The dramatic loss comes at a time when the PBGC is beginning to implement a new controversial investment policy approved in February. The new policy would significantly shift PBGC assets from fixed-income securities, such as U.S. Treasuries, into more risky securities like real estate, emerging market debt, junk bonds and venture equities.

“With the current market turmoil, we have to ask the question whether it is wise to invest our nation’s pension backstop in volatile equities,” Chairman George Miller said.

The head of the PBGC, Charles Millard, appeared before the Committee today regarding the agency's financial problems that may threaten the retirement security of millions of Americans. The PBGC is a government agency that insures traditional private-sector pension plans, manages failed pension plans and pays benefits to workers of those plans.

PBGC investment documents »

We also learned today that U.S. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation lost at least $3 billion in stock investments during the last fiscal year through August, and invested a significant portion of its funds in mortgage-backed securities. The head of the PBGC, Charles Millard, will testify before the committee on Friday in Washington regarding the agency's financial problems.

Taxpayers subsidize 401(k) plans by $80 billion dollars annually. For a taxpayer investment of this size, we must ensure that the structure of 401(k)s adequately protects the nest eggs of participating workers.

At a minimum, we know that much greater transparency and disclosures in 401(k) investment policies are needed, to protect workers from “hidden” fees that could be eating deeply into their retirement accounts.

And with seniors poised to suffer the most from the current economic turmoil, we must suspend an unfair tax penalty for seniors who don’t take a minimum withdrawal from their depleted retirement accounts, like 401(k)s.  We’ll push to enact legislation based on a bill Rep. Rob Andrews recently introduced, so that seniors who have seen their retirement savings evaporate don’t get penalized for trying to build those savings back up.

At the hearing today, we heard from Roberta Quan, a retired school teacher from San Pablo, CA, who is also caring for her husband who has Alzheimer’s:  "The recent unstable financial crisis is having a devastating effect on my life.  A lifetime of savings in catastrophic decline is demoralizing. The bottom line is that I am retired and unable to re-earn lost funds."

Steve Carroll, a retired writer from Petaluma, CA, told us: "Our monthly budget has been severely depleted for life.  We still have our IRAs. But, as they are in mutual stock funds they are so far down in value that selling any of them right now, as the law requires of [my partner] Chuck, the loss would be an enormous percentage of the investment."

Current regulations require account holders of 401(k)-type account to withdraw a minimum amount of money every year after they reach 70 ½ years old. If seniors do not take out a minimum amount based on an Internal Revenue Service formula, they are subject to a 50 percent penalty. For instance, if an individual fails to withdraw $4,000, they would be assessed a $2,000 tax the next year.

Registered investment advisor Mark Davis told us that a temporary repeal of minimum required distribution rules could help some retirees.  On October 10, Rep. Andrews and I called on U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to suspend the tax penalty for retirees who are forced to make withdrawals but want to have additional time to rebuild their retirement savings.

Other witnesses spoke about problems with the current retirement security system where individually directed 401(k)-type plans have become a worker's main retirement savings vehicle. Where investment decisions were once made by professionals managing a traditional pension portfolio on behalf of workers, the responsibility of picking the right investments and implementing retirement savings strategies are left up to an individual account holder.

The Education and Labor Committee passed legislation earlier in the year that would help workers shop around for the best retirement investment options by providing complete information on the fees taken from their retirement accounts. According to the Government Accountability Office, a 1 percentage point difference in fees can reduce retirement benefits by nearly 20 percent.

We started this investigation last week, as part of a series of hearings the House is conducting to investigate the causes of the financial crisis, and what additional steps are needed to protect homeowners, workers, and families.

Last week, Peter Orszag, the director of the Congressional Budget Office, told us that American workers have lost more than $2 trillion in retirement savings over the last fifteen months – an astonishing loss that could lead workers to delay their retirement.

Several experts also told us that workers closest to retirement could suffer the most from this financial tsunami.  But while the housing and financial crises are intensifying retirement insecurity, we also know that workers’ retirement savings have been declining for quite some time.  Rising unemployment, stagnating wages and benefits, and a shift away from more traditional defined-benefit pension plans have been making it much harder for workers to save for retirement while juggling other expenses.

