Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement: evaluation of dyspepsia.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement: evaluation of dyspepsia. Gastroenterology 1998 Mar;114(3):579-81.

According to the guideline developer, the Clinical Practice Committee meets three times a year to review all American Gastroenterological Association Institute (AGAI) guidelines. This review includes new literature searches of electronic databases followed by expert committee review of new evidence that has emerged since the original publication date.

** REGULATORY ALERT **

FDA WARNING/REGULATORY ALERT

Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse: This guideline references a drug(s) for which important revised regulatory information has been released.

  • May 2, 2007, Antidepressant drugs: Update to the existing black box warning on the prescribing information on all antidepressant medications to include warnings about the increased risks of suicidal thinking and behavior in young adults ages 18 to 24 years old during the first one to two months of treatment.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 ** REGULATORY ALERT **
 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Management Recommendations

Patients 55 years of age or younger without alarm features should receive Helicobacter pylori test and treat followed by acid suppression if symptoms remain (see Figure 2 in the original guideline document). H. pylori testing is optimally performed by a 13C-urea breath test or stool antigen test. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the drug class of choice for acid suppression. Those who are H. pylori negative should be prescribed an empirical trial of acid suppression with a PPI for 4 to 8 weeks. Empirical PPI therapy is the most cost-effective approach in populations with a low prevalence of H. pylori (10% or less). The recommendation to test and treat is based on randomized controlled trials and the possible impact of eradication in preventing future gastric adenocarcinoma.

Patients who respond to H. pylori test and treat or PPI therapy can be managed without further investigation. Endoscopy usually adds little in young patients who continue to have upper gastrointestinal symptoms without alarm features despite H. pylori test and treat and PPI therapy. There is a very low probability of finding relevant organic disease in this group of patients. Endoscopy may reassure some young patients with continued symptoms, but evidence suggests this is not the case in those who are most anxious and that many H pylori test-and-treat patients can be managed in the long term without further investigation. Endoscopy may be appropriate for some young patients who continue to have dyspepsia, but this should be considered in the wider context of reevaluating the symptoms and the diagnosis. Endoscopy appears not to be a cost-effective use of resources compared with alternatives such as screening for colorectal cancer (see Figure 3 in the original guideline document).

The value of alarm symptoms in younger patients is controversial. A systematic review of alarm symptoms suggests that these are not very useful in diagnosing upper gastrointestinal malignancy. However, although the yield of endoscopy is low, it is recommended for patients older than 55 years of age and for younger patients with alarm features (e. g., weight loss, progressive dysphagia, recurrent vomiting, evidence of gastrointestinal bleeding, or family history of cancer) presenting with new-onset dyspepsia. Upper gastrointestinal malignancy becomes more common after age 55 years. Biopsy specimens should be obtained for H. pylori at the time of endoscopy, and eradication therapy offered to those who are infected because this may reduce the risk of subsequent peptic ulcer disease and gastric malignancy. Endoscopy should be preferred over upper gastrointestinal radiography because it has greater diagnostic accuracy and biopsy specimens can be taken for H pylori infection. After endoscopy, and H. pylori eradication therapy if positive, treatment should be targeted at the underlying diagnosis. Most patients will have functional dyspepsia and can be offered acid suppression therapy.

Patients of any age who continue to have symptoms despite appropriate investigations, therapy, and reassurance are a difficult group to manage (see Figure 4 in the original guideline document). Symptoms should be reassessed and prokinetic agents, antidepressant therapy, or psychological treatments considered, although the benefits of these approaches are not established.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

Clinical algorithms are provided in the original guideline document for:

  • Initial Management of Dyspepsia
  • Management of Dyspepsia Based on Age and Alarm Features
  • Endoscopy in Patients Who Have Failed Empirical Therapy
  • Management of Functional Dyspepsia

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of evidence supporting the recommendations is not specifically stated.

The recommendations are based upon the interpretation and assimilation of scientifically valid research, derived from a comprehensive review of published literature.

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

1997 Nov 8 (revised 2005 Nov)

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

American Gastroenterological Association Institute - Medical Specialty Society

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

American Gastroenterological Association Institute

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

American Gastroenterological Association Clinical Practice and Economics Committee

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Author: Nicholas J. Talley

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Not stated

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement: evaluation of dyspepsia. Gastroenterology 1998 Mar;114(3):579-81.

According to the guideline developer, the Clinical Practice Committee meets three times a year to review all American Gastroenterological Association Institute (AGAI) guidelines. This review includes new literature searches of electronic databases followed by expert committee review of new evidence that has emerged since the original publication date.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies: Available from the American Gastroenterological Association Institute (AGAI) Web site.

Print copies: Available from American Gastroenterological Association Institute, 4930 Del Ray Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This summary was completed by ECRI on September 1, 1998. It was verified by the guideline developer on December 1, 1998. This NGC summary was updated by ECRI on January 16, 2006. The updated information was verified by the guideline developer on February 15, 2006. This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on November 9, 2007, following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisory on Antidepressant drugs.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions. Please contact the Public Policy Coordinator, American Gastroenterological Association, 4930 Del Ray Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone, (301) 654-2055; fax, (301) 654-5970.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo