Full Text View  
  Tabular View  
  Contacts and Locations  
  No Study Results Posted  
  Related Studies  
Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Children With the MED-EL Cochlear Implant
This study is enrolling participants by invitation only.
Sponsored by: Med-El Corporation
Information provided by: Med-El Corporation
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00784043
  Purpose

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and document longitudinal efficacy in young children implanted bilaterally with MED-EL COMBI 40+ / PULSARCI100/SONATATI100 cochlear implant systems.


Condition Intervention
Hearing Loss
Device: Cochlear Implant

Genetics Home Reference related topics: nonsyndromic deafness
MedlinePlus related topics: Hearing Disorders and Deafness
U.S. FDA Resources
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Non-Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Parallel Assignment
Official Title: Longitudinal Efficacy in Young Children Implanted Bilaterally With MED-EL COMBI 40+ / PULSARCI100/SONATATI100 Cochlear Implant Systems.

Further study details as provided by Med-El Corporation:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • The primary objective of this investigation is to evaluate and document longitudinal efficacy in young children implanted bilaterally with MED-EL COMBI 40+ / PULSARCI100/SONATATI100 cochlear implant systems. [ Time Frame: 60 months post initial stimulation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • To measure post-operative speech perception ability, language acquisition, and speech production over time in bilaterally implanted children. [ Time Frame: 60 months post initial activation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • To measure post-operative speech perception ability in noise of bilaterally implanted subjects in the binaural versus monaural conditions [ Time Frame: 60 months post initial activation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • To compare post-operative speech perception ability in noise of bilaterally implanted subjects to unilaterally implanted subjects [ Time Frame: 60 months post initial activation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • To measure the localization abilities of bilaterally implanted subjects in the binaural versus monaural conditions. [ Time Frame: 60 months post initial activation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • To compare localization abilities of bilaterally implanted subjects to unilaterally implanted subjects. [ Time Frame: 60 months post initial activation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Estimated Enrollment: 60
Study Start Date: March 2004
Estimated Study Completion Date: December 2013
Estimated Primary Completion Date: December 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Intervention Details:
    Device: Cochlear Implant
    Bilateral Implantation in children
  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   12 Months to 36 Months
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between 12 and 36 months of age at time of implantation
  • Profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss
  • English as the primary language in the home
  • Realistic expectations of guardians
  • Child must be enrolled in a post-operative rehabilitative/educational program that supports the use of cochlear implants and the development of auditory-based skills
  • Willing and available to comply with all scheduled procedures as defined in the protocol

Audiological:

  • Profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss with average thresholds between ears of 90 dB HL or greater at 1000 Hz and above, and must demonstrate minimal functional benefitfrom conventional amplification
  • Behavioral test measures must include unaided threshold measures for the right and left ears using insert earphones; left-alone and right-alone aided sound field threshold measurements; and aided and unaided speech-awareness / detection thresholds (for each ear individually)
  • Children accepted into the study must be able to demonstrate a consistent response to sound. If a child has no measurable hearing, he/she must be able to demonstrate a consistent response to vibrotactile stimuli.
  • All children must have completed an appropriate trial period with optimally fit amplification prior to inclusion in the study.

Medical:

  • Good general health status, as judged by Primary Investigator
  • Patent cochleae bilaterally, as indicated by radiological evaluation
  • No contraindications for surgery, in general, or cochlear implant surgery in particular

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior experience with any cochlear implant system
  • Younger than 12 months or older than 36 months at time of implantation
  • Audiological: Presence of otoacoustic emissions and/or cochlear microphonic, indicating possible condition of auditory neuropathy

Medical:

  • Evidence of ossification that would prevent full insertion of the standard C40+ / PULSARCI100 /SONATATI100 electrode array in the cochlea(e) to be implanted, as indicated by radiological evaluation
  • Abnormal or malformed cochlea(e) to be implanted
  • Severed or non-functional auditory nerve in the ear(s) to be implanted
  • Central auditory lesion
  • Cognitive and/or neurological dysfunction
  • Auditory neuropathy
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00784043

Locations
United States, Florida
Nemours Children's Clinic
Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32207
United States, Georgia
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30324
United States, Ohio
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44124
United States, Texas
Callier Center
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75235
Texas Children's Hospital
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
Dallas Otolaryngology Associates
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75230
United States, Virginia
Eastern Virginia Medical School
Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23507
United States, Wisconsin
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226
Canada, Ontario
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5A5
Sponsors and Collaborators
Med-El Corporation
  More Information

Publications:
Kühn-Inacker H, Shehata-Dieler W, Müller J, Helms J. Bilateral cochlear implants: a way to optimize auditory perception abilities in deaf children? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2004 Oct;68(10):1257-66.
Nopp P, Schleich P, D'Haese P. Sound localization in bilateral users of MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2004 Jun;25(3):205-14.
Schleich P, Nopp P, D'Haese P. Head shadow, squelch, and summation effects in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant. Ear Hear. 2004 Jun;25(3):197-204.
Müller J, Schön F, Helms J. Speech understanding in quiet and noise in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant system. Ear Hear. 2002 Jun;23(3):198-206.
Schön F, Müller J, Helms J. Speech reception thresholds obtained in a symmetrical four-loudspeaker arrangement from bilateral users of MED-EL cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol. 2002 Sep;23(5):710-4.
Tyler RS, Gantz BJ, Rubinstein JT, Wilson BS, Parkinson AJ, Wolaver A, Preece JP, Witt S, Lowder MW. Three-month results with bilateral cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2002 Feb;23(1 Suppl):80S-89S.
Winkler F, Schön F, Peklo L, Müller J, Feinen Ch, Helms J. [The Würzburg questionnaire for assessing the quality of hearing in CI-children (WH-CIK)] Laryngorhinootologie. 2002 Mar;81(3):211-6. German.
Zimmerman-Phillips S, Robbins AM, Osberger MJ. Assessing cochlear implant benefit in very young children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2000 Dec;185:42-3. No abstract available.
Kirk KI, Pisoni DB, Osberger MJ. Lexical effects on spoken word recognition by pediatric cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 1995 Oct;16(5):470-81.
Grantham DW, Ashmead DH, Ricketts TA, Labadie RF, Haynes DS. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2007 Aug;28(4):524-41.
Ricketts TA, Grantham DW, Ashmead DH, Haynes DS, Labadie RF. Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources. Ear Hear. 2006 Dec;27(6):763-73.
Dorman MF, Dahlstrom L. Speech understanding by cochlear-implant patients with different left- and right-ear electrode arrays. Ear Hear. 2004 Apr;25(2):191-4.
Laback B, Pok SM, Baumgartner WD, Deutsch WA, Schmid K. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors. Ear Hear. 2004 Oct;25(5):488-500.
Van Hoesel R, Ramsden R, Odriscoll M. Sound-direction identification, interaural time delay discrimination, and speech intelligibility advantages in noise for a bilateral cochlear implant user. Ear Hear. 2002 Apr;23(2):137-49.
Pijl S. Single-channel versus bilateral multichannel cochlear implant results: a case report. Ear Hear. 1991 Dec;12(6):431-3.
Beijen JW, Snik AF, Mylanus EA. Sound localization ability of young children with bilateral cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol. 2007 Jun;28(4):479-85.
Truy E, Ionescu E, Ceruse P, Gallego S. The binaural digisonic cochlear implant: surgical technique. Otol Neurotol. 2002 Sep;23(5):704-9.
Brown KD, Balkany TJ. Benefits of bilateral cochlear implantation: a review. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Oct;15(5):315-8. Review.
Das S, Buchman CA. Bilateral cochlear implantation: current concepts. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Oct;13(5):290-3. Review.
Offeciers E, Morera C, Müller J, Huarte A, Shallop J, Cavallé L. International consensus on bilateral cochlear implants and bimodal stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol. 2005 Sep;125(9):918-9. No abstract available.
Verschuur CA, Lutman ME, Ramsden R, Greenham P, O'Driscoll M. Auditory localization abilities in bilateral cochlear implant recipients. Otol Neurotol. 2005 Sep;26(5):965-71.
Senn P, Kompis M, Vischer M, Haeusler R. Minimum audible angle, just noticeable interaural differences and speech intelligibility with bilateral cochlear implants using clinical speech processors. Audiol Neurootol. 2005 Nov-Dec;10(6):342-52. Epub 2005 Aug 5.
Sharma A, Dorman MF, Kral A. The influence of a sensitive period on central auditory development in children with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants. Hear Res. 2005 May;203(1-2):134-43.
Laszig R, Aschendorff A, Stecker M, Müller-Deile J, Maune S, Dillier N, Weber B, Hey M, Begall K, Lenarz T, Battmer RD, Böhm M, Steffens T, Strutz J, Linder T, Probst R, Allum J, Westhofen M, Doering W. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results. Otol Neurotol. 2004 Nov;25(6):958-68.
Litovsky RY, Parkinson A, Arcaroli J, Peters R, Lake J, Johnstone P, Yu G. Bilateral cochlear implants in adults and children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 May;130(5):648-55.
