Quantcast
Environmental Health Perspectives Free Trail Issue
Author Keyword Title Full
About EHP Publications Past Issues News By Topic Authors Subscribe Press International Inside EHP Email Alerts spacer
Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly journal of peer-reviewed research and news on the impact of the environment on human health. EHP is published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and its content is free online. Print issues are available by paid subscription.DISCLAIMER
spacer
NIEHS
NIH
DHHS
spacer
Current Issue

EHP Science Education Website




Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD)

spacer
Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 114, Number 10, October 2006 Open Access
spacer
Privacy and Ethics in Pediatric Environmental Health Research—Part II: Protecting Families and Communities

Celia B. Fisher

Center for Ethics Education, Fordham University, Bronx, New York, USA

Abstract
Background: In pediatric environmental health research, information about family members is often directly sought or indirectly obtained in the process of identifying child risk factors and helping to tease apart and identify interactions between genetic and environmental factors. However, federal regulations governing human subjects research do not directly address ethical issues associated with protections for family members who are not identified as the primary "research participant." Ethical concerns related to family consent and privacy become paramount as pediatric environmental health research increasingly turns to questions of gene–environment interactions.

Objectives: In this article I identify issues arising from and potential solutions for the privacy and informed consent challenges of pediatric environmental health research intended to adequately protect the rights and welfare of children, family members, and communities.

Discussion: I first discuss family members as secondary research participants and then the specific ethical challenges of longitudinal research on late-onset environmental effects and gene–environment interactions. I conclude with a discussion of the confidentiality and social risks of recruitment and data collection of research conducted within small or unique communities, ethnic minority populations, and low-income families.

Conclusions: The responsible conduct of pediatric environmental health research must be conceptualized as a goodness of fit between the specific research context and the unique characteristics of subjects and other family stakeholders.

Key words: , , , , , , , , , , . Environ Health Perspect 114:1622–1625 (2006) . doi:10.1289/ehp.9004 available via http://dx.doi.org/ [Online 14 August 2006]


This article is part of the mini-monograph "Ethical Issues in Pediatric Environmental Health Research."

Address correspondence to C.B. Fisher, Center for Ethics Education, Fordham University, Dealy Hall, Psychology 441 East Fordham Rd., Bronx, NY 10458 USA Telephone: (718) 817-3793. Fax: (212) 759-2009. E-mail: Fisher@Fordham.edu

The writing of this article was partially supported by a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development grant (HD39332-02) awarded to C.B.F.

The author declares she has no competing financial interests.

Received 11 January 2006 ; accepted 22 June 2006.


The full version of this article is available for free in HTML or PDF formats.
spacer
 
Open Access Resources | Call for Papers | Career Opportunities | Buy EHP Publications | Advertising Information | Subscribe to the EHP News Feeds News Feeds | Inspector General USA.gov