a barrel. Weak dollar equals high prices of all imports, strong dollar equals cheaper imports.

  • Linda 8/16/2008 2:39:18 AM

    Wow, so much info yet (any info is to be taken with a grain of salt that it's true and all facts, pros and cons are given) so many opinions and insults on something that is NOT as simple and one sided as people keep saying and wanting it to be, it goes way deeper then that. Information seems to mostly see one side and getting a straight forward and informed answer is a toss up from any angle,lol. I'm fairly sure when the writer said "Here are a FEW of the MANY factors behind the recent surge in oil prices:" It's because there are NO simple answers to this question.
    ..shipping food, having cars on the road, motorcycles, boats, yahts, trucks, the more things produced, spent, used ...inflation, consumption, supply..demand on EVERYTHING, housing, toys and more toys, convenience, fast food, health issues, longer life ...taxes, population, etc.............................................
    I was born in 1972 and was raised by a single Mom who worked 3 jobs at one time and 2 most of the time to feed, cloth and put a roof over our head, gas to drive to work every day was food from our family (and for those who may say/think something, she couldn't get help she worked 2 to 3 jobs so unless she wanted to quit she didn't qualify for help, idiotic, yes but it was 1972) Maybe it's just now effecting you, but gas, and food prices have always effected my family and plenty of families who have struggled to survive.
    My suggestions:::Choose to use your feet, and/or alternatives (covered bikes/electric bikes, cars w/ solar/ wind options) if possible as much as you can because it is not going away and it will get worse {don't let people fool you it is getting worse NO matter who is in office}
    Buy local, grow if you can and walk as much as possible
    http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=6440
    was made in 2006, this is not a new subject, fear, concern
    Cut your spending and wasting and learn to grow and use tools to build things you

  • teddyboy 8/8/2008 5:07:49 PM

    Wow. Lots of interesting angles and stories and theories here...yet no one has an answer to the very simple question of why oil company After-Tax Profits are so incredibly, obscenely high. I maintain it is simply that since they have no real competition, they CAN and DO make allllll the money they want. I would - wouldn't you or any other capitalist American? Of course we would. It's a no-brainer - but it's still just as obscene - it's just not illegal, that's all. They need Real Competition from Alternative Energy already.

  • al 8/3/2008 6:31:25 PM

    I love this discussion,some rude people but most are searching for a solution. The profits from the oil companies are big because the oil companies are BIG. if I make a penny a million times its a bunch of money. The oil companies handle enough product that insures they will make a pocket full of loot,get over it.
    That doesn't solve anything. in the seventies the government in its wisdumd initiated a lot of policies issued from an "energy Czar". 1...no oil was to be sold above the average price per barrel. Oil was well-head priced,some was cheap because it wes easy to get,some was expensive because it wes hard to pump,when the price of oil was frozen all oil above the average became unprofitable to pump=capped wells
    2..Oil comming in was sold at a reasonable profit while the price of domestically produced oil was frozen. As the price of oil went up it quickly became WAY less profitable to pump oil instead of purchase oil=more capped wells
    3..government bungles with production mandates,storage errors,gave us dumping rumors and wouldn't unload tankers rumors,but those stories can be delt with in a history book.
    ...Refineries were available on american soil at 2000%+ capasity. the freezing of exploration and the non appearance of new oil fields cost oil companies $$$ when a hurricane hit the gulf coast and erased the refineries, the oil companies sold them to the insurance industry and moved on,now we need them!
    we need a change, I think the oil companies need to be a part of it. They have the gas stations in place,they have the money to impliment change. and if you totally eleminate gasoline the will be selling something to you instead,batteries,hydrogen refills,natural gas,coal=somthing.
    we are on the brink of change,hydrogen storage breakthroughs, electric generation breakthroughs etc. Somthing is going to come along and the bright boys will still make a profit from it. the free enterprise system works. lets continue to pour pmney into res

  • Anti Elvis 8/2/2008 8:11:49 PM

    Blaming "Big Oil" is just another excuse or witch hunt. Oil companies don't set prices, traders do. The high profits from oil companies are mostly due to good luck. Most of the worlds reserves were discovered 40 years ago when oil was a dollar a barrel. They're now selling and the price is high. Not much different than you buying a house in 1970 for 10K and selling it today for 500K. Good luck or good investing ?

    There is no collusion to oil prices, it's demand. Demand has fallen recently..and prices have dropped. We are RUNNING out of oil and everyone in the oil industry knows it. Just the general public doesn't

    Someone mentioned Peak Oil. Yes, we are there. I might suggest reading "the Long Emergency" from Kunstler. That'll change your mind.

  • Michael McCarthy 7/29/2008 10:50:49 AM

    You can't measure oil profits by the total profit. You must, to be fair, measure it by profit margin which is a paltry 9%. No, I'm not a fan of oil but at least these guys delivered this precious product that allows us to convert to hydrogen without shortages. This is amazing in itself considering world demand for oil. I hated the shortages of the 70's. So, we have work to do. Let's put up some windmills and nuclear power plants to generate electricity to electrolyze water in hydrogen. It is the obvious answer. Quiet clean cars will be the result. And no one will bitch because you're driving an SUV.

  • teddyboy 7/21/2008 9:10:17 PM

    Ronn, I agree that we need to refrain from the sarcasm. 'Nuff said. Now, I KNOW that the taxes are brutal - Americans are some of the most taxed people on the planet (sit sometime and just make a list of ALL the things we pay the government for - whatever they're called....taxes, fees, licenses, etc., etc., etc. - and you'll discover that it's close to 60% of our income. Ouch.) And honestly, I wouldn't mind so much if these taxes weren't such a BAD VALUE. But that's another story for another time. The bottom line on Big Oil is the profits they put in their pocket AFTER TAXES. That's the part that makes me squirm....their unmitigated GREED. And like I always say: thanks to our free market system, I'd probably do the same thing. But THE ONLY ANSWER is COMPETITION from alternative energy (as Mr. Gore so eloquently put it). They have no reason to lower the price if there is no competition for their product. And yes, oil is used for MOST products we enjoy - I know that. I just think it shouldn't be used for fuel. The time for gasoline is past. Time to be replaced by a cheaper, cleaner, safer, and home-made fuel.

  • Tom O'Brien 7/21/2008 2:37:41 PM

    OIL IS TRADED IN DOLLARS AND THE DOLLAR HAS DROPPED IN VALUE GREATLY AGAINST OTHER CURRENCIES IN THE WORLD. THAT IN AND OF ITSELF ALONG WITH THE INCREASED DEMAND FROM CHINA AND INDIA, IS THE REASON THAT OIL HAS GONE UP IN PRICE SO MUCH. And its a darn good thing too. Because we need this wakeup call while we still have 40 years to take corrective measures. And wean ourselves on oil.

  • Ronn 7/20/2008 8:20:51 PM

    Is there any particular reason some of you folks feel the need to insult those who give their opinions? Honestly, it's attitudes such as that that have caused our country to lose focus on fixing our problems to fixing the blame for our problems.

    The oil companies make huge profits, but have you ever researched how much the government earns in taxes?? The government earns more in taxes, cradle to grave, on a gallon of oil than the oil companies make in end profits. No elected official will tell you they're cutting taxes to allow a break in oil costs, only that they want to tax the oil company profits. (This will only lead to higher gas prices at the pump.)

    Yes the oil companies earn huge profits, it cannot be denied, it's how our country's free market works. If you don't want to pay the price, then not only should you cut back on your driving, but cut purchases on products made from petroleum based products. Let me tell you friend; that would be WAY more items than you may realize.

  • teddyboy 7/17/2008 9:53:38 AM

    Can someone PLEASE offer some Common Sense reason, considering the whining the oil industry is doing, WHY their AFTER-TAX QUARTERLY PROFITS are so obscenely high (Exxon posts an average of $10 BILLION EVERY T H R E E M O N T H S - for YEARS!)? I suggested that it's simply "because they can." They have us where they want us and are making the ultimate profit power play - and you and I would do the same thing, greedy stinkers that we are. Might it possibly be that simple?? What do YOU think?

  • RW Caremore 7/17/2008 8:55:02 AM

    Willa79 It's knuckleheads like you that give environmentally conscious people a bad name. Your uninformed ramblings make you sound like some "I'll follow any cause" idiot incapable of independent thought. Did you sign the petition to eliminate dihydrogen oxide from the environment?

    Socialism, Communism, ffs is your name McCarthy??? You sound like you support Ron Paul with your ridiculous notion that the devalued dollar is the root of evil and the cure for the worlds ills. Here's a clue, the dollar is not the all controlling currency it once was and the US has no lock on technology and innovation. You probably started thinking like Ron Paul because he supports legalized marijuana right? admit it.

    The problem with oil prices has, only to a small degree, issues rooted in the geopolitical arena. The problem is considerably more complex than perhaps your mind can comprehend. High oil and gas prices are the result of a metaphorical "perfect storm" of circumstances. First (consumption), people in India and China don't all walk behind oxen these days, they are actually driving vehicles and heating homes with fossil fuels (I know, how dare they?). Second, supply and demand. Depending on your position on "Peak Oil", we have either reached or are very close to having consumed 1/2 the earth's oil. You should be aware with your extensive IQ that most of the current oil fields operate at near production capacity. You can only suck so much from the ground in a given day. So when the world wants 100 barrels and you can pump 99.3 barrels, someone doesn't get what they wanted. This brings us to the third phase of Perfect Storm..... Speculation. This is one area where I'll let your little conspiracy theory mind run wild. Just like the folks at ENRON, we have oil speculators, driving oil futures through the roof for no other reason than good old fashioned capitalist greed, to make a buck off the opportunit

  • ccm989 7/16/2008 10:52:40 AM

    Gas will continue to be expensive as we have reached the Peak Oil situation where all the known and easy to get oil has already been extracted. Consequently the price for oil will only go up. Folks, we can't drill our way out of this one. Drilling for oil in ANWR will provide oil to the Chinese not to us Americans so I don't see why we should contribute to GLOBAL WARMING and destroy our fragile eco system to make the Chinese richer!
    T. Bone Pickens has a plan to use Wind Power to replace Natural Gas as a home heating source which is fine but since Mr. Pickens personally contributed $3 million to Swift Boat John Kerry I can't trust Mr. Pickens to do the right thing. But I believe alternate energies are a good idea, not a perfect solution, but a step in the right direction.
    The SOLUTION to the energy problem must come from us, the American people, not from Big Oil whose only goal is to line its own pockets regardless of the the expense to this planet and its inhabitants.

  • teddyboy 7/15/2008 12:12:09 AM

    willia79, you write that everything our government gets involved in it messes up. Yep, there's a handful of idiots in government that certainly shouldn't be in charge of a hot dog stand. But perhaps you didn't mean the 401k program, or Medicare, or police officers, or firefighters, or the postal service, or national defense, or rubbish removal, or road building, or water/sanitation systems, or air/space travel, etc. You must of meant the OTHER things the government gets involved in, right? Furthermore, I always thought that WE were the government (what a bunch of screw-ups we must be!). I guess I was wrong. But seriously, competition from alternative energy will bring down the price of gasoline, not drilling for more oil - doing more of what doesn't work doesn't make it work any better.

  • rustydragon 7/14/2008 6:48:44 PM

    if oil rules the world: the country with the last oil field producing will then rule the world. should we drill domesticaly or import? let me think...."last country standing with oil rules the world"...hmmm, russia? venazuela? arabia? USA? who do YOU want? I say let's import oil at any price --- until everyone else is out --- and learn to live with it, for our own survival.

  • teddyboy 7/14/2008 3:47:58 PM

    willia79,
    I must say I'm interested in having a better understanding of your idea that raising the interest rate would lower the price of oil. Perhaps...but doesn't that smack of the government intervention/control that you eschew? Can't we just let market forces just do their job?

  • teddyboy 7/14/2008 3:42:03 PM

    willia 79,
    You sound irritated. I didn't say Exxon et. al control the price of oil, which I know is rising - this is not news. I'm talking about how the oil companies are pricing their products, mainly gasoline, for maximum profits - which in a free society they SHOULD do. The most glaring fact I'm aware of is how oil companies are managing to have AFTER-TAX PROFITS of MANY Billions of Dollars - Every Three Months. Perhaps you have a better explanation of why this is? I thought mine was quite simple. "Because They Can." They can and do charge whatever they'd like to charge. We don't need socialism to fix this problem: oil companies simply need to have some Serious Capitalist Competition - and exactly what that is, I don't know yet. I do know that, as a businessman, and I would do exactly what Big Oil is doing - keeping costs as low as possible, and profits as high as possible. I do not at all hold their feet to the fire simply for doing what they are designed to do: Make Money. HOWEVER, to benefit ourselves as a whole we need to come up with an alternative to provide serious competition....only THEN will the price of their product come down, and perhaps they'll be a bit less greedy. But till then, they will continue to take every advantage of our dependence on their product. Everything else is just distractions and idle talk. BTW, this is my favorite Income Statement: http://finance.yahoo.com/q/is?s=XOM

  • D Woodard 7/14/2008 12:46:40 AM

    I have two teens who are new to the driving scene. They are seeing for themselves that money doesn't grow on trees and they can't just go when ever they want. Just as I was starting to drive the price of gas went from 25 cents a gallon to 50 and then more. It made me so mad when gas was 1.98 now that would be such a bargain. I also remember when the price of sugar was going up. I was just a young teen then and remember the public took a stand and didn't buy the sugar it sat on the shelves till the price came down. I wish Americans today would do stuff like that then maybe the government and the oil companies would know they can't get away with screwing us all over. But it takes more than just one to make an impact.

  • saray 7/13/2008 3:19:48 PM

    I think we need to import more high mileage cars and less oil. The only way to get out of this is to use less drill for more domestic oil and build more refineries, along with develop more alternative energy. Did you know Dodge makes high mileage diesel models right here in Dearborn that are for overseas sales only. Or the vw polo that get 70 mpg, mini d 65mpg, bmw 118 5 door, just to name a few there are dozens more. Even their gas models most get over 40 mpg. With a little conserving and importing and releasing high mpg cars some drilling refining and more use of alternatives I think we could break the hold of foreign oil.

  • John Bollinger 7/12/2008 11:18:08 PM

    ok lets all be a little more reasonable about this. The price of oil has nothing to do with a sudden explosion of more demand for it. Case in point the cost of gas in the middle east is 25 cents per gallon. Now ask yourself if there is such a demand for it then everybody would be paying outrageous prices. Bottom line is the oil companies are price gauging because they can. How many other companyies do you hear taking in billions in profits per quater. We need new energy sources to put these people put of bussiness once and for all. When Henery Ford built the first auto, he built it with the idea that all would be able to make thier own fuel for it. Autos then ran on a wide range of fuels. However it was just more convient to have someone eles make the gas for you and thus started the oil companies a running.

  • willia79 7/11/2008 8:26:46 PM

    I enjoy reading Mother earth news but let it be said that many of the commenters and I assume readers on here are delusional. It would appear to some of you that you want socialism to step in and try to control the the price of oil. Is this what you want? The United States produces about 5 million barrels of oil per day where as we use 20 million barrels a day. Even if our government wanted to control the price of oil the only oil they could control would be domestically produced oil. So that leaves 15 million barrels that the US has no control over. So now what? Adapt to the current situation or perish. Cheap oil is not a birth right. Everyone knew the day would come and like oil or not it is still the cheapest solution we have to fuel the number or cars we have on the road. Every time some new law is enacted it just interferes with the free market which develops the best economical solution. Ethanol use today is a case in point. Corn grown for motor fuel can not compete with $4 gasoline without government subsidy and to beat it all now it's impacting food everywhere. This is why I want less government involvement not more. Every time the government gets involved it messes things up. If the government just raised interest rates the dollar would strengthen and guess what would happen, oil would be cheaper instantly.

