Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sponsored by: |
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital |
---|---|
Information provided by: | Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00103636 |
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of extending the dwell time of peripheral intravenous cannulas on clinical outcomes and cost.
Condition | Intervention | Phase |
---|---|---|
Phlebitis |
Procedure: Extending peripheral intravenous (IV) cannula dwell times |
Phase II Phase III |
Study Type: | Interventional |
Study Design: | Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study |
Official Title: | Peripheral Venous Catheter Trial: 3 Day Versus No Routine Change |
Estimated Enrollment: | 200 |
Study Start Date: | March 2004 |
Estimated Study Completion Date: | December 2004 |
Among hospitalized patients, intravenous therapy is the most common invasive procedure. It is associated with a phlebitis rate of between 1.1% and 63% and a central venous catheter related bacteremia rate of approximately 3.0%. Catheter related blood-stream infections have an attributable mortality rate of 12% to 25%. Factors thought to be associated with these complications include insertion techniques, catheter securement, type of catheter used, type of infusate and additives, post-insertion catheter care and length of time the catheter remains in place.
Current Centers of Disease Control Guidelines provide direction for intravenous therapy management including a recommendation that peripheral intravenous catheters should be re-sited every 72-96 hours. Data underpinning the recommendation was collected in 1992, over a decade ago. Since that time, there have been improvements in catheter design and composition, and prospective surveillance studies have demonstrated the safety of longer dwell times. To date, these observations have not been validated in adults, using randomized controlled trial methodology.
Re-siting intravenous cannulas causes discomfort to patients and has a high recurrent cost. The primary aim of the present study is to compare the rates of peripheral catheter-related blood stream infection, catheter-related local infection, phlebitis and obstruction between two groups of patients - those having routine catheter changes every 72 hours and those having catheter changes only when clinically indicated.
Specific hypotheses:
That changing intravenous peripheral catheters when indicated by clinical signs compared to changing intravenous catheters every 3 days reduces the incidence of intravenous catheter related morbidity.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients are eligible to join the Peripheral Venous Catheter Trial if:
AND
AND
Exclusion Criteria:
Study ID Numbers: | RBWH 2003/131 |
Study First Received: | February 11, 2005 |
Last Updated: | June 23, 2005 |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00103636 |
Health Authority: | Australia: Department of Health and Ageing Therapeutic Goods Administration |
Phlebitis/etiology Infusions Intravenous/adverse effects Randomised controlled trial |
Phlebitis/prevention Adult Time factors |
Vasculitis Peripheral Vascular Diseases Phlebitis Vascular Diseases |
Cardiovascular Diseases |