Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Diagnosis and management of peripheral arterial disease. A national clinical guideline.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Diagnosis and management of peripheral arterial disease. A national clinical guideline. Edinburgh (Scotland): Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN); 2006 Oct. 37 p. (SIGN publication; no. 89). [129 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Note from the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) and National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC): In addition to these evidence-based recommendations, the guideline development group also identifies points of best clinical practice in the full-text guideline document.

The grades of recommendations (A–D) and levels of evidence (1++, 1+, 1-, 2++, 2+, 2-, 3, 4) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Cardiovascular Risk Reduction

Smoking Cessation

D - Patients with peripheral arterial disease should be actively discouraged from smoking.

Cholesterol Lowering

A - Lipid lowering therapy with a statin is recommended for patients with peripheral arterial disease and total cholesterol level >3.5 mmol/L.

Glycaemic Control

B - Optimal glycaemic control is recommended for patients with peripheral arterial disease and diabetes in order to reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events.

Weight Reduction

D - Obese patients with peripheral arterial disease should be treated to reduce their weight.

Blood Pressure Control

A - Hypertensive patients with peripheral arterial disease should be treated to reduce their blood pressure.

Antiplatelet Therapy

A - Antiplatelet therapy is recommended for patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease.

Referral, Diagnosis, and Investigation

Investigations in Secondary Care

Digital Subtraction Arteriography

D - Digital subtraction arteriography is not recommended as the primary imaging modality for patients with peripheral arterial disease.

Computed Tomography Angiography

A - Non-invasive imaging modalities should be employed in the first instance for patients with intermittent claudication in whom intervention is being considered.

Treatment of Symptoms

Licensed Drug Therapy for Peripheral Arterial Disease

Cilostazol

A - Patients with intermittent claudication, in particular over a short distance, should be considered for treatment with cilostazol.

A - If cilostazol is ineffective after three months, or if adverse effects prevent compliance with therapy, the drug should be stopped.

Naftidrofuryl

A - Patients with intermittent claudication and who have a poor quality of life may be considered for treatment with naftidrofuryl.

Oxpentifylline

A - Oxpentifylline is not recommended for the treatment of intermittent claudication.

Inositol Nicotinate

B - Inositol nicotinate is not recommended for the treatment of intermittent claudication.

Unlicensed Research Drugs and Procedures

Statins

A - Statins should be given for risk factor management in patients with intermittent claudication and total cholesterol level >3.5 mmol/L.

Prostaglandins

A - The use of oral prostaglandin therapy in patients with intermittent claudication is not recommended.

Exercise Therapy

A - Patients with intermittent claudication should be encouraged to exercise.

Vascular Intervention

D - Endovascular and surgical intervention are not recommended for the majority of patients with intermittent claudication.

D - For those with severe disability or deteriorating symptoms, referral to a vascular specialist is recommended.

D - The TransAtlantic Inter-society consensus guidelines should be used when advising patients about possible interventions.

Definitions:

Levels of Evidence

1++: High quality meta-analyses, systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), or RCTs with a very low risk of bias

1+: Well-conducted meta-analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs, or RCTs with a low risk of bias

1-: Meta-analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs, or RCTs with a high risk of bias

2++: High quality systematic reviews of case control or cohort studies
High quality case control or cohort studies with a very low risk of confounding or bias and a high probability that the relationship is causal

2+: Well-conducted case control or cohort studies with a low risk of confounding or bias and a moderate probability that the relationship is causal

2-: Case control or cohort studies with a high risk of confounding or bias and a significant risk that the relationship is not causal

3: Non-analytic studies (e.g. case reports, case series)

4: Expert opinion

Grades of Recommendation

Note: The grade of recommendation relates to the strength of the evidence on which the recommendation is based. It does not reflect the clinical importance of the recommendation.

A: At least one meta-analysis, systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), or RCT rated as 1++ and directly applicable to the target population; or

A body of evidence consisting principally of studies rated as 1+, directly applicable to the target population, and demonstrating overall consistency of results

B: A body of evidence including studies rated as 2++, directly applicable to the target population, and demonstrating overall consistency of results; or

Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 1++ or 1+

C: A body of evidence including studies rated as 2+, directly applicable to the target population and demonstrating overall consistency of results; or

Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 2++

D: Evidence level 3 or 4; or

Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 2+

Good Practice Points: Recommended best practice based on the clinical experience of the guideline development group

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see "Major Recommendations").

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Diagnosis and management of peripheral arterial disease. A national clinical guideline. Edinburgh (Scotland): Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN); 2006 Oct. 37 p. (SIGN publication; no. 89). [129 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2006 Oct

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network - National Government Agency [Non-U.S.]

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Scottish Executive Health Department

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Not stated

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Guideline Development Group: Professor Gerry Fowkes (Chair) Professor of Epidemiology, Public Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh; Ms Margaret Armitage, Vascular Liaison Nurse, Greater Glasgow Primary Care Trust; Professor Jill Belch, Professor of Vascular Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee; Mr Graham Bell, Lay representative, Penicuik; Ms Julie Brittenden, Senior Lecturer and Consultant Vascular Surgeon, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary; Dr Henry Doig, Lay representative, Glasgow; Dr Ian Gillespie, Vascular (Interventional) Radiologist, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh; Ms Margaret Greene, Vascular Technologist, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow; Ms Alison Howd, Consultant Vascular Surgeon, Queen Margaret Hospital, Dunfermline; Dr Gordon Isbister, General Practitioner, Beith; Dr Moray Nairn, Programme Manager, SIGN Executive; Dr Jackie Price, Clinical Lecturer, Public Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh; Ms May Roseburgh, Clinical Nurse Specialist, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh; Ms Mairi Ross, Senior Vascular Physiotherapist, Raigmore Hospital, Inverness; Ms Helen Scott, Superintendent Physiotherapist WESTMAR, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow; Ms Valerie Sinclair, Vascular Nurse, Stirling Royal Infirmary; Ms Christine Smith, Vascular Liaison Nurse, Raigmore Hospital, Inverness; Mrs Ailsa Stein Information Officer, SIGN Executive; Dr Rebecca Walton, Specialist Registrar in Public Health, Lothian NHS Board; Dr Olivia Wu, Health Economist, Reproductive and Maternal Medicine, Division of Developmental Medicine, University of Glasgow

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Declarations of interests were made by all members of the guideline development group. Further details are available from the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) Executive.

GUIDELINE STATUS

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

The following are available:

PATIENT RESOURCES

The following are available:

Please note: This patient information is intended to provide health professionals with information to share with their patients to help them better understand their health and their diagnosed disorders. By providing access to this patient information, it is not the intention of NGC to provide specific medical advice for particular patients. Rather we urge patients and their representatives to review this material and then to consult with a licensed health professional for evaluation of treatment options suitable for them as well as for diagnosis and answers to their personal medical questions. This patient information has been derived and prepared from a guideline for health care professionals included on NGC by the authors or publishers of that original guideline. The patient information is not reviewed by NGC to establish whether or not it accurately reflects the original guideline's content.

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on November 28, 2006.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo