Random_Intensity_30_3a: 30 Cases, 30 Controls, 300 Peaks
Brian T. Luke (lukeb@ncifcrf.gov)Return to Description of Tables
BMDK Analysis
22 peaks selected as putative biomarkers by the 10 methods within BMDK
13 | 1 | 3 | ||||||||
26 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |||||
51 | 3 | 5 | ||||||||
72 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |||||||
113 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | |
118 | 5 | |||||||||
125 | 4 | |||||||||
136 | 4 | |||||||||
147 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1 | ||||||
168 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||||
184 | 4 | |||||||||
208 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||
213 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | ||||||
217 | 5 | 2 | ||||||||
227 | 2 | 3 | ||||||||
256 | 4 | |||||||||
266 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |||||||
269 | 5 | |||||||||
271 | 4 | |||||||||
272 | 2 | 4 | 3 | |||||||
277 | 3 | |||||||||
284 | 4 |
Peaks used in each of the best distance-dependent 6-nearest neighbor classifiers
13 | X | X | X | |||||||
26 | ||||||||||
51 | ||||||||||
72 | ||||||||||
113 | X | |||||||||
118 | ||||||||||
125 | ||||||||||
136 | X | X | X | X | ||||||
147 | X | |||||||||
168 | X | X | X | |||||||
184 | X | X | X | |||||||
208 | ||||||||||
213 | X | X | X | |||||||
217 | ||||||||||
227 | ||||||||||
256 | X | X | X | |||||||
266 | X | |||||||||
269 | ||||||||||
271 | ||||||||||
272 | ||||||||||
277 | ||||||||||
284 |
Sensitivity, specificity, %undetermined, and quality (sensitivity + specificity - %undetermined) for each of the best distance-dependent 6-nearest neighbor classifiers using any of the 22 putative biomarkers.
76.7 | 74.1 | 80.8 | 76.7 | 65.4 | 77.3 | 80.8 | 90.0 | 76.9 | 90.0 | |
72.4 | 77.8 | 77.8 | 69.0 | 86.4 | 90.9 | 76.9 | 82.1 | 77.8 | 85.2 | |
1.7 | 10.0 | 11.7 | 1.7 | 20.0 | 26.7 | 13.3 | 20.0 | 11.7 | 21.7 | |
147.4 | 141.9 | 146.9 | 144.0 | 131.7 | 141.5 | 144.4 | 152.1 | 143.0 | 153.5 |
Sensitivity, specificity, %undetermined, and quality (sensitivity + specificity - %undetermined) for each of the best distance-dependent 6-nearest neighbor classifiers using any of the 22 putative biomarkers with the caveat that %undetermined cannot exceed 5.0%.
76.7 | 69.0 | 71.4 | 76.7 | None | None | 72.4 | None | 72.4 | None | |
72.4 | 70.0 | 79.3 | 69.0 | None | None | 64.3 | None | 64.3 | None | |
1.7 | 1.7 | 5.0 | 1.7 | None | None | 5.0 | None | 5.0 | None | |
147.4 | 137.3 | 145.7 | 144.0 | None | None | 131.7 | None | 131.7 | None |
Fingerprint Analysis
Sensitivity, specificity and quality (sensitivity + specificity) for the best and 200th best decision tree constructed from any of the 300 peak intensities. The evolutionary programming search used a population size of 200 and ran for 400 generations. A decision node became a terminal node when it contained 1% (no samples) or 4% (1 sample) of a given State.
Metric | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | ||||
1st | 200th | 1st | 200th | 1st | 200th | 1st | 200th | |
Sensitivity | 96.7 | 96.7 | 93.3 | 90.0 | 96.7 | 93.3 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Specificity | 93.3 | 93.3 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 96.7 | 93.3 |
Quality | 190.0 | 190.0 | 193.3 | 190.0 | 196.7 | 193.3 | 196.7 | 193.3 |
Sensitivity, specificity and quality (sensitivity + specificity) for the best and 200th best medoid classifier algorithm in each of the two runs using 5-, 6-, and 7-peak intensities from the set of 300. The evolutionary programming search used a population size of 400 and ran for 800 generations with the requirement that there are at most 20 Case-cells and 20 Control-cells.
Metric | 5-Features | 5-Features | 6-Features | 6-Features | 7-Features | 7-Features | ||||||
1st | 200th | 1st | 200th | 1st | 200th | 1st | 200th | 1st | 200th | 1st | 200th | |
Sens | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 93.3 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 96.7 |
Spec | 100.0 | 90.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 96.7 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Quality | 200.0 | 190.0 | 200.0 | 193.3 | 200.0 | 196.7 | 200.0 | 200.0 | 200.0 | 200.0 | 200.0 | 196.7 |
(Last updated 4/21/07)