Bookshelf » GeneReviews » Roberts Syndrome
 
gene
GeneReviews
PagonRoberta A
BirdThomas C
DolanCynthia R
SmithRichard JH
StephensKaren
University of Washington, Seattle2009
geneticspublic health

GeneReviews designates a molecular genetic test as clinically available only if the test is listed in the GeneTests Laboratory Directory by either a US CLIA-licensed laboratory or a non-US clinical laboratory. GeneTests does not verify laboratory-submitted information or warrant any aspect of a laboratory's licensure or performance. Clinicians must communicate directly with the laboratories to verify information.—ED.

Genetics clinics, staffed by genetics professionals, provide information for individuals and families regarding the natural history, treatment, mode of inheritance, and genetic risks to other family members as well as information about available consumer-oriented resources. See the GeneTests Clinic Directory.

For current information on availability of genetic testing for disorders included in this section, see GeneTests Laboratory Directory. —ED.

Genetic counseling is the process of providing individuals and families with information on the nature, inheritance, and implications of genetic disorders to help them make informed medical and personal decisions. The following section deals with genetic risk assessment and the use of family history and genetic testing to clarify genetic status for family members. This section is not meant to address all personal, cultural, or ethical issues that individuals may face or to substitute for consultation with a genetics professional. To find a genetics or prenatal diagnosis clinic, see the GeneTests Clinic Directory.

Roberts Syndrome
[Roberts-SC Phocomelia Syndrome, Pseudothalidomide Syndrome, Roberts-SC (Pseudothalidomide), SC-Phocomelia Syndrome]

Miriam Gordillo, PhD
Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
New York
Hugo Vega, MD, PhD
Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
New York
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Bogotá
Ethylin Wang Jabs, MD
Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
New York
02102008rbs
Initial Posting: April 18, 2006.
Last Revision: April 14, 2009.

Summary

Disease characteristics. Roberts syndrome (RBS) is characterized by prenatal growth retardation (ranging from mild to severe) and limb malformations (including bilateral symmetric tetraphocomelia or hypomelia caused by mesomelic shortening). Upper limbs are more severely affected than lower limbs. Other limb malformations include oligodactyly with thumb aplasia or hypoplasia, syndactyly, clinodactyly, and elbow and knee flexion contractures. Craniofacial abnormalities include cleft lip and/or cleft palate, premaxillary protrusion, micrognathia, microbrachycephaly, malar hypoplasia, downslanting palpebral fissures, ocular hypertelorism, exophthalmos resulting from shallow orbits, corneal clouding, hypoplastic nasal alae, beaked nose, and ear malformations. Mental retardation is reported in the majority of affected individuals. Mortality is high among severely affected pregnancies and newborns. Mildly affected individuals may survive to adulthood.

Diagnosis/testing. The diagnosis of RBS relies on cytogenetic testing. Standard cytogenetic preparations stained with Giemsa or C-banding techniques show the characteristic chromosomal abnormality of premature centromere separation (PCS) and separation of the heterochromatic regions (also named heterochromatin repulsion, HR) in most chromosomes in all metaphases. ESCO2 is the only gene known to be associated with RBS. Molecular genetic testing is available.

Management. Treatment of manifestations: Individualized treatment aimed to improve quality of life; surgery for cleft lip and/or palate, for correction of limb abnormalities, and to improve proper development of the prehensile hand grasp. Prostheses, speech assessment and therapy, aggressive treatment of otitis media, special education for developmental delays, and standard treatment for cardiac defects and renal abnormalities may be indicated. Surveillance: periodic follow-up of psychomotor development and physical growth; follow-up assessment of speech development and hearing if cleft lip and palate are present; screening for developmental delays or learning disorders; monitoring for specific ophthalmologic, cardiac, or renal anomalies.

Genetic counseling. RBS is inherited in an autosomal recessive manner. At conception, each sib of an affected individual has a 25% chance of being affected, a 50% chance of being an asymptomatic carrier, and a 25% chance of being unaffected and not a carrier. Once an at-risk sib is known to be unaffected, the risk of his/her being a carrier is 2/3. Heterozygotes (carriers) are asymptomatic. Prenatal testing for pregnancies at increased risk may be possible by a combination of ultrasound examination combined with cytogenetic testing, or by molecular genetic testing if the mutations have been identified in the family.

Diagnosis

Clinical Diagnosis

The diagnosis of Roberts syndrome (RBS; also known as Roberts-SC phocomelia syndrome) is suspected in individuals with the following:

  • Prenatal growth retardation ranging from mild to severe. Mean birth length and weight is below the third centile in most term and prematurely-born affected infants.

  • Limb malformations including bilateral symmetric tetraphocomelia or hypomelia caused by mesomelic shortening. Upper limbs are more severely affected than lower limbs. Other limb malformations include oligodactyly with thumb aplasia or hypoplasia, syndactyly, clinodactyly, and elbow and knee flexion contractures.

  • Craniofacial abnormalities including bilateral cleft lip and/or palate, micrognathia, hypertelorism, exophthalmos, downslanting palpebral fissures, malar hypoplasia, hypoplastic nasal alae, and ear malformation.

The diagnosis of RBS relies upon cytogenetic testing in peripheral blood of individuals with suggestive clinical findings.

Testing

Cytogenetic testing. Standard cytogenetic preparations stained with Giemsa or C-banding techniques show the characteristic chromosomal abnormality of premature centromere separation (PCS) and separation of the heterochromatic regions (also termed heterochromatin repulsion [HR]) in most chromosomes in all metaphases (Figure 1).

Note on terminology used in RBS: The centromere and the heterochromatin are affected in RBS. (1) The term premature centromere separation (PCS) describes the cytogenetic abnormalities observed in standard cytogenetic preparations and the prematurely separating centromeres during metaphase rather than in anaphase. PCS is related to the most probable pathologic mechanism and associated spindle checkpoint activation and impaired cell proliferation. (2) The term "heterochromatin repulsion" only describes the cytogenetic abnormality of the heterochromatin and does not describe the abnormal process of sister chromatid cohesion, which is fundamental to the pathophysiology of RBS. (3) Until a better term is available to define the structural and functional characteristics of RBS, the authors prefer to use the combined term PCS/HR.

  • Many chromosomes display a "railroad track" appearance as a result of the absence of the primary constriction and presence of "puffing" or "repulsion" at the heterochromatic regions around the centromeres and nucleolar organizers.

  • The heterochromatic region of the long arm of the Y chromosome is often widely separated in metaphase spreads.

Note: PCS/HR is different from premature sister chromatid separation (PSCS) described in Cornelia de Lange syndrome and premature centromere division (PCD) associated with mosaic variegated aneuploidy syndrome, in which separation and splaying involves not only the centromeric regions but also the entire sister chromatids [Plaja et al 2001, Kaur et al 2005].

Aneuploidy, micronucleation, and multilobulated nuclei are also common findings in RBS cell cultures.

Carrier status cannot be determined by cytogenetic analysis.

Molecular Genetic Testing

GeneReviews designates a molecular genetic test as clinically available only if the test is listed in the GeneTests Laboratory Directory by either a US CLIA-licensed laboratory or a non-US clinical laboratory. GeneTests does not verify laboratory-submitted information or warrant any aspect of a laboratory's licensure or performance. Clinicians must communicate directly with the laboratories to verify information.—ED.

Gene. ESCO2 is the only gene with documented RBS-causing mutations [Vega et al 2005].

Clinical testing

  • Sequence analysis of the ESCO2 gene is available; all individuals with a cytogenetic diagnosis of RBS have had mutations in ESCO2.

Table 1 summarizes molecular genetic testing for this disorder.

Table 1. Molecular Genetic Testing Used in Roberts Syndrome

Gene SymbolTest Method Mutations Detected Mutation Detection
Frequency by Test Method
Test Availability
ESCO2Sequence analysisSequence variants100% of reported mutations 1Clinical graphic element

1. To date, all individuals with a cytogenetic diagnosis of RBS also have mutations in ESCO2.

Testing Strategy

Confirming the diagnosis in a proband. Detection of the characteristic chromosomal abnormalities or identification of two ESCO2 mutations establishes the diagnosis of RBS in individuals with suggestive clinical findings.

Carrier testing for at-risk relatives requires prior identification of the disease-causing mutations in the family.

Note: Carriers are heterozygotes for this autosomal recessive disorder and are not at risk of developing the disorder.

Prenatal diagnosis for at-risk pregnancies requires ultrasound examination combined with cytogenetic testing [Kennelly & Moran 2007] or prior identification of the disease-causing mutations in the family.

Clinical Description

Natural History

Little is known about the natural history of Roberts syndrome (RBS; also known as Roberts-SC phocomelia syndrome). Wide clinical variability is observed among affected individuals, including siblings. The prognosis for an individual with RBS depends on the malformations present: the severity of manifestations correlates with survival. Mortality is high among most of the severely affected pregnancies and newborns. Mildly affected children are more likely to survive to adulthood. The cause of death has not been reported for most affected individuals; in five cases it was reported to be infection [Herrmann & Opitz 1977].

The following information is based on individuals reported in the literature or from the observation of individuals who have diagnostic cytogenetic findings of PCS/HR and/or an ESCO2 mutation.

Growth retardation of prenatal onset is the most consistent finding in all affected individuals. Postnatal growth retardation can be moderate to severe and correlates with the severity of the limb and craniofacial malformations.

Limb malformations include symmetric mesomelic shortening and anterior-posterior axis involvement in which the frequency and degree of involvement of long bones is, in decreasing order: radii, ulnae, and humeri in the upper limbs; fibulae, tibiae, and femur in the lower limbs. The degree of limb abnormalities follows a cephalo-caudal pattern: the upper limbs are more severely affected than the lower, with several cases of only upper limb malformations.

Hand malformations include brachydactyly and oligodactyly. The thumb is most often affected by proximal positioning or digitalization, hypoplasia, or agenesis. The fifth finger is the next most affected digit with clinodactyly, hypoplasia, or agenesis. Severe cases can have only three fingers and, rarely, only one finger.

Craniofacial abnormalities include: cleft lip and/or cleft palate, premaxillary protrusion, micrognathia, microbrachycephaly, midfacial capillary hemangioma, malar hypoplasia, down-slanting palpebral fissures, ocular hypertelorism, exophthalmos resulting from shallow orbits, corneal clouding, hypoplastic nasal alae, beaked nose, and ear malformations. Mildly affected individuals have no palatal abnormalities or only a high-arched palate. The most severely affected individuals have fronto-ethmoid-nasal-maxillary encephalocele.

Correlation between the degree of limb and facial involvement is observed. Individuals with mild limb abnormalities also have mild craniofacial malformations, while those with severely affected limbs present with extensive craniofacial abnormalities.

Other abnormalities may be observed:

  • Heart. Atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect, patent ductus arteriosus

  • Kidneys. Polycystic kidney, horseshoe kidney

  • Male genitalia. Enlarged penis, relatively large appearance in relation to the reduced limbs; cryptorchidism

  • Female genitalia. Enlarged clitoris

  • Hair. Sparse hair, silvery blonde scalp hair

  • Cranial nerve paralysis (occasional)

  • Moyamoya disease (occasional)

  • Stroke (occasional)

  • Intellectual ability. Mental retardation is present in the majority of affected individuals; however, normal intellectual and social development have been reported [Petrinelli et al 1984, Stanley et al 1988, Maserati et al 1991, Holden et al 1992].

Genotype-Phenotype Correlations

To date, correlation of genotype with specific phenotypic features has not been established. However, disparate clinical presentations among affected members within the same family suggest that modifier genes, epigenetic factors, and environment may play a role in expression of the clinical phenotype.

Nomenclature

In 1919, John B Roberts reported phocomelia, bilateral cleft lip and cleft palate, and protrusion of the intermaxillary region in three affected sibs of an Italian couple who were first cousins [Roberts 1919].

In 1969, J Herrmann and colleagues described a syndrome of intrauterine and postnatal growth retardation; mild symmetric reduction of the limbs; flexion contractures of various joints; multiple minor anomalies including: capillary hemangiomas of the face, cloudy corneas, hypoplastic cartilages of the ears and nose, micrognathia, and scanty, silvery-blond hair; and autosomal recessive inheritance. They named this condition the pseudothalidomide or SC syndrome (for the initials of the surnames of the two families described) [Herrmann et al 1969].

Controversy existed about whether SC phocomelia syndrome was the same entity as RBS. After reports of unrelated families with a high degree of phenotypic variation between sibs, some with RBS and others with SC phocomelia syndrome, these two syndromes are now considered clinical variants of the same disorder [Van Den Berg & Francke 1993, Schüle et al 2005].

Other synonyms used for RBS in the past are Appelt-Gerken-Lenz syndrome, hypomelia-hypotrichosis-facial hemangioma syndrome, and tetraphocomelia-cleft palate syndrome.

Prevalence

RBS is rare; no accurate estimates of prevalence have been published. Approximately 150 individuals of diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds have been reported.

Parental consanguinity is common.

Carrier frequency for RBS is unknown.

Differential Diagnosis

For current information on availability of genetic testing for disorders included in this section, see GeneTests Laboratory Directory. —ED.

While some syndromes share some of the clinical features of Roberts syndrome (RBS), a physical examination and skeletal survey followed by the finding of cytogenetic abnormalities should allow for differentiation between individuals with RBS and those with conditions that are clinically similar.

