White House Policy Reversal on Auto Standards Will Cost Jobs

Posted by Kevin on January 26th, 2009

On a day the Big Three automakers acknowledged the closure of nearly 1,000 car dealerships last year and that GM will cut 2,000 jobs in Michigan and Ohio, President Obama pushed forward with a plan which will allow California to exceed already strict Federal automobile emissions regulations and will certainly pave the way for other states to follow suit.  The result can only place additional burdens on the struggling American auto industry, which may now be forced to comply with a patchwork of conflicting and costly environmental standards that have less to do with protecting the environment than in securing the accolades of radical environmentalists.

Republican Leader John Boehner (R-OH) issued a statement:

The President’s action today is disappointing.  The effect of this policy will be to destroy American jobs at the very time government leaders should be working together to protect and create them.  Millions of American jobs will be placed in further jeopardy if automakers are forced to spend billions to comply with potentially dozens of different emissions standards in dozens of different states.

Rather than saving the American automobile industry, as the President claims, his policies will hamper the recovery of the Big Three.  Henry Payne at National Review Online notes that:

Detroit automakers estimate that meeting California’s edict would cost them $30.5 billion alone. With Detroit now on the federal dole, this expense will likely form the basis of further federal subsidies. For even though GM can only return to profitability (and repay its federal loans) by selling high-volume, gas-fueled vehicles like the Chevy Malibu and Chevy Tahoe, it will have to make more money-losing, electric plug-ins like the Chevy Volt (anticipated EPA rating of 100 mpg when it comes to market in 2010) to meet Golden State rules.

President Obama has vowed to govern from the center and put the interests of the country above the interests of narrow special-interest groups.  It’s still early in his presidency, obviously.  And as Leader Boehner has noted, Washington is a difficult town, and it won’t always be easy for the President to do this.  But it’s disappointing that in his first week in office, the President has taken at least two significant actions (the other being his reversal Friday of the Mexico City Policy, forcing taxpayers to pay for overseas abortions) that are out of step with the priorities of most Americans.

Permalink |

This entry was posted on Monday, January 26th, 2009 at 6:14 pm and is filed under Economy, Environment. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to “White House Policy Reversal on Auto Standards Will Cost Jobs”

  1. John McDonough Says:

    This is the clearest indication yet that Dick Morris is right. The economy is only the excuse. Socialism is the objective.

    I was mad at Bush for pushing the auto industry’s problems onto Obama who will destroy them. But it looks like Obama will give them a double whammy to be sure they stay down. I guess if he can knock them down before it becomes more obvious that they need labor relief that means he doesn’t have to take the blame from the UAW. R.I.P. Big Three. Next step; nationalization.

  2. Cathy Johnson Says:

    What is truly disappointing is the Republican response to the President’s proposal. Tax cuts are NOT stimulators, particularly in the short run. We are in the most serious economic crises since the 1930’s and you are being obstructionists. How do you not see that Americans are behind President Obama with unprecedented support? We do not want more of the past — the tax cuts that benefit the wealthy. Not the massive wealth redistribution to the CEOs of the Halliburtons, Bechtels, Merrill Lynch , etc. No more Katrina non-responses. We want our country back.

  3. Peter Schuller Says:

    Let auto be done by the Asians. The advanced tech part is in the machine tool part, not in assembly. Those skilled teams should be helped to move on to 21st century projects, cutting edge technologies which cars –basically a late 19th century technology–are no longer. Included here would be magnetically levitated trains and high speed rail; new generation nuclear plants; etc.

Leave a Reply




 

Blog & Comment Policy