Plant Viruses Online   

Descriptions and Lists from the VIDE Database


Editors: Alan Brunt 1, Karen Crabtree 2, 4, Michael Dallwitz 3, Adrian Gibbs 2, Leslie Watson 2, 5 and Eric Zurcher 2, 3

  1. Horticulture Research International, Wellesbourne, Warwick CV35 9EF, UK and
    Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of London, South Kensington, London SW7 2BB, UK.
  2. Research School of Biological Sciences, Institute of Advanced Studies, Australian National University, GPO Box 475, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia.
  3. CSIRO Division of Entomology, GPO Box 1700, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia.
    Phone +61 6 246 4075. Fax +61 6 246 4000.
  4. Present address: 65 Garden Road, Woolmer Green, Knebworth SG2 6JZ, UK.
  5. Present address: 78 Vancouver Street, Albany, WA 6330, Australia.


CAB International Virus descriptions from the VIDE database have also been published in book form by CAB International. Copies of this book may be ordered from the publisher, or simply click here to order from The Internet Book Shop


Contents


Introduction

These pages contain information on most species of virus known to infect plants, not only those whose virions have been described, but also those like umbraviruses that have no virion protein genes of their own, and use the virion proteins of their symbiotic helper viruses instead. We include data on host range; transmission and control; geographical distribution; physical, chemical and genomic properties; taxonomy and relationships; and selected literature references. We also include the database accession numbers (up to Gb[90] and Em[44]) of the genomic sequences of viruses and of satellite RNAs, and provide links to the NCBI taxonomy database to facilitate searchs for these and for more current accessions. These pages also contain generic-level summaries of data for viruses that are definitive or tentative members of genera or `groups'.


DELTA and the VIDE database

These pages are a product of the VIDE (Virus Identification Data Exchange) project (Boswell and Gibbs, 1983; Boswell and Gibbs, 1986; Boswell, Dallwitz, Gibbs and Watson, 1986; Brunt, Crabtree and Gibbs, 1990; Búchen-Osmond, Crabtree, Gibbs and McLean, 1988; Watson, Dallwitz, Gibbs and Pankhurst,1988; Brunt et al., 1996). The project has used the DELTA (DEscription Language for TAxonomy) system (Dallwitz, 1980; Dallwitz, Paine and Zurcher, 1993; also URL http://www.keil.ukans.edu/delta/) for formatting, storing and manipulating data on all plant viruses. The data to be stored were defined in the character list, which also served as a questionnaire for each virus. The data were then encoded, and manipulated using the DELTA software and associated programs to automatically generate a printed version (Brunt et al., 1996).

The data for experimental infections, natural hosts and host ranges were then collated at the plant species and family level and used to produce an interactive key (INTKEY) version and finally this HTML version, available on InterNet from the BioWeb server (URL http://biology.anu.edu.au). Although these three forms of presentation each represent substantially the same data, they offer rather different means of accessing that data, and users may prefer one presentation to another, depending on their needs and circumstances. The editors would be grateful for comments from users as to which of these presentations they find most useful, and the reasons for their preference.


Notes on the data

Virus names

Each virus species description is headed by a formal vernacular name which, in most instances, is the most commonly used name for that virus, or is that used in ICTV publications (Murphy et al., 1995), or that listed in Steadman's ICTV Words (Calisher and Fauquet, 1992). The order of words in some names has been changed so that host names appear first.

Many of the viruses described are definitive members of genera, whose names have been approved by the ICTV. The names of such viruses include their generic names, in italics, in the style introduced by Fenner (1976). Thus `American plum line pattern virus', for example, appears as `Plum American line pattern ilarvirus'.

Some virus clusterings, although generally recognized by virologists, have not yet been given generic status with ICTV-approved names. For these we have used the most commonly used euphonious name, but without italics. However for those that have no generally agreed name we have coined one for use in these pages. New names of this type are:

Bigeminivirus, Monogeminivirus and Hybrigeminivirus
the three genera of the Geminiviridae. The first includes the whitefly-transmitted geminiviruses that mostly have bipartite genomes, the second the leafhopper-transmitted geminiviruses with unipartite genomes and, mostly, monocotyledonous hosts, and the last includes viruses, such as beet curly top virus, which has intermediate properties and a genomic sequence clearly shows that it derived its replicase from a bigeminivirus ancestor and virion protein gene from a monogeminivirus (Howarth and Vandemark, 1989; Padidam, Beachy and Fauquet, 1995).

Ipomovirus
a genus of the Potyviridae with, at present, two species, both of which were isolated from sweet potato, Ipomoea batatus.

Macluravirus
a genus named after the natural host, Maclura pomifera (Moraceae), of its best known species.

Nanavirus
a group otherwise clumsily known as the `subterranean clover stunt virus group'. The proposed name, nanavirus, is derived from nanos Gr. meaning dwarf, as these viruses have among the smallest known virions and genome segment sizes, they stunt their hosts and, incidentally, the best known nanavirus infects bananas.

Ourmiavirus
named after the town in Iran where the melon infected with the type species was found.

Satellite RNA
sub-viral pathogens that produce no virions themselves, but are associated with, and depend on (but not vice versa), particular helper viruses.

Satellivirus
the satellite viruses, like that of tobacco necrosis virus, which depend on helper viruses, but which produce their own virions.

Varicosavirus
a group otherwise known as the `lettuce big-vein virus group'. The proposed name, varicosavirus, is derived from varix L. meaning `abnormal dilatation or enlargement of a vein or artery' (Shorter Oxford Dictionary), and alludes to the disease caused by the type species.

Some viruses are only tentatively associated with particular genera or groups. The descriptions of these viruses include `(?)' placed before the generic component of their names. In addition there are several viruses with virions characteristic of the families Potyviridae or Rhabdoviridae, which have not yet been assigned to particular genera in these families. Their formal vernacular names contain `(?) potyvirus' or `(?) rhabdovirus' (N.B. no italics) respectively.


Virus species descriptions (Click here for an index of viral species)

The data for each virus description were mostly collated by the person named at the start of each description, however the editors have added some key references to some descriptions. The references given for each virus are indicative, certainly not exhaustive, and some are unfortunately incomplete; they are included to assist those wishing to find the major areas of published work on each species.

Where possible the data have been encoded numerically (i.e. as a series of characters and states). Viruses are, however, a particularly disparate group of pathogens, and this has made it impossible to define a set of genuinely homologous characters that apply to all plant viruses. As a result much information has been stored as `comments', associated with appropriate characters, and this is responsible for the many differences between the character list and the translated description of each species.


Summaries of viral genera (Click here for an index of viral genera)

Summaries of viral genera were generated automatically from the species descriptions via the program INTKEY. Comments in the data are removed during the conversion to INTKEY format; hence all comments are missing from the summaries. Also omitted from these summaries are data that are clearly specific to individual species, such as their geographic distribution and host range. The summaries give a list of the definitive and tentative species in the genus, and also the ranges and means for numerical characters, and the frequency of occurrence of each state of multistate characters. This frequency information is placed within parentheses following each state. For example, you might read: "Virus retained when the vector moults (9/14), or lost by the vector when it moults (5/14)." This indicates that the virus was reported as being retained by a moulting vector for 9 species within the genus, and as being lost for 5 species. The number 14 in the "denominator" indicates the number of species within the genus for which data on this character has been recorded.


Host susceptibility data (Click here for an index of host families)

We have generated summary tables for over 1500 different vascular plant species listing all virus species reported to (or reported not to) infect them. Note that these host summaries include reports of susceptibility to experimental infections as well as to natural infections, and does not distinguish between the two. However, detailed information on reported natural host ranges is available as part of the individual virus species descriptions.

We provide lists of synonyms and common names for many of the host species; these appear in the various host family indexes. These synonyms and common names were obtained from the GRIN database on 20 June 1996. (GRIN is the Germplasm Resources Information Network, managed by the Database Management Unit of the National Germplasm Resources Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.) In those cases where a host name used in VIDE is regarded by GRIN as a synonym of an `accepted' name, the name which is regarded by GRIN as the accepted name is presented in bold at the start of the list of synonyms.

Assignment of plant genera to families follows Watson and Dallwitz, 1991; and Watson and Dallwitz, 1992 onwards. In particular, note the use of `traditional' names, such as Graminae rather than Poaceae, and Cruciferae rather than Brassicaceae. Devotees of Cronquistian classification should note that rather "narrow" definitions of families (i.e., a tendency for splitting rather than lumping) are used herein, particularly within the Liliaceae sensu lato. Also note that within the Leguminosae, the three major sub-families (Caesalpinioideae, Mimosoideae and Papilionoideae) are treated as if they are separate families.

Information on the susceptibility of plant families was derived automatically from the data on the susceptibility of host species. Within the viral species descriptions, the family susceptibility is typically followed by a pair of numbers, so that the information appears, for example, as "Chenopodiaceae (3/5)". The notation in this example indicates that 5 plant species within the family Chenopodiaceae are known to have been tested against the virus, and 3 of these proved to be susceptible (or insusceptible, depending on the section in which this line appears). The same notation, when occurring within the generic summaries carries a quite different meaning. In this context, our example indicates that 5 species within the viral genus have at least some data on host susceptibility; of these, 3 species are known to be capable of infecting at least one member of the Chenopodiaceae.


Abbreviations used

A
adenine

A260/280
ratio of absorption of light of 260 and 280 nm wavelength

AM
ammonium molybdate

(B)
bottom (fastest sedimenting) component of `multicomponent virus' (one with more than one kind of virion)

C
cytosine

c-DNA
complementary deoxyribonucleic acid

DAS-ELISA
double antibody sandwich form of ELISA

DEP
dilution end point of the infectivity of sap

(ds)DNA
(double-stranded) deoxyribonucleic acid

(ds)RNA
(double-stranded) ribonucleic acid

EDTA
ethylene diamine tetraacetate

ELISA
enzyme-linked immuno-sorbent assay

G
guanine

G+C
guanine plus cytosine

ICTV
International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses

ISEM
immuno-sorbent electron microscopy

Kb
kilobases; the size of a ssDNA or ssRNA molecule

Kbp
kilobase pairs; the size of a dsDNA or dsRNA molecule

kDa
kilodaltons; the size of a protein

KPT
potassium phosphotungstate

LIV
longevity of the infectivity of sap in vitro

(M)
middle component of `multicomponent virus' (see (B))

(MAb)
monoclonal antibody

MLO(s)
mycoplasma-like organism(s) or phytoplasma

Mr
relative molecular mass

mRNA
messenger RNA

nm
nanometers

nt(s)
nucleotide(s)

ORF(s)
open reading frame(s)

PEG
polyethylene glycol

S
sedimentation coefficient; Svedberg units

S20°,w
corrected sedimentation coefficient; extrapolated to that in water at 20°C and infinitely diluted

SDI
serological differentiation index

SDS
sodium dodecyl sulphate

ssDNA
single-stranded DNA

ssRNA
single-stranded RNA

T
thymine

(T)
top (slowest sedimenting) component of `multicomponent virus' (see (B))

TIP
thermal inactivation point; lowest temperature at which infectivity of sap is destroyed in 10 min

U
uracil

UA
uranyl acetate

UF
uranyl formate

Vpg
genome-linked protein


Illustrations (and how YOU can help us!)

The illustrations currently attached to this data set are a series of electron micrographs, primarily of the type species of ICTV-approved viral genera. These illustrations are provided courtesy of the Rothamsted Experimental Station, U.K., and are available at URL http://www.res.bbscr.ac.uk/plantpath/virusems/.
The following copyright notice applies: This notice must accompany any copy of the images. The images must not be used for commercial purpose without the consent of the copyright owners. The images are not in the public domain. The images can be freely used for educational purposes.
(Copyright) 1994 Rothamsted Experimental Station.

HOW YOU CAN HELP US ! ! !

The VIDEdB would be greatly improved if it included colour pictures of symptoms. We want to assemble a set of picture of characteristic symptoms (primary host and diagnostic test plants) - 2 or 3 photos per virus. Do you or any of your colleagues have any suitable pictures we could use? Photos (transparencies and/or prints) could be sent airmail for us to scan here, and returned immediately, or, if you have already scanned them, transferred to us electronically. Please send E-mail to vide-manager@biology.anu.edu.au or write to:

Adrian Gibbs
Research School of Biological Sciences
Australian National University
GPO Box 475
Canberra ACT 2601
Australia.


Acknowledgements

The VIDE (Virus Identification Data Exchange) project started in the early 1980s and, with support from the Rural Credit Development Fund of the Reserve Bank of Australia, produced and published an experimental database of viruses of legumes in 1983. Legumes were chosen, not just because of their economic importance, and that they are hosts to a large and representative collection of viruses, but also because the International Working Group on Legume Viruses comprised a group of experts willing to collate the information. The database was extended, with further support from the Fund, to produce the book `Viruses of Plants in Australia' in 1988.

Since 1983 the project has also been generously supported by the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR), and this work resulted in the publication of `Viruses of Tropical Crops' in 1990 and, in 1996 the book `Viruses of Plants'. Further funding from ACIAR allowed this data to be converted into an INTKEY dataset and HTML format.

