|
|
Construction Rating Guildeline
Quality of Product or Service
N/A=Not Applicable 0=Unsatisfactory 1=Poor 2=Fair 3=Good 4=Excellent 5=Outstanding
Unsatisfactory |
Nonconformances are jeopardizing the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of Agency resources |
Poor |
Overall compliance requires major Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements |
Fair |
Overall compliance requires minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements |
Good |
Overall compliance does not impact achievement of contract requirements |
Excellent |
There are no quality problems |
Outstanding |
The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent". |
Cost Control
N/A=Not Applicable 0=Unsatisfactory 1=Poor 2=Fair 3=Good 4=Excellent 5=Outstanding
Unsatisfactory |
Ability to manage cost issues is jeopardizing performance of contract requirements, despite use of Agency resources |
Poor |
Ability to manage cost issues requires major Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements |
Fair |
Ability to control cost issues requires minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements |
Good |
Management of cost issues does not impact achievement of contract requirements |
Excellent |
There are no cost management issues |
Outstanding |
The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent". |
Timeliness of Performance
N/A=Not Applicable 0=Unsatisfactory 1=Poor 2=Fair 3=Good 4=Excellent 5=Outstanding
Unsatisfactory |
Delays are jeopardizing the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of Agency resources |
Poor |
Delays require major Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements |
Fair |
Delays require minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements |
Good |
Delays do not impact achievement of contract requirements |
Excellent |
There are no delays |
Outstanding |
The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent". |
Effectiveness of Management / Business Relations
N/A=Not Applicable 0=Unsatisfactory 1=Poor 2=Fair 3=Good 4=Excellent 5=Outstanding
Unsatisfactory |
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is not effective |
Poor |
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is marginally effective |
Fair |
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is somewhat effective |
Good |
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is usually effective |
Excellent |
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is effective |
Outstanding |
The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent". |
Compliance With Labor Standards
N/A=Not Applicable 0=Unsatisfactory 1=Poor 2=Fair 3=Good 4=Excellent 5=Outstanding
Unsatisfactory |
Noncompliance is jeopardizing the achievement of contract requirements, despite Agency intervention |
Poor |
Overall compliance requires major Agency intervention to ensure achievement of contract requirements |
Fair |
Overall compliance requires minor Agency intervention to ensure achievement of contract requirements |
Good |
Overall compliance does not impact achievement of contract requirements |
Excellent |
There are no compliance issues |
Outstanding |
The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent". |
Compliance With Safety Standards
N/A=Not Applicable 0=Unsatisfactory 1=Poor 2=Fair 3=Good 4=Excellent 5=Outstanding
Unsatisfactory |
Inadequate safety program/equipment/training is ineffective and jeopardizes the achievement of the contract requirements |
Poor |
Overall compliance requires major Agency resources to ensure corrective action when safety deficiencies are identified |
Fair |
Overall compliance requires minor Agency resources to ensure corrective action when safety deficiencies are identified |
Good |
Safety program/equipment/training and corrective action of safety deficiencies are usually effective |
Excellent |
There are no compliance issues with safety standards |
Outstanding |
The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent". |
Overall Rating
N/A=Not Applicable 0=Unsatisfactory 1=Poor 2=Fair 3=Good 4=Excellent 5=Outstanding
Unsatisfactory |
Nonconformances are jeopardizing the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of Agency resources |
Poor |
Overall compliance requires major Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements |
Fair |
Overall compliance requires minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements |
Good |
Overall compliance does not impact achievement of contract requirements |
Excellent |
There are no problems |
Outstanding |
The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent". |
|
Paulette Smith
E-mail: SmithPM@od.nih.gov
Alexander Tran
E-mail: TranA@od.nih.gov
David Redd
E-mail: Reddd@od.nih.gov
CPS help desk E-Mail: cps-support-l@list.nih.gov
PHONE: (301)451-2771
|