  • willia79 7/11/2008 8:17:05 PM

    Teddy boy,

    Get a clue. Exxon and oil companies which you speak of do not control the price of oil. Most of the worlds oil supply comes from government owned National oil companies like Saudi Aramco, Lukoil (Russia), Pedervasa (Venezuala), Petrobras (Brazil), Pemex etc. Exxon has a grand total of 3% of the worlds oil reserves hardly enough to control the market. Get you head out of the sand and wake up to the fact that this is the first time in history where demand has exceeded supply over an extended time period. All other high oil prices run up's like in the early 80's was due to supply disruptions not demand increases. Read the comments or are you like so many people out there who don't pay attention to facts and information you just make up your mind and believe what you want. Increased demand plus a dollar that is worth 50% of what is was just 8 years ago and that equals very high oil prices.

  • Sara 7/11/2008 3:22:47 PM

    Long story short - we may use 1% less oil than we used to, but we're still using waaaaaay too much. If we focused on small and large ways of reducing our energy use (home stuff, buying locally, buying stuff when we need it rather than because we *can*, the amount of oil we'd consume would be fractional.
    We know we're going to run out of oil, conservatively in the next 100 years. Let's start looking forward at decreasing what we use. Everything else is just looking back over our shoulder.

  • George Works 7/11/2008 2:48:45 PM

    Oil production is not keeping up with demand. This is because the easy-to-get oil has been produced, and most of what is left is deep in the ground, deep under the sea, and in politically unstable countries. So production costs are rapidly rising, and world production has leveled off -- there has been little production increase since 2004.

    At the same time, the developing world has been developing, which means buying cars, air conditioners, and all the other things that use energy, which we in the US take for granted. They also use a great deal of energy to produce the manufactured goods that they now sell to America. So demand is rising.

    Higher production costs + constant supply + higher demand = higher price.

    The US imports a great deal of increasingly expensive oil to fuel its lifestyle, and pays for it on credit. The US is now the world's biggest debtor. It has no real prospects for paying off this debt. So the value of the dollar is falling. The falling dollar, and rising oil price, feed each other. We Americans are in a bad way. This problem will not be getting better any time soon.

  • teddyboy 7/11/2008 10:30:03 AM

    Why are the oil companies raising the price of gasoline? Hmmmm...lemme think...how 'bout, "Because they can!" (Well, that, and pure greed.) If I were the CEO of Exxon, et.al., and I had the world by the (energy) tail, I'd do the same thing. This is not that complicated. As soon as they have some REAL competition in energy (and that's open to debate), maybe they'll get concerned and lower their prices. But, till then, why would/should they?!? I wouldn't!! It's PARTY TIME!!! BILLIONS of profit in THREE MONTHS?? Think it through, people. It's simply because they can - they have you right where they want you, and you'll dance.

  • teddyboy 7/11/2008 10:24:37 AM

    Why are the oil companies raising the price of gasoline? Hmmmm...lemme think...how 'bout, "Because they can!" (Well, that, and pure greed.) If I were the CEO of Exxon, et.al., and I had the world by the (energy) tail, I'd do the same thing. This is not that complicated. As soon as they have some REAL competition in energy (and that's open to debate), maybe they'll get concerned and lower their prices. But, till then, why would/should they?!? I wouldn't!! It's PARTY TIME!!! BILLIONS of profit in THREE MONTHS?? Think it through, people. It's simply because they can - they have you right where they want you, and you'll dance.

  • willia79 7/8/2008 7:43:05 PM

    To people like Steve who think Hydrogen is the way to go you need to do some research before blindly jumping on miracle technologies. Did you know that nearly all of the hydrogen supplied today for fuel cell and direct combustion is made from natural gas. Thats right, the clean burning hydrogen comes from a fossil fuel. The process is called steam reformation if you wish to read more about it. Secondly you need to go back to physics and chemistry class. Hydrogen is the most common and most reactive element in the universe. It requires massive amounts of energy to isolate Hydrogen from methane (currently the cheapest method) or via electrolysis (splitting water with electricity). The amount of energy you get from combusting the hydrogen is less than the energy required to produce it. If you could get more energy out of combusting hydrogen than it took to isolateit you would have invented an infinite supply of energy. This is not possible, wake up and quit dreaming. The only advantage of using hydrogen as fuel is it is clean burning but the energy source that isolated it is likely to not be. I am sick and tired of the media pummeling the public with junk science. It's time that people learn sound science and math and figure things out for themselves and stop trusting journalism majors who couldn't hack it in anything else. People attack religion because it requires faith yet they turn 180 degrees and believe junk science based on nothing more than faith.

