Quantcast
Environmental Health Perspectives Free Trail Issue
Author Keyword Title Full
About EHP Publications Past Issues News By Topic Authors Subscribe Press International Inside EHP Email Alerts spacer
Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly journal of peer-reviewed research and news on the impact of the environment on human health. EHP is published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and its content is free online. Print issues are available by paid subscription.DISCLAIMER
spacer
NIEHS
NIH
DHHS
spacer
Current Issue

EHP Science Education Website




Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD)

spacer
Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 110, Number 4, April 2002 Open Access
spacer
The Pitfalls of Hair Analysis for Toxicants in Clinical Practice: Three Case Reports

Melissa Frisch and Brian S. Schwartz

Division of Occupational and Environmental Health, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Abstract
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health icon

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health


Hair analysis is used to assess exposure to heavy metals in patients presenting with nonspecific symptoms and is a commonly used procedure in patients referred to our clinic. We are frequently called on to evaluate patients who have health-related concerns as a result of hair analysis. Three patients first presented to outside physicians with nonspecific, multisystemic symptoms. A panel of analytes was measured in hair, and one or more values were interpreted as elevated. As a result of the hair analysis and other unconventional diagnostic tests, the patients presented to us believing they suffered from metal toxicity. In this paper we review the clinical efficacy of this procedure within the context of a patient population with somatic disorders and no clear risk factors for metal intoxication. We also review limitations of hair analysis in this setting ; these limitations include patient factors such as low pretest probability of disease and test factors such as the lack of validation of analytic techniques, the inability to discern between exogenous contaminants and endogenous toxicants in hair, the variability of analytic procedures, low interlaboratory reliability, and the increased likelihood of false positive test results in the measurement of panels of analytes. Key words: , , , . Environ Health Perspect 110:433-436 (2002) . [Online 12 March 2002]

http://ehpnet1.niehs.nih.gov/docs/2002/110p433-436frisch/ abstract.html

Address correspondence to B.S. Schwartz, Division of Occupational and Environmental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Room 7041, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA. Telephone: (410) 955-4158. Fax: (410) 955-1811. E-mail: bschwart@jhsph.edu

Received 29 November 2001 ; accepted 14 February 2002.


The full version of this article is available for free in HTML or PDF formats.
spacer
 
Open Access Resources | Call for Papers | Career Opportunities | Buy EHP Publications | Advertising Information | Subscribe to the EHP News Feeds News Feeds | Inspector General USA.gov