Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement: osteoporosis in hepatic disorders.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

According to the guideline developer, the Clinical Practice Committee meets three times a year to review all American Gastroenterological Association Institute (AGAI) guidelines. This review includes new literature searches of electronic databases followed by expert committee review of new evidence that has emerged since the original publication date.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 
RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

The strength of the evidence supporting each guideline statement is graded (A–D). Definitions of these grades are provided at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Summary of Bone Disease in Chronic Liver Disease

  1. On average, there is a mild bone mineral density (BMD) deficit in chronic liver disease, but considerable patient heterogeneity exists (level B evidence).
  2. In the absence of concurrent corticosteroid therapy, rates of BMD loss are similar to predicted (level B evidence).
  3. Vertebral and nonvertebral fracture rates are increased in chronic liver disease, especially in postmenopausal women (level A evidence).
  4. Markers of greater osteoporosis and fracture risk include older age, hypogonadism, corticosteroid therapy, and established cirrhosis (level B evidence).
  5. Eugonadal noncirrhotic patients generally have a low incidence of osteoporotic fractures (level A evidence).
  6. Patients with primary biliary cirrhosis are at increased risk for osteoporosis due to predominant female sex and older age, but cholestatic disease per se does not differ significantly from noncholestatic disorders in terms of osteoporosis and fracture risk (level A evidence).
  7. Prediction rules relying on multiple variables (such as body mass index, corticosteroid history, age, and sex) may be a useful aid in predicting the presence of osteoporosis and for risk stratification (level B evidence).

Summary of Bone Disease after Liver Transplantation

  1. All pre-orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) patients should be evaluated for osteoporosis and disorders of bone metabolism: history and physical examination with attention to risk factors for osteoporosis, thoracolumbar spine x-rays, serum calcium, phosphate, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and free testosterone (for men). Thoracolumbar spine radiographs should be repeated if the patient reports loss of height or severe back pain (level D evidence).
  2. Bone loss after OLT follows a biphasic course, with the greatest decrease during the first 3 to 6 months and then spontaneous stabilization or even improvement (level A evidence).
  3. Most fractures develop in the first year, and very few fractures occur after the first 3 years (level A evidence).
  4. The small but statistically significant decrease in BMD after OLT is insufficient to completely account for the high early fracture risk and usually does not worsen over time (level A evidence).
  5. Posttransplant BMD can recover to above baseline, and this seems to be more common with cholestatic liver disease (level B evidence).
  6. Pretransplant insufficiency fractures and low BMD are markers of high fracture risk after OLT (level A evidence).

Summary of Bone Density Testing and Therapy in Liver Disease

The following outlines a possible approach to managing osteoporosis in hepatic disorders:

  1. Patients who have experienced a fragility fracture, who are postmenopausal, and who require long-term treatment with corticosteroids (>3 months) should undergo BMD testing. BMD should also be assessed when the diagnosis of primary biliary cirrhosis is first made, in patients with cirrhosis, and before liver transplantation (level D evidence).
  2. Patients with risk factors and a normal initial BMD result should be retested after 2 to 3 years to exclude significant bone loss. A shorter follow-up interval (approximately 1 year) is recommended for patients recently initiating high-dose corticosteroid therapy (level D evidence).
  3. Osteoporosis can be the first clinical manifestation underlying cholestatic liver disease, and it may be worthwhile to screen for anti-mitochondrial antibody in osteoporotic patients with both an elevated gamma-glutamyltransferase and serum alkaline phosphatase level (level D evidence).
  4. All patients require education regarding the importance of lifestyle changes (e.g., regular exercise, smoking cessation) as well as vitamin D and calcium supplementation (level D evidence).
  5. All patients should receive 1,000 to 1,200 mg of elemental calcium daily (depending on their age) and at least 400 to 800 IU of vitamin D daily. Vitamin D deficiency should be corrected by increasing serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels to at least 25 to 30 ng/mL (level D evidence). In patients with malabsorption, higher doses of calcium and vitamin D may be necessary.
  6. If female hypogonadism or early menopause (before age 45 years) is evident, hormone replacement therapy (best via the transdermal route in patients with malabsorption or liver disease) is advised for the prevention of osteoporosis (level D evidence in hepatic disease, level A evidence for vertebral and nonvertebral fracture risk reduction in generally healthy postmenopausal women). Estrogen therapy is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal or hypogonadal premenopausal women but must be balanced against the significant risks. Non–estrogen-based therapy is generally preferred for older postmenopausal women.
  7. Raloxifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women (level D evidence in hepatic disease, level A evidence for vertebral fracture risk reduction in osteoporotic postmenopausal women). A bone disease specialist should participate in the decision to choose raloxifene in patients with a hepatic disorder.
  8. Testosterone should be used to treat hypogonadism in men (level D evidence).
  9. Bisphosphonates should be considered in patients with known osteoporosis, with vertebral fractures, or who cannot withdraw from corticosteroids after 3 months of use (level D evidence). Bisphosphonates are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with known osteoporosis, with fragility fractures, or on prolonged corticosteroid therapy (level D evidence in hepatic disease, level A evidence regarding vertebral and nonvertebral fracture risk reduction in postmenopausal women, level A evidence regarding vertebral fracture risk reduction in osteoporotic men and corticosteroid-treated patients).
  10. Nasal or subcutaneous calcitonin can be considered as an alternative when the preceding antiresorptive agents are contraindicated or poorly tolerated (level D evidence in hepatic disease, level A evidence regarding fracture risk reduction in osteoporotic postmenopausal women).
  11. As in other organ transplant recipients, bone loss occurs rapidly, so therapy is optimally started before or at the time of OLT. There is conflicting evidence that intravenous administration of a bisphosphonate at the time of transplantation may reduce bone turnover and fractures, but its use should be directed by a bone disease specialist (level C evidence).
  12. Parathyroid hormone is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of severe osteoporosis (level D evidence in hepatic disease, level A evidence in osteoporotic postmenopausal women). Its use should be directed by a bone disease specialist.
  13. Fluoride is not recommended for the treatment of osteoporosis associated with a hepatic disorder (level D evidence in hepatic disease, no consistent evidence for fracture risk reduction in other groups).

Definitions:

Quality of Evidence on Which a Recommendation is Based

Grade A

Homogeneous evidence from multiple well-designed randomized (therapeutic) or cohort (descriptive) controlled trials each involving a number of participants to be of sufficient statistical power

Grade B

Evidence from at least one large well-designed clinical trial with or without randomization, cohort or case-control analytic studies, or well-designed meta-analysis

Grade C

Evidence based on clinical experience, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees

Grade D

Not rated

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

An algorithm for a general approach to clinical management of osteoporosis in patients with chronic liver disease is provided in the Technical Review that accompanies the guideline (see the "Companion Documents" field).

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see the "Major Recommendations" field).

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2003 Sep

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

American Gastroenterological Association Institute - Medical Specialty Society

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

American Gastroenterological Association Institute

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

American Gastroenterological Association Clinical Practice Committee

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Not stated

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Not stated

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

According to the guideline developer, the Clinical Practice Committee meets three times a year to review all American Gastroenterological Association Institute (AGAI) guidelines. This review includes new literature searches of electronic databases followed by expert committee review of new evidence that has emerged since the original publication date.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies: Available from the American Gastroenterological Association Institute (AGAI) Gastroenterology journal Web site.

Print copies: Available from the American Gastroenterological Association Institute, 4930 Del Ray Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on May 19, 2004.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo