Healthier Lives Through Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
Skip Navigation
U.S.Department of Health and Human Services www.hhs.gov
National Institutes of Health Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research National Institutes of Health
Home
About OBSSR Funding Opportunities Scientific Areas Training and Education News & Events Publications Sitemap
Go
MissionHistoryFrom The DirectorStrategic PlanStaffBehavioral and Social Sciences Research Coordinating Committee
Print Printer Friendly Text Size Text Size Small Text Size Medium Text Size Big
History
BSSR Definition
OBSSR 10th Anniversary
News

December 12, 2008
Retreat Refreshes Behavioral, Social Sciences

Dr. Christine Bachrach, acting director of the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research, wanted just one thing out of the first-ever day-long retreat for NIH’s widely dispersed community of behavioral and social scientists, held Nov. 12 at Natcher Bldg.


December 12, 2008
CBT4CBT
New Hope for Treatment of Addiction


Drug addiction is notoriously tough to treat, but now research is showing a fresh way to tackle the problem. It’s called computer-based training for cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT4CBT)


OBSSR’s Mabry Wins with Systems Analysis Team


  More News >>

Calendar

January 28-29, 2009 Dissemination and Implementation Conference


February 9, 2009, ­ 10:00 – 11:00 AM
Stigma: Lessons & New Directions from a Decade of Research on Mental Illness


July 12-24, 2009
OBSSR/NIH Summer Training Institute on Randomized Clinical Trials Involving Behavioral Interventions


May 3-8, 2009
Institute on Systems Science and Health



May 22-25, 2009
Gene-Environment Interplay in Stress and Health at the Association for Psychological Science 21st Annual Convention, San Francisco, CA

  More Events >>
Home > About OBSSRHistory > Adherence Research Network


NIH Adherence Research Network

Background

Several recent reports and literature reviews point to the continuing need for improving adherence to therapeutic regimens. Adherence rates vary considerably across diseases and treatments, measuring instruments, and populations, with rates ranging from 30% to 60% in many instances. Most researchers agree that at least 50% of persons for whom drugs are prescribed fail to receive the full benefit through inadequate adherence. As noted by the American Heart Association (1997), the rationale for enhancing [adherence] is based on the premise that the patient will get well or stay well if the physician, other healthcare providers, and the healthcare organization make appropriate recommendations, providing the patient has the requisite knowledge, motivation, skills, and resources to follow the recommendations.

Lack of adherence to therapeutic regimens may result in poorer health for individuals as well as economic costs for their health-care organizations and the broader society. The reasons for non-adherence are multifaceted and not fully understood. Health-care providers, organizational systems, and personal factors all play a role in adherence to therapeutic regimens. Thus, to understand and eventually improve adherence, conceptual frameworks and interventions need to take into account institutional, system, situational, interpersonal, and personal factors as well as the characteristics of the illness or condition and of the treatment regimen.

Research has demonstrated the efficacy of a variety of approaches to improving adherence to therapeutic regimens in controlled laboratory or field experimental situations, in small, selected samples, or over limited periods of time. Less is known about the effectiveness of interventions when they are moved from controlled research settings to where health care is actually practiced with individuals of varied backgrounds over extensive periods of time. How does the success of interventions to improve adherence vary across types of health-care providers, settings, and persons of varying educational, economic, and ethnic backgrounds? What adjustments may be needed to implement interventions in the real world of health care and under what circumstances? In addition to research on effectiveness, opportunities may exist for research on adapting and assessing the efficacy of promising intervention strategies that have been used successfully to improve adherence, but in small, selected (e.g., unrepresentative) samples. Similarly, behavior-change strategies that have been successful in one domain may hold promise for improving adherence to therapeutic regimens for other illnesses or health conditions.

In response to the public health significance of such issues as these, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has issued a number of funding announcements in order to encourage fundamental and translational research. Among these is the Request for Applications (RFA) on Testing Interventions to Improve Adherence to Pharmacological Treatments. Under the leadership of the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research (OBSSR), an informal network of program officers at several NIH Institutes, Offices, and Centers emerged out of the cooperative efforts to issue and administer this RFA.

In order to encourage and facilitate further research on adherence, compliance, and related issues, the NIH Adherence Research Network is developing this HomePage. We intend to post information about:

Programs and initiatives at the NIH

Policies affecting research

Research resources (e.g., data sets)

Currently active funded research projects

Your suggestions for suitable subjects and services that we might provide the research community are welcome. Please send comments to:

Lynn Bosco, MD, MPH
Medical Officer
Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
Office of the Director
National Institutes of Health
Email: BoscoL@od.nih.gov