Office of Management Assessment National Institutes of Health |
OMA
Home ^ Quality Management ^ Customer Service ^ Customer Service Plan ^ Attachment 2 |
NIH Customer Service Plan: Attachment 2 Clear and to the Point: Guidelines for Using Plain Language at NIH What is Plain Language?Plain language is
writing that effectively communicates with the specific audience being
addressed (i.e., a plain language document geared to a scientific audience
is different from a plain language document geared to the general public).
Using plain language ensures that your audience can both find and understand
the information you provide. You should use plain language for all documents, presentations, and electronic communications. First, let's look at the characteristics of plain language. Plain language is:
Plain language
is not:
Certain hallmarks characterize plain language. These include:
Why Should You Use Plain Language? A Government-wide directive requires Federal agencies to use plain language by January 1, 2002, in all documents written for the public. More importantly, communicating clearly is its own reward-it saves time and money, and it improves reader response to your message. Using plain language avoids creating barriers that set us apart from the people with whom we are communicating. NIH's mission is complex and involves at least three broadly defined groups with varying interests.
Because part of the NIH mission is to reach all Americans with health information they can use, we must try to communicate in a way that helps people to easily understand our research results. Where Do You Start? You can start by concentrating on four things:
1. How Do You Engage Your Readers? First, consider who your reader is. Often, there is more than one reader. For example, Members of Congress often forward copies of letters from their constituents; both will read your response. Next, consider what the reader needs to know and organize your document to answer the reader's questions. You should also
write to the appropriate reading level. The NIH Plain Language Coordinating
Committee recommends:
Note: You
can use the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) Readability Index
(see Evaluation section) to determine the grade level of your text.
You can find tools in your word processing program to assist you in
counting words and sentences and finding the average length of sentences
and paragraphs.
a)
Use common, everyday words whenever possible. Documents should
be written clearly and simply. Government writing should be dignified,
but not pompous.
b) Use "you" and other personal pronouns to engage the reader.
c) Use "must" instead of "shall." The use of "shall" creates confusion. To impose a legal obligation, use "must." To predict future action, use "will."
d) Avoid using undefined technical terms (jargon and acronyms).
e) Use positive rather than negative words, in most cases. Words can attract or repel readers, and a negative statement can be unclear. However, the negative is appropriate if you're cautioning the reader, as in "Don't smoke."
Avoid when possible
using words that antagonize, such as allege, complaint, liable,
and waste. f) Avoid using gender-specific terminology. Try to avoid gender-specific nouns and pronouns unless referring specifically to either women or men.
g) Avoid long strings of nouns. Administrative writing often uses too many noun clusters-groups of nouns sandwiched together ("noun sandwiches").
h) Use active voice. Write sentences in the active voice when possible. The active voice eliminates confusion by naming the actor in the sentence. (However, passive voice is appropriate when the actor is unknown, unimportant, or obvious. For example, "Small items are often stolen.")
i) Use action verbs. Action verbs are short and direct.
j) Use the present tense when possible. This makes your material more direct and forceful.
k) Use parallel construction. Arrange sentences so that parallel ideas look parallel. This is especially important when you use a list.
l) Be direct. Talk directly to your readers. Use imperatives when appropriate. This is especially true for lists of duties, how-to instructions, procedures, and regulations.
m) Avoid using exceptions. If possible, state a rule or category directly rather than describing that rule or category by stating its exceptions.
