2. Identifying Emerging Technologies:
The Emerging Technology
Search
Responding to the pace of innovation requires
two approaches that identify new and emerging
technologies and their impact on workplace safety
and health. One effort would identify technologies
that can improve worker safety and health. Another
effort seeks to identify problems in new workplace
processes, equipment, materials, and practices before
they enter the workplace so they can be solved.
Identification and Surveillance
Gaps
Identifying new and emerging technologies is not
difficult: journals of major scientific and engineering
professional societies routinely cover them (see
Appendix). A cursory reading of Chemical and
Engineering News, for example, would reveal new
areas of nanotechnology (with many subfields),
computational chemistry, biotechnology, and
bioengineering. Also included are operation
and product area reviews that cover emerging
technologies such as fuel cells, coatings and paints,
detergents and soaps, sensors, and chemical/product
manufacturing. Even though these categories can
be readily identified, they are large and general. In
order for this data to be useful it needs to be further
analyzed to determine possible effects on workers.
Researchers have developed many methods for
recognizing if a technology poses a hazard to working
people. Hazard identification is the evaluation of the
adverse health effects of a substance(s) in animals
or in humans. It relates to those aspects of a new
technology that may have adverse effects on worker
safety and health based on current knowledge
and data. It is an attempt to forecast hazardous
outcomes possibly associated with a new technology
that in time could become an emerging technology.
Similarly, benefit identification aims to reveal
the opportunities for an emerging or expanding
technology to be deployed in new ways to prevent
occupational safety and health problems.
As an example, nanotechnology has emerged as a
key strategic branch of science and engineering in
the 21st century. The interagency working group
[NNI 2004] on nanoscience, engineering, and
technology stated: “The ability to image, measure,
model, and manipulate matter on the nanoscale
is leading to new technologies that will impact
virtually every sector of our economy and our daily
lives.” One entrepreneur identified nanotechnology
by “browsing” the journal Science [Lenatti 2004]. He
then invested time with experts to identify the areas
of nanotechnology that could turn this expertise
into products for existing markets. He chose an
area that could revolutionize energy technology
based upon new kinds of solar cells, which had the
potential to be inexpensively implanted into roofing
shingles and provide electricity to the residence.
This approach is a cursory form of content analysis
[Janowitz 1976].
While several sources exist to identify emerging
technologies, the research community currently
lacks a system to prioritize technologies based on
the magnitude of their potential benefits or threats
to worker safety and health. Nanotechnology,
for example, already has applications in many
industrial, commercial, and consumer products.
This technology is likely to find uses in such diverse
areas as materials science and catalyst development,
and in products such as ceramics, electronics,
advanced coating materials, pharmaceutics, and
cosmetics [Pui et al. 1998; Otten et al. 2001; Fissan
et al. 2002].
It is difficult to conduct research on whole
technologies. A focus on applications of the
technology provides a way to narrow the research
agenda, for technologies have long been defined in
terms of application, i.e., systematic applications
of organized knowledge to practical activities,
especially productive ones [Ayers 1969]. Indeed, the
application view has produced success in the market
that has driven the emergence of technologies
[Moore 1999]. Knowledge about the consequences
of prior applications of one technology can be
predictive of that technology’s impact in other uses.
![The nanoparticle-DMA](images/figure2.JPG)
Figure 2. The nanoparticle-DMA
(differential mobility aerosol) is a new
instrument for the classification of nanosized
particles in the 1-50 nm range.
Responding to Identification and
Surveillance Gaps
Knowing the minimum data needed for the
identification and surveillance of emerging
technologies like nanotechnology is critical for
the research process. Researchers need to (1)
identify major areas of emerging technologies,
(2) survey the current state of technology within
each of these areas, and (3) continue to review the
areas in order to set priorities for attention or for
more concerted research. Criteria are needed for
minimal information identification, and a method
is needed for recording this information in one or
more databases. Methods also need to be developed
for the identification and systematic surveillance
of emerging technologies that may lead to research
of their positive or negative consequences to
occupational safety and health. These methods need
to include criteria as well as reporting protocols for
systematic surveillance. Model approaches may be
adapted from other organizations [U.S. Department
of Agriculture 2003; Transportation Research Board
2003] and be built on hazard identification [NRC
1983; NRC 1993].
Nanotechnology: With the rapid development
of nanotechnology, research on the potential
health effects of exposure to nanoparticles
on occupational and environmental health has
gained increased attention. New scientific
instruments to characterize nanoparticles are
essential to enable this research. The nanodifferential
mobility aerosol (DMA) analyzer
for nanoparticles is such an example (see
Figure 2). Since it has been hypothesized that
nanoparticles may readily enter the interstitial
spaces of the lungs, preliminary studies with
inert particles of nanometer size have shown
an inflammatory response in some animals
[Wichmann et al. 2000: Oberdörster et al.
2000]. Further research has to be conducted to
establish the etiological or epidemiological basis
to support the findings in the animal studies
[Pui et al. 1998]. Moreover, fine particulate
matter exposures have been associated with
increased cardiovascular disease [Pope et al.
2003]. However, it should be noted that the
nanoparticles in the atmosphere have relatively
short half-lives due to their reactivity [Zhu
et al. 2003], which is critical in the evaluation
of the overall impact of nanoparticles in the
workplace and the environment. |
Addressing identification and surveillance gaps
requires a range of expert perspectives. An academic
expert or a team might, for example, be recruited
biannually to evaluate emerging technology literature
for potential negative and positive consequences on
occupational safety and health. Industrial hygiene
or safety professionals could then generate lists of
emerging technologies and evaluate them for their
potential hazards or benefits to worker safety and
health and publish reports describing their potential
consequences.
Methods are needed for effective early screening of
emerging technologies. A matrix approach as is used
in competitive technology intelligence techniques
[Coburn 1999] is one strategy experts can use for
translating general opportunities and concerns
about emerging technologies into specific areas for
surveillance.
In this method, various technology areas would
be arrayed in a 2 x 2 matrix as shown in Figure 3,
depicting high versus low benefits of intended use
against high versus low risks to worker safety and
health.
|
|
BENEFITS |
OF USE |
|
|
High |
Low |
Risk to |
High |
|
|
Workers |
Low |
|
|
Figure 3. Matrix for setting priorities for
safety and health surveillance.
Those technologies offering high benefits (e.g., the
high strength and light weight of carbon nanotubes)
but potentially high risks to worker safety
and health (e.g., possible respiratory challenges from
nano-sized particle exposures) would be identified
for surveillance.
Researchers can also apply this matrix to the
technology’s benefits rather than its risks to worker
safety and health. For example, titanium dioxide
coating on windows, a new nanotechnology, is self cleaning
and may reduce a window washer’s risk of
falls from scaffolding on high-rise buildings [Spice
2002].
A cross-disciplinary approach between occupational
safety and health experts and new technology experts
can facilitate the identification and surveillance process. There is also a need to train developers of
new technologies to identify potentially valuable or
risky technologies. Consortia need to be convened
around priority technologies to consider their
potential for application or their potential concerns
regarding worker safety and health. Increased
funding and awareness may be necessary to enable
technology developers to appreciate the perspective
of occupational safety and health experts and to
encourage them to develop applications that will
improve safety and health in the workplace.
|