In cases of mild manifestations, syndromes with associated preaxial reduction defects to be considered in the differential diagnosis include the following:

In cases of severe manifestations, the following syndromes should be considered in the differential diagnosis:

Disorders with similar but not the same cytogenetic findings (see Testing) include the following:

Management

Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis

To establish the extent of disease in an individual diagnosed with Roberts syndrome (RBS), the following evaluations are recommended:

  • Radiographic documentation of the craniofacial, limb, and hand anomalies

  • Orofacial and limb malformation assessment to determine the need for management and plastic surgery

  • Ophthalmologic evaluation

  • Echocardiogram or evaluation by cardiologist to assess for structural heart defects

  • Ultrasound evaluation of the kidneys for cysts

  • Multidisciplinary evaluation including psychological assessment and formal, age-appropriate developmental assessment

Note: No published guidelines to evaluate the clinical manifestations contributing to morbidity and mortality exist. The recommendations given are based on the literature and the experience of medical geneticists.

Treatment of Manifestations

It has been suggested that most individuals with RBS are stillborn or die in infancy. However, it is important to emphasize that, because it is possible for individuals to have normal intelligence and a healthy psychological adjustment, even with all of the stigmata of RBS, such individuals should be managed in a way that allows each to improve their quality of life and to reach their full potential.

Individuals with severe RBS who survive the newborn period face a number of medical problems, and management of these individuals usually requires more than one medical specialist; experts in pediatrics, genetics, ophthalmology, cardiology, nephrology, neurology, child development, rehabilitation, general surgery, orthopedics, or dentistry may be involved. Comprehensive medical intervention is suggested, as is complete and clear parental counseling when discussing the possible outcome for these individuals [Karabulut et al 2001].

Treatment is based upon the affected individual’s specific needs and may include the following:

  • Surgical treatments including cosmetic or reconstructive surgery for clefts of the lip and/or palate and for limb abnormalities (several surgeries are usually required). Hand surgery improves early and proper development of the prehensile grasp.

  • Prostheses

  • Speech assessment and therapy and aggressive treatment of otitis media if cleft palate is present

  • Intervention and/or special education if developmental delays are detected

  • Standard treatment for specific cardiac defects and renal dysfunction

Surveillance

The following are appropriate:

  • Periodic follow-up to monitor mental and physical growth and to determine if frequent infections are an issue

  • Regular follow-up for assessment of speech and ear infections/hearing loss if cleft lip and palate are present

  • Annual screening for developmental delays or learning disorders

  • Monitoring as per specific ophthalmologic, cardiac, or renal anomalies

Testing of Relatives at Risk

See Genetic Counseling for issues related to testing of at-risk relatives for genetic counseling purposes.

Therapies Under Investigation

Search ClinicalTrials.gov for access to information on clinical studies for a wide range of diseases and conditions. Note: There may not be clinical trials for this disorder.

Other

Genetics clinics, staffed by genetics professionals, provide information for individuals and families regarding the natural history, treatment, mode of inheritance, and genetic risks to other family members as well as information about available consumer-oriented resources. See the GeneTests Clinic Directory.

See Consumer Resources for disease-specific and/or umbrella support organizations for this disorder. These organizations have been established for individuals and families to provide information, support, and contact with other affected individuals.

Genetic Counseling

Genetic counseling is the process of providing individuals and families with information on the nature, inheritance, and implications of genetic disorders to help them make informed medical and personal decisions. The following section deals with genetic risk assessment and the use of family history and genetic testing to clarify genetic status for family members. This section is not meant to address all personal, cultural, or ethical issues that individuals may face or to substitute for consultation with a genetics professional. To find a genetics or prenatal diagnosis clinic, see the GeneTests Clinic Directory.

Mode of Inheritance

Roberts syndrome (RBS) is inherited in an autosomal recessive manner.

Risk to Family Members

Parents of a proband

  • The parents of an affected child are obligate heterozygotes (i.e., carriers of one mutant allele).

  • Heterozygotes (carriers) are asymptomatic.

Sibs of a proband

  • At conception, each sib of an affected individual has a 25% chance of being affected, a 50% chance of being an asymptomatic carrier, and a 25% chance of being unaffected and not a carrier.

  • Once an at-risk sib is known to be unaffected, the risk of his/her being a carrier is 2/3.

  • Heterozygotes (carriers) are asymptomatic.

Offspring of a proband

  • Pregnancies in individuals with RBS are rare; two have been reported, one resulting in an unaffected girl and the other resulting in a second-trimester miscarriage [Parry et al 1986].

  • The offspring of an individual with RBS are obligate heterozygotes (carriers) for a disease-causing mutation in the ESCO2 gene.

Other family members of a proband. Each sib of the proband's parents is at a 50% risk of being a carrier.

Carrier Detection

Carrier status cannot be determined by cytogenetic analysis.

