March 9, 1999 - Colon Cancer Screening and Prevention : NIDDK

March 9, 1999 - Colon Cancer Screening and Prevention

Member attendees

NIDDK
Jay Hoofnagle (Chair)
Thomas Kresina (executive secretary)
Frank Hamilton
Rita Yeager

DRG
Mushtaq Khan

NCCAM
Cheong Chah

NCI
Jorge Gomez

NCRR
Bernard Talbot

NIAAA
Vishnudutt Purohit

NIAID
Diana Berard (for Dennis Lang)

NNMC
James Butler

 

Guests from NIH

NCI
Ernest Hawk
Paul Limburg

NHLBI
Mariam Daniel

NIDDK
James Everhart

ORS
Bob Dedrick

Other Guests

Scott Kern, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Amy Kiesel, American Gastroenterological Association
Rebecca Ryen, American Gastroenterological Association
Kurt Stromberg, FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research
Sidney Winawer, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center


1:16 p.m.

Dr. Jay Hoofnagle, Director, Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition (DDDN) of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) welcomed attendees to this Digestive Diseases Interagency Coordinating Committee (DDICC) meeting on colon cancer screening and prevention.

Before turning the meeting over to Dr. Jorge Gomez of the National Cancer Institute (NCI), who organized this meeting, Dr. Hoofnagle explained that although DDDN does fund some colon cancer-related grants and the gastroenterologist community seeks information from DDDN, the majority of funding and research activity related to colon cancer comes from NCI.

Dr. Gomez first mentioned NCI's 1998 budget of $132,145,000. This budget was broken down into clinical ($32 million), basic ($35 million), hazard control ($36 million), and other research. Dr. Gomez said he later would discuss the mechanism of Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) grants and then turned the meeting over to Dr. Ernest Hawk, from the Chemoprevention Branch of NCI.

Because of their relevance to the meeting's topic of screening and prevention, Dr. Hawk presented an overview of NCI's programs in the Division of Cancer Prevention (DCP) and the Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences (DCCPS). He mentioned that DCP is undergoing a reorganization, and under this new structure, digestive diseases are represented as an individual entity.

The PLCO (prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian) Trial has been ongoing for approximately 6 years now. Its goal is to determine if screening tests for prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancers will reduce the number of deaths from these cancers. Another NCI initiative is the establishment of a Cooperative Family Registry for Colorectal Cancer Studies, which involves the creation of a network of six centers to provide family registries of persons at risk for colorectal cancer that subsequently can be used to evaluate etiologies, genetics, risk factors, and, ultimately, interventions.

Within the Institute and through its collaborations with academia and industry, NCI funds a chemoprevention drug development program that includes in vitro screening assays, in vivo screening assays, animal testing of efficacy, biomarker identification and development in animal models, preclinical toxicology, phase I clinical studies, and phase II studies of preliminary clinical efficacy.

DCP also collaborates with industry to facilitate novel compounds' entry into its research program. Furthermore, DCP has agreements with approximately 25 institutions for phase II clinical trials of chemopreventive agents.

NCI's preclinical prevention research in animal models with germline defects is solicited through contracts, requests for applications (RFAs), administrative supplements to existing grants, and investigator-initiated grants.

NCI's clinical prevention research in germline colorectal cancer risk cohorts is solicited through contracts, RFAs, investigator-initiated grants, and the DCCPS genetic networks, including the Cooperative Family Registries and the Cancer Genetics Networks. In its contract-based program, 15 trials of the 60 currently in progress are colorectal-oriented.

Dr. Gomez introduced Dr. Scott Kern's talk by describing the NCI's SPORE program, which may be expanded in the gastrointestinal (GI) area within the next 1 to 2 years. SPORE is administered under the Office of the Director; the Office of the Deputy Director for Extramural Sciences; the Office of Centers, Training, and Resources; and the Organ Systems Branch. The program is based on an interdisciplinary research approach requiring MDs and PhDs to work together in studying a specific organ/disease, such as breast, prostate, GI, and lung cancers. SPORE is focused on translational research, involving the laboratory, clinical, and community settings. It uses special review criteria that allow for flexibility.

Within SPORE, translational research is defined as the movement of laboratory discoveries into patient and population research settings and the movement of observations in patients and populations into laboratory research. General features of SPORE include a principal investigator (PI), a strong institutional commitment, access to patients and populations, a strong basic and clinical research base, a team concept, flexibility to realign resources, and scientific outreach.

