Intersection Safety Strategies
Download the Printable Version [PDF,
743 KB]
You will need the Adobe
Acrobat Reader to view this PDF.
Unsignalized Intersection Strategies
A. Improve Management of Access
B. Reduce Conflicts Through Geometric Design Improvements
D. Improve Availability of Gaps in Traffic and Assist Drivers in Judging Gaps
E. Improve Driver Awareness on Approaches
F. Choose Appropriate Intersection Traffic Control
G. Improve Compliance with Traffic Control Devices and Traffic Laws
Signalized Intersection Strategies
Key to the Brochure
Time frame:
Time frames will naturally vary based on numerous factors (agency procedures, number of stakeholders, need for additional right-ofway). The scale is meant as a general guide. One circle indicates a short time frame for implementation perhaps in as little as a few months or up to 1 year. Example short term strategies include signage improvements, signal timing changes, and sight distance improvements. Two circles indicates a medium time frame of 1-2 years. Example medium term strategies include channelization improvements, system-wide signal improvements, and minor geometric improvements. Three circles indicates a longer time frame of over 2 years. These strategies will typically require major construction or right-of-way acquisition.
Costs:
Costs will also vary considerably and are affected by local conditions. Costs are ranked as: low, moderate, moderate to high, and high. The scale is meant to reflect costs relative to the other strategies described in the category (signalized or unsignalized).
Effectiveness:
This section will discuss any research or evaluations that have been done to ascertain the effectiveness of the particular strategy. Three descriptors are used to identify to what degree the strategy has been evaluated:
Proven: Those strategies that have been used in one or more locations and for which properly designed evaluations have been conducted that show it to be effective. These strategies may be employed with a good degree of confidence, but with the understanding that any application can lead to results that vary significantly from those found in previous evaluations. Crash reduction factors reported are typically based on valid research methods.
Tried: Those strategies that have been implemented in a number of locations and may even be accepted as standards or standard approaches, but for which there have not been found valid evaluations. These strategies, while frequently or even generally used, should be applied with caution; users should carefully consider the attributes cited in the guide and relate them to the specific conditions for which they are being considered. There can be some degree of assurance that implementation will not likely have a negative impact on safety and will very likely have a positive one. Crash reduction factors reported are not necessarily based on valid research methods and should be used with caution.
Experimental: Those strategies that have been suggested and that at least one agency has considered sufficiently promising to try on a small scale in at least one location. These strategies should be considered only after the others have been determined to be inappropriate or unfeasible. Even where they are considered, their implementation should initially occur using a very controlled and limited pilot study that includes a properly designed evaluation component.
This brochure is a quick reference to the countermeasures described in the NCHRP Report 500 volumes on reducing crashes at unsignalized (Volume 5) and signalized (Volume 12) intersections and is a supplement to individual guide sheets for each of the 77 countermeasures. These documents describe and illustrate the countermeasures in greater detail. |
Unsignalized Intersection Safety Strategies
Safety Concern: High frequency of right-angle crashes attributed to: | Low | Moderate | Moderate-High | High |
---|---|---|---|---|
nearby driveways | A2, B12, C1, C2, C4 | A1 | B8 | ![]() |
traffic from minor street | B12, C1, C2, C4, D2 | D1 | B8 | B13, F3 |
skewed intersection | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
B16, C3, F3 |
poor sight distance | C1, C2, C4, H3 | D1 | ![]() |
C3, F3 |
drivers misjudging gaps | D2, H3 | D1 | ![]() |
F3 |
not enough gaps for drivers | D3 | ![]() |
![]() |
B14, F3 |
driver unaware of intersection | E1, 5-E9, E10, E11 | E3 | ![]() |
![]() |
nighttime conditions | E10 | ![]() |
E2 | ![]() |
failure to yield at stop or yield sign | E1, E4-E9, E11 | G1 | ![]() |
F3 |
possible signal location | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
F1, F3 |
heavy but balanced traffic flow | F2 | ![]() |
![]() |
F3 |
speed differentials of vehicles | H3 | H1, H2 | ![]() |
F3 |
Safety Concern: High frequency of rear-end crashes attributed to: | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
left turning vehicles hit from behind | B4 | B1, B2 | ![]() |
F3 |
left opposing vehicles hit from behind | ![]() |
![]() |
B3 | F3 |
trucks and RVs entering divided highway | ![]() |
B5 | ![]() |
![]() |
speed differential of entering vehicles | ![]() |
B6, B9 | ![]() |
F3 |
right turning vehicles hit from behind | ![]() |
B6, B7 | ![]() |
B16, F3 |
appoaching vehicles hit from behind | ![]() |
B10 | ![]() |
![]() |
no left turn lane and high opposing traffic | B11, B12 | ![]() |
![]() |
B13 |
driver unaware of intersection | E1, E5-E9, E10, E11 | E3 | ![]() |
![]() |
nighttime conditions | E8, E10 | ![]() |
E2 | ![]() |
speed differentials of vehicles | H3 | H1, H2 | ![]() |
F3 |
Safety Concern: High frequency of left-turn crashes attributed to: | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
left turn vehicles hit by opposing traffic | C2 | B1, B17 | B3 | B15, F3 |
trucks and/or RVs entering divided highway | ![]() |
B5 | ![]() |
![]() |
no left turn lane and high opposing traffic | B11, B12 | B17 | ![]() |
B13 |
nighttime conditions | E10 | ![]() |
E2 | ![]() |
heavy but balanced traffic flow | F2 | ![]() |
![]() |
F3 |
Poor sight distance | C2, B11, B12 | B17 | ![]() |
B13 |
Safety Concern: High frequency of sideswipe crashes attributed to: | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
speed differential of entering vehicles | ![]() |
B9 | ![]() |
F3 |
vehicles within intersection | I1, I2 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
vehicles approaching intersection | I3 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Safety Concern: High frequency of run off road crashes: | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
approaching intersection | ![]() |
B10 | ![]() |
![]() |
Safety Concern: High frequency of pedestrian/bicycle crashes: | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
at the intersection | ![]() |
![]() |
B18, H2 | ![]() |
Safety Concern: Address overall safety issues: | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
violation of traffic laws | G2 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Note: Counter measures indicated on the table are possible treatments for individual crash problems. Implementation should be based on individual circumstances and studies. |
CATEGORY A: IMPROVE MANAGEMENT OF ACCESS
A1 – Implement driveway closures/relocations (HTML | PDF). WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections with high crash frequencies related to driveways adjacent to the intersection. Generally, driveways within 250 feet of the intersection are the greatest concern. Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried
A2 – Implement driveway turn restrictions (HTML | PDF). WHERE TO USE – Driveways located near unsignalized intersections that experience high crash frequencies but that cannot practically be closed or relocated. Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
CATEGORY B: REDUCE CONFLICTS THROUGH GEOMETRIC DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS
B1 – Provide left-turn lanes at intersections (HTML | PDF). WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections with a high frequency of crashes resulting from the conflict between (1)
vehicles turning left and following vehicles and (2) vehicles turning left and opposing through vehicles. Time: Medium. Effectiveness: Proven.
B2 – Provide longer left-turn lanes at intersections (HTML | PDF).WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections with existing leftturn lanes that are not long enough to store all left-turning vehicles and have a high frequency of rear-end crashes resulting from the conflict between vehicles waiting to turn left and following vehicles. Time: Medium. Effectiveness: Tried.
B3 – Provide offset left-turn lanes at intersections (HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections with a high frequency of crashes between vehicles turning left and opposing through vehicles, as well as rear-end crashes between through vehicles on the opposing approach. Also at intersections on divided highways with medians wide enough to provide the appropriate offset but can be implemented on approaches without medians if sufficient width exists. Time: Medium. Effectiveness: Tried.
B4 – Provide bypass lanes on shoulders at
T-intersections
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – At three-legged unsignalized intersections on two-lane highways with moderate through and turning volumes, especially intersections that have a pattern of rearend collisions involving vehicles waiting to turn left from the highway. Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
B5 – Provide left-turn acceleration lanes at divided highway intersections (HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections on divided highways that experience a high proportion of rear-end crashes related to the speed differential caused by vehicles turning left onto the highway. Also where intersection sight distance is inadequate or where there are high volumes of trucks or recreational vehicles entering the divided highway. Time: Medium. Effectiveness: Tried.
B6 – Provide right-turn lanes at intersections
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections with a high frequency of rear-end crashes resulting from conflicts between (1) vehicles turning right and following vehicles and (2) vehicles turning right and through vehicles coming from the left on the cross street. Time: Medium. Effectiveness: Proven.