Carrier testing for at-risk family members is available once the mutations have been identified in the family.

Related Genetic Counseling Issues

Family planning

  • The optimal time for determination of genetic risk, clarification of carrier status, and discussion of the availability of prenatal testing is before pregnancy.

  • It is appropriate to offer genetic counseling (including discussion of potential risks to offspring and reproductive options) to young adults who are affected or at risk of being carriers.

DNA banking. DNA banking is the storage of DNA (typically extracted from white blood cells) for possible future use. Because it is likely that testing methodology and our understanding of genes, mutations, and diseases will improve in the future, consideration should be given to banking DNA of affected individuals. See graphic element for a list of laboratories offering DNA banking.

Prenatal Testing

Ultrasound examination combined with cytogenetic testing. Prenatal diagnosis for pregnancies at increased risk is possible by cytogenetic testing of fetal cells obtained by amniocentesis usually performed at approximately 15-18 weeks' gestation or chorionic villus sampling (CVS) at approximately ten to 12 weeks' gestation. These findings in conjunction with ultrasound examination to follow growth and to evaluate the limbs, heart, palate, and other organs or structures affected in RBS are used for prenatal diagnosis of the syndrome [Kennelly & Moran 2007].

Molecular genetic testing. Prenatal diagnosis for pregnancies at increased risk is possible by analysis of DNA extracted from fetal cells obtained by amniocentesis usually performed at about 15-18 weeks’ gestation or chorionic villus sampling (CVS) at approximately ten to 12 weeks’ gestation. Both disease-causing alleles of an affected family member must be identified before prenatal testing can be performed.

Note: Gestational age is expressed as menstrual weeks calculated either from the first day of the last normal menstrual period or by ultrasound measurements.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) may be available for families in which the disease-causing mutations have been identified. For laboratories offering PGD, see graphic element.

Molecular Genetics

Information in the Molecular Genetics and OMIM tables may differ from that elsewhere in the GeneReview: tables may contain more recent information. —ED.

Table A. Roberts Syndrome: Genes and Databases

Gene Symbol Chromosomal Locus Protein Name Locus Specific HGMD
ESCO2 8p21.1 N-acetyltransferase ESCO2 Establishment of Cohesion 1 homolog 2 (ESCO2) @ LOVD ESCO2

Data are compiled from the following standard references: gene symbol from HGNC; chromosomal locus, locus name, critical region, complementation group from OMIM; protein name from UniProt. For a description of databases (Locus Specific, HGMD) linked to, click here.

Table B. OMIM Entries for Roberts Syndrome (View All in OMIM)

268300 ROBERTS SYNDROME; RBS
269000 SC PHOCOMELIA SYNDROME
609353 ESTABLISHMENT OF COHESION 1, S. CEREVISIAE, HOMOLOG OF, 2; ESCO2

Normal allelic variants. The ESCO2 gene comprises 11 exons distributed over 30.3 kb, transcribed into a 3,376 nucleotide mRNA with an open reading frame of 1,806 nucleotides [Vega et al 2005]. The normal variant p.Ala80Val in exon 3 has a heterozygosity of 0.235, but its functional significance is not known.

Pathologic allelic variants. The mutations in ESCO2 are highly variable. Different mutations in ESCO2 have been reported in families with Roberts syndrome (RBS) (Table 2). All but one are frameshift or nonsense mutations that lead to protein truncation or nonsense-mediated decay. The single missense mutation leads to an amino acid substitution of one highly conserved amino acid in the acetyltransferase domain.

