House GOP Raises Questions About Closing GuantanamoPosted by Kevin on January 22nd, 2009
Today on Fox News, Leader Boehner reacted to President Obama’s executive order to close the terrorist detention camp at Guantanamo Bay: Leader Boehner and House Republicans have serious reservations about closing the terrorist detention camp. “The key question is where do you put these terrorists?” Leader Boehner said. The Leader issued a statement today regarding elaborating upon his concern:
Recently, the Associated Press ran a story entitled, “Gitmo detainees rejoin fight against U.S.,” which states that:
Others share the House Republicans’ concerns. So-Called “Freedom of Choice” Act Would Deepen the Tragedy of Roe v. WadePosted by Kevin on January 22nd, 2009
Today marks the 36th anniversary of Roe v. Wade. Since that fateful decision was handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court, nearly 50 million abortions have been performed. Each year, hundreds of thousands gather not far from where Barack Obama took the oath of office this past Tuesday to “March for Life” and commemorate the lives ended in abortion since the Court legalized the practice in 1973. Those who attend, and the millions more who support the pro-life cause, seek to promote a “culture of life” by urging the adoption of policies which will protect all innocent human life. This year presents a new challenge to life: the so-called “Freedom of Choice Act” (FOCA). Despite its name, FOCA would deprive Americans of their freedom to enact almost any restraint on abortion at any stage of pregnancy. It would overturn hundreds of current laws on conscience rights, informed consent, limits on tax-funded abortion, and parental involvement in minors’ abortion decisions. During the 2008 presidential campaign, then-candidate Obama vowed that signing FOCA would be the “first thing” he would do if he were elected president. Led by Leader John Boehner (R-OH), a total of 105 House Republican Members of Congress sent a letter to the President urging him to reconsider his support for the Freedom of Choice Act:
GOP Leaders Request Meeting with President TomorrowPosted by Kevin on January 21st, 2009
Consistent with Leader Boehner’s pledge to work with President Obama, today Republicans on Capitol Hill sent a letter to the President requesting a meeting tomorrow to discuss Republican proposals to strengthen the economy and create new jobs. Last week on PBS’s Newshour, Leader Boehner stated:
For the last several weeks, an Economic Recovery Working Group chaired by Republican Whip Eric Cantor has heard from experts and begun crafting a series of principles to present to the President. The Congressional Democrats’ “Stimulus” Bill - now estimated to cost $825 billion, and growing - is hardly consistent with the President’s statement that a stimulus plan should “immediately jumpstart job creation and long-term growth.” According to a recently released Congressional Budget Office report on the Congressional Democrats’ Stimulus Bill:
Republicans know we can’t borrow and spend our way to prosperity. In order to support real job creation and make an immediate impact for our economy, any government “stimulus” bill must include real tax cuts and promise spending restraint. House Republicans look forward to presenting the President with such a plan at the earliest opportunity. Giving a Voice to the “Stimulus Spending” SkepticsPosted by Kevin on January 16th, 2009
In response to President-elect Obama’s request for Republican input, House Republicans formed a working group (led by Republican Whip Eric Cantor) aimed at developing constructive ideas that can be included in legislation to help put the nation’s economy on the path to recovery. Yesterday, the working group held a hearing to discuss America’s economic recovery. Joining the discussion were Governor Mitt Romney, Meg Whitman, Grover Norquist, Alex Brill, and Bill Beach. In addition, the panel answered questions that were submitted for the panel by the American people via YouTube. A video of the working group hearing is below. In addition, Leader Boehner has solicited, and received, comments from prominent economists who are skeptical of Congressional Democrats’ trillion dollar spending plan. Scholars’ opinions have continued to pour in, and they have been universally critical of the tax, spend, and borrow precepts of the Democratic proposal. On January 7, Boehner released comments from dozens of skeptical economists, and since then, opinions have continued to stream in. Following is some of the latest commentary made by economists about the impact of a massive government “stimulus spending” bill. For a more detailed list, click here. “I have a number of reservations about a major stimulus package. One is that it is not in any sense clear that