  • willia79 7/7/2008 10:22:39 PM

    To Donna Burgess: I believe you are mistakenly using the imperial gallon in your math where you say that Canada's gasoline is $6.40 per gallon. The imperial gallon is 4.5 liters per gallon. The US gallon is 3.8 liters per gallon making the Canadian price about $5.40 per gallon (US gallon) which is the gallon used in comparison. While this is much higher than the US it is a bit lower than most of western Europe. I do believe that somehow Canadians are being screwed on gasoline prices much worse than the US as your dollar has appreciated 40% against the US dollar in the last 8 years. At the least you should be paying a comparable price to the US average which would be about $1.05 per liter. I do not know how much of your gasoline price is taken up in taxes but as I am married to a Canadian and visit Canada often I can say unequivocally almost every consumer good I have ever purchased is significantly more expensive in Canada than it is in the US even with your strong dollar that is virtually at parity with the US dollar. You can thank this higher cost of almost everything on your so called "free health care". As you can see it is not free you just pay for it with your gasoline, groceries, and 50% income taxes.

  • willia79 7/7/2008 10:15:59 PM

    A quick response to most of you cry babies complaining about the high price of gasoline. The biggest and I mean biggest cause for crude oil going up in price is the very weak US dollar. The politicians that we continually put in office that you vote for who push through unbalanced budgets who give out massive welfare without having the revenue to pay for it has caused the dollar to drop down to levels that are frankly worthless compared to other currencies. Quit crying and share in the blame you cry baby democrats and so called conservatives. Both sides Dem's and Republicans are the same. They spend spend spend without thinking about what the value of our currency is doing as the deficit grows. You can blame whoever you want but look in the mirror every morning and you share in the blame. A democratic country gets the government it deserves. We have that idiot government now. It is up to us to either take it or fix it. Frankly our system is broken when both candidates care nothing about sound fiscal policy they are just running on what they think is popular. Don't believe me? Look at what the dollar was worth before bush took office and what crude was running at. We import 75% of our oil. If our dollar drops in value the price we pay for oil must go up. Now add in the increased demand and we have a perfect storm. All of you communists who think the government should control the price you can move to Venezuela and live under a fascist dictator and get your cheap gasoline. The best thing that could happen to cheapen gasoline over night would be for the FED to raise interest rates drastically. As soon as the US $ strengthens the price would go down. But our idiot government has to help morons who bought houses at teaser interest rates then wake up one day and realize hey I can't pay for this. We have become a nation of complainers who look to the government to take care of stupid people. Bad business decisions are just that and people a

  • marty85911 7/1/2008 3:27:15 PM

    I find it odd that even the most conservative and independent-minded friends and associates I have all want to blame someone for the high cost of gas. And to want and expect our government to "fix" the situation? It is truely an exhibit of twisted values when we care so much about an oil company's profit margin but don't care about a phamaceutical company's profit numbers, or Microsoft, or any of the Fortune 500 companies. As consumers we love to buy low and sell high, especially our homes (real estate) and we smile from ear to ear when doubling our money when we sell. We rationalize it by saying "if the market can bear that price then so be it". In our business's we price according to what the customer will pay. But when it has to do with what we pay at the gas pump we want government oversight, tax penalties, congressional hearings, witch hunts etc.

  • Lane Parsons 6/30/2008 1:04:53 PM

    Well, its certainly sad. Mother 'used' to be a source for useful, practical information about everything, including economy issues, and didnt let government/politics EVER get in the way of what it wanted to say. Now, it looks grim on that front. Demand is NOT what has the gas/fuel prices out of reach. Not one person in this country believes that. Did the demand 'suddenly' go UP in the past two years, all over the world? Not likely. And also, attacks in Nigeria, and hurricane Katrina - nothing new. Sorry Mother, you got it wrong. USA's foreign policy, and its total lack of oversight into BIG OIL is the reason we are choking at the pump. Plain and simple (just like you used to be).

  • B Magnuson 6/30/2008 9:01:05 AM

    california has stop fires for so long they can not control them anymore. how much forrest has been destroyed rather than properly managed? BTU and wasted carbon dioxide. I wish for a simple wood gas 24hr electric generator that kicks the exhaust into algae production for road diesel. I could collect the overgrowth that is left for the next great fire that no one can stop. My own small backyard power station that would not have government screw ups. as for the oil deal. we need to drill and develope and stop importing oil and exporting war. We need to survive to turn the corner to a renewable power source. the high gas prices have killed my livelyhood.

  • Musa Eubanks 6/28/2008 11:25:10 AM

    No one wants to admit it, but peak oil has very likely begun. Oil prodution has not increased since 2004, probably because we are in the "plateau" period of peak oil. No amount of new drilling will help significantly. The only rational course of action is a major campaign of conservation (all forms of energy) so that we can develop light rail and other forms of public transportation. If you are not familiar with "peak oil" look it up on Google.

  • AKBEAR 6/28/2008 3:29:10 AM

    LAST PART

    according to the USDA the amount of agricultural
    production in the US has decreased by almost half
    from 20 years ago, rather inconceivable when
    population is growing exponentially)

  • AKBEAR 6/28/2008 3:28:11 AM

    PART THREE
    (let's face it, if the goal was
    truly to reduce consumption, why don't hybrids have
    solar panels on the roof instead of suggesting we
    plug them into a wall socket? But then again we
    also live in a country that thinks it should produce
    ethanol out of corn rather than something with a
    much higher sugar yield per acre such as sugar
    beets) and it sure does upset me that we now should
    pay a premium price for a car with consumption
    intensive components (and don't forget the impact of
    employment to earn those funds) and eventual
    replacement and maintenance parts when we had the
    availability of vehicles in past that equalled or
    exceeded the fuel economy of what is being sold
    today (never did quite grasp the concept of the
    environmental benefits of banning low consumption
    technologies for those that produce less pollutants
    when it increases fuel consumption and production
    (including transport), more intensive manufacturing,
    and the eventual disposal of many toxic components
    as well as the impact of funding purchases of
    technological marvels)

    The last thing I'd like to ponder, while I'm
    certainly not in favour of continuing or increasing
    our rate of consumption, what eventually will happen
    if we as a country continue to use everyone else's
    resources while placing ours off limits? Will we
    wind up being the next Iraq invaded for our
    stockpile of oil, or will it be a matter of
    preserving habitat until the need outweighs the
    desire (how many pandas ended up on dinner tables in
    china because most people will not starve in order
    to make sure a habitat is preserved) Let's face it,
    the only real solution is a reduction in consumption
    and a reversal of population growth which if not
    done at some point nothing will be sacred or saved
    (and food for thought, even before taking into
    account this years shortages, floods and droughts,
    according to the USDA the amount of ag

  • AKBEAR 6/28/2008 3:24:13 AM

    PART TWO
    had made their money through business or
    are subsidised in their campaigns by business.
    Unless there was a limit to campaign spending (such
    as 25% of the expected salary of the position,
    similar to how mortgage payments used to be limited
    to 25% of ones income or combined with all other
    monthly expenses should be less than 36% of income)
    there really is no hope of having a common voice in
    power since elections are simply bought and sold by
    those profiting from capitalistic endeavours. Pretty
    much these days is based upon taking advantage of a
    persons need or misfortunes (health care is a
    perfect example). The economy and making profits
    will always trump the health and welfare of the
    people until that well is pumped bone dry and the
    people can no longer support it's leaders and
    business interests, so it's very unlikely much
    action will come out of congress that will help
    (reminds me of congress' investigations into high
    gasoline prices about 18 years ago, front page story
    on how congress couldn't understand why prices were
    so high, and the adjacent column was a story on oil
    companies posting the highest prices ever, some
    great mystery....)

    Most of the alternatives are no better, they're
    simply shifting costs and preserving consumption (if
    not encouraging it). What will we benefit from
    hydrogen or plug in hybrid cars if it means a mad
    rush to build hundreds of power plants to keep up
    with the demand of electricity (which already is
    struggling to keep pace). An article I read in the
    globe last year suggested if Britain were to convert
    to hydrogen power that it would require over 160 new
    power plants to be constructed to produce the needed
    hydrogen. In the same light, advertising that a
    hybrid car will get 70mpg with plug in technology is
    pretending that electricity is free and takes no
    energy to produce (let's face it, if the goal was
    truly to reduce con

  • AKBEAR 6/28/2008 3:02:58 AM

    it is interesting how lately the cost of crude has been pegged as the majority of the cost of a barrel of oil while conveniently leaving out all the buying, selling and trading that goes into making that high cost. It's simply another attempt to smooth ruffled feathers and help us forget that the production cost of crude is very low in comparison and affected very little by the volatile price swings that affect the end users.

    It is a empty argument, though, to compare world prices (mainly Europe or subsidised countries such as Venezuela) as examples of why we should feel lucky or slighted. Government intervention to add, reduce or offer discounts is an issue of how a government (and/or it's own people) choose to treat their residents and themselves. If for example prices in a European country are 75% tax, that has nothing whatsoever to do with the cost of the product itself that people have to pay, and therefore is not a valid argument to say the U.S. has had it too good for too long. Our waste and consumption is another issue altogether from price, and some countries have simply chosen to use that tactic (taxes or subsidies) as a method of increased revenue, discouraging consumption or encouraging development, much in the same way that it's an invalid argument for a state to produce commercials saying that the high prices of cigarettes are taking food out of children's mouths as a reason to quit when the state is responsible for increasing the taxes to the point that one must choose between items one can afford to spend money on (we aren't arguing the health issues or spending money on a non-necessity, it's just a perfect example of another issue that uses creative manipulation of the facts to make a statement or point)

    Why oil isn't considered a utility and regulated like many of our utilities used to be (and not traded on wall-street) is easy as realising that our leaders and legislators are business leaders themselves, had m

  • mailhill 6/27/2008 5:10:12 PM

    Apologies for double posting on gas prices; prices for Denmark were cut, I attempted to correct - failed!

    In the UK, domestic fuel prices have doubled in the last couple of years, the average domestic fuel bill is now approx £1,000.00/quarter (3months).
    We are faced with a further rise of up to 40% this winter bringing it to £5,600 or $8,813 annually, that's $170 or £107 each week!
    You are classed as being in 'fuel poverty' if you spend more than 10% of your income on fuel!
    For a pensioner, student, person on low wage, or sickness or unemployment benefits, this exceeds annual income, in some cases by double!
    By not heating my home at all last winter, I managed to keep my gas bill at the same level it had been the year before; it was cold & miserable; I wore several layers of clothing and a hat 24/7! This winter I expect it will be cold food and candlelight!
    Alas, I do not have a real fire or stove, and live in rented property, so modifications are not easily sanctioned.
    I hope when I get my degree (wildlife & countryside conservation) I can get a job that will meet the current cost of living!