3. How Should You Display Information in Documents? Appearance is an important aspect of clear communication. If your document is pleasing to the eye, it will be more likely to attract your reader's attention. Appearance can also be an aid to the reader, improving comprehension and retention. There are four main aspects of appearance:
a) A strong, logical organization includes:
People read documents to get answers. Organize your message to respond to their interests and concerns. Readers come to documents with several key questions:
Use introductions to help your reader understand how the document is organized. For a simple letter or memorandum, an introductory paragraph should suffice. For brochures and lengthy briefing documents or reports, use a table of contents or other list early in the document to guide the reader. Sentence length should average 15-20 words. Sentences that are simple, active, affirmative, and declarative hold the reader's interest. Generally, each paragraph should contain only one topic. A series of paragraphs may be used to express complex or highly technical information. The more your writing deviates from this clear and to-the-point structure, the harder it is to understand. b) Layout includes:
Use adequate margins and provide white space between sections to break up your text. This makes it easier for the reader to understand. Use headings to guide the reader; the question-and-answer format is especially helpful. Try to anticipate the reader's questions and pose them as the reader would.
c) Tables make complex information readily understandable. If-then tables lay out the text visually, helping your reader see relationships more easily and usually requiring fewer words than straight text. For example, the paragraph below is written in the "dense text" method: For good reasons, the Secretary may grant extensions of time in 30-day increments for filing of the appeal and all required documents, provided that additional extension requests are submitted and approved before the expiration of the original 30 days or the previously granted extension. Try it this way instead:
d) Typography relates to:
Generally, use
the same font throughout the text of a document. Use shading/boxes
sparingly. Bullets and numbers:
For emphasis use italics or bold (not underlining). Use the tips and tools contained in this document but also use good judgment. For example, the question-and-answer format is an excellent way to present some material...but not necessarily all material. Decide which tools fit your situation and aid the reader. 4. How Can You Evaluate Your Document? You need to evaluate your document to ensure that you are communicating clearly. Always have another person read your document and offer suggestions for clarifying it. In addition, use at least one of the methods described below. Checklists You can develop checklists to guide you through a thorough evaluation. At the simplest level, you need to look over the document for:
Feedback Another simple way to evaluate your document is to include a box at the bottom of the page that says:
Outcome
or Process Measures Evaluation of the process used to develop a product is called "process evaluation"; evaluation of the effectiveness of a document is called "outcome evaluation." Either method may be used to evaluate a particular document. Easy process measures
include counting the number of copies distributed, meetings attended,
or articles printed. This information will tell you how a program is
operating and whether the target audience receives your information.
Extending a step beyond process measures, outcome evaluation provides information about the quality rather than the quantity of response. The measures may be self-reported (e.g., interviews with members of the target audience) or be observed (e.g., changes in clinic visits or disease morbidity). Comparisons between a control group and the target audience are desirable. Focus
Groups Focus groups are
especially helpful in evaluating frequently requested documents (e.g.,
health information brochures and forms). These groups are composed of
individuals who share traits with the planned recipients of your document.
Focus group members can give you excellent feedback about your document
before it is finalized.
Individual
Interviews
A simple but meaningful
way to be certain readers will understand your document is to interview
some of them. Such "protocol testing" requires one-on-one interviews
with representative readers. This testing generally requires interviewing
from three to nine people to find out what each sentence means to them.
Before and After Comparison According to Making
Health Communication Programs Work: A Planner's Guide (NCI), true
outcome evaluation requires a "before" and "after" version of the document.
This type of evaluation is routinely used for health brochures and documents
to be distributed to a broad audience. Outcome evaluation usually involves
comparing the target audience's awareness, attitudes, and behavior before
and after reading the document. These are quantitative measures that
allow you to draw conclusions about the program's effect.
The SMOG (Simple Measure of Gobbledygook) Readability Index Many tools are available to measure the readability of your document. One is the SMOG Readability Index. It is a simple technique that can be used to assess the grade level of a document. First, count the number of words with three or more syllables in a chain of 30 sentences in your draft. Then look up the approximate grade level on the following chart. SMOG Conversion Table*
* Developed by Harold C. McGraw, Office of Educational Research, Baltimore County Schools, Towson, Maryland.
You can also evaluate
your document by using your computer software to provide some statistics,
such as the total number of words:
8/8/00
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
< Attachment 1 |
Last updated on: | Office of Management Assessment National Institutes of Health |