|
 Death Rate Report by State, death years through 2005
Colon & Rectum
Healthy People 2010 Objective Number: 03-05
Reduce the colorectal cancer death rate.
All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages
Sorted by Rate |
State
 |
Met
Healthy People
Objective
of
13.9? 1 |
Annual
Death
Rate
over rate period
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 |
Deaths per Year
over rate period
 |
Rate Period |
Recent Trend 2 |
Recent
Annual
Percent
Change2
in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
|
Recent Trend Period2 |
| United States |
No |
17.4 (17.2, 17.5) |
53,005 |
2005 |
falling  |
-4.4 (-5.2, -3.6) |
2002 - 2005 |
| Kentucky |
No |
20.6 (19.3, 22.0) |
890 |
2005 |
falling |
-1.2 (-1.4, -1.0) |
1981 - 2005 |
| Louisiana |
No |
20.4 (19.1, 21.8) |
880 |
2005 |
stable  |
-7.3 (-16.5, 2.8) |
2003 - 2005 |
| District of Columbia |
No |
19.9 (16.4, 23.8) |
118 |
2005 |
stable |
-8.8 (-17.1, 0.5) |
2001 - 2005 |
| Mississippi |
No |
19.9 (18.4, 21.6) |
582 |
2005 |
stable |
-0.1 (-0.4, 0.3) |
1981 - 2005 |
| West Virginia |
No |
19.8 (18.0, 21.8) |
441 |
2005 |
falling |
-0.9 (-1.2, -0.5) |
1984 - 2005 |
| South Dakota |
No |
19.6 (16.8, 22.8) |
178 |
2005 |
falling |
-1.5 (-1.9, -1.1) |
1981 - 2005 |
| Indiana |
No |
19.2 (18.2, 20.3) |
1,243 |
2005 |
falling |
-1.7 (-1.9, -1.5) |
1981 - 2005 |
| Oklahoma |
No |
19.2 (17.8, 20.6) |
730 |
2005 |
falling |
-1.0 (-1.2, -0.8) |
1981 - 2005 |
| Pennsylvania |
No |
19.0 (18.3, 19.7) |
2,951 |
2005 |
falling |
-4.3 (-5.6, -2.9) |
2001 - 2005 |
| New Jersey |
No |
18.9 (18.0, 19.8) |
1,775 |
2005 |
falling |
-3.0 (-3.6, -2.4) |
1994 - 2005 |
| Tennessee |
No |
18.9 (17.8, 20.0) |
1,162 |
2005 |
falling |
-0.9 (-1.2, -0.7) |
1981 - 2005 |
| North Dakota |
No |
18.8 (15.9, 22.2) |
152 |
2005 |
falling |
-1.7 (-2.1, -1.2) |
1981 - 2005 |
| Ohio |
No |
18.8 (18.1, 19.6) |
2,365 |
2005 |
stable |
-5.9 (-11.9, 0.6) |
2003 - 2005 |
| Maryland |
No |
18.7 (17.6, 19.9) |
1,017 |
2005 |
falling |
-4.7 (-6.2, -3.1) |
2000 - 2005 |
| Arkansas |
No |
18.6 (17.1, 20.2) |
574 |
2005 |
falling |
-1.0 (-1.5, -0.6) |
1988 - 2005 |
| Nebraska |
No |
18.6 (16.8, 20.7) |
367 |
2005 |
falling |
-1.5 (-1.8, -1.2) |
1981 - 2005 |
| Illinois |
No |
18.5 (17.7, 19.3) |
2,363 |
2005 |
falling |
-5.5 (-8.9, -1.9) |
2002 - 2005 |
| Alabama |
No |
18.4 (17.2, 19.7) |
900 |
2005 |
falling |
-1.0 (-1.2, -0.8) |
1981 - 2005 |
| Kansas |
No |
18.4 (16.9, 20.1) |
548 |
2005 |
falling |
-1.5 (-1.8, -1.3) |
1981 - 2005 |
| South Carolina |
No |
18.4 (17.1, 19.7) |
811 |
2005 |
falling |
-3.9 (-6.8, -1.0) |
2000 - 2005 |
| Michigan |
No |
18.3 (17.5, 19.1) |
1,912 |
2005 |
falling |
-2.3 (-2.6, -2.0) |
1991 - 2005 |
| Nevada |
No |
18.2 (16.4, 20.1) |
401 |
2005 |
falling |
-1.1 (-1.6, -0.6) |
1981 - 2005 |
| Iowa |
No |
18.1 (16.7, 19.6) |
662 |
2005 |
falling |
-1.9 (-2.1, -1.7) |
1981 - 2005 |
| New Hampshire |
No |
18.0 (15.8, 20.4) |
244 |
2005 |
falling |
-2.5 (-2.9, -2.0) |
1981 - 2005 |
| Vermont |
No |
18.0 (14.9, 21.5) |
123 |
2005 |
falling |
-2.1 (-2.6, -1.6) |
1981 - 2005 |
| Delaware |
No |
17.9 (15.2, 20.8) |