    The UK government's commitment to renewables, just announced, is to increase renewable energy production 10fold, from it's current level of >5% to 50%. Many people feel this is not achievable under present policies. The renewables obligation has aided large-scale renewable generation; but there is presently very little aid toward microgeneration, and Britain's renewables record is hardly outstanding so far.
    However, they are also considering building a new fleet of coal-fired power stations, and banking on carbon storage technology being developed in time to offset emmissions.

  • mailhill 6/27/2008 4:29:04 PM

    Here's a price comparison for gas. Prices are May 2008, so a little out of date, what with current rises!
    Prices are listed in Euros/litre, USdollars/litre and US$/US gallon. The UK and Canada use Imperial Gallons, which are based upon the imperial quart. (four Canadian/UK gallons = five U.S. gallons)
    1 litre = 0.26 US gallons or 0.22 UK/Canadian gallons
    1 US Gallon = 3.79 litres or 0.83 UK/Can gallon
    1 UK/Canadian gall = 4.546 litres
    For anyone who wishes to check my maths, (done on the fly), the Euro prices were provided by the AA http://www.aaroadwatch.ie/eupetrolprices/default.asp.
    I multiplied euro prices by 1.5738 to obtain U.S. dollars per litre, then multiplied this result by 3.78 to get the US gallon price.
    There are many sites on the web which list fuel prices...

    Euro cent/litre US $/l US$/USgal
    Country Currency Unleaded Diesel Unleaded
    Austria Euro 1.311 1.382 2.063 7.798
    Belgium Euro 1.580 1.421 2.487 9.400
    Finland Euro 1.517 1.407 2.387 9.022
    Germany Euro 1.499 1.500 2.359 8.917
    Greece Euro 1.228 1.365 2.027 7.662
    Netherlands Euro 1.657 1.463 2.607 9.854
    Italy Euro 1.370 1.344 2.156 8.171
    Luxembourg Euro 1.296 1.301 2.039 7.709
    Spain Euro 1.188 1.046 1.870 7.067
    France Euro 1.466 1.438 2.307 8.721
    Ireland Euro 1.169 1.175 1.839 6.954
    Portugal Euro 1.394 1.269 2.194 8.314
    Slovenia Euro 1.157 1.259 1.821 6.882
    Sweden Euro 1.470 1.589 2.313 8.745
    Estonia Euro 1.125 1.125 1.771 6.693
    Latvia Euro 1.071 1.198 1.686 6.371
    Lithuania Euro 1.127 1.237 1.774 6.704
    Slovakia Euro 1.221 1.297 1.921 7.264
    Switzerland Euro 1.193 1.384 1.878 7.097
    GB Euro 1.442 1.610 2.269 8.578
    USA Euro 0.634 0.736 0.998 3.771
    Canada Euro 0.869 1.382 5.224
    N Ireland Euro 1.416 1.556 2.229 8.424
    Norway Euro 1.292 1.323 2.033 7.686
    Hungary Euro 1.165 1.240 1.833 6.931
    Czech Republic Euro 1.277 1.357 2.009 7.597
    Denmark Euro 1.

  • mailhill 6/27/2008 4:25:47 PM

    Here's a price comparison for gas. Prices are May 2008, so a little out of date, what with current rises!
    Prices are listed in Euros/litre, USdollars/litre and US$/US gallon. The UK and Canada use Imperial Gallons, which are based upon the imperial quart. (four Canadian/UK gallons = five U.S. gallons)
    1 litre = 0.26 US gallons or 0.22 UK/Canadian gallons
    1 US Gallon = 3.79 litres or 0.83 UK/Can gallon
    1 UK/Canadian gall = 4.546 litres
    For anyone who wishes to check my maths, (done on the fly), the Euro prices were provided by the AA http://www.aaroadwatch.ie/eupetrolprices/default.asp.
    I multiplied euro prices by 1.5738 to obtain U.S. dollars per litre, then multiplied this result by 3.78 to get the US gallon price.
    There are many sites on the web which list fuel prices...

    Euro cent/litre US $/l US$/USgal
    Country Currency Unleaded Diesel Unleaded
    Austria Euro 1.311 1.382 2.063 7.798
    Belgium Euro 1.580 1.421 2.487 9.400
    Finland Euro 1.517 1.407 2.387 9.022
    Germany Euro 1.499 1.500 2.359 8.917
    Greece Euro 1.228 1.365 2.027 7.662
    Netherlands Euro 1.657 1.463 2.607 9.854
    Italy Euro 1.370 1.344 2.156 8.171
    Luxembourg Euro 1.296 1.301 2.039 7.709
    Spain Euro 1.188 1.046 1.870 7.067
    France Euro 1.466 1.438 2.307 8.721
    Ireland Euro 1.169 1.175 1.839 6.954
    Portugal Euro 1.394 1.269 2.194 8.314
    Slovenia Euro 1.157 1.259 1.821 6.882
    Sweden Euro 1.470 1.589 2.313 8.745
    Estonia Euro 1.125 1.125 1.771 6.693
    Latvia Euro 1.071 1.198 1.686 6.371
    Lithuania Euro 1.127 1.237 1.774 6.704
    Slovakia Euro 1.221 1.297 1.921 7.264
    Switzerland Euro 1.193 1.384 1.878 7.097
    GB Euro 1.442 1.610 2.269 8.578
    USA Euro 0.634 0.736 0.998 3.771
    Canada Euro 0.869 1.382 5.224
    N Ireland Euro 1.416 1.556 2.229 8.424
    Norway Euro 1.292 1.323 2.033 7.686
    Hungary Euro 1.165 1.240 1.833 6.931
    Czech Republic Euro 1.277 1.357 2.009 7.597
    Denmark Euro 1.

  • DANIEL Brown 6/27/2008 2:45:16 PM

    About a month ago, Forbes.com reported: "In Venezuela gas subsidies hold prices to 15 cents a gallon." So the solution is simple...Move to Venezuela! LOL

  • neosapiens 6/27/2008 2:30:59 PM

    As painful as it is, I welcome the rise in gas prices--and I hope they continue to rise. We need a good hard shove in the direction of getting off oil. We've been avoiding taking real action on this for over 30 years and letting out national wealth be drained off. Can you imagine the good that could have been done here at home if the 4 or 5 trillion $ we sent abroad to pay for oil in that time had been circulating in the domestic economy? If money going abroad for oil were turned off today and redirected into the national treasury, it would erase the deficit and be a good start on paying down the national debt.

  • Bill Stephens 6/27/2008 11:18:44 AM

    The article missed the biggest cause of high gas prices. Trading on the stock exchange/margins/whatever you want to call it is the biggest reason for high prices. People that don't even know where oil/gas comes from are controlling the price just so they and their special investors will make a nice tidy profit. These people don't care if the common people are suffering at the pump as they go buy their new yacht, fancy car and 40 room mansion.

    Natural resources should not be allowed to be traded on the stock market. The best thing our government could do would be to bar this action.

  • ccm989 6/27/2008 10:29:14 AM

    Probably all those things mentioned in the article contribute at least somewhat to the price of oil but it seems to me, if memory serves correct, that the price of oil began its ascent when Dick Cheney met in secret with the CEOs of the Big Oil companies allegedly to set the energy policies.
    When the meetings became public knowledge, Congress held hearings and conveniently none of the CEOs could recall a single thing about the meetings. Even more conveniently, Ted Stevens, another disgraced Congressmen, waived swearing the CEOs under oath, apparently to avoid perjury charges.
    Coincidence? Somehow, I don't think so.
    A greener future is only possible when we Americans vote for a candidate who will give us one. Tuesday, November 4th may be our only chance to make the future GREENER. This election is really, really important.

  • nonewconspiracy 6/27/2008 10:14:56 AM

    there is enough oil in alaska to supply america and bring down the price of oil, but because oil is traded in dollars and iraq has to invest a percentage of it's profit into buying our national debt back it is not likely to go down until the powers that be decide everything has gotten bad enough again like in the late 70's through the mid 80's and they'll start bringing it down again. check out this link http://www.restoretherepublic.com/component/option,com_seyret/task,videodirectlink/id,756/
    and make your own educated decisions.

  • Steve Jones 6/27/2008 9:41:42 AM

    Honda has a hydrogen car. California plans to install hydrogen filling stations. Why don't we hear more about this in the media? I would suggest that we grant Walmart the exclusive rights to distribute hydrogen for vehicles. It is obvious that the Federal Government cannot manage anything. Walmart can handle the job and in a matter of months, we would be on our way to a green America.

  • Dale Hanks 6/27/2008 9:07:48 AM

    Big Oil companies do not control the prices and thus do not control their profits. This IS NOT a reason that prices for gasoline are up. Not enough refinery capacity? Sure. China and India increasing usage? Yep. Falling dollar? Yep.

    The biggest reason that oil continues to rise is that the largest pension funds in the country are now using a loophole to invest in oil. Until 2004 they were not allowed to. This coincides with the rise in the cost of gas. Combines this with the falling dollar and you can explain the quick rise in gasoline prices almost perfectly.

    That being said, there was nothing new in this article. I would hope that Mother Earth News would a better job of grasping all of the components and not just what they can grab off of the AP wire.

  • Andrew Zebrun 6/25/2008 11:48:07 AM

    I can't help but think that the war in Iraq has done a lot towards increasing energy costs. All those planes, tanks, and trucks are burning a lot of fuel! I think staying out of unnecessary wars would be very smart in the future...

  • Donna Burgess 6/24/2008 8:04:36 PM

    I just Had to comment about having relatively low gas prices in comparison with Europe. Well, here in Canada, we sure don't. I just compared our prices to the rest of Europe and we have the dubious distinction on having a slightly lower price than the most expensive fuel in Europe, namely Norway. The fuel price there is 6.42 per gallon, ours is roughly 6.40 depending on what city and province you reside in. Gouging? probably..... I just wonder when its going to be too much for all us seniors to absorb. Its not like we have a lot of choice either, I can't use public transportation, I can;t walk far enough to get to it. sad sad world.

Add Your Comment

Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.

New to Mother Earth News?
Sign up to share comments.
Asterisks(*) indicate required fields.
Name*
Your name appears next to your comment.

E-mail Address*
This will be your login ID.

City State Zip Code

Password*


Confirm Password*

Comments
(Offensive materials and/or spam will be removed, no HTML allowed)
Please Note: Your sign-up must be verified via e-mail before your comment is published.

Ask your question, get an answer:

Question:
Name:   
City: State:
Email: