Southern Research Station

Title: What happens to allochthonous material that falls into streams? A synthesis of new and published information from Coweeta

Author: Webster, J. R; Benfield, E. F; Ehrman, T. P.; Schaeffer, M. A.; Tanks, J. L.; Hutchens, J. J.; D'angelo, D. J.

Date: 1999

Source: Freshwater Biology 41: 687-705

Description: 1. One of two things can happen to allochthonous material once it enters a stream: it can be broken down or it can be transported downstream. The efficiency with which allochthonous material is used is the result of these two opposing factors: breakdown and transport. 2. The present synthesis of new and published studies at Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory compares biological use versus transport for four categories of particulate organic material: (1) large wood (logs); (2) small wood (sticks); (3) leaves; and (4) fine particulate organic matter (FPOM). 3. Over 8 years, logs showed no breakdown or movement. 4. The breakdown rate of sticks (9 3 cm diameter) anged from 0.00017 to 0.00103 day'-', while their rate of transport, although varying considerably with discharge, ranged from 0 to 0.1 m day^-1. 5. Based on 40 published measurements, the average rate of leaf breakdown was 0.0098 daym1. The leaf transport rate depended on stream size and discharge. 6. The average respiration rate of POM was 1.4 mg O2 g AFDM^-1 day^-1 over a temperature range of 6-22 OC, which implies a decomposition rate of 0.00104 day^-1. Transport distances of both corn pollen and glass beads, surrogates of natural FPOM, were short (c 10 m) except during high discharge. ' 7. Estimates of transport rate were substantially larger than the breakdown rates for sticks, leaves and FPOM. Thus, an organic particle on the stream bottom is more likely to be transported than broken down by biological processes, although estimates of turnover length suggest that sticks and leaves do not travel far. However, once these larger particles are converted to refractory FPOM, either by physical or biological processes, they may be transported long distances before being metabolized.

Keywords: breakdown, coweeta, detritus, stream, transport

View and Print this Publication (1.32 MB)

Pristine Version:  An uncaptured or "pristine" version of this publication is available. It has not been subjected to OCR (Optical Character Recognition) and therefore does not have any errors in the text. However it is a larger file size and some people may experience long download times. The "pristine" version of this publication is available here:

View and Print the PRISTINE copy of this Publication (2.52 MB)

Publication Notes: 

• We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
• This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

 Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

Citation

Webster, J. R; Benfield, E. F; Ehrman, T. P.; Schaeffer, M. A.; Tanks, J. L.; Hutchens, J. J.; D'angelo, D. J.  1999.  What happens to allochthonous material that falls into streams? A synthesis of new and published information from Coweeta.   Freshwater Biology 41: 687-705