the benefits justify the significant price tag of the package. Another concern is that the historical record of government stimulus programs is poor - I can’t think of a single fiscal stimulus program that demonstrably moderated a recession. But there is ample evidence based on peer-reviewed research that these programs have substantially damaged the U.S. economy, such as the New Deal programs in the 1930s. More recent stimulus attempts, such as the tax rebate in early 2008, did nothing but increase the deficit. The best policies are those that are evaluated carefully and not rushed out, and that are consistent with the key goals of long-run economic prosperity - broad-based tax reform that raises the incentives to work, save, and invest, promoting competition, and fostering economically open ties with other countries. Any fiscal policy should pass this test, and this one doesn’t seem to.” “The stimulus plan is little more than a grossly-inefficient special-interest grab bag that will leave a massive burden for our grandchildren to pay and, in the meantime, deter development of more productive sectors of the economy in favor of those politically favored.” Leader Boehner has repeatedly stated that “We can’t simply borrow and spend our way back to prosperity.” Clearly many American economists tend to agree. If At First It Fails, Try, Try Again?Posted by Kevin on January 15th, 2009
The Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, Rep. Barney Frank (D-Massachusetts), has sponsored new legislation that would allegedly make the TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program) more accountable to the American people. Despite the title of his bill, Rep. Frank’s “TARP Reform and Accountability Act of 2009″ (H.R. 384) provides neither reform nor accountability to the TARP. That’s unfortunate, because both are desperately needed. Though Rep. Frank’s bill does not authorize the release of the remaining $350 billion of TARP funds, the purpose of the bill is to help ensure that congressional efforts to stop the release of the remaining funds fail. House Republican leaders today issued an analysis warning that “passage of H.R. 384 may facilitate the discharge of the final tranche by establishing guidelines for spending the next $350 billion for those Members concerned with how the first tranche was spent.” There are several concerning elements of Rep. Frank’s Bill, most notably among them (From the “Statement of Republican Policy” issued Jan. 15, 2009):
There has been a plethora of criticism from other quarters as well concerning the Frank bill and the larger effort by Democratic congressional leaders to ensure the remaining $350 billion in taxpayer funds is released. Read the rest of this entry » American Taxpayers Deserve a TARP Exit StrategyPosted by Kevin on January 15th, 2009
Leader Boehner has an op-ed in today’s USA Today in which he expresses his reservations about approving the second tranche – which would amount to $350 billion – of money from the so-called TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program). The Treasury Department has already blown through the first $350 billion, but the money was spent with little transparency and virtually no accountability. This morning in USA Today, Leader Boehner argues that unless dramatic changes are made and a clear exit strategy is defined that would get the federal government back out of the private sector, Congress should not approve the release of any further TARP money. This program has gone off the rails. As Leader Boehner stated in his op-ed:
Moreover, given the mismanagement of the first $350 billion, Leader Boehner asks a reasonable question:
American taxpayers deserve a TARP exit strategy, and major changes in the way the program is operated. Until taxpayers get these things, Congress should not even consider releasing the remaining TARP money Keep the Airwaves Free of the Fairness DoctrinePosted by Kevin on January 14th, 2009
Leading Democrats are pushing to restore the “Fairness Doctrine” - an antiquated idea which would effectively silence critics of the government. This blatant attempt to quash those who disagree with the Democrats should offend all who cherish their First Amendment right to Freedom of Speech. The right to speak one’s mind is diminished - and effectively silenced - if it cannot find a voice on the radio, television, or the internet. The American people should not have to get approval from bureaucrats in Washington before they speak their mind on any given issue. Republicans in the Congress agree with that sentiment - and have The bill, introduced January 7, 2009, by Congressman Mike Pence (R-IN), chairman of the House Republican Conference, Congressman Greg Walden (R-OR), Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC), chairman of the Senate Steering Committee, and Senator John Thune (R-SD), Vice Chairman of the Senate Republican Conference, would prevent the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from reinstating the Fairness Doctrine, which would suppress free speech by requiring the government to monitor political views and decide what constitutes fair political discourse. The Pence-Walden bill in the House already has over 100 cosponsors including Republican Leader Boehner. Congress Comes to YouTube (again)…But it Almost Didn’t HappenPosted by Nick on January 12th, 2009
Today marks the launch of a new collaborative effort between The U.S. Congress and YouTube.com. The House Hub and Senate Hub have been developed to make it easier for visitors to find their elected officials and their YouTube channels. YouTube and other popular technologies continue to empower American citizens with real-time information about the policy debates and actions being undertaken by Congress. As we see more and more members from both sides of the aisle embrace web video and social media, it’s easy to forget that only a few months ago Democrats on the House Administration Committee were proposing rules that would have brought this free flow of information to a screeching halt. The proposed rules, including an “approved list” of websites that could be used by members of Congress, would have amounted to new government censorship of the Internet by a panel of federal officials that is neither neutral or independent. Using the very tools Democrats proposed to restrict, citizens spoke out in the thousands. Thankfully, House Republicans, led by Reps. Vern Ehlers (R-MI), Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), and Tom Price (R-GA), and supported strongly by Rep. John Culberson (R-TX) and Leader Boehner, expressed their strong opposition to this attack on Internet freedom and proposed an alternative solution that would allow Members of Congress to continue posting content at sites of their choosing. House Republicans’ recommendations were eventually adopted by the Committee on House Administration. House Republicans will continue fight to increase transparency and openness in government using technology and any other means at our disposal. If you have any thoughts on how we can better achieve these goals, let us know in the comments or as a video response to Leader Boehner’s welcome video below. Stimulus Spending Skeptics Speak OutPosted by GOP Leader Press Office on December 22nd, 2008
Since putting out the call for outside economists’ opinions on President-elect Obama’s proposed $1 trillion economic “stimulus” spending plan, we’ve been contacted by dozens of economists and academics eager to add their name to the list of stimulus spending skeptics. Below you will find selected entries from experts that agree that tax relief for families and small businesses, not more government spending, will help to get America’s economy moving again: Jeffrey Miron
John Seater
Michael Keran
Daniel J. Mitchell New Choice for Labor Secretary Supports Secret Ballots For Democrats, Opposes Them for WorkersPosted by GOP Leader Press Office on December 19th, 2008
According to press reports, President-Elect Barack Obama will name Rep. Hilda Solis (D-CA) as his choice for Labor Secretary later today. As a member of Congress, Rep. Solis co-sponsored the highly-controversial Employee Free Choice Act, legislation that would end a worker’s right to a secret ballot when deciding whether to join a union. She also voted for this anti-worker bill when Democrats passed it through the House on March 1, 2007. However, Rep. Solis took a different tack on secret ballot elections when it came time for internal Democratic Caucus elections. Specifically, she co-signed a letter criticizing the absence of secret ballots in electing the Congressional Hispanic Caucus leadership on January 5, 2007. The letter explained:
The letter continued:
So Rep. Solis strongly supports secret ballot elections for Democrats, but opposes them for working Americans. Ending secret ballots, as Democrats and their Big Labor allies have proposed, would leave workers vulnerable to coercion, pressure, and outright intimidation and threats – from either the management or the union side of the election. And nearly 80 percent of Americans strongly oppose this bill. That’s why Republicans are working to preserve the decades-old secret ballot election in the workplace – to prevent workers from being intimidated into doing something they don’t believe is in their best interests. House Republican Leader John Boehner (R-OH) recently said on Fox News Sunday that Republicans will do everything they can to stop the efforts of Democrats and Big Labor to kill the secret ballot, saying:
|
SubscribeArchivesCategories
|
GOP Leader Blog