Table 2. Selected ESCO2 Allelic Variants

Class of
Variant
Allele
DNA Nucleotide
Change
(Alias 1)
Protein Amino
Acid Change
(Alias 1)
Exon or
IVS 2
Reference
Sequences
Normalc.239C>Tp.Ala80Val3NM_001017420.2NP_001017420.1rs4732748
Pathologicc.252_253delAT 3p.Ser85PhefsX6 (p.V84fsX7)3NM_001017420.2NP_001017420.1
c.294_297delGAGA 4p.Arg99SerfsX2 (p.E98fsX2)3
c.307_311delAAAGA (c.307_311delAGAAA) 5p.Lys103GlufsX2 (p.I102fsX1)3
c.308_309delAA 4p.Lys103ArgfsX3 (p.K103fsX3)3
c.417dupA (c.411_412insA) 3p.Pro140ThrfsX8 (p.K138fsX10)3
c.505C>T 3p.Arg169X3
c.604C>T 5p.Gln 202X3
c.745_746delGT 6p.Val249GlnfsX13
c.751dupG (c.750_751insG) 3p.Glu251GlyfsX30 (p.E251fsX30)3
c.760dupA (c.751_752insA) 4, 5p.Thr254AsnfsX27 (p.K253fsX26)3
c.760delA (c.752delA) 4, 5p.Thr254LeufsX13 (p.K253fsX12)3
c.764_765delTT 4p.Phe255CysfsX25 (p.F255fsX25)3
c.875_878delACAG 4p.Asp292GlufsX48 (p.D292fsX47)4
c.879_880delAG (c.877_888delAG) 3, 4, 7p.Arg293SerfsX7 (p.R293fsX7)4
c.955+2_+5delTAAG 4--IVS4
c.1111dupA (c.1104_1105insA) 3p.Thr371AsnfsX32 (p.K369fsX34)6
c.1111_1112insG 4p.Thr371SerfsX32 (p.T371fsX32)6
c.1131+1G>A 2, 5--IVS6
c.1132-7A>G 2, 5--IVS6
c.1263+1G>C 5--IVS7
c.1269G>A 2p.Trp423X8
c.1354-18G>A 5--IVS8
c.1461_1462delAG (c.1457_1458delAG) 3p.Arg487SerfsX19 (p.K486fsX20)9
c.1597_1598dupT
(c.1597_1598insT) 5
p.Cys533LeufsX5 (p.L533fsX5)10
c.1615T>G 3p.Trp539Gly10
c.1674-2A>G 5--IVS10

See Quick Reference for an explanation of nomenclature. GeneReviews follows the standard naming conventions of the Human Genome Variation Society (www.hgvs.org).

1. Variant designation that does not conform to current naming conventions

2. IVS = intervening sequence or intron

Normal gene product. Translation of the mRNA results in a protein of 601 amino acids with two different domains, the C-terminal portion with acetyltransferase activity and the N-terminal end, which binds to chromatin [Hou & Zou 2005, Vega et al 2005]. The acetyltransferase domain is homologous to Drosophila deco and S. cerevisiae eco1, which are proposed to play a role in establishing sister chromatid cohesion during S phase after DNA replication [Skibbens et al 1999, Toth et al 1999, Williams et al 2003].

Abnormal gene product. The abnormalities reported in the ESCO2 gene are predicted to lead to loss of function, truncation in the protein, or single amino acid changes [Schüle et al 2005, Vega et al 2005, Gordillo et al 2008]. Table 2 shows the amino acid changes. The c.1615T>G (pTrp539Gly) missense mutation results in loss of in vitro acetyltransferase activity [Gordillo et al 2008]. The cellular phenotype resulting from this missense mutation is equivalent to the one produced by nonsense and frameshift mutations, indicating that the RBS molecular mechanism involves loss of acetyltransferase activity [Gordillo et al 2008]. Alterations in ESCO2 function result in lack of cohesion at heterochromatic regions, which may lead to activation of the mitotic spindle checkpoint with the subsequent mitotic delay and the impaired cell proliferation observed in RBS cells. The clinical manifestations of RBS may result from the loss of progenitor cells during embryogenesis of structures affected in RBS.

Resources

See Consumer Resources for disease-specific and/or umbrella support organizations for this disorder. These organizations have been established for individuals and families to provide information, support, and contact with other affected individuals. GeneTests provides information about selected organizations and resources for the benefit of the reader; GeneTests is not responsible for information provided by other organizations.—ED.

References

Medical Genetic Searches: A specialized PubMed search designed for clinicians that is located on the PubMed Clinical Queries page. graphic element

