Your browser doesn't support JavaScript. Please upgrade to a modern browser or enable JavaScript in your existing browser.
Skip Navigation U.S. Department of Health and Human Services www.hhs.gov
Agency for Healthcare Research Quality www.ahrq.gov
www.ahrq.gov
Monitoring and Evaluating Medicaid Fee-for-Service Care Management Programs: User's Guide

References

1. Suh R. Presentation of evaluation findings (draft). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2005.

2. Johnson A. Measuring DM's net effect is harder than you might think. Manag Care 2003 June;12(6):28-32.

3. Williams C. Medicaid disease management: issues and promises. Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured. Washington, DC: Kaiser Family Foundation; September 2004.

4. Letter to State Medicaid Directors, Baltimore, MD: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2004 Feb 25.

5. Health Strategies Consultancy. Disease management in Medicaid. Oakland, CA: California HealthCare Foundation, 2004.

6. Leatherman S, Berwick D, Iles D, et al. The business case for quality: case studies and an analysis. Health Aff 2003 March-April; 22(2):17-30.

7. Holtz-Eakin D. An analysis of the literature on disease management programs. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office; 2004.

8. Goetzel RZ, Ozminkowski RJ, Villagra VG, et al. Return on investment in disease management: a review. Health Care Financ Rev 2005;26:1-19.

9. Glabman M. 'Take my word for it': the enduring dispute over measuring dm's economic value. Manag Care Mag Apr 2006. Available at: http://www.managedcaremag.com/archives/0604/0604.dmvalue.html. Accessed December 10, 2007.

10. Chang D, Burton A, O'Brien J, et al. Honesty as good policy: evaluating maryland's medicaid managed care program. Milbank Q 2003;81(3):389-414.

11. Wallace P. Is there long-term value in programs? Reflections on the 2004 CBO report. The Disease Management Colloquium. Philadelphia: Jefferson Medical College; 2005 June 22.

12. Lind A. Department of Social and Health Services, Washington State. Personal communication; March 17, 2006.

13. Vann C. Texas Health and Human Services Commission. Personal communication; March 26, 2006.

14. Suchman E. Evaluation research: principles and practice in public service and social action programs. New York: Russell Sage College; 1967.

15. Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available at http://www.cahps.ahrq.gov/. Accessed October 19, 2007.

16. Rosenman M, Holmes A, Ackermann R, et al. The Indiana chronic disease management program. Milbank Q 2006;84(1):135-63.

17. Congressional Budget Office. An analysis of the literature on disease management programs. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 2004.

18. Fitzner K, Sidorov J, Fetterolf D, et al. Principles for assessing disease management outcomes. Dis Manag 2004;7(3):191-201.

19. Christakis D, Connell F, Richardson A, et al. Report of disease management evaluation. Seattle, WA: University of Washington; 2004.

20. Lawson K. Virginia Department of Medical Assistance Services. Personal communication; March 29, 2006.

21. Hewson D. Community Care of North Carolina. Personal communication; October 12 2006 and March 16, 2007.

22. Morgan J. Pennsylvania Office of Medical Assistance Programs. Personal communication; March 6, 2006.

23. Blueprint for Health. Burlington, VT: Vermont Department of Health; 2005. Available at http://healthvermont.gov/blueprint.aspx. Accessed December 10, 2007.

25. North Carolina Area Health Education Centers. Chapel Hill, NC: North Carolina AHEC Program. Available at http://www.ncahec.net. Accessed December 10, 2007.

25. Inui T. Regenstief Institute, Indianapolis, IN. Personal communication; March 8, 2006.

26. Rosenman M, Holmes A, Ackermann R, et al. The Indiana Chronic Disease Management Program. Milbank Q 2006;84(1):135-63.

27. Lind A, Kaplan L, Berg G. Evaluation of an asthma disease management program in a Medicaid population. Dis Manag 2006;14(3):151-61.

28. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell, et al, eds. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press; 1996.

29. Rossi PH, Lipsey MW, Freeman HE. Evaluation: a systematic approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2003.

30. Veney JE, Kaluzny, AD. Evaluation and decision making for health services programs. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1998.

31. Wilson T. Evaluating ROI in State disease management programs. Issue Brief, State Coverage Initiatives. Washington, DC: AcademyHealth; 2003.

32. Fetterolf D, Wennberg D, DeVries A. Estimating the return on investment in disease management programs using a pre-post analysis. Dis Manag 2004 Spring;7(1):5-23.

33. Evaluation of Community Care of North Carolina asthma and diabetes management initiatives: January 2000-December 2002. Raleigh, NC: NC Foundation for Advanced Health Programs, Inc; 2004. Available at: http://www.communitycarenc.com/PDFDocs/Sheps%20Eval.pdf. Accessed December 10, 2007.

34. Linden A, Adams JL, Roberts N. Evaluation methods in disease management: determining program effectiveness. Washington, DC: Disease Management Association of America; 2006. Available at http://www.dmaa.org/pdf/Evaluation_Methods_in_DM.pdf. Accessed December 10, 2007.

35. Family and Children's Health Programs Group, Center for Medicaid and State Operations. The guide to quality measures: a compendium. Medicaid and SCHIP quality improvement, Volume 1.0. Baltimore, MD: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; Sept 2006. Available at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/MedicaidSCHIPQualPrac/Downloads/pmfinalaugust06.pdf. Accessed December 10, 2007.

36. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma (EPR-3). Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Health; July 2007. Available at http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma. Accessed December 10, 2007.

37. American Diabetes Association clinical practice recommendations, 2007. Diabetes Care 2007;1(Suppl 30). Available at http://www.diabetes.org/for-health-professionals-and-scientists/cpr.jsp. Accessed December 10, 2007.

Return to Contents
Proceed to Appendix 1

 

AHRQ Advancing Excellence in Health Care