Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Assessment and management of venous leg ulcers.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO). Assessment and management of venous leg ulcers. Toronto (ON): Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO); 2004 Mar. 112 p. [64 references]


  • Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO). Assessment and management of venous leg ulcers: guideline supplement. Toronto (ON): Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO); 2007 Mar. 21 p. [51 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 
RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC): In March 2007, the Registered Nurses Association of Ontario amended the current practice recommendations for this topic. Through the review process, many recommendations were re-worded, removed or combined to reflect current knowledge and to enhance the clarity of the document. Two new recommendations have also been added. Changes have been noted below as "changed," "unchanged" or "new."

The levels of evidence supporting each recommendation (Level A-C) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Practice Recommendations

Comprehensive Assessment

Recommendation 1 (Unchanged)

Assessment and clinical investigations should be undertaken by healthcare professional(s) trained and experienced in leg ulcer management. (Level of Evidence = C)

Recommendation 2 (Changed March 2007)

A comprehensive clinical history and physical examination includes:

  • Blood pressure measurement
  • Weight
  • Blood glucose level
  • Doppler measurement of Ankle Brachial Pressure Index (ABPI)
  • Any other tests relevant to presenting patient's condition
  • Ulcer history
  • Ulcer treatment history
  • Medical history
  • Medication
  • Bilateral limb assessment
  • Pain
  • Nutrition
  • Allergies
  • Psychosocial status (including quality of life)
  • Functional, cognitive, emotional status and ability for self-care

The above should be documented in a structured format for a client presenting with either their first or recurrent leg ulcer and should be ongoing thereafter.

(Level of Evidence = C)

Recommendation 3 (Changed March 2007)

A comprehensive assessment of an ulcer should include:

  • Measurement of the wound and undermining
  • Amount and quality of exudate
  • Wound bed appearance
  • Condition of the wound edge
  • Infection
  • Presence or absence of patient suffering
  • Re-evaluation

(Level of Evidence C)

Measure the surface areas of ulcers, at regular intervals, to monitor progress. Maximum length and width, or tracings onto a transparency are useful methods. (Level of Evidence B)

Recommendation 4 (Unchanged)

Regular ulcer assessment is essential to monitor treatment effectiveness and healing goals. (Level of Evidence = C)

Diagnostic Evaluation

Recommendation 5 (Changed March 2007)

An Ankle Brachial Pressure Index (ABPI) measurement should be performed by a trained practitioner to rule out the presence of peripheral arterial disease, particularly prior to the application of compression therapy. (Level of Evidence = B)

Recommendation 6 (Changed March 2007)

An Ankle Brachial Pressure Index (ABPI) >1.2 and <0.8 warrants referral for further medical assessment. (Level of Evidence = C)

Recommendation 7 (Changed March 2007)

Prior to debridement, vascular assessment, such as Ankle Brachial Pressure Index (ABPI), is recommended for ulcers in lower extremities to rule out vascular compromise and ensure healability. (Level of Evidence = C)

Pain

Recommendation 8 (Unchanged)

Pain may be a feature of both venous and arterial disease, and should be addressed. (Level of Evidence = B)

Recommendation 9 (Unchanged)

Prevent or manage pain associated with debridement. Consult with a physician and pharmacist as needed. (Level of Evidence = C)

Venous Ulcer Care

Recommendation 10 (New March 2007)

Develop treatment goals mutually agreed upon by the patient and healthcare professionals, based on clinical findings, current evidence, expert opinion and patient preference. (Level of Evidence = C)

Recommendation 11 (New March 2007)

Local wound bed preparation includes debridement when appropriate, moisture balance and bacterial balance. (Level of Evidence = C)

Recommendation 12 (Unchanged)

Cleansing of the ulcer should be kept simple; warm tap water or saline is usually sufficient. (Level of Evidence = B)

Recommendation 13 (Changed March 2007)

First-line and uncomplicated dressings must be simple, low adherent, acceptable to the client and should be cost-effective. (Level of Evidence = A)

Recommendation 14 (Changed March 2007)

Avoid products that are known to cause skin sensitivity, such as those containing lanolin, phenol alcohol, or some topical antibiotic and antibacterial preparations. (Level of Evidence = C)

Recommendation 15 (Changed March 2007)

Choose a dressing that optimizes the wound environment and patient tolerance. (Level of Evidence = C)

Recommendation 16 (Unchanged)

No specific dressing has been demonstrated to encourage ulcer healing. (Level of Evidence = A)

Recommendation 17 (Unchanged)

In contrast to drying out, moist wound conditions allow optimal cell migration, proliferation, differentiation and neovascularization. (Level of Evidence = A)

Recommendation 18 (Unchanged)

Refer clients with suspected sensitivity reactions to a dermatologist for patch testing. Following patch testing, identified allergens must be avoided, and medical advice on treatment should be sought. (Level of Evidence = B)

Recommendation 19 (Changed March 2007)

Venous surgery followed by graduated compression hosiery is an option for consideration in clients with superficial venous insufficiency. (Level of Evidence =A)

Infection

Recommendation 20 (Changed March 2007)

Assess for signs and symptoms of infection. (Level of Evidence = A)

Recommendation 21 (Changed March 2007)

Manage wound infection with cleansing and debridement, as appropriate. Where there is evidence of cellulitis, treatment of infection involves systemic antibiotics. (Level of Evidence = B)

Recommendation 22 (Changed March 2007)

The use of topical antiseptics to reduce bacteria in wound tissue should be reserved for situations in which concern for bacterial load is higher than that of healability. (Level of Evidence = C)

Compression

Recommendation 23 (Changed March 2007)

The treatment of choice for venous ulceration uncomplicated by other factors is graduated compression bandaging, properly applied and combined with exercise. (Level of Evidence = A)

  • In venous ulceration, high compression achieves better healing than low compression. (Level of Evidence = A)
  • Compression bandages should only be applied by a suitably trained and experienced practitioner. (Level of Evidence = B)
  • The concepts, practice, and hazards of graduated compression should be fully understood by those prescribing and fitting compression stockings. (Level of Evidence = B)
  • Ankle circumference should be measured at a distance of 2.5 cm (one inch) above the medial malleolus. (Level of Evidence = C)

Recommendation 24 (Changed March 2007)

External compression applied using various forms of pneumatic compression pumps can be indicated for individuals with chronic venous insufficiency. (Level of Evidence = A)

Recommendation 25 (Changed March 2007)

The client should be prescribed regular vascular exercise by means of intensive controlled walking and exercises to improve the function of the ankle joint and calf muscle pump. (Level of Evidence = A)

Complementary Therapies

Recommendation 26 (Unchanged)

Consider electrical stimulation in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. (Level of Evidence = B)

Recommendation 27 (Unchanged)

Therapeutic ultrasound may be used to reduce the size of chronic venous ulcers. (Level of Evidence = A)

Reassessment

Recommendation 28 (Changed March 2007)

If signs of healing are not evident, a comprehensive assessment and re-evaluation of the treatment plan should be carried out at three month intervals, or sooner if clinical condition deteriorates. (Level of Evidence = C)

Recommendation 29 (Unchanged)

For resolving and healing venous leg ulcers, routine assessment at six-month intervals should include:

  • Physical assessment
  • Ankle Brachial Pressure Index (ABPI)
  • Replacement of compression stockings
  • Reinforcement of teaching

(Level of Evidence = C)

Client Education for Secondary Prevention

The section heading was modified to emphasize the importance of client education as a valuable means to promoting effective preventative measures.

Recommendation 30 (Changed March 2007) (Level of Evidence = C)

Inform the client of measures to prevent recurrence after healing:

  • Daily wear of compression stockings, cared for as per manufacturer's instructions and replaced at a minimum every six months
  • Discouragement of self-treatment with over-the-counter preparations
  • Avoidance of accidents or trauma to legs
  • Rest periods throughout the day with elevation of affected limb above level of heart
  • Early referral at first sign of skin breakdown or trauma to limb
  • Need for exercise and ankle-joint mobility
  • Appropriate skin care avoiding sensitizing products
  • Compression therapy for life with reassessment based on symptoms

Education Recommendations

Recommendation 31 (Unchanged)

Guidelines are more likely to be effective if they take into account local circumstances and are disseminated by an ongoing education and training program. (Level of Evidence = C)

Recommendation 32 (Changed March 2007)

Using principles of adult learning, present information at an appropriate level for the target audience, including healthcare providers, clients, family members and caregivers. (Level of Evidence = C)

Recommendation 33 (Changed March 2007)

All healthcare professionals who manage lower limb ulcers should be trained in leg ulcer assessment and management. (Level of Evidence = C)

Recommendation 34 (Unchanged)

Design, develop, and implement educational programs that reflect a continuum of care. The program should begin with a structured, comprehensive, and organized approach to prevention and should culminate in effective treatment protocols that promote healing as well as prevent recurrence. (Level of Evidence = C)

Recommendation 35 (Changed March 2007) (Level of Evidence = C)

Education programs for healthcare professionals who manage lower limb ulcers should include:

  • Pathophysiology of leg ulceration
  • Leg ulcer assessment
  • Need for Doppler ultrasound to measure Ankle Brachial Pressure Index (ABPI)
  • Normal and abnormal wound healing
  • Compression therapy theory, management, and application
  • Dressing selection
  • Principles of debridement
  • Principles of cleansing and infection control
  • Skin care of the lower leg
  • Peri-wound skin care and management
  • Psychological impact of venous stasis disease
  • Quality of life
  • Pain management
  • Teaching and support for care provider
  • Health education
  • Preventing recurrence
  • Principles of nutritional support with regard to tissue integrity
  • Mechanisms for accurate documentation and monitoring of pertinent data, including treatment interventions and healing progress
  • Criteria for referral for specialized assessment

Recommendation 36 (Changed March 2007)