B7 – Provide longer right-turn lanes at intersections
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections with an existing right-turn lane that is not long enough to store all right-turning vehicles and that are experiencing a high frequency of rear-end crashes resulting from the conflict between vehicles waiting to turn right and following vehicles. Time: Medium. Effectiveness: Tried.
B8 – Provide offset right-turn lanes at intersections
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections with a high frequency of crashes between vehicles on the minor road that are turning left, turning right, or proceeding straight through, and vehicles on the major road. Time: Medium. Effectiveness: Tried.
B9 – Provide right-turn acceleration lanes at
intersections
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections that experience a high proportion of rear-end and/or sideswipe crashes related to the speed differential caused by vehicles making a rightturn maneuver onto the highway.
Time: Medium. Effectiveness: Tried.
B10 – Provide full-width paved shoulders in intersection areas
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections on divided highways with no shoulder or shoulder widths less than 8 feet that experience a high proportion of run-off-road crashes as a result of avoidance maneuvers or a high proportion of rearend crashes that could have been avoided had a full-width paved shoulder been provided. Time: Medium. Effectiveness: Tried.
B11 – Restrict or eliminate turning maneuvers by signing
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections with patterns of
crashes related to particular turning maneuvers where it is
impractical to reduce that pattern of crashes by improving sight
distance or providing a left-turn or shoulder bypass lane.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
B12 – Restrict or eliminate turning maneuvers by providing channelization or closing median openings
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections with patterns of
crashes related to particular turning maneuvers where it is
impractical to reduce that pattern of crashes by improving
sight distance or providing a left-turn or shoulder bypass lane.
Also, at locations where it is possible to restrict or eliminate
turning maneuvers by providing channelization or by closing
the median opening.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
B13 – Close or relocate "high-risk" intersections
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections with high levels
of intersection-related crashes that other strategies have not
been successful in reducing or for which other strategies
are not considered appropriate. Also at locations where a
particular strategy such as installing a turn lane or increasing
sight distance is impractical at the current location, but could
be applied if the intersection were moved.
Time: Long. Effectiveness: Tried.
B14 – Convert four-legged intersections to two T-intersections
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized four-legged intersections with
very low through volumes on the cross street.
Time: Medium. Effectiveness: Tried.
B15 – Convert offset T-intersections to four-legged
intersections
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized offset T-intersections where
through volumes on the cross street are very high.
Time: Medium. Effectiveness: Tried.
B16 – Realign intersection approaches to reduce or eliminate intersection skew
(HTML | PDF). WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections with a high frequency
of crashes resulting from insufficient intersection sight distance
and awkward sight lines at a skewed intersection.
Time: Medium. Effectiveness: Proven.
B17 – Use indirect left-turn treatments to minimize conflicts at divided highway intersections
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections with operational
and safety problems that can be traced to difficulties of
accommodating left-turn demand.
Time: Medium. Effectiveness: Tried.
B18 – Improve pedestrian and bicycle facilities to reduce conflicts between motorists and nonmotorists
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections that experience
crashes involving pedestrians and/or bicyclists with motor
vehicles or that have the potential for such crashes.
Time: Medium. Effectiveness: Tried/Proven.
CATEGORY C: IMPROVE SIGHT DISTANCE
C1 – Clear sight triangles on stop- or yield-controlled
approaches to intersections
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections with restricted
sight distance and patterns of crashes related to lack of sight
distance, where sight distance can be improved by clearing
roadside obstructions without major construction.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
C2 – Clear sight triangles in the medians of divided highways near intersections
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections on divided
highways with (a) fixed sight obstructions in the median near
the intersection and (b) patterns of crashes related to the lack
of sight distance.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
C3 – Change horizontal and/or vertical alignment of
approaches to provide more sight distance
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections with restricted sight
distance due to horizontal and/or vertical geometry and with
patterns of crashes related to that lack of sight distance that
cannot be ameliorated by less expensive methods.
Time: Long. Effectiveness: Tried.
