National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health
NIAID Home Health & Science Research Funding Research News & Events Labs at NIAID About NIAID

NIAID Research Funding

NIAID Funding News
Opportunities and Announcements
Budget and Funding
Grants
Application
Peer Review
Grant Award and Management
Early-Stage and New Investigators
Training and Career
R01 Investigator Resources
International Awards
Small Business Awards
Other Grant Types

Animals in Research

Human Subjects
Biodefense and Biosecurity
Contracts
Standard Operating Procedures
Questions and Answers
Advisory Council
Glossary of Funding and Policy Terms
Find It! A-Z
Latest Updates

NIH Review Criteria

Search in Research Funding

<< previous · tutorial index · next >>

An application does not need to be strong in all categories to deserve an outstanding priority score.

Scored multiproject applications receive an overall priority score based on their strength in the following:

To put NIH's five review criteria in context, consider the goals of NIH-supported research: to advance understanding of biological systems, improve the control of disease, and enhance health.

Reviewers use the criteria to judge the likelihood that the proposed research will have a substantial impact on achieving these goals.

Peer reviewers consider each criterion when assigning a priority score. However, an application does not need to be strong in all categories to have a major scientific impact and deserve an outstanding priority score.

For example, an investigator may propose important work that is not innovative but is essential to move a field forward.

<< previous · tutorial index · next >>

Separator line
DHHS Logo Department of Health and Human Services NIH Logo National Institutes of Health NIAID Logo National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases December 9, 2008
Home | Help | Site Index | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Web Site Links & Policies | FOIA