Schauwers K, Gillis S, Daemers K, De Beukelaer C, De Ceulaer G, Yperman M, Govaerts PJ. Normal hearing and language development in a deaf-born child. Otol Neurotol. 2004 Nov;25(6):924-9.
Seeber BU, Baumann U, Fastl H. Localization ability with bimodal hearing aids and bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Sep;116(3):1698-709.
Stark T, Engel A, Borkowski G. [Bilateral cochlea implantation in varying duration of deafness] Laryngorhinootologie. 2004 Jan;83(1):20-2. German.
Tyler RS, Witt SA, Dunn CC. Trade-offs between better hearing and better cosmetics. Am J Audiol. 2004 Dec;13(2):193-9.
van Hoesel RJ. Exploring the benefits of bilateral cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol. 2004 Jul-Aug;9(4):234-46.
Au DK, Hui Y, Wei WI. Superiority of bilateral cochlear implantation over unilateral cochlear implantation in tone discrimination in chinese patients. Am J Otolaryngol. 2003 Jan-Feb;24(1):19-23.
Kong W, Yu L, Xu Y, Yue J, Xiong X, Zhu L, Duan J. [Benefit of bilateral cochlear implantation on congenital prelingually deafened Chinese-speaking children] Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 2003 Oct;17(10):577-9. Chinese.
Ramsden R, Greenham P, O'Driscoll M, Mawman D, Proops D, Craddock L, Fielden C, Graham J, Meerton L, Verschuur C, Toner J, McAnallen C, Osborne J, Doran M, Gray R, Pickerill M. Evaluation of bilaterally implanted adult subjects with the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Otol Neurotol. 2005 Sep;26(5):988-98.
Schoen F, Mueller J, Helms J, Nopp P. Sound localization and sensitivity to interaural cues in bilateral users of the Med-El Combi 40/40+cochlear implant system. Otol Neurotol. 2005 May;26(3):429-37.
Long CJ, Eddington DK, Colburn HS, Rabinowitz WM. Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Sep;114(3):1565-74.
Tyler RS, Dunn CC, Witt SA, Preece JP. Update on bilateral cochlear implantation. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Oct;11(5):388-93. Review.
van Hoesel RJ, Tyler RS. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Mar;113(3):1617-30.
Vermeire K, Brokx JP, Van de Heyning PH, Cochet E, Carpentier H. Bilateral cochlear implantation in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2003 Jan;67(1):67-70.
Wilson BS, Lawson DT, Muller JM, Tyler RS, Kiefer J. Cochlear implants: some likely next steps. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2003;5:207-49. Epub 2003 Apr 16. Review.
Gantz BJ, Tyler RS, Rubinstein JT, Wolaver A, Lowder M, Abbas P, Brown C, Hughes M, Preece JP. Binaural cochlear implants placed during the same operation. Otol Neurotol. 2002 Mar;23(2):169-80.
Summerfield AQ, Marshall DH, Barton GR, Bloor KE. A cost-utility scenario analysis of bilateral cochlear implantation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 Nov;128(11):1255-62.
van Hoesel, R. J. M., & Clark, G. M. (1999). Speech results with a bilateral multi-channel cochlear implant subject for spatially separated signal and noise. Australian Journal of Audiology, 21, 23-28.
Lawson DT, Wilson BS, Zerbi M, van den Honert C, Finley CC, Farmer JC Jr, McElveen JT Jr, Roush PA. Bilateral cochlear implants controlled by a single speech processor. Am J Otol. 1998 Nov;19(6):758-61.
van Hoesel RJ, Clark GM. Psychophysical studies with two binaural cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Jul;102(1):495-507.
Van Hoesel RJ, Clark GM. Fusion and lateralization study with two binaural cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1995 Sep;166:233-5.
van Hoesel RJ, Tong YC, Hollow RD, Clark GM. Psychophysical and speech perception studies: a case report on a binaural cochlear implant subject. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Dec;94(6):3178-89.
Pelizzone M, Kasper A, Montandon P. Binaural interaction in a cochlear implant patient. Hear Res. 1990 Oct;48(3):287-90.
Balkany T, Boggess W, Dinner B. Binaural cochlear implantation: comparison of 3M/House and Nucleus 22 devices with evidence of sensory integration. Laryngoscope. 1988 Oct;98(10):1040-3.

Responsible Party: MED-EL Corporation ( Richard Collette, CEO )
Study ID Numbers: MED-EL NA 013
Study First Received: October 30, 2008
Last Updated: October 31, 2008
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00784043  
Health Authority: United States: Institutional Review Board

Keywords provided by Med-El Corporation:
Cochlear implant
hearing loss

Study placed in the following topic categories:
Signs and Symptoms
Sensation Disorders
Hearing Disorders
Deafness
Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases
Neurologic Manifestations
Hearing Loss
Ear Diseases

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Nervous System Diseases

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on January 16, 2009