C4 – Eliminate parking that restricts sight distance
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections with restricted sight
distance due to parking.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
CATEGORY D: IMPROVE AVAILABILITY OF GAPS AND ASSIST DRIVERS IN JUDGING GAPS
D1 – Provide an automated real-time system to
inform drivers of the suitability of available gaps for
making turning and crossing maneuvers
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections with a high frequency of right-angle collisions due to restricted sight distance.
Time: Medium. Effectiveness: Experimental.
D2 – Provide innovative signs and markings to assist drivers in judging the suitability of available gaps for making turning and crossing maneuvers
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections where crash data
shows a high occurrence of crashes where vehicles on
secondary roadways intersecting at grade misjudge the gap
between approaching vehicles.
Time: Medium. Effectiveness: Experimental.
D3 – Retime adjacent signals to create gaps at stopcontrolled intersections
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections (between signalized intersections) with a high frequency of right-angle or turningrelated
crashes due to a lack of sufficient gaps in through traffic on the major road.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
CATEGORY E: IMPROVE DRIVER AWARENESS
E1 – Improve visibility of intersections by providing
enhanced signing and delineation
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections that are not clearly
visible to approaching motorists, particularly approaching
motorists on the major road. The strategy is particularly
appropriate for intersections with patterns of rear-end, rightangle,
or turning crashes related to lack of driver awareness of
the presence of the intersection.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
E2 – Improve visibility of the intersection by
providing lighting
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized, unlit intersections with substantial
patterns of nighttime crashes. In particular, patterns of rear-end,
right-angle, or turning crashes on the major-road approaches
to an unsignalized intersection may indicate that approaching
drivers are unaware of the presence of the intersection.
Time: Medium. Effectiveness: Proven.
E3 – Install splitter islands on the minor-road
approach to an intersection
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Minor road approaches to unsignalized
intersections where the presence of the intersection or the
stop sign is not readily visible to approaching motorists. The
strategy is particularly appropriate for intersections where the
speeds on the minor road are high.
Time: Medium. Effectiveness: Tried.
E4 – Provide a stop bar (or provide a wider stop bar)
on minor-road approaches
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Approaches to unsignalized intersections
having traffic control devices that are not currently being
recognized by some approaching motorists. Locations should
be identified by patterns of crashes related to lack of driver
recognition of the traffic control device (e.g., right-angle
crashes related to stop sign violations).
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
E5 – Install larger regulatory and warning signs at
intersections
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Approaches to unsignalized intersections with
patterns of rear-end, right-angle, or turning collisions related
to lack of driver awareness of the presence of the intersection.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
E6 – Call attention to the intersection by installing rumble
strips on intersection approaches
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Approaches to unsignalized intersections with
traffic control devices that are not currently being recognized
by some approaching motorists. Locations should be identified
by patterns of crashes related to lack of driver recognition of
the traffic control device (e.g., right-angle crashes related to
stop sign violations). Rumble strips should be considered only
after an adequate trial of less intrusive treatments.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
E7 – Provide dashed markings (extended left
edgelines) for major-road continuity across the
median opening at divided highway intersections
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections on divided
highways. The strategy is particularly appropriate for
intersections with patterns of rear-end, right-angle, or
turning crashes related to lack of awareness by the driver
on the minor road to the presence of the intersection.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
E8 – Provide supplementary stop signs mounted
over the roadway
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections with patterns
of right-angle crashes related to lack of driver awareness
of the presence of the intersection. In particular, it might be
appropriate to use this strategy at the first stop-controlled
approach (possibly of a series) located on a long stretch of
highway without any required stops, or at an intersection
located after a sharp horizontal curve.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
E9 – Provide pavement markings with
supplementary messages, such as STOP AHEAD
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections with patterns of
rear-end, right-angle, or turning crashes related to lack of
driver awareness of the presence of the intersection.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
E10 – Provide improved maintenance of stop signs
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – All stop-controlled intersections.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
E11 – Install flashing beacons at stop-controlled intersections
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections with patterns of
right-angle crashes related to lack of driver awareness of the
intersection on an uncontrolled approach and lack of driver
awareness of the stop sign on a stop-controlled approach.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
CATEGORY F: CHOOSE APPROPRIATE INTERSECTION TRAFFIC CONTROL
F1 – Avoid signalizing through roads
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Medium- to high-volume unsignalized
intersections where installation of signals is being considered.
Before a decision to install a signal is made, adequate
consideration should be given to less restrictive forms of
traffic control.
