Cancer Risk Assessment Methods in Occupational
Epidemiology (Past Initiative)
Investigators are conducting research to develop or improve methods of
surveillance, exposure measurements, and risk assessment that may be applicable
in epidemiologic studies of cancer.
The projects are funded from proposals received in response to two Requests
for Applications (RFAs March
1999, April
1999), co-sponsored by NCI, to stimulate methodologic research in
occupational epidemiology, and to implement the National Occupational
Research Agenda (NORA).
The Epidemiology and Genetics Research Program (EGRP) is supporting five
research projects, and a fifth project is being co-funded with the National
Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) (Keating).
Funding is for three years, beginning in September
1999, except for the co-funded project for which funding began in April
2000.
- Distributed Occupational Knowledge System
Philip Harber, M.D., University of California at Los Angeles
- Improved Exposure Assessment for Organophosphate Pesticides
Garrett Keating, Ph.D., Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, University
of California
- Multi-state Migrant Farmworker Surveillance Study
John May, M.D., Northeast Center for Agricultural Occupational Health
- Cytogenetic Models for Assessing Low Dose Radiation Risk
Rainer Sachs, Ph.D., University of California at Berkeley
- Development and Validation of a Mail Survey of Chemical
Exposures
David Valiante, M.S., New Jersey Department of Health
Distributed Occupational Knowledge System
Philip Harber, M.D.
University of California at Los Angeles School of Medicine
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Los Angeles, Calif.
Occupational health receives too little attention in primary care settings.
In addition, public health surveillance acquires and utilizes too little
of the information available in clinical settings. Obtaining an appropriate
occupational history requires both time and expert knowledge about occupational
medicine, both of which are inadequate in most primary care settings.
The Distributed Occupational Knowledge System (DOKS) addresses these
problems by developing a computer assisted system, which may be directly
incorporated in routine primary health care delivery. It obtains a computer-assisted
occupational history and makes case-specific recommendations for preventive
interventions. It will also systematically collect clinical information
for public health analysis.
The system is being implemented in 3 types of ambulatory health care
settings – county hospital-based, health maintenance organization, and
clinic group. Initially, interviews will be in person, then by phone,
and later by computer. Recommendations will be provided to patients and
clinical care providers. Evaluation includes historical and concurrent
controls and is based on exit and 3-month interviews and record review.
The process will also yield valuable surveillance data, including on
population segments that are often missed by other methods, and describing
functional impact of work, rather than just occupationally caused disease.
Improved Exposure Assessment for Organophosphate Pesticides
Garrett Keating, Ph.D.
University of California
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Livermore, Calif.
This study will improve exposure assessment of pesticides by developing
a methodology for measuring acetylcholinesterase
(AChE) inhibition that includes determinations of free and total enzyme
in the same blood sample.
The researchers will develop a methodology for preparing whole blood
samples so that these measurements can be made sequentially using currently
available methods for measuring cholinesterase activity that are used
in clinical monitoring of pesticide exposure. They will calibrate colorimetric
measurements of these AChE activities with specific binding of a radiolabeled
probe to AChE in blood samples partially inhibited by an organophosphate
(OP) pesticide.
Once analyzed by standard AChE assays, the samples will be processed
to reactivate the OP-inhibited AChE followed by determination of this
reactivated fraction through binding of the AChE-specific probe and colorimetric
assay. This parallel AChE measurement approach is intended to validate
the sequential colorimetric determinations so that the methodology can
be performed without the radioactive assay.
This capability will improve exposure assessment of pesticides in several
ways:
- knowledge of the total AChE activity in a blood sample will permit
a more accurate estimate of the level of inhibition by utilizing individual-specific
information,
- measurement of AChE activity is considered to be a more relevant endpoint
for the neurological effects of pesticides than other cholinesterase
activities, and
- the ratio of inhibited-to-total AChE will provide an internal standard
to normalize the different AChE assays currently used to monitor pesticide
exposure.
Multi-state Migrant Farmworker Surveillance Study
John May, M.D.
Northeast Center for Agricultural Occupational Health
Cooperstown, N.Y.
The Multi-State Migrant Farmworker Surveillance Study is investigating
a new occupational injury and illness surveillance system, developed by
the Northeast Center for Agricultural Occupational Health, and successfully
piloted in New York and Pennsylvania. The new surveillance system uses
the existing network of federally funded migrant health centers to track
medical visits for work-related health problems, and collect anonymous
medical chart data.
Occupational injury and illness rates obtained from the new surveillance
system will be compared to those based on data on the same population
from Worker's Compensation claims. In addition, the collected data will
be used to identify leading occupational injury and illness types by region
and work type, assess the importance of pesticides as a threat to farmworker
occupational safety in the Northeast, and determine the consistency of
occupational injury and illness patterns for leading commodities throughout
the region.
