pmc logo imageJournal ListSearchpmc logo image
Logo of radoncolBioMed Central web siteReference to the article.Search.Manuscript submission.Registration.Journal front page.
Radiat Oncol. 2009; 4: 1.
Published online 2009 January 12. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-4-1.
PMCID: PMC2631491
Recommendations for implementing stereotactic radiotherapy in peripheral stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: report from the Quality Assurance Working Party of the randomised phase III ROSEL study
Coen W Hurkmans,corresponding author1 Johan P Cuijpers,2 Frank J Lagerwaard,2 Joachim Widder,3 Uulke A van der Heide,4 Danny Schuring,1 and Suresh Senan2
1Department of Radiation Therapy, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
2Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
4Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
corresponding authorCorresponding author.
Coen W Hurkmans: coen.hurkmans/at/catharina-ziekenhuis.nl; Johan P Cuijpers: jp.cuijpers/at/vumc.nl; Frank J Lagerwaard: fj.lagerwaard/at/vumc.nl; Joachim Widder: j.widder/at/rt.umcg.nl; Uulke A van der Heide: u.a.vanderheide/at/umcutrecht.nl; Danny Schuring: danny.schuring/at/catharina-ziekenhuis.nl; Suresh Senan: s.senan/at/vumc.nl
Received September 24, 2008; Accepted January 12, 2009.
Abstract
Background
A phase III multi-centre randomised trial (ROSEL) has been initiated to establish the role of stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with operable stage IA lung cancer. Due to rapid changes in radiotherapy technology and evolving techniques for image-guided delivery, guidelines had to be developed in order to ensure uniformity in implementation of stereotactic radiotherapy in this multi-centre study.
Methods/Design
A Quality Assurance Working Party was formed by radiation oncologists and clinical physicists from both academic as well as non-academic hospitals that had already implemented stereotactic radiotherapy for lung cancer. A literature survey was conducted and consensus meetings were held in which both the knowledge from the literature and clinical experience were pooled. In addition, a planning study was performed in 26 stage I patients, of which 22 were stage 1A, in order to develop and evaluate the planning guidelines. Plans were optimised according to parameters adopted from RTOG trials using both an algorithm with a simple homogeneity correction (Type A) and a more advanced algorithm (Type B). Dose conformity requirements were then formulated based on these results.
Conclusion
Based on current literature and expert experience, guidelines were formulated for this phase III study of stereotactic radiotherapy versus surgery. These guidelines can serve to facilitate the design of future multi-centre clinical trials of stereotactic radiotherapy in other patient groups and aid a more uniform implementation of this technique outside clinical trials.