pmc logo imageJournal ListSearchpmc logo image
Logo of viroljBioMed Central web siteReference to the article.Search.Manuscript submission.Registration.Journal front page.
Virol J. 2008; 5: 163.
Published online 2008 December 24. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-5-163.
PMCID: PMC2628893
Ephrin-B2 expression critically influences Nipah virus infection independent of its cytoplasmic tail
Lena Thiel,1 Sandra Diederich,1 Stephanie Erbar,1 Dennis Pfaff,2 Hellmut G Augustin,2 and Andrea Maisnercorresponding author1
1Institute of Virology, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
2Joint Research Division Vascular Biology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg (CBTM), and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
corresponding authorCorresponding author.
Lena Thiel: thiellen/at/staff.uni-marburg.de; Sandra Diederich: sandra.diederich/at/staff.uni-marburg.de; Stephanie Erbar: Erbar/at/students.uni-marburg.de; Dennis Pfaff: Dennis.Pfaff/at/unibas.ch; Hellmut G Augustin: h.augustin/at/dkfz-heidelberg.de; Andrea Maisner: maisner/at/staff.uni-marburg.de
Received December 11, 2008; Accepted December 24, 2008.
Abstract

Background
Cell entry and cell-to-cell spread of the highly pathogenic Nipah virus (NiV) requires binding of the NiV G protein to cellular ephrin receptors and subsequent NiV F-mediated fusion. Since expression levels of the main NiV entry receptor ephrin-B2 (EB2) are highly regulated in vivo to fulfill the physiological functions in axon guidance and angiogenesis, the goal of this study was to determine if changes in the EB2 expression influence NiV infection.

Results
Surprisingly, transfection of increasing EB2 plasmid concentrations reduced cell-to-cell fusion both in cells expressing the NiV glycoproteins and in cells infected with NiV. This effect was attributed to the downregulation of the NiV glycoproteins from the cell surface. In addition to the influence on cell-to-cell fusion, increased EB2 expression significantly reduced the total amount of NiV-infected cells, thus interfered with virus entry. To determine if the negative effect of elevated EB2 expression on virus entry is a result of an increased EB2 signaling, receptor function of a tail-truncated and therefore signaling-defective ΔcEB2 was tested. Interestingly, ΔcEB2 fully functioned as NiV entry and fusion receptor, and overexpression also interfered with virus replication.

Conclusion
Our findings clearly show that EB2 signaling does not account for the striking negative impact of elevated receptor expression on NiV infection, but rather that the ratio between the NiV envelope glycoproteins and surface receptors critically influence cell-to-cell fusion and virus entry.