162 |
2005 |
falling |
-2.5 (-2.9, -2.0) |
1981 - 2005 |
| Missouri |
No |
17.9 (16.9, 19.0) |
1,141 |
2005 |
falling |
-4.7 (-9.0, -0.2) |
2002 - 2005 |
| Maine |
No |
17.6 (15.6, 19.9) |
278 |
2005 |
falling |
-5.2 (-7.4, -3.0) |
2000 - 2005 |
| Massachusetts |
No |
17.5 (16.6, 18.5) |
1,277 |
2005 |
falling |
-6.3 (-9.2, -3.4) |
2002 - 2005 |
| Georgia |
No |
17.3 (16.4, 18.3) |
1,326 |
2005 |
falling |
-3.3 (-5.6, -1.1) |
2001 - 2005 |
| Montana |
No |
17.3 (14.9, 20.0) |
186 |
2005 |
falling |
-1.9 (-2.4, -1.4) |
1981 - 2005 |
| Rhode Island |
No |
17.3 (15.0, 19.7) |
223 |
2005 |
falling |
-2.6 (-2.9, -2.3) |
1981 - 2005 |
| Virginia |
No |
17.0 (16.0, 17.9) |
1,236 |
2005 |
falling |
-5.7 (-10.2, -1.0) |
2002 - 2005 |
| Colorado |
No |
16.8 (15.5, 18.1) |
661 |
2005 |
falling |
-1.8 (-2.0, -1.6) |
1984 - 2005 |
| New York |
No |
16.8 (16.3, 17.4) |
3,512 |
2005 |
falling |
-6.2 (-9.0, -3.3) |
2002 - 2005 |
| North Carolina |
No |
16.8 (15.9, 17.7) |
1,461 |
2005 |
falling |
-2.4 (-3.1, -1.8) |
1995 - 2005 |
| Oregon |
No |
16.8 (15.5, 18.1) |
667 |
2005 |
falling |
-1.6 (-1.8, -1.3) |
1981 - 2005 |
| Texas |
No |
16.5 (16.0, 17.1) |
3,191 |
2005 |
falling |
-4.3 (-6.9, -1.5) |
2002 - 2005 |
| Wisconsin |
No |
16.5 (15.5, 17.5) |
999 |
2005 |
falling |
-2.1 (-2.3, -1.9) |
1981 - 2005 |
| New Mexico |
No |
16.1 (14.3, 18.0) |
305 |
2005 |
falling |
-1.1 (-1.4, -0.8) |
1981 - 2005 |
| Florida |
No |
16.0 (15.5, 16.6) |
3,756 |
2005 |
falling |
-3.3 (-4.6, -2.1) |
2000 - 2005 |
| California |
No |
15.8 (15.4, 16.2) |
5,156 |
2005 |
falling |
-2.2 (-2.3, -2.1) |
1985 - 2005 |
| Connecticut |
No |
15.6 (14.4, 16.9) |
632 |
2005 |
falling |
-5.6 (-8.0, -3.3) |
2000 - 2005 |
| Idaho |
No |
15.5 (13.5, 17.8) |
211 |
2005 |
falling |
-1.5 (-1.9, -1.1) |
1981 - 2005 |
| Washington |
No |
15.3 (14.3, 16.3) |
946 |
2005 |
falling |
-1.9 (-2.1, -1.7) |
1981 - 2005 |
| Arizona |
No |
15.1 (14.1, 16.1) |
924 |
2005 |
falling |
-1.6 (-1.9, -1.4) |
1981 - 2005 |
| Alaska |
No |
15.0 (11.2, 19.5) |
60 |
2005 |
falling |
-2.2 (-3.3, -1.1) |
1981 - 2005 |
| Minnesota |
No |
14.8 (13.8, 15.9) |
789 |
2005 |
stable |
-10.4 (-21.4, 2.1) |
2003 - 2005 |
| Hawaii |
No |
14.7 (12.8, 16.9) |
211 |
2005 |
falling |
-1.8 (-2.3, -1.3) |
1981 - 2005 |
| Wyoming |
Yes |
13.6 (10.6, 17.3) |
70 |
2005 |
falling |
-4.7 (-7.1, -2.4) |
1996 - 2005 |
| Utah |
Yes |
13.0 (11.3, 14.7) |
236 |
2005 |
falling |
-1.5 (-2.1, -1.0) |
1981 - 2005 |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/30/2009 5:05 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of annual percent change is below 0.
|
1 Healthy People 2010 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
2 Recent trend in death rates were calculated using the Joinpoint Regression Program and are expressed as the annual percent change over the recent trend period. Recent trend period is the period since last change in trend as determined by Joinpoint.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1–4, 5–9, … , 80–84, 85+). The Healthy People 2010 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
|
 
|
|
