Title: Testing transferability of willingness to pay for forest fire prevention among three states of California, Florida and Montana
Author: Loomis, John B.; Le, Hung Trong; Gonzalez-Caban, Armando
Date: 2005
Source: Journal of Forest Economics, Vol. 11: 125-140
Description: The equivalency of willingness to pay between the states of California, Florida and Montana is tested. Residents in California, Florida and Montana have an average willingness to pay of $417, $305, and $382 for prescribed burning program, and $403, $230, and $208 for mechanical fire fuel reduction program, respectively. Due to wide confidence intervals, household WTP in the three states are not statistically different. Over all tests, there is mixed evidence on transferability, but California and Montana WTP are similar to each other for prescribed burning and Florida and Montana have similar values for the mechanical fuel reduction.
Keywords: benefits transfer, contingent valuation, mechanical fuel reduction, prescribed burning
View and Print this Publication (970 KB)
Pristine Version: An uncaptured or "pristine" version of this publication is available. It has not been subjected to OCR (Optical Character Recognition) and therefore does not have any errors in the text. However it is a larger file size and some people may experience long download times. The "pristine" version of this publication is available here:
View and Print the PRISTINE copy of this Publication (1.2 MB)
Publication Notes:
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility
Citation
Loomis, John B.; Le, Hung Trong; Gonzalez-Caban, Armando 2005. Testing transferability of willingness to pay for forest fire prevention among three states of California, Florida and Montana. Journal of Forest Economics, Vol. 11: 125-140.