Welcome to NQMC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Complete Summary


TITLE

Major depression in adults in primary care: percentage of patients who have reached remission at six months (+/- 30 days) after initiating treatment, i.e., have any PHQ-9 score less than five after six months (+/- 30 days).

SOURCE(S)

  • Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI). Major depression in adults in primary care. Bloomington (MN): Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI); May 2008. 84 p. [244 references]

Measure Domain

PRIMARY MEASURE DOMAIN

SECONDARY MEASURE DOMAIN

Does not apply to this measure

Brief Abstract

DESCRIPTION

This measure is used to assess the percentage of patients who have reached remission at six months (+/- 30 days) after initiating treatment, i.e., have any PHQ-9 score less than five after six months (+/- 30 days).

RATIONALE

The priority aim addressed by this measure is to improve the outcomes of treatment for major depression.

PRIMARY CLINICAL COMPONENT

Major depression; remission; Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) score; Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score

DENOMINATOR DESCRIPTION

Number of adult patients older than 18 years with a new primary care diagnosis* of major depression who have remained under depression management within their primary care clinic for six months

Suggested International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes include: 296.2x, 296.3x

*New diagnosis = no diagnosis in the six-month period prior to the target quarter.

NUMERATOR DESCRIPTION

Number of patients whose quantitative symptom assessment tool (Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]) administered six months (+/- 30 days) after initiating treatment, was less than 5 or (Hamilton Rating Scale) 7 or less

Evidence Supporting the Measure

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE CRITERION OF QUALITY

  • A clinical practice guideline or other peer-reviewed synthesis of the clinical evidence

NATIONAL GUIDELINE CLEARINGHOUSE LINK

Evidence Supporting Need for the Measure

NEED FOR THE MEASURE

Unspecified

State of Use of the Measure

STATE OF USE

Current routine use

CURRENT USE

Internal quality improvement

Application of Measure in its Current Use

CARE SETTING

Physician Group Practices/Clinics

PROFESSIONALS RESPONSIBLE FOR HEALTH CARE

Advanced Practice Nurses
Nurses
Physicians

LOWEST LEVEL OF HEALTH CARE DELIVERY ADDRESSED

Group Clinical Practices

TARGET POPULATION AGE

Age greater than 18 years

TARGET POPULATION GENDER

Either male or female

STRATIFICATION BY VULNERABLE POPULATIONS

Unspecified

Characteristics of the Primary Clinical Component

INCIDENCE/PREVALENCE

In a national survey from the World Health Organization of more than 9,000 adults age 18 and over, the prevalence of major depression was 6.7 percent.

EVIDENCE FOR INCIDENCE/PREVALENCE

ASSOCIATION WITH VULNERABLE POPULATIONS

  • Women (including pregnant and postpartum women). The rate of perinatal depression in the general population has been 10% to 15%. According to O'Hara, there is an increased incidence of perinatal depression as follows:
    • 25% - history of major depressive disorder
    • 35% - history of major depression during pregnancy
    • 50% - history of previous postpartum depression
    • 70% - history of both major depressive disorder and postpartum depression
  • Depression in the elderly is widespread, often undiagnosed and usually untreated. The rate of depression in adults older than 65 years of age ranges from 7% to 36% in medical outpatient clinics and increases to 40% in the hospitalized elderly.

EVIDENCE FOR ASSOCIATION WITH VULNERABLE POPULATIONS

  • Gaynes BN, Gavin N, Meltzer-Brody S, Lohr KN, Swinson T, Gartlehner G, Brody S, Miller WC. Perinatal depression: prevalence, screening accuracy, and screening outcomes: summary. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); 2005 Feb. 8 p. (Evidence report/technology assessment; no. 119). [77 references]


  • Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI). Major depression in adults in primary care. Bloomington (MN): Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI); May 2008. 84 p. [244 references]


  • O'Hara MW, Swain AM. Rates and risk of postpartum depression: a meta-analysis. Int Rev Psychiatry 1996 Mar;8(1):37-54.

BURDEN OF ILLNESS

  • Major depression is a treatable cause of pain, suffering, disability and death.
  • The estimate of the lifetime prevalence of suicide in those ever hospitalized for suicidality is 8.6%. The lifetime risk is 4% for affective disorder patients hospitalized without specification of suicidality.
  • Cardiovascular disease, diabetes and chronic pain are common comorbidities in patients with depression.
  • Major depression is associated with an increased risk of developing coronary artery disease, and has also been shown to increase the risk of mortality in patients after myocardial infarction by as much as four-fold. Moderate to severe depression before coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and/or persistent depression after surgery increases the risk of death after CABG more than two-fold compared to non-depressed patients.
  • Depression earlier in life increases the risk of developing diabetes by twofold.
  • In a national survey from the World Health Organization (WHO), major depression was second only to back and neck pain for having the greatest effect on disability days, at 386.6 million U.S. days per year. In another WHO study of more than 240,000 people across 60 countries, depression was shown to produce the greatest decrease in quality of health compared to several other chronic diseases. Health scores worsened when depression was a comorbid condition, and the most disability combination was depression and diabetes.

EVIDENCE FOR BURDEN OF ILLNESS

  • Blumenthal JA, Lett HS, Babyak MA, White W, Smith PK, Mark DB, Jones R, Mathew JP, Newman MF, NORG Investigators. Depression as a risk factor for mortality after coronary artery bypass surgery. Lancet 2003 Aug 23;362(9384):604-9. PubMed


  • Bostwick JM, Pankratz VS. Affective disorders and suicide risk: a reexamination. Am J Psychiatry 2000 Dec;157(12):1925-32. PubMed


  • Frasure-Smith N, LespĂ©rance F, Talajic M. Depression and 18-month prognosis after myocardial infarction. Circulation 1995 Feb 15;91(4):999-1005. PubMed


  • Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI). Major depression in adults in primary care. Bloomington (MN): Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI); May 2008. 84 p. [244 references]


  • Katon W, von Korff M, Ciechanowski P, Russo J, Lin E, Simon G, Ludman E, Walker E, Bush T, Young B. Behavioral and clinical factors associated with depression among individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004 Apr;27(4):914-20. PubMed


  • Merikangas KR, Ames M, Cui L, Stang PE, Ustun TB, Von Korff M, Kessler RC. The impact of comorbidity of mental and physical conditions on role disability in the US adult household population. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007 Oct;64(10):1180-8. PubMed


  • Moussavi S, Chatterji S, Verdes E, Tandon A, Patel V, Ustun B. Depression, chronic diseases, and decrements in health: results from the World Health Surveys. Lancet 2007 Sep 8;370(9590):851-8. PubMed


  • Rugulies R. Depression as a predictor for coronary heart disease. a review and meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med 2002 Jul;23(1):51-61. [163 references] PubMed


  • Schonfeld WH, Verboncoeur CJ, Fifer SK, Lipschutz RC, Lubeck DP, Buesching DP. The functioning and well-being of patients with unrecognized anxiety disorders and major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord 1997 Apr;43(2):105-19. PubMed


  • Wulsin LR, Singal BM. Do depressive symptoms increase the risk for the onset of coronary disease? A systematic quantitative review. Psychosom Med 2003 Mar-Apr;65(2):201-10. [53 references] PubMed

UTILIZATION

Unspecified

COSTS

Work productivity is significantly decreased in employees with major depression with 8.4 hours lost on average per worker per week. This is estimated to cost employers $44 billion per year in lost productivity.

EVIDENCE FOR COSTS

Institute of Medicine National Healthcare Quality Report Categories

IOM CARE NEED

Getting Better
Living with Illness

IOM DOMAIN

Effectiveness

Data Collection for the Measure

CASE FINDING

Users of care only

DESCRIPTION OF CASE FINDING

Adults older than 18 years with a new primary care diagnosis* of major depression

The primary source of data would be a registry. Other possible sources include claims or encounter data, scheduling information, and list of diagnosis codes.

The suggested time period for data collection is a calendar month.

*New diagnosis = no diagnosis in the six-month period prior to the target quarter.

DENOMINATOR SAMPLING FRAME

Patients associated with provider

DENOMINATOR INCLUSIONS/EXCLUSIONS

Inclusions
Number of adult patients older than 18 years with a new primary care diagnosis* of major depression who have remained under depression management within their primary care clinic for six months

Suggested International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes include: 296.2x, 296.3x

*New diagnosis = no diagnosis in the six-month period prior to the target quarter.

Exclusions
Unspecified

RELATIONSHIP OF DENOMINATOR TO NUMERATOR

All cases in the denominator are equally eligible to appear in the numerator

DENOMINATOR (INDEX) EVENT

Clinical Condition

DENOMINATOR TIME WINDOW

Time window is a fixed period of time

NUMERATOR INCLUSIONS/EXCLUSIONS

Inclusions
Number of patients whose quantitative symptom assessment tool (Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]) administered six months (+/- 30 days) after initiating treatment, was less than 5 or (Hamilton Rating Scale) 7 or less

Exclusions
Unspecified

MEASURE RESULTS UNDER CONTROL OF HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS, ORGANIZATIONS AND/OR POLICYMAKERS

The measure results are somewhat or substantially under the control of the health care professionals, organizations and/or policymakers to whom the measure applies.

NUMERATOR TIME WINDOW

Fixed time period

DATA SOURCE

Administrative data
Registry data

LEVEL OF DETERMINATION OF QUALITY

Not Individual Case

OUTCOME TYPE

Clinical Outcome

PRE-EXISTING INSTRUMENT USED

Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV TR)

Computation of the Measure

SCORING

Rate

INTERPRETATION OF SCORE

Better quality is associated with a higher score

ALLOWANCE FOR PATIENT FACTORS

Unspecified

STANDARD OF COMPARISON

Internal time comparison

Evaluation of Measure Properties

EXTENT OF MEASURE TESTING

Unspecified

Identifying Information

ORIGINAL TITLE

Percentage of patients who have reached remission at six months (+/- 30 days) after initiating treatment, i.e., have any PHQ-9 score less than five after six months (+/- 30 days).

MEASURE COLLECTION

DEVELOPER

Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement

FUNDING SOURCE(S)

The following Minnesota health plans provide direct financial support: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, HealthPartners, Medica, Metropolitan Health Plan, PreferredOne and UCare Minnesota. In-kind support is provided by the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement's (ICSI) members.

COMPOSITION OF THE GROUP THAT DEVELOPED THE MEASURE

Work Group Members: Mary Ellen Jaehne, LICSW (Work Group Leader) (Hamm Clinic) (Mental Health); Michael Trangle, MD (Work Group Leader) (HealthPartners/Regions Hospital) (Psychiatry); Craig Anderson, MD (SuperiorHealth Medical Group) (Family Medicine); Barbara Bank, MD (Fairview Health Services) (Family Medicine); Joel Haugen, MD (Dakota Clinic) (Family Medicine); Jay Mitchell, MD (Mayo Clinic) (Family Medicine); David Rossmiller, MD (Family HealthServices Minnesota) (Family Medicine; Bob Haight, PharmD, BCPP (Fairview Health Services) (Pharmacy); Cedric Skillon, MD (Park Nicollet Health Services) (Psychiatry); Amitabh Tipnis, MD (Hennepin County Medical Center) (Psychiatry); Jeffrey Boyd, PhD (Hennepin County Medical Center) (Psychology); Deb Rich, PhD (Fairview Health Services) (Psychology); Heidi Novak, WHNP (North Point Health & Wellness Center) (Women's Health OB/GYN); Nancy Jaeckels (Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement) (Measurement Advisor); Pam Pietruszewski, MA (Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement) (Facilitator)

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/OTHER POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

ICSI has adopted a policy of transparency, disclosing potential conflict and competing interests of all individuals who participate in the development, revision and approval of ICSI documents (guidelines, order sets and protocols). This applies to all work groups (guidelines, order sets and protocols) and committees (Committee on Evidence-Based Practice, Cardiovascular Steering Committee, Women's Health Steering Committee, Preventive & Health Maintenance Steering Committee, Respiratory Steering Committee and the Patient Safety & Reliability Steering Committee).

Participants must disclose any potential conflict and competing interests they or their dependents (spouse, dependent children, or others claimed as dependents) may have with any organization with commercial, proprietary, or political interests relevant to the topics covered by ICSI documents. Such disclosures will be shared with all individuals who prepare, review and approve ICSI documents.

No work group members have potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

ADAPTATION

Measure was not adapted from another source.

RELEASE DATE

2008 May

MEASURE STATUS

Please note: This measure has been updated. The National Quality Measures Clearinghouse is working to update this summary.

SOURCE(S)

  • Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI). Major depression in adults in primary care. Bloomington (MN): Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI); May 2008. 84 p. [244 references]

MEASURE AVAILABILITY

NQMC STATUS

This NQMC summary was completed by ECRI Institute on June 30, 2008.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NQMC summary (abstracted Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement [ICSI] Measure) is based on the original measure, which is subject to the measure developer's copyright restrictions.

The abstracted ICSI Measures contained in this Web site may be downloaded by any individual or organization. If the abstracted ICSI Measures are downloaded by an individual, the individual may not distribute copies to third parties.

If the abstracted ICSI Measures are downloaded by an organization, copies may be distributed to the organization's employees but may not be distributed outside of the organization without the prior written consent of the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement, Inc.

All other copyright rights in the abstracted ICSI Measures are reserved by the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement, Inc. The Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement, Inc. assumes no liability for any adaptations or revisions or modifications made to the abstracts of the ICSI Measures.

Disclaimer

NQMC DISCLAIMER