DOE Genomes
-

Human Genome Project Information


Evaluating Gene Tests: Some Considerations

Basic Information
 FAQs
 Glossary
 Acronyms
 Links
 Genetics 101
 Publications

 Meetings Calendar
 Media Guide

About the Project
 What is it?
 Goals
 Landmark Papers
 Sequence Databases
 Timeline
 History
 Ethical Issues
 Benefits
 Genetics 101
 FAQs

Medicine &
the New Genetics

 Home
 Gene Testing
 Gene Therapy
 Pharmacogenomics

 Disease Information
 Genetic Counseling

Ethical, Legal,
Social Issues

 Home
 Privacy Legislation

 Gene Testing
 Gene Therapy
 Patenting
 Forensics
 Genetically Modified Food
 Behavioral Genetics
 Minorities, Race, Genetics
 Human Migration

Education
 Teachers
 Students
 Careers
 Webcasts
 Images
 Videos
 Chromosome Poster
 Presentations
 Genetics 101
 
Genética Websites en Español

Research
 Home
 Sequence Databases
 Landmark Papers
 Insights

Publications
 Chromosome Poster
 Primer Molecular Genetics
 List of All Publications

  ???Search This Site


 Contact Us
 Privacy Statement

 Site Stats and Credits
 Site Map

Considerations include test quality, the potential usefulness of the information the test provides, available preventive or treatment options, and social issues.

Test Quality

The analytical validity of a test can be determined by its

  • Sensitivity - test detects the mutations it was designed to detect
  • Specificity - test detects only those mutations it was designed to detect (i.e., it does not flag other DNA sequence variations, some of which may be normal variation)

Clinical Utility

What practical information can this test provide? What is the probability that a person who has or will get a disease will test positively? Need to consider test results in the context of mutation variability, gene penetrance, and gene expressivity.

Mutation variability (heterogeneity): Many different mutations can cause the same disease. Mutations can be in the same or different genes. Mutation tests often test for only the most common mutations.

Example: Cystic fibrosis --over 700 mutations (most are rare) in CFTR gene. Current tests are for about 70 common mutations.

It is important to consider the proportion of people with clinically significant disease that are detected by the test (clinical sensitivity). Current CF tests pick up 90% of CF mutations in whites, 50% in African-Americans and Hispanics, and 30% in Asian Americans.

Gene Penetrance: Probability of getting the disease when mutation is present. Incomplete penetrance - an individual with a mutation may never get the disease.

Example: BRCA1 and 2 genes (associated with a rare form of breast cancer) and ApoE gene (modifies risk of Alzheimer's Disease). Possible reasons for incomplete penetrance: Some mutations work together with other (unknown) mutations or with environmental factors.

Some mutations are completely penetrant - an individual with the mutation always gets the disease. Examples are Huntington's disease and Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) --a rare, inherited colon cancer that accounts for about 1% of all colorectal cancers.

Gene Expressivity: Range of disease severity for a mutation. Severity can vary widely for some diseases, and few specific mutations have been correlated with the severity of their expression in an individual.

Example: Severity of cystic fibrosis ranges from mild bronchial symptoms and male sterility to severe lung, pancreatic, and intestinal difficulties (usually fatal by 30 years of age).

The most common mutation in Caucasians has been associated with pancreatic insufficiency, but few other correlations have been made of disease gene mutations and their particular expression.

Available Treatment Options

Few treatments or preventive strategies exist for patients testing positive for most gene tests. Unfortunately, knowledge of a gene mutation alone is insufficient information for researchers trying to devise intervention strategies. Researchers must first understand the normal function of the disease-associated gene(s) and determine how the mutation disrupts that function.

Some exceptions exist, such as that for FAP. Experts recommend that even children at high risk be screened for mutations in the APC gene associated with FAP, because they can be monitored more frequently for growths and effective preventive surgical options can be chosen. Left untreated, FAP causes death at an average age of 42.

Social Issues

Genetic information is personal, powerful, potentially predictive, pedigree sensitive (affects families as well as individuals), permanent, and prejudicial.

Education on implications of testing and results is critical, yet only 2000 specially trained genetic counselors are currently available in the U.S., and training programs are not increasing their rolls. Most people will need to rely on primary-care physicians to explain results. This poses a great challenge for physicians, many of whom are not trained in molecular genetics. Many commercially available gene tests are still controversial in the scientific community, where their interpretation is debated.

Psychological issues - fear of unknown, coping with uncertainty, guilt, shame, survivor guilt, family dynamics.

Discrimination risk - by employers, insurers, commercial institutions, schools, army, others.

Ethical issues - privacy and confidentiality, fairness in use of information, commercialization/patents, social concepts of health and disease, reproductive rights.


For more information, see:
August 1998. Denise Casey, Science Writer (caseydk@ornl.gov)
Human Genome Management Information System
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
1060 Commerce Park
Oak Ridge, TN 37830
865/574-0597, Fax: /574-9998
HGMIS Web Site

Send the url of this page to a friend


Last modified: Friday, September 19, 2008

Home * Contacts * Disclaimer

Base URL: www.ornl.gov/hgmis

Office of Science Site sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, Human Genome Program