Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Long-acting anticoagulant rodenticide poisoning: an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 
RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Definitions for the weight of the evidence (A-D, Z) and classes of recommendations (1a-6) can be found at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

  1. Patients with exposure due to suspected self-harm, abuse, misuse, or potentially malicious administration should be referred to an emergency department immediately regardless of the doses reported (Grade D).
  2. Patients with symptoms of long-acting anticoagulant rodenticide (LAAR) poisoning (e.g., bleeding, bruising) should be referred immediately to an emergency department for evaluation regardless of the reported doses (Grade C).
  3. Patients with chronic ingestion of LAAR should be referred immediately to an emergency department for evaluation of intent and potential coagulopathy (Grade B).
  4. Patients taking anticoagulants therapeutically and who ingest any dose of a LAAR should have a baseline prothrombin time measured and then again at 48 to 72 hours after ingestion (Grade D).
  5. Patients with unintentional ingestion of less than 1 mg of LAAR active ingredient can be safely observed at home without laboratory monitoring. This includes practically all unintentional ingestions in children less than 6 years of age (Grade C).
  6. Pregnant patients with unintentional exposure to less than 1 mg of LAAR active ingredient should be evaluated by their obstetrician or primary care provider as an outpatient. Immediate referral to an emergency department or clinic is not required.
  7. Patients with unintentional ingestion of 1 mg or more of active ingredient and are asymptomatic should be evaluated for coagulopathy at 48–72 hours after exposure (Grade B).
  8. Physicians' offices or outpatient clinics must be able to obtain coagulation study results in a timely manner, preferably in less than 24 hours, for patients who require outpatient monitoring (Grade D).
  9. Gastrointestinal decontamination with ipecac syrup is not recommended (Grade D).
  10. Transportation to an emergency department should not be delayed for administration of activated charcoal (Grade D).
  11. Patients with dermal exposures should be decontaminated by washing the skin with mild soap and water (Grade D).
  12. The administration of vitamin K is not recommended prior to evaluation for coagulopathy (Grade D).

Definitions:

Grades of Recommendation and Levels of Evidence

Grade of Recommendation Level of
Evidence
Description of Study Design
A 1a Systematic review (with homogeneity) of randomized clinical trials
1b Individual randomized clinical trials (with narrow confidence interval)
1c All or none (all patients died before the drug became available, but some now survive on it; or when some patients died before the drug became available, but none now die on it.)
B 2a Systematic review (with homogeneity) of cohort studies
2b Individual cohort study (including low quality randomized clinical trial)
2c "Outcomes" research
3a Systemic review (with homogeneity) of case-control studies
3b Individual case-control study
C 4 Case series, single case reports (and poor quality cohort and case control studies)
D 5 Expert opinion without explicit critical appraisal or based on physiology or bench research
Z 6 Abstracts

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

An algorithm is provided in Appendix 4 of the original guideline document: for triage for long-acting anticoagulant rodenticides (LAARs) ingestion.

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see "Major Recommendations").

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2006 Apr 19

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

American Association of Poison Control Centers - Professional Association

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Not stated

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Primary Authors: Martin Caravati, MD, MPH; Andrew R. Erdman, MD; Elizabeth J. Scharman, PharmD; Alan D. Woolf, MD, MPH; Peter A. Chyka, PharmD; Daniel J. Cobaugh, PharmD; Paul M. Wax, MD; Anthony S. Manoguerra, PharmD; Gwenn Christianson, MSN; Lewis S. Nelson, MD; Kent R. Olson, MD; Lisa L. Booze, PharmD; William G. Troutman, PharmD

Expert Consensus Panel Members: Lisa L. Booze, PharmD, Certified Specialist in Poison Information, Maryland Poison Center, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland; E. Martin Caravati, MD, MPH, FACMT, FACEP, Professor of Surgery (Emergency Medicine) University of Utah, Medical Director, Utah Poison Center, Salt Lake City, Utah; Gwenn Christianson, RN, MSN, Certified Specialist in Poison Information, Indiana Poison Center, Indianapolis, Indiana; Peter A. Chyka, PharmD, FAACT, DABAT, Professor, Department of Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee; Daniel J. Cobaugh, PharmD, FAACT, DABAT, Director of Research, ASHP Research and Education Foundation, Bethesda, Maryland, Former Associate Director, American Association of Poison Control Centers; Daniel C. Keyes, MD, MPH, FACEP, FACMT, Medical Director, Pine Bluff Chemical Demilitarization Facility, Associate Professor, Southwestern Toxicology Training Program, Dallas, Texas; Anthony S. Manoguerra, PharmD, DABAT, FAACT, Professor of Clinical Pharmacy and Associate Dean, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, Former Director, California Poison Control System, San Diego Division, San Diego, California; Lewis S. Nelson, M.D., FACEP, FACMT, Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, Associate Medical Director, New York City Poison Control Center, New York, New York; Kent R. Olson, MD, FACEP, FAACT, FACMT, Medical Director, California Poison Control System, San Francisco Division, Clinical Professor of Medicine & Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Elizabeth J. Scharman, PharmD, DABAT, BCPS, FAACT, Director, West Virginia Poison Center, Professor, West Virginia University School of Pharmacy, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Charleston, West Virginia; Paul M. Wax, MD, FACMT, Managing Director, Banner Poison Center, Professor of Clinical Emergency Medicine, University of Arizona School of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona; Alan D. Woolf, MD, MPH, FACMT, Director, Program in Environmental Medicine, Children's Hospital, Boston, Associate Professor of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

There are no potential conflicts of interest reported by the expert consensus panel or project staff regarding this guideline.

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the American Association of Poison Control Centers.

Print copies: Available from the American Association of Poison Control Centers, 3201 New Mexico Avenue NW, Suite 330, Washington, DC 20016

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

None available

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on November 29, 2006. The information was verified by the guideline developer on December 13, 2006.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo