[Xplor-nih] Fe vdW radius

[Charles at schwieters.org]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Hello Dan--

> Thanks a lot. one question though. The difference between both
> references are quite large, for Fe 2.27 --1.33. Do you have any idea
> about that.

these numbers are for differently charged species. The FeII is
significantly smaller than elemental iron.

Charles
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQFGgXniPK2zrJwS/lYRAjmmAKCAradr6Mi0WnBUeeAekV4rUz2pWACfQfjC
GHYxMGC25QM2r0DKeEgHWKA=
=bPJ4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----