Time: Long. Effectiveness: Tried.
F2 – Provide all-way stop-control at appropriate
intersections
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections with patterns of
right-angle and turning crashes and moderate and relatively
balanced volumes on the intersection approaches.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Proven.
F3 – Provide roundabouts at appropriate locations
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections that are
experiencing right-angle, rear-end, and turning crashes.
Roundabouts are appropriate at most intersections, and
at intersections with large traffic delays roundabouts
are oftentimes a superior alternative to signalization.
Roundabouts can also be very effective at intersections with
complex geometry (e.g., more than four approach roads)
and intersections with frequent left-turn movements.
Time: Long. Effectiveness: Proven.
CATEGORY G: IMPROVE COMPLIANCE WITH TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND TRAFFIC LAWS
G1 – Provide targeted enforcement to reduce stop
sign violations
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections where stop sign
violations and patterns of crashes related to stop sign violations
have been observed. Crash types potentially related to stop
sign violations include right-angle and turning collisions.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
G2 – Provide targeted public information and
education on safety problems at specific
intersections
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Jurisdictions that have experienced a large
number of safety problems at unsignalized intersections.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
CATEGORY H: REDUCE OPERATING SPEEDS
H1 – Provide targeted speed enforcement
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections where speed
violations and patterns of crashes related to speed violations
are observed. Crash types potentially related to speed
violations include right-angle, rear-end, and turning crashes.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Proven.
H2 – Provide traffic calming on intersection
approaches through a combination of geometrics
and traffic control devices
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Specific approaches to unsignalized
intersections that are experiencing crash types potentially
related to speed violations, specifically right-angle, rear-end,
and turning collisions.
Time: Medium. Effectiveness: Proven.
H3 – Post appropriate speed limit on intersection approaches
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections experiencing a high frequency of speed related crashes.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
CATEGORY I: GUIDE MOTORISTS MORE EFFECTIVELY
I1 – Provide turn path markings
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Complex unsignalized intersections with a high
frequency of crashes related to turning vehicle positioning
(e.g., sideswipe crashes).
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
I2 – Provide a double yellow centerline on the median opening of a divided highway at intersections
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections on divided highways
that are experiencing a high degree of crashes caused by sideby-
side queuing and angle stopping within the median area.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
I3 – Provide lane assignment signing or marking at complex intersections
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Unsignalized intersections with a high frequency
of crashes caused by driver indecision in lane assignment.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
Signalized Intersection Safety Strategies
Safety Concern: High frequency of right-angle crashes attributed to: | Low | Moderate | Moderate-High | High |
---|---|---|---|---|
nearby driveways | F1, F2 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
traffic from cross street | A2, A3 | E2, E3 | ![]() |
![]() |
skewed intersection | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
B4, B5, C2 |
poor sight distance | A1, C1, G5 | G4 | ![]() |
B4, B5, C2 |
drivers misjudging gaps | A1 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
not enough gaps for drivers | A1 | A4 | ![]() |
![]() |
driver unaware of intersection | D1, D2 | ![]() |
![]() |
B4, C2 |
nighttime conditions | D1, D2 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
right turning vehicles hit from side | A3, C1, G5 | B2, G4 | ![]() |
![]() |
Safety Concern: High frequency of rear-end crashes attributed to: | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
left turning vehicles hit from behind | A1 | B1 | ![]() |
B4, B5 |
left opposing vehicles hit from behind | ![]() |
B1 | ![]() |
B5 |
right turning vehicles hit from behind | A3 | B2 | ![]() |
![]() |
standing water on roadway | ![]() |
G1 | ![]() |
![]() |
vehicles unable to stop safely (skidding) | ![]() |
G2 | ![]() |
![]() |
driver unaware of intersection | D1, D2 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
nighttime conditions | D1, D2 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
speed differentials of vehicles | ![]() |
A4, E4, E5 | ![]() |
![]() |
sudden stops | A2, A3 | A4 | ![]() |
![]() |
Safety Concern: High frequency of left-turn crashes attributed to: | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
left turn vehicles hit by opposing traffic | A1, A3, C1 | B1 | ![]() |
B4, B5 |
nighttime conditions | D1, D2 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Safety Concern: High frequency of sideswipe crashes attributed to: | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
vehicles within intersection | A1 | B1 | ![]() |
![]() |
Safety Concern: High frequency of pedestrian/bicycle crashes: | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
on school routes or near generators of ped/bike traffic | A6, B3 | E2 | ![]() |
![]() |
vehicle/bicycle sideswipes on approaches | ![]() |
G1 | ![]() |
![]() |
with left turning vehicles | A1, A3 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Safety Concern: Address overall safety issues: | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
violation of traffic laws | E1 | E2 | ![]() |
![]() |
intersection near railroad crossing | ![]() |
G3 | ![]() |
![]() |
intersection near fire station | ![]() |
A5 | ![]() |
![]() |
excessive delay | A7 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
disobedience of traffic signal | A7 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Note: Counter measures indicated on the table are possible treatments for individual crash problems. Implementation should be based on individual circumstances and studies. |
CATEGORY A: REDUCE FREQUENCY AND SEVERITY OF INTERSECTION CONFLICTS THROUGH TRAFFIC CONTROL AND OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS
A1 – Employ Multiphase Signal Operation
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Signalized intersections with a high frequency
of angle crashes involving left turning and opposing through
vehicles. A properly timed protected left-turn phase can also
help reduce rear-end and sideswipe crashes between leftturning
vehicles and the through vehicles behind them.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried/Proven.
A2 – Optimize Change Intervals
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Signalized intersections with a high frequency
of crashes related to change interval lengths that are possibly
too short. These crashes include angle crashes between
vehicles continuing through the intersection after one phase
has ended and the vehicles entering the intersection on the
following phase. Rear-end crashes may also be a symptom of
short change intervals.Time: Short. Effectiveness: Proven.
A3 – Restrict or eliminate turning maneuvers (including right turns
on red) (HTML
| PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Signalized intersections with a high frequency of crashes related
to turning maneuvers. For right turn on red (RTOR), the target of this strategy
is right-turning vehicles that are involved in rear-end or angle crashes with
cross-street vehicles approaching from the left or vehicles turning left from
the opposing approach, and crashes involving pedestrians. Time:
Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
A4 – Employ signal coordination
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Signalized intersections with a high frequency
of crashes related to turning maneuvers. For right turn on red
(RTOR), the target of this strategy is right-turning vehicles that
are involved in rear-end or angle crashes with cross-street
vehicles approaching from the left or vehicles turning left from
the opposing approach, and crashes involving pedestrians.
Time: Medium. Effectiveness: Proven.
A5 – Employ emergency vehicle preemption
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Signalized intersections where normal traffic
operations impede emergency vehicles and where traffic
conditions create a potential for conflicts between emergency
and non-emergency vehicles.
Time: Medium. Effectiveness: Proven.
A6 – Improve operation of pedestrian and bicycle
facilities at signalized intersections
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Signalized intersections with high
frequencies of pedestrian and/or bicycle crashes. Also on
routes serving schools or other generators of pedestrian
and bicycle traffic.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried/Proven.
A7 – Remove unwarranted signal
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Signalized intersections where the traffic
volumes and safety record do not warrant a traffic signal.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Proven.
CATEGORY B: REDUCE INTERSECTION CONFLICTS THROUGH GEOMETRIC IMPROVEMENTS
B1 – Provide/improve left-turn channelization
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Signalized intersections where crashes related
to left-turn movements are an issue.
Time: Medium. Effectiveness: Tried/ Proven.
B2 – Provide/improve right-turn channelization
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Signalized intersections with a high frequency
of rear-end collisions resulting from conflicts between: (1)
vehicles turning right and following vehicles; and (2) vehicles
turning right and through vehicles coming from the left on the
cross street.
Time: Medium. Effectiveness: Proven.
B3 – Improve geometry of pedestrian and bicycle
facilities
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Signalized intersections with high
frequencies of pedestrian and/or bicycle crashes and on
routes serving schools or other generators of pedestrian
and bicycle traffic.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried/Proven.
B4 – Revise geometry of complex intersections
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Signalized intersections with high levels of
crashes on a leg where other low-cost strategies have not been
successful or are not considered appropriate.
Time: Long. Effectiveness: Tried/Proven.
B5 – Construct special solutions
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Signalized intersections with high
frequencies of crashes that are not reduced through other
lower-cost solutions.
Time: Long. Effectiveness: Tried.