The VIDE project has relied on the help and encouragement of a very large number of colleagues around the world. Those who collated most of the data of each virus are specifically named in the description of that virus. Very large contributions were made by past members of the editorial team: K.F. Boswell, C. Büchen-Osmond and G.D. McLean. T.A. Paine of the CSIRO Division of Entomology provided invaluable help with the theory and practical use of the DELTA system. J.F. Antoniw of Rothamsted Experimental Station, U.K. very kindly provided the sequence database accession codes.

We are pleased to receive comments on all aspects of the VIDE project, to discuss additional applications of the database, to learn of errors in the data and to have offers of assistance in revising or adding new information. Send your comments, corrections and suggestions to: vide-manager@biology.anu.edu.au.


References

Boswell, K.F. and Gibbs, A.J. (eds) (1983). Viruses of Legumes 1983 - Descriptions and Keys from VIDE. 139 pp. Australian National University, Canberra.

Boswell, K. and Gibbs, A. (1986). The VIDE data bank for plant viruses. In Developments and Applications in Virus Testing (ed. R.A.C. Jones). pp. 283-287. Assoc. Applied Biologists, U.K.

Boswell, K.F., Dallwitz, M.J., Gibbs, A.J. and Watson, L. (1986). The VIDE (Virus Identification Data Exchange) project: a database for plant viruses. Rev. Plant Path. 65: 221-231.

Büchen-Osmond, C., Crabtree, K., Gibbs, A. and McLean, G. (1988). Viruses of Plants in Australia. 590 pp. Australian National University, Canberra. (Also available as URL http://life.anu.edu.au/viruses/Aussi/aussi.html.)

Brunt, A., Crabtree, K., Dallwitz, M., Gibbs, A. and Watson, L. (1996). Viruses of Plants: Descriptions and Lists from the VIDE Database. 1484 pp. C.A.B. International, U.K.

Brunt, A., Crabtree, K. and Gibbs, A. (1990). Viruses of Tropical Plants: Descriptions and Lists from the VIDE Database. 707 pp. C.A.B. International, U.K.

Calisher, C.H. and Fauquet, C.M. (1992). Steadman's ICTV Virus Words. 271 pp. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.

Dallwitz, M.J. (1980). A general system for coding taxonomic descriptions. Taxon 29: 41-46.

Dallwitz, M. J., Paine, T. A., and Zurcher, E. J. (1993). User's Guide to the DELTA System: a general system for processing taxonomic descriptions. 4th edition. 136 pp. (CSIRO Division of Entomology: Canberra).

Fenner, F. (1976). Classification and Nomenclature of Viruses; 2nd Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Intervirology 7: 1-116.

Howarth, A.J. and Vandemark, G.J. (1989). Phylogeny of geminiviruses. J. gen. Virol. 70: 2717-2727.

Murphy, F.A., Fauquet, C.M., Mayo, M.A., Jarvis, A.W., Ghabrial, S.A., Summers, M.D., Martelli, G.P. and Bishop, D.H.L. (1995). 6th Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Virusus. Archiv. Virol. Suppl. 10, Springer-Verlag, Wein, New York.

Padidam, M. Beachy, R.N. and Fauquet, C.M. (1995). Classification and identification of geminiviruses using sequence comparisons. J. gen. Virol. 76: 249-263.

Watson, L. and Dallwitz, M.J. (1991). The Families of Angiosperms: automated descriptions, with interactive identification and information retrieval. Aust. Sys. Bot. 4: 601-695.

Watson, L. and Dallwitz, M.J. (1992 onwards). `The Families of Flowering Plants: Descriptions, Illustrations, Identification and Information Retrieval.' URL ftp://www.keil.ukans.edu/pub/delta/

Watson, L., Dallwitz, M.J., Gibbs, A.J. and Pankhurst, R.J. (1988). Automated taxonomic descriptions. In Prospects in Systematics (ed D.L. Hawksworth). pp 292-304. Clarendon Press, Oxford.


Cite this publication as: Brunt, A.A., Crabtree, K., Dallwitz, M.J., Gibbs, A.J., Watson, L. and Zurcher, E.J. (eds.) (1996 onwards). `Plant Viruses Online: Descriptions and Lists from the VIDE Database. Version: 20th August 1996.' URL http://biology.anu.edu.au/Groups/MES/vide/

Dallwitz (1980) and Dallwitz, Paine and Zurcher (1993) should also be cited.


VIDE HomeNotesAbbreviationsCharacter List
Species IndexAcronym IndexGenus IndexHost Family Index

Please send comments, corrections and suggestions to: vide-manager@biology.anu.edu.au