Now, the number of investors taking loans on their 401(k) accounts is increasing. And hardship withdrawals are also increasing. T. Rowe Price estimates a 14 percent increase in hardship withdrawals just in the first eight months of 2008. And, all the signs point to an increased frequency of 401(k) loans and hardship withdrawals in the coming year.

As other committees’ hearings have revealed, many of the Wall Street titans responsible for this crisis have still escaped with their plush perks, lavish spa trips and golden parachutes intact. This is an outrage. For too long, the Bush administration anything goes economic policy allowed Wall Street to go unchecked.

As we look at how we can rebuild workers’ retirement savings and our nation’s economy, the Democratic Congress will continue to conduct this much-needed oversight on behalf of the American people.

Being able to save for retirement after a lifetime of hard work has always been a core tenet of the American Dream. We can’t allow the promise of a secure retirement for workers to become a casualty of the financial crisis.

The PBGC is a government agency that insures private-sector pension plans, manages failed pension plans and pays benefits to workers of those plans.

The head of the PBGC, Charles Millard, will testify before the House Education and Labor Committee on Friday regarding the agency's financial problems that may threaten the retirement security of millions of Americans.

"At a time when Americans' anxiety about their economic future is escalating, Millard's testimony is vital to better understand the financial situation of the nation's pension guarantor," said Chairman Miller. "Now is the time to gather all the information we need in order to rescue the economy and help workers and retirees."

According to a document obtained by the Education and Labor Committee and based on preliminary unaudited figures, the PBGC lost more than $3.1 billion in its trust fund related to the agency's stock investments for the first 11 months of its 2008 fiscal year. The PBGC trust fund invests pension assets in order to pay out benefits to workers whose pension plans were turned over to the agency.

The recent dramatic loss also comes in light of a new controversial investment policy the agency recently approved. The new policy would significantly shift PBGC assets from fixed-income securities, such as U.S. Treasuries, into more risky securities like real estate.

Millard recently testified before Congress recently that the new investment policy would not add any additional risk to the long-term stability of the trust fund.

The invitation to answer questions from Congress comes after the Millard rebuffed a committee subpoena in July that demanded the agency turn over documents regarding a report into the agency's mismanagement and lax governance practices.

Witnesses:

Shlomo Benartzi, Ph.D.
Professor
UCLA Anderson School of Management
Los Angeles, CA

Mark Davis
Partner
Kravitz Davis Sansone
Encino, CA

Jacob S. Hacker, Ph.D.
Professor
University of California at Berkeley

Additional witnesses to be announced.

According to the Congressional Budget Office, this multi-trillion dollar loss in workers’ retirement wealth could further slow the ailing economy. 

“To the extent households view balances in defined-contribution plans as part of their overall portfolio of wealth, a decline in those balances could lead people to reduce or delay purchases of goods and services,” said Peter Orszag, director of the CBO. “It could also lead some workers to delay their retirement.”

According to a survey released today by the AARP, in the last year 20 percent of baby boomers stopped contributing to their retirement plans because they have had trouble making ends meet. As several witnesses explained, workers closest to retirement may suffer the biggest hit from the financial meltdown. 

“The current financial crisis has certainly highlighted the fact that 401(k) participants—whose 401(k) account represent their sole retirement savings—bear all the investment risk,” said Jerry Bramlett, president and CEO of BenefitStreet, Inc., an independent retirement plan administration firm. “The pain is particularly acute for those participants closer to retirement whose retirement income expectations have been significantly impaired possibly resulting in the need to postpone retirement.”

The AARP also found that a third of workers surveyed are considering delaying retirement as a result of the financial and housing crises.

“In the last few weeks, we’ve been confronted with older worker and retirees’ lives being turned upside down; their panic tops-off an already existing state of chronic anxiety about retirement futures,” said Teresa Ghilarducci, professor of economic policy analysis at The New School for Social Research.

Witnesses also said that while the current financial crisis is reducing workers' savings today, retirement insecurity had been steadily growing over the past decade.

 “While the events that have taken place over the past several weeks have shone a spotlight on how affected Americans’ retirement plans can be by such volatility in the financial markets, it is important to keep in mind that Americans’ retirement security has been in distress for much longer than the past few weeks,” said Christian Weller, senior fellow at the Center for American Progress  “In fact, retirement security has been a growing concern for Americans for many years due to limited retirement plan coverage, little retirement wealth, and increasing risk exposure of the individual.”

Chairman Miller said that greater transparency in retirement plans and the fees workers pay is needed, especially when workers are losing money and looking for the best deal.

“401(k) holders lack critical information about how their money is managed and what fees they pay. I’m here to say right now, those days are over,” said Chairman Miller. “We must have more transparency in 401(k) investment practices. The Wall Street veil of secrecy must end.”

Earlier this year, the Committee passed a bill introduced by Chairman Miller that would require workers to receive clear and complete information about fees that – in some cases – are cutting deeply into their 401(k)-style retirement savings.

Immediately after the plan was approved, Speaker Pelosi announced that the House would conduct a series of hearings to investigate the causes of the current financial crisis and what steps we should take next to protect homeowners, workers and families struggling today.

As part of that commitment, the Committee on Education and Labor today is holding a hearing to explore how this financial crisis is impacting the retirement security of American families.

Yesterday, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee launched the first of many oversight hearings examining the toxic mix of corporate greed, recklessness, and deregulation that created this financial crisis.

During his testimony, Lehman’s CEO, Mr. Fuld, showed no remorse for his catastrophic mismanagement of the company. In fact, he repeatedly denied responsibility for running the storied Lehman Brothers investment house into financial oblivion.

He refused to admit that his own reckless management – and his industry’s success of keeping regulators at bay – directly contributed to this historic financial crisis that is costing taxpayers, shareholders, and the nation’s current and future retirees billions of dollars from their nest eggs.

All the while, he insisted on taking obscene multi-million dollar bonuses for his executive teammates.

Unlike Wall Street executives, American families don’t have a golden parachute to fall back on.
It’s clear that their retirement security may be one of the greatest casualties of this financial crisis.

The current financial and housing crises are stripping wealth from American families at a record rate.

A new poll just found that 63 percent of Americans are worried that they will not have enough savings for their retirement. Tragically, they may very well be right. Due to the collapse of the housing market and the financial crisis, trillions of dollars that Americans were counting on has been lost.

Americans were counting on much of this wealth for their retirement. Now it is gone – as is their ability to adequately fund their retirement.

Even before the current meltdown, middle-income families were losing ground due to the decline in middle-class wages over the last decade – making it harder for them to save for their retirement and family emergencies.

Retirement and financial experts now predict that retirees and older workers who rely on financial investments for retirement income may suffer more than any portion of the American population in the coming years.

According a survey released today by the AARP, one in five middle-aged workers stopped contributing to their retirement plans in the last year because they had trouble making ends meet. One in three workers has considered delaying retirement.

Now, the number of investors taking loans on their 401(k) accounts is increasing. And hardship withdrawals are also increasing.

T. Rowe Price estimates a 14 percent increase in hardship withdrawals just in the first eight months of 2008.

And, all the signs point to an increased frequency of 401(k) loans and hardship withdrawals in the coming year.

It makes sense that more Americans will be raiding their retirement accounts as they deal with rising unemployment and increasing costs of basic necessities.

Unfortunately, these drastic measures taken by workers today will have a long-lasting impact by significantly reducing account balances once these workers reach retirement age.

Over the past 12 months, more than a half trillion dollars have evaporated from 401(k) plans as a direct result of the crisis in the markets.

Some experts say that it will take as long as 3 years to recover market losses in 401(k)-style accounts – but only if the market turns around soon.

Just like consumer directed retirement plans, traditional pension plans are not immune from the financial crisis.

Although pension plans hire professional money managers and are required to be diversified, these plans will likely lose value as a result of the weak performance of the investment markets.

Sophisticated pension funds lost 20 to 30 percent of their value during the 2001 recession and took several years to overcome those losses.

We must keep our eye on these plans and I await further data on the health of our nation’s pensions.

While this crisis began on Wall Street, much of the financial burden will ultimately be borne by Main Street. And this did not happen overnight.

With the Republicans’ help and armed with their powerful lobbyists, Wall Street cunningly held off fair regulations by Congress, arguing that Americans would be better off if left to their own devices.

As Congress continues our investigations into this crisis, we cannot allow those responsible to emerge unscathed. The American people are paying the price of this go-go, Wild West approach to governing.

One cost will be the concern that our nation’s workers will not have sufficient savings to ensure a secure retirement after a lifetime of hard work. In the coming months, this committee will examine what measures may be needed to ensure a safe and secure retirement for workers, retirees and their families.

For starters, we know that 401(k) holders lack critical information about how their money is managed and what fees they pay.

I’m here to say right now, those days are over.

We must have more transparency in 401(k) investment practices. The Wall Street veil of secrecy must end.

I would like to thank all of our witnesses for joining us today. I look forward to their testimony.  

And I expect that we will be back here repeatedly until we can ensure greater security for the retirement of hard-working Americans.

Witnesses:

Jerry Bramlett
CEO
BenefitStreet, Inc.

Dr. Teresa Ghilarducci
Professor of Economic Policy Analysis
The New School for Social Research

Dr. Peter Orszag
Director
Congressional Budget Office

Jack VanDerhei
Research Director
Employee Benefit Research Institute

Dr. Christian Weller
Associate Professor of Public Policy, University of Massachusetts-Boston
Senior Fellow, Center for American Progress

“Through the years, millions of workers have retired believing that they would be provided with the health care benefits that they were promised by their employer, benefits that they earned. What many of those workers found was their former employer eventually made a cost-cutting decision to renege on that promise and cut or reduce those health care benefits,” said Rep. John Tierney.

One of those companies was Raytheon Missile Systems, a defense contractor. Despite guaranteeing lifetime heath coverage to its retirees in the 1990s, in 2004 the company notified retirees that they would be have to pay several hundred dollars a month to continue coverage. “Retirees have been forced to sell a large part of their retirement dreams in order to afford the premiums they now have to pay,” said David Lillie, a Raytheon retiree. “More than a few retirees have had to mortgage their homes that were paid off in order to pay medical expenses that were not covered under a cheaper insurance plan.”

Employees have few protections when trying to prevent employers from shrinking or eliminating health benefits. Employer-sponsored health insurance for both retirees and current employees is voluntary.  If an employer chooses to provide these benefits, employers are generally allowed to modify or terminate benefits, as long as they disclose it in the fine print.  “The law is hostile to reasonable employee expectations about retiree health benefits – expectations created by the employer and from which the employer benefited in terms of increased employee loyalty and productivity,” said Norman Stein, a University of Alabama law professor and pension expert at the Pension Rights Center. “We know that in a real work environment, rather than the imagined work environment conjured up by the judge, employees tend to believe communications – oral and written – that they receive from their managers.”

The trend of scaling back or canceling promised health benefits accelerated in the 1990s when, as a result of an accounting rule change, companies were forced to disclose future health care obligations as a part of their balance sheet. By rolling back promised benefits, companies could result in a healthier bottom line to shareholders.

Historically, employer-sponsored retirement health benefits have been an essential source of health care coverage for retired workers and were a common benefit among larger institutions. As a part of their compensation package, loyal and dedicated employees were promised health benefits when they retired.  “When most of the current retirees were in the workforce, larger American companies universally offered retiree health care to their employees and retirees as an incentive to retain trained employees,” said C. William Jones, chairman of ProtectSeniors.org, an advocacy group founded to protect retiree health care. “The workers accepted the IOU for retirement health care and other benefits in exchange for lower wages, and fewer vacations and holidays.”