Literature Cited

Deardorff MA, Kaur M, Yaeger D, Rampuria A, Korolev S, Pie J, Gil-Rodríguez C, Arnedo M, Loeys B, Kline AD, Wilson M, Lillquist K, Siu V, Ramos FJ, Musio A, Jackson LS, Dorsett D, Krantz ID. Mutations in cohesin complex members SMC3 and SMC1A cause a mild variant of cornelia de Lange syndrome with predominant mental retardation. Am J Hum Genet. 2007; 80: 48594. [PubMed]
Franks ME, Macpherson GR, Figg WD. Lancet. 2004; 363: 180211. [PubMed]
Gordillo M, Vega H, Trainer AH, Hou F, Sakai N, Luque R, Kayserili H, Basaran S, Skovby F, Hennekam RC, Uzielli ML, Schnur RE, Manouvrier S, Chang S, Blair E, Hurst JA, Forzano F, Meins M, Simola KO, Raas-Rothschild A, Schultz RA, McDaniel LD, Ozono K, Inui K, Zou H, Jabs EW. The molecular mechanism underlying Roberts syndrome involves loss of ESCO2 acetyltransferase activity. Hum Mol Genet. 2008; 17: 217280. [PubMed]
Hanks S, Coleman K, Reid S, Plaja A, Firth H, Fitzpatrick D, Kidd A, Mehes K, Nash R, Robin N, Shannon N, Tolmie J, Swansbury J, Irrthum A, Douglas J, Rahman N. Constitutional aneuploidy and cancer predisposition caused by biallelic mutations in BUB1B. Nat Genet. 2004; 36: 115961. [PubMed]
Herrmann J, Feingold M, Tuffli GA, Opitz JM (1969) A familial dysmorphogenetic syndrome of limb deformities, characteristic facial appearance and associated anomalies: the 'pseudothalidomide' or 'SC-syndrome'. Birth Defects Orig Art Ser V(3):81-9.
Herrmann J, Opitz JM. The SC phocomelia and the Roberts syndrome: nosologic aspects. Eur J Pediatr. 1977; 125: 11734. [PubMed]
Holden KR, Jabs EW, Sponseller PD. Roberts/pseudothalidomide syndrome and normal intelligence: approaches to diagnosis and management. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1992; 34: 5349. [PubMed]
Hou F, Zou H. Two human orthologues of Eco1/Ctf7 acetyltransferases are both required for proper sister-chromatid cohesion. Mol Biol Cell. 2005; 16: 390818. [PubMed]
Huson SM, Rodgers CS, Hall CM, Winter RM. The Baller-Gerold syndrome: phenotypic and cytogenetic overlap with Roberts syndrome. J Med Genet. 1990; 27: 3715. [PubMed]
Karabulut AB, Aydin H, Erer M, Mezdegi A, Guven E. Roberts syndrome from the plastic surgeon's viewpoint. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 108: 14435. [PubMed]
Kaur M, DeScipio C, McCallum J, Yaeger D, Devoto M, Jackson LG, Spinner NB, Krantz ID. Precocious sister chromatid separation (PSCS) in Cornelia de Lange syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2005; 138: 2731. [PubMed]
Kennelly MM, Moran P. A clinical algorithm of prenatal diagnosis of Radial Ray Defects with two and three dimensional ultrasound. Prenat Diagn. 2007; 27: 7307. [PubMed]
Klopocki E, Schulze H, Strauss G, Ott CE, Hall J, Trotier F, Fleischhauer S, Greenhalgh L, Newbury-Ecob RA, Neumann LM, Habenicht R, König R, Seemanova E, Megarbane A, Ropers HH, Ullmann R, Horn D, Mundlos S. Complex inheritance pattern resembling autosomal recessive inheritance involving a microdeletion in thrombocytopenia-absent radius syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2007; 80: 23240. [PubMed]
Krantz ID, McCallum J, DeScipio C, Kaur M, Gillis LA, Yaeger D, Jukofsky L, Wasserman N, Bottani A, Morris CA, Nowaczyk MJ, Toriello H, Bamshad MJ, Carey JC, Rappaport E, Kawauchi S, Lander AD, Calof AL, Li HH, Devoto M, Jackson LG. Cornelia de Lange syndrome is caused by mutations in NIPBL, the human homolog of Drosophila melanogaster Nipped-B. Nat Genet. 2004; 36: 6315. [PubMed]
Maserati E, Pasquali F, Zuffardi O, Buttitta P, Cuoco C, Defant G, Gimelli G, Fraccaro M. Roberts syndrome: phenotypic variation, cytogenetic definition and heterozygote detection. Ann Genet. 1991; 34: 23946. [PubMed]
Musio A, Selicorni A, Focarelli ML, Gervasini C, Milani D, Russo S, Vezzoni P, Larizza L. X-linked Cornelia de Lange syndrome owing to SMC1L1 mutations. Nat Genet. 2006; 38: 52830. [PubMed]
Niemann S, Zhao C, Pascu F, Stahl U, Aulepp U, Niswander L, Weber JL, Muller U. Homozygous WNT3 mutation causes tetra-amelia in a large consanguineous family. Am J Hum Genet. 2004; 74: 55863. [PubMed]
Parry DM, Mulvihill JJ, Tsai SE, Kaiser-Kupfer MI, Cowan JM. SC phocomelia syndrome, premature centromere separation, and congenital cranial nerve paralysis in two sisters, one with malignant melanoma. Am J Med Genet. 1986; 24: 65372. [PubMed]
