skip navigationNational Nutrition Summit 2000
Home Background Activities Future Actions 1969 White House Conference Resources Contact Us Site Map
 

Activities

Summit Agenda

Opening Ceremonies

Breakout Sessions

Breakout Summaries

Perspectives for Future Actions

Overarching Themes


guy biking

 

NNS logo

 

 

 

Agenda
Session I
* Part 1
* Part 2
Session II
* Part 1
* Part 2
Session III
Session IV
Session V
Session VI
* Group A
* Group B
Session VII
* Group C
* Group D
* Group E
Session VIII
* Group F
* Group G
Session IX
Session X

 

 

line

Breakout Session VI—Influences of the Community Food and Activity Environment on Obesity

Discussion Group A: Influences of Community Physical Activity Environments on Obesity

Moderators: Mark Fenton, Kathy Spangler

Recorders: Kathy Cullinen, Shannon Hughes

Purpose: Community infrastructure and networks can promote health. This discussion group considered those networks that impact physical activity and recommended ways that communities and neighborhoods could promote healthy weight and prevent obesity in priority populations.

Process: The group opened with brief presentations from the moderators and selected four areas as actionable priorities through a consensus-making process. A brief discussion of the specific recommendations contained within each priority is included in the discussion that follows each recommendation.

Introduction
The introduction by Mark Fenton and Kathy Spangler shared their viewpoint with the session participants regarding the influence of community physical activity environments on obesity. The key principles discussed by the group were to eliminate inequities in the opportunities for regular physical activity and to reduce barriers across all groups. Eliminating disparities, one of the goals of Healthy People 2010, requires surveillance and programming appropriate for diverse communities and needs. The least active persons in high-risk environments need to be reached by targeted programs and approaches. Opportunities and barriers must be inventoried in various communities to consider eliminating and hurdling barriers facing these communities. In addition, there is still a need for reliable and valid indicators of physical activity.

Actionable Priority: Social Marketing Agenda
A social marketing agenda would work to improve the acceptance of physical activity, increase incentives for participation, and enhance the attractiveness of physical activity (i.e., make it attractive to walk or ride a bike routinely). Early targets include State government and public health agencies.

Ideas and Considerations

  • The social marketing agenda should address widely diverse target audiences from across the lifespan and in different geographic locations, looking especially at high-risk populations. Messages need to be culturally relevant and build on social norms and infrastructure.
  • Funding could come from the healthcare sector or from the taxation of unhealthy foods. In addition, who will develop and deliver the message and how active community environments will be promoted to diverse groups must be resolved.

Back to Top

Actionable Priority: Infiltrate and Recruit Communities Through Schools
One way to reach communities would be through schools, by universally applying a redesigned physical education program that focuses on inclusion, activity, and lifelong activity skills.

Ideas and Considerations

  • Parent-teacher organizations and community groups can involve senior citizens and other community members through school-based facilities and programs. State and local leaders need to be informed of such opportunities.
  • Schools can support the nationwide initiative Safe Routes to School.
  • Schools can create more active environments for faculty and staff and offer the opportunity for cross-curricular efforts. They also can offer facilities for physical activity.
  • Schools can act as community activity centers, providing lifelong education not only to children but also to other community members, such as senior citizens.

Back to Top

Actionable Priority: Improve Community Infrastructure
Community infrastructure could be improved through intersectoral cooperation (e.g., health, transportation, planning, and public service sectors). Public health groups need to work with and through these entities to promote change.

Ideas and Considerations

  • To begin this strategy, advocacy and support are needed. Intersectoral cooperation could be initiated by convening community-level discussions, perhaps facilitated by public health agencies or prevention research centers.
  • Communities with high densities and communities with mixed use of land (e.g., residential and commercial) should consider bike/pedestrian facilities and traffic-calming strategies to improve infrastructure and increase opportunities for physical activity.
  • Transportation initiatives need to continue working with "smart growth" initiatives. Zoning and infrastructure can help make smart growth, which equals healthy growth.

Back to Top

Actionable Priority: Develop Commitment and Leadership of Elected Officials and Public Servants
Commitment from elected officials and public servants is needed to overcome barriers within the community. Policymakers need to be educated and provided with economic data and effective solutions, such as opportunities for community-planning grants. Governmental commitment to change needs to be developed at Federal, State, and local levels. At the Federal level, the White House, Cabinet, and Congress need the will to make change and the desire to take initiative.

Ideas and Considerations

  • Interagency dialog at regular intervals (e.g., between the Departments of Health and Human Services, Transportation, Commerce, Interior, and Justice) could help redesign political infrastructure and lay out clear benchmarks and goals, measurable outcomes, and specific responsibilities.
  • Targeted funding for research and surveillance needs to be established.
  • A national network and clearinghouse could help facilitate interagency dialog and commitment among elected officials and public servants.
  • Educational facilities are interested in economic (and academic) benefits. We must be able to demonstrate that good nutrition and physical activity are economically and academically beneficial.

Back to Top