SPORE's requirements include a PI, research projects, core or shared resources, a career development program, a developmental research program, and participation in NCI's annual SPORE meeting.

The annual SPORE Investigators' Workshop aims to promote inter-SPORE collaborations; share ideas, materials, and technologies; identify new research opportunities; establish research priorities that will maximize the impact of research; and resolve research issues and problems by making appropriate recommendations to the NCI leadership.

SPORE grant recipients can set aside money without a peer-review process to support pilot projects by investigators within their own institutions.

In 1998, there were six breast cancer, three prostate cancer, three lung cancer, and two GI cancer SPORE programs in progress. Dr. Gomez finished by stating that while SPORE currently is RFA-driven, NCI's goal is to make it an investigator-initiated program.

1:59 p.m.

Dr. Gomez introduced Dr. Scott Kern, the first of two guest speakers, who shared with the committee his experience with SPORE at Johns Hopkins University (JHU). Dr. Kern's experience with SPORE began in 1993 with a 3-year grant of approximately $1 million per year to study colorectal and pancreatic cancer and then followed with a 5-year grant of approximately $1.6 million per year beginning in 1997. One of the projects funded through JHU's SPORE grant concerns early diagnosis and genetic susceptibility; another concerns how cancer develops; and a third concerns the search for therapeutics, including rational drug screening.

JHU's SPORE funding is divided between colorectal cancer (58%) and pancreatic cancer (42%). Each original research project is funded with between $94,000 and $181,000. The original research projects are
1.

  • A. Screening for mutant genes in fecal specimens
  • B. Pancreatic cancer genetics
  • C. Screening targets of preinvasive neoplasms of the pancreas
2. Markers of colorectal cancer metastasis
3.
  • A. Hereditary colorectal cancer genetics
  • B. Tumor prevention in MIN mice
  • C. Markers of familial pancreatic cancer
4. T-cell targets in pancreatic cancer

JHU's career development research projects include
1. Chromosomal instability
2. Methylation patterns

Dr. Kern explained how genetic mutations occur in the development of cancer. He addressed premutations, which are considered normal polymorphisms yet they increase the mutation rate of neighboring sequences. One specific premutation is common in Ashkenazi Jews. Six percent of healthy Ashkenazi Jews have the premutation, 12 percent of Ashkenazi Jews with colon cancer have the premutation, 17 percent of Ashkenazi Jews with colon cancer under the age of 65 have the mutation, and 28 percent of Ashkenazi Jews with familial colon cancer have this premutation.

Dr. Kern also addressed developing new drugs to test in the MIN mouse model through a translational approach by examining the biochemistry of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) pathway. The APC gene--a gene that is essential for normal epithelial cell growth and differentiation--is responsible for the breakdown of beta-catenin, a regulatory protein that acts like a classic oncogene. Because APC is missing in 80-85 percent of colorectal cancer cases, this downregulation of beta-catenin cannot occur. In other cases (about 7-10 percent), beta-catenin mutates in tumors and becomes non-susceptible to APC's degradative abilities. Beta-catenin provides the oncogenic drive in both of these scenarios; therefore, researchers are testing thousands of drugs in an attempt to find those that shut off the beta-catenin.

2:30 p.m.

Dr. Gomez then introduced the next speaker, Dr. Sidney Winawer of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, who presented Colon Cancer Screening to the DDICC members and guests.

Dr. Winawer first presented some common statistics, including that colorectal cancer is one of the four leading cancers in terms of incidence and the second most common cancer killer in the United States. He also said that colorectal cancer is as much a woman's disease as it is a man's, and he presented a dramatic graph in slide format that plotted age-specific incidence rates of breast, colorectal, and cervical cancers per 100,000 women against age.

Dr. Winawer said he co-chaired with Bob Fletcher a multidisciplinary panel at a consortium meeting convened by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) to look at the evidence for colorectal cancer screening. Represented on the panel were generalists, surgeons, a radiologist, nurses, an economist, a consumer, a geneticist, an osteopath, gastroenterologists, and oncologists. They developed colorectal cancer screening guidelines, which were published in the February 1997 issue of Gastroenterology. They examined a good deal of evidence that was consistent with a reduction in colorectal cancer mortality with stool blood testing. Preliminary evidence for sigmoidoscopy also shows a reduction in colorectal cancer mortality. Sigmoidoscopy as a colorectal screening tool is being further investigated. Dr. Winawer said that the American Cancer Society's guidelines, as well as the AHCPR's panel's guidelines, recommend that physicians also should discuss colonoscopy and the double contrast barium enema with patients.

Dr. Winawer briefly addressed the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. The research has established that all screening methods are comparable and the cost is equivalent to screening mammography.

He then moved on to discuss polypectomy to reduce incidence as another form of secondary prevention of colorectal cancer, as adenomatous polyps are precursors to cancer. Researchers more recently have found that the polyp is preceded by an aberrant crypt. The adenoma develops into carcinoma over a very long period of time, and because the technology allows doctors to detect very small polyps, there is a large window of opportunity for prevention.

The National Polyp Study showed that a good colonoscopy at time zero is extremely effective in clearing out the colon of significant pathology. Patients at higher risk of developing cancer are those with multiple adenomas and a positive family history. Age also is an important factor because people tend to develop more adenomas with age.

To test the hypothesis that the removal of colorectal adenomas results in a reduction of colorectal cancer incidence, Dr. Winawer used data collected prior to the availability of colonoscopy technology and determined that it is beneficial to the patient to have the polyp(s) removed.

Dr. Winawer reported that several trials are either under way or have been completed to study the application of colonoscopy screening to the general population as a viable approach to the ultimate eradication of colorectal cancer in the United States. Currently, the National Colonoscopy Screening Trial is being planned and aims to identify in the general population people at risk for advanced adenomas in order to reduce colon cancer mortality by reducing incidence.

3:00 p.m.

Dr. Frank Hamilton began his presentation with a brief introduction to applicable legislation. Congress enacted the Balanced Budget Amendment that authorized the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) for the first time to provide colorectal cancer (CRC) screening to Medicare beneficiaries as of January 1, 1998. This coverage includes fecal occult blood, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy.

Currently, several Federal agencies (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, HCFA, and NCI) are collaborating on an ongoing national CRC screening initiative, "CRC: Screen for Life," which is a multi-year effort. The objectives are to inform people over the age of 50 about benefits of CRC screening, motivate this group to talk to their health care provider about the CRC screening program, and promote Medicare's new CRC screening benefits.

Dr. Hamilton concluded by mentioning that CRC is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths; CRC deaths are preventable; and most CRCs begin as polyps, which can be detected and removed. He then distributed an educational handout for attendees to give to family members to inform them of the importance of early detection. [This handout is a printout of the following CDC web page <http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/colorctl/colorect.htm>.]

3:05 p.m.

Ms. Rita Yeager of NIDDK reported that the congressional hearings for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have ended. Each NIH Center and Institute Director had an opportunity to testify, and their statements can be found on their respective agency Web sites. Finally, the President's budget plan for fiscal year 2000 would increase the NIH budget by 2.1 percent.

Dr. Hoofnagle reported on recently released DDDN RFAs, which deal with celiac disease screening in special populations, endoscopy database screening, hepatitis C, and GI motility. He also announced that NIDDK will be hosting a meeting on complementary and alternative medicine and liver disease August 24-26 on the NIH campus. Finally, Dr. Hoofnagle announced that Dr. Thomas Kresina will be leaving DDDN to join the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), but he will continue to participate on the DDICC and serve as its Executive Secretary.

Dr. Kresina reported that the next meeting is being moved to June 15 because June 8 conflicts with the international hepatitis C meeting. [Note: This has changed again; the new meeting date is June 10.]

In closing, Dr. Hoofnagle asked attendees to make their agency announcements. Dr. Vishnudutt Purohit reported that NIAAA has put out a program announcement on mechanisms of alcohol-induced fibrosis and an RFA on alcohol and hepatitis C. Dr. Butler reported that the National Naval Medical Center is beginning a study at four military hospitals of screening colonoscopy in women and is in the middle of another study comparing the screening colonoscopy with sigmoidoscopy to see if sigmoidoscopy by itself is missing some cases of polyps. Ms. Diana Berard reported that National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases put out an RFA on animal models of hepatitis C, and they will be putting out another RFA on hepatitis C in the near future.

3:20 p.m.

Dr. Hoofnagle adjourned the meeting.


Page last updated: September 24, 2007

General inquiries may be addressed to: Office of Communications & Public Liaison
NIDDK, NIH
Building 31. Rm 9A06
31 Center Drive, MSC 2560
Bethesda, MD 20892-2560
USA
For information about NIDDK programs: 301.496.3583

The National Institutes of Health   Department of Health and Human Services   USA.gov is the U.S. government's official web portal to all federal, state, and local government web resources and services.  HONcode Seal - Link to the Health on the Net Foundation