Petrinelli P, Antonelli A, Marcucci L, Dallapiccola B. Premature centromere splitting in a presumptive mild form of Roberts syndrome. Hum Genet. 1984; 66: 969. [PubMed]
Plaja A, Vendrell T, Smeets D, Sarret E, Gili T, Catala V, Mediano C, Scheres JM. Variegated aneuploidy related to premature centromere division (PCD) is expressed in vivo and is a cancer-prone disease. Am J Med Genet. 2001; 98: 21623. [PubMed]
Resta N, Susca FC, Di Giacomo MC, Stella A, Bukvic N, Bagnulo R, Simone C, Guanti G. A homozygous frameshift mutation in the ESCO2 gene: evidence of intertissue and interindividual variation in Nmd efficiency. J Cell Physiol. 2006; 209: 6773. [PubMed]
Roberts JB. A child with double cleft of lip and palate, protrusion of the intermaxillary portion of the upper jab and imperfect development of the bones of the four extremeties. Ann Surg. 1919; 70: 2523.
Schüle B, Oviedo A, Johnston K, Pai S, Francke U. Inactivating mutations in ESCO2 cause SC phocomelia and Roberts syndrome: no phenotype-genotype correlation. Am J Hum Genet. 2005; 77: 111728. [PubMed]
Schulz S, Gerloff C, Ledig S, Langer D, Volleth M, Shirneshan K, Wieacker P. Prenatal diagnosis of Roberts syndrome and detection of an ESCO2 frameshift mutation in a Pakistani family. Prenat Diagn. 2008; 28: 425. [PubMed]
Skibbens RV, Corson LB, Koshland D, Hieter P. Ctf7p is essential for sister chromatid cohesion and links mitotic chromosome structure to the DNA replication machinery. Genes Dev. 1999; 13: 30719. [PubMed]
Stanley WS, Pai GS, Horger EO, Yan YS, McNeal KS. Incidental detection of premature centromere separation in amniocytes associated with a mild form of Roberts syndrome. Prenat Diagn. 1988; 8: 5659. [PubMed]
Tonkin ET, Wang TJ, Lisgo S, Bamshad MJ, Strachan T. NIPBL, encoding a homolog of fungal Scc2-type sister chromatid cohesion proteins and fly Nipped-B, is mutated in Cornelia de Lange syndrome. Nat Genet. 2004; 36: 63641. [PubMed]
Toth A, Ciosk R, Uhlmann F, Galova M, Schleiffer A, Nasmyth K. Yeast cohesin complex requires a conserved protein, Eco1p(Ctf7), to establish cohesion between sister chromatids during DNA replication. Genes Dev. 1999; 13: 32033. [PubMed]
Uhl K, Cox E, Rogan R, Zeldis JB, Hixon D, Furlong LA, Singer S, Holliman T, Beyer J, Woolever W. Thalidomide use in the US: experience with pregnancy testing in the S.T.E.P.S. programme. Drug Saf. 2006; 29: 3219. [PubMed]
Van Den Berg DJ, Francke U. Roberts syndrome: a review of 100 cases and a new rating system for severity. Am J Med Genet. 1993; 47: 110423. [PubMed]
Vega H, Waisfisz Q, Gordillo M, Sakai N, Yanagihara I, Yamada M, van Gosliga D, Kayserili H, Xu C, Ozono K, Jabs EW, Inui K, Joenje H. Roberts syndrome is caused by mutations in ESCO2, a human homolog of yeast ECO1 that is essential for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Nat Genet. 2005; 37: 46870. [PubMed]
Williams BC, Garrett-Engele CM, Li Z, Williams EV, Rosenman ED, Goldberg ML. Two putative acetyltransferases, san and deco, are required for establishing sister chromatid cohesion in Drosophila. Curr Biol. 2003; 13: 202536. [PubMed]
Zeldis JB, Williams BA, Thomas SD, Elsayed ME. S.T.E.P.S.: a comprehensive program for controlling and monitoring access to thalidomide. Clin Ther. 1999; 21: 31930. [PubMed]

Published Statements and Policies Regarding Genetic Testing

No specific guidelines regarding genetic testing for this disorder have been developed.

Suggested Reading

Gordillo M, Vega H, Jabs EW (2008) ESCO2 and Roberts syndrome. In: Epstein CJ, Erickson RP, Wynshaw-Boris A (eds) Inborn Errors of Development, 2 ed. Oxford University Press, New York, Chap 111, pp 1011-9.

Chapter Notes

Revision History

  • 14 April 2009 (cd) Revision: sequence analysis and prenatal testing available for ESCO2 mutations

  • 2 October 2008 (me) Comprehensive update posted live

  • 18 April 2006 (me) Review posted to live Web site

  • 2 December 2005 (ewj) Original submission

Next
GeneReviews2009
(navigation arrows) Go to previous chapter Go to next chapter Go to top of this page Go to bottom of this page Go to Table of Contents