This study has two broad objectives:
- increase the understanding of farmworker occupational injury and illness
in the Northeast, and
- improve researchers' ability to collect migrant and seasonal farmworker
injury and illness data throughout the country.
Cytogenetic Models for Assessing Low-dose Radiation Risk
Rainer Sachs, Ph.D.
University of California at Berkeley
Department of Mathematics
Berkeley, Calif.
Science-based assessments of environmental or occupational cancer risks
from sparsely ionizing radiation estimate effects on large populations
from doses that are very small compared to typical experimental doses
and small compared even to epidemiologically tractable doses. A priority
is developing credible dose-response relationships, both in an intermediate-dose
range (up to 2 Gy or more) where epidemiology is feasible and in the most
relevant, low-dose range (<0.1 Gy).
The pertinent initial damage, such as DNA double strand breaks, is almost
certainly produced linearly with dose, so the main issue is cellular processing
of initial damage via molecular repair/misrepair pathways, which can result
in more complex endpoints such as chromosome aberrations and, ultimately,
cancer. Exchange-type chromosome aberrations, produced during the GO/G1
cell cycle phase and scored at the next metaphase, are complex endpoints,
characteristic of ionizing radiation damage and highly relevant to carcinogenesis
risk estimation.
The goal is to use in vitro experiments on human cells and quantitative,
mechanistic modeling to find realistic dose-response relations for such
aberrations in a dose range from 0.08-2 Gy, as a practical surrogate for
studying carcinogenesis in vivo at low doses. Biophysical and Monte Carlo
computer analysis, comparing the best currently available models of molecular
aberration formation pathways to data, is emphasized as a relatively inexpensive
approach. The researchers have assembled a team of modelers and experimental
radiobiologists from the University of California at Berkeley, Columbia
University, and Harvard University for the research.
Exchange-type chromosome aberrations will be measured with state-of-the-art
fluorescent in situ hybridization techniques after gamma-irradiation of
human lymphocytes. Modeling will use extensions of sophisticated chromosome
aberration simulator (CAS) computer software previously written and successfully
applied by members of the research team.
The main novelties of the project are:
- close integration of mechanistic computer modeling with low-dose experiments,
using repeated low-dose fractions to enhance response above background,
including inversions and complex aberrations among the aberrations measured
for risk-estimation purposes; and
- explicit consideration of the recombinational-repair aberration formation
model.
The research project will help firm up risk estimates and make them more
credible by studying quantitatively molecular mechanisms relevant to low
doses and low dose-rates.
Development and Validation of A Mail Survey of Chemical Exposures
David Valiante, M.S.
New Jersey Department of Health
Occupational Health Service
Trenton, N.J.
This project is a 3-year hazard surveillance study with objectives to:
- develop and validate a prototype mailed, employer survey to assess
the potential for worker chemical exposure and the controls in place
to prevent exposure, and
- develop a method to score the surveys and rank facilities for priority
for preventive activities.
Design Phase: Three draft versions of the Chemical Survey
are mailed to groups of 40, 50, and 120 facilities that are asked to voluntarily
complete the survey and discuss its clarity and ease of completion during
a follow-up telephone interview with health department researchers. Survey
responses and interview data are reviewed and the survey is revised accordingly.
Validation Phase: Following completion of the design phase,
the final version of the survey is mailed to 1600 facilities in eight
rounds of 200 facilities each. Facilities are asked to voluntarily complete
the survey. Response accuracy is analyzed by conducting onsite visits
with a random sample of respondents. Facilities are contacted by phone
and a health department researcher visits those choosing to participate
in the validation. The procedures and documents used to complete the survey
are reviewed and employees observed. Job activities and related machinery,
equipment, tools, and control measures are evaluated. Health department
findings are compared to the information supplied by the employer. There
are no repercussions for inaccuracies on the survey.
Ranking Phase: Surveys are scored and facilities are ranked
by their priority for interventions, for example, education, consultation,
regulation, and medical screening. There are separate ranked lists of
facilities for each chemical and for different types of interventions.
Ranking is based on analysis of key questions such as amount of chemical
handled, patterns of handling, number of workers handling, worker job
titles and duties, engineering controls in place, and personal protective
equipment in use.
Chemicals Selected: The final survey requests information about
specific chemical carcinogens that are in common use and, except for silica,
for which there are comprehensive federal regulations. They are cadmium,
benzene, crystalline silica, ethylene oxide (IARC category 1), formaldehyde
(IARC category 2A), and lead and methylene chloride (IARC category 2B).
Types of Industry Selected: Industry groups are chosen based
on research and expert industrial hygiene knowledge of where the selected
chemicals are likely to be handled. Researchers use 4- and 8-digit Standard
Industrial Classification (SIC) codes for selection from a Dun and Bradstreet
employer database. The use of 8-digit codes allows for greater specificity
in choosing types of industry.
|