Skip Navigation Genome.gov - National Human Genome Research InstituteGenome.gov - National Human Genome Research InstituteGenome.gov - National Human Genome Research InstituteNational Institutes of Health
   
       Home | About NHGRI | Newsroom | Staff
Research Grants Health Policy & Ethics Educational Resources Careers & Training

Home>Policy & Ethics>Genetic Discrimination>The Role of the NHGRI in the Federal Legislative Process >Cases of Genetic Discrimination


Cases of Genetic Discrimination

Although no genetic-employment discrimination case has been brought before U.S. federal or state courts, in 2001 the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) [eeoc.gov] settled the first lawsuit alleging this type of discrimination.

EEOC filed a suit against the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad for secretly testing its employees for a rare genetic condition (hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies - HNPP) that causes carpal tunnel syndrome as one of its many symptoms. BNSF claimed that the testing was a way of determining whether the high incidence of repetitive-stress injuries among its employees was work-related. Besides testing for HNPP, company-paid doctors also were instructed to screen for several other medical conditions such as diabetes and alcoholism. BNSF employees examined by company doctors were not told that they were being genetically tested. One employee who refused testing was threatened with possible termination.

On behalf of BNSF employees, EEOC argued that the tests were unlawful under the Americans with Disabilities Act because they were not job-related, and that any condition of employment based on such tests would be cause for illegal discrimination based on disability. The lawsuit was settled quickly, with BNSF agreeing to everything sought by EEOC.

Besides the BNSF case, the Council for Responsible Genetics [genewatch.org] claims that hundreds of genetic-discrimination cases have been documented and describes select cases in its Genetic Discrimination Position Paper. In one reported case, genetic testing indicated that a young boy had Fragile X Syndrome, an inherited form of mental retardation. The insurance company for the boy's family dropped his health coverage, claiming the syndrome was a preexisting condition. In another case, a social worker lost her job within a week of mentioning that her mother had died of Huntington's disease and that she had a 50 percent chance of developing it.

Despite claims of hundreds of genetic-discrimination incidents, an article from the January 2003 issue of the European Journal of Human Genetics reports a real need for a comprehensive investigation of these claims. The article warns that many studies rely on unverified, subjective accounts from individuals who believe employers or insurance companies have unfairly subjected them to genetic discrimination. Rarely are these subjective accounts assessed objectively to determine whether actions taken by employers and insurers were truly based on genetic factors or other legitimate concerns.

Top of page

Last Updated: June 13, 2008




Print Version


See Also:

Genetic Information and the Workplace

Workshop on Genetic Discrimination and the Workplace: Implications for Employment, Insurance and Privacy

Senate Hearing on Genetic Information in the Workplace, EEOC Commissioner Miller
July 2000

Genetic Information in the Workplace Senate Hearing
July 2000

Statement of Francis Collins on President Clinton's Announcement to End Genetic Discrimination in Health Insurance
July 1997

Genetic Discrimination

Government-Citizen Group Suggests Policies to Limit Genetic Discrimination in the Workplace
March 1997

Genetic Discrimination in Health Insurance
Fact Sheet

Policy Recommendations for Genetic Discrmination in Insurance and Employment



PrivacyCopyrightContactAccessibilitySite MapStaff DirectoryFOIAHome Department of Health and Human Services  National Institutes of Health  USA.gov