CATEGORY C: IMPROVE SIGHT DISTANCE AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
C1 – Clear sight triangles
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Signalized intersections where there is a high
frequency of crashes between vehicles turning right on red
from one street and through vehicles on the other street
or crashes involving left turning traffic where landscaped
medians are present.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
C2 – Redesign intersection approaches
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Signalized intersections with safety problems
related to sight distance that cannot be addressed with less
expensive methods.
Time: Long. Effectiveness: Proven.
CATEGORY D: IMPROVE DRIVER AWARENESS OF INTERSECTIONS AND SIGNAL CONTROL
D1 – Improve visibility of intersections on approach(es)
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Signalized intersections with a high frequency of crashes attributed to drivers being unaware of the presence
of the intersection.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
D2 – Improve visibility of signals and signs at
intersections
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Signalized intersections with a high frequency
of right-angle and rear-end crashes occurring because drivers
are unable to see traffic signals and signs sufficiently in advance
to safely negotiate the intersection being approached.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
CATEGORY E: IMPROVE DRIVER COMPLIANCE WITH TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
E1 – Provide public information and education
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Signalized intersections with a high frequency
of crashes related to drivers either being unaware of (or
refusing to obey) traffic laws and regulations that impact traffic
safety (especially red-light running, speeding, and not yielding
to pedestrians).
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
E2 – Provide targeted conventional enforcement of traffic laws
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Signalized intersections with a high frequency
of crashes related to drivers either being unaware of (or
refusing to obey) traffic laws and regulations that impact
traffic safety.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
E3 – Implement automated enforcement of red-light running (cameras)
(HTML
| PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Signalized intersections with a high frequency of right-angle
and rear-end crashes attributed to drivers who intentionally disobey red signal
indications. Time: Medium. Effectiveness:
Proven.
E4 – Implement automated enforcement of approach
speeds (cameras)
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Signalized intersections with a high frequency
of crashes attributed to drivers who intentionally disobey
posted approach speed limits.
Time: Medium. Effectiveness: Tried.
E5 – Control speed on approaches
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Signalized intersections with a high frequency
of crashes attributed to drivers who intentionally disobey
posted approach speed limits.
Time: Medium. Effectiveness: Experimental.
CATEGORY F: IMPROVE ACCESS MANAGEMENT NEAR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
F1 – Restrict access to properties using driveway
closures or turn restrictions
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Signalized intersections with high crash
frequencies related to driveways adjacent to the intersection.
Generally, driveways within 250 feet of the intersection are
the greatest concern.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
F2 – Restrict cross-median access near intersections
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Approaches to signalized intersections with
a high frequency of crashes involving drivers making turns
across medians.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
CATEGORY G: IMPROVE SAFETY THROUGH OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE TREATMENTS
G1 – Improve drainage in intersection and on approaches (HTML
| PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Signalized intersections with a high frequency of crashes that
are related to poor drainage. Such crashes involve vehicles that hydroplane
and, hence, are not able to stop when required. Time: Medium.
Effectiveness: Tried.
G2 – Provide skid resistance in intersection and on approaches
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Signalized intersection approaches where
skidding is determined to be a problem, especially in wet
conditions.
Time: Medium. Effectiveness: Tried.
G3 – Coordinate closely spaced signals near at-grade railroad crossings
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Signalized intersections in close proximity to
at-grade railroad crossings with a high frequency of crashes.
This situation presents a significant potential for vehicletrain
crashes, but vehicle-vehicle crashes could also occur if
drivers try to speed through an intersection to avoid waiting
in a queue near the railroad crossing.
Time: Medium. Effectiveness: Tried.
G4 – Relocate signal hardware out of clear zone
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Signalized intersections where signal hardware
is located within the clear zone or is a sight obstruction
(particularly on high-speed approaches).
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Tried.
G5 – Restrict or eliminate parking on intersection approaches
(HTML | PDF).
WHERE TO USE – Signalized intersections with permitted parking
on the approaches that may present a safety hazard either by
blocking sight distance or due to parking maneuvers.
Time: Short. Effectiveness: Proven.
![Stylized bar graph shows that, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration FARS database, in 2006, 2,718 fatalities occurred at signalized intersections, 5,715 fatalities occurred at unsignalized intersections, and 364 fatalities occurred under other/unknown conditions.](images/fatalities.jpg)