US Forest Service
  
Treesearch

Pacific Southwest

 

US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.
20090-6090

(202) 205-8333

USA.gov  Government Made Easy

Publication Information

Title: Using Wildlife Species Richness to Identify Land Protection Priorities in California's Hardwood Woodlands

Author: Motroni, Robert S.; Airola, Daniel A.; Ma rose, Robin K.; Tosta, Nancy D.

Date: 1991

Source: In: Standiford, Richard B., tech. coord. 1991. Proceedings of the symposium on oak woodlands and hardwood rangeland management; October 31 - November 2, 1990; Davis, California. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-126. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture; p. 110-119

Station ID: GTR-PSW-126

Description: A geographic information system was used to assess wildlife species richness (number of species) in valley-foothill hardwood habitats throughout California to set priorities for conservation attention. Species richness values were assessed and compared using three methods: one that included all species without considering canopy cover conditions and species preferences; a second that restricted the analysis to sensitive species; and a third that used sensitive species and considered canopy cover conditions and species canopy preferences. The identified locations of species rich areas were markedly altered with the inclusion of information on habitat structure and species sensitivity. Comparison of different species richness analyses showed that the greatest difference in areas identified in richness classes was produced when species sensitivity and canopy closure requirements were included. The largest areas of high species richness were in the southern Sierra Nevada foothills. Valley foothill hardwood habitat is not well represented in reserved areas. Only 3.8 percent of a total 4.5 million acres were classified as reserved by virtue of ownership. Similarly, only 4.5 percent of the 1.1 million acres in the highest species richness class was reserved. Areas of sparse canopy closure supported the most species. Selecting conservation areas based solely on species richness would, however, omit species that favor or are restricted to denser canopy closure classes. Ensuring protection of the maximum number of species requires examining the distribution, size, and species composition of species rich areas identified. Site specific considerations are essential as a second step in the ranking of local habitats for management or protection.

Keywords: 

View and Print this Publication (541 KB)

Publication Notes: 

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
  • You may send email to pubrequest@fs.f ed.us to request a hard copy of this publication. (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)

 [ Get Acrobat ]  Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

Citation

Motroni, Robert S.; Airola, Daniel A.; Ma rose, Robin K.; Tosta, Nancy D.   1991.  Using Wildlife Species Richness to Identify Land Protection Priorities in California's Hardwood Woodlands .   In: Standiford, Richard B., tech. coord. 1991. Proceedings of the symposium on oak woodlands and hardwood rangeland management; October 31 - November 2, 1990; Davis, California. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-126. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture; p. 110-119.

US Forest Service - Research & Development
Last Modified:  February 24, 2009


USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.