Healthcare professionals with recognized training in leg ulcer care should mentor and transfer their knowledge and skills to local healthcare teams. (Level of Evidence = C)

Recommendation 37 (Unchanged)

The knowledge and understanding of the healthcare professional is a major factor in adherence to treatment regimens. Level of Evidence = C)

Organization and Policy Recommendations

Recommendation 38 (Unchanged)

Successful implementation of a venous ulcer treatment policy/strategy requires:

  • Dedicated funding
  • Integration of healthcare services
  • Support from all levels of government
  • Management support
  • Human resources
  • Financial resources
  • Functional space
  • Commitment
  • Collection of baseline information about vulnerable populations
  • Resources and existing knowledge
  • Interpretation of above data and identification of organizational problems

(Level of Evidence = C)

Recommendation 39 (Unchanged)

Nursing best practice guidelines can be successfully implemented only where there are adequate planning, resources, organizational and administrative support, as well as appropriate facilitation. Organizations may wish to develop a plan for implementation that includes:

  • An assessment of organizational readiness and barriers to education.
  • Involvement of all members (whether in a direct or indirect supportive function) who will contribute to the implementation process.
  • Dedication of a qualified individual to provide the support needed for the education and implementation process.
  • Ongoing opportunities for discussion and education to reinforce the importance of best practices.
  • Opportunities for reflection on personal and organizational experience in implementing guidelines.

Refer to the "Description of the Implementation Strategy" field for more information.

(Level of Evidence = C)

Definitions:

Level A: Evidence obtained from at least one randomized controlled trial or meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Level B: Evidence from well designed clinical studies but no randomized controlled trials

Level C: Evidence from expert committee reports or opinion and/or clinical experience or respected authorities. Indicates absence of directly applicable studies of good quality

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of evidence is provided for each recommendation (see "Major Recommendations").

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO). Assessment and management of venous leg ulcers. Toronto (ON): Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO); 2004 Mar. 112 p. [64 references]


  • Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO). Assessment and management of venous leg ulcers: guideline supplement. Toronto (ON): Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO); 2007 Mar. 21 p. [51 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2004 Mar (addendum released 2007 Mar)

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Registered Nurses Association of Ontario - Professional Association

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Funding was provided by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care.

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Not stated

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Guideline Revision Panel Members:

Patricia Coutts, RN, IIWCC
Team Leader
Wound Care and Clinical Trials Coordinator
Debary Dermatological
Mississauga, Ontario

Patti Barton, RN, PHN, ET
ET Wound Consultant
Specialty ET Services
Toronto, Ontario

Cathy Burrows, RN, BScN
Staff Nurse
Vascular Surgery Leg Ulcer Clinic
QE II Health Sciences Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia

Karen E. Campbell, RN, MScN, PhD(c), ACNP
Nurse Practitioner/Clinical Nurse Specialist
London Health Sciences Center, University Hospital
London, Ontario

Moira Coates, RN, BScN, ET
Enterostomal Therapy Nurse
St. Joseph's Care Group
Thunder Bay, Ontario

Theresa Hurd, RN, MScN, MSN, ACNP
Advanced Practice Nurse
Hamilton Niagara Haldimand Brant CCAC
St. Catharines, Ontario

Karen Lorimer, RN, MScN, CCHN
Advanced Practice Nurse
Carefor Health & Community Services
Ottawa, Ontario

Nancy Parslow, RN, ET
Wound Care Nurse Specialist
Southlake Regional Health Centre
Newmarket, Ontario

Christine Pearson, RN, IIWCC
Community Wound Clinician
North Vancouver, British Columbia

Laura Teague, RN, MN, ACNP
Nurse Practitioner
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario

Samantha Mayo, RN, BScN, MN
Program Coordinator
Nursing Best Practice Guidelines Program
Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario
Toronto, Ontario

Meagan Cleary, BA
Project Coordinator
Nursing Best Practice Guidelines Program
Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario
Toronto, Ontario

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO) convened a panel to develop this guideline, conducting its work independent of any bias or influence from the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care.

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

March 2004 Guideline

Electronic copies: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) in English and French from the Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO) Web site.

March 2007 Supplement

Electronic copies: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the RNAO Web site.

Print copies: Available from the Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO), Nursing Best Practice Guidelines Program, 158 Pearl Street, Toronto, Ontario M5H 1L3.

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

The following are available:

Print copies: Available from the Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO), Nursing Best Practice Guidelines Project, 158 Pearl Street, Toronto, Ontario M5H 1L3.

PATIENT RESOURCES

The following is available:

  • Health education fact sheet. Taking care of your legs. Toronto (ON): Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO); 2004 Mar. 2 p.

Electronic copies: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) in English and French from the Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO) Web site.

Print copies: Available from the Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO), Nursing Best Practice Guidelines Program, 158 Pearl Street, Toronto, Ontario M5H 1L3.

Please note: This patient information is intended to provide health professionals with information to share with their patients to help them better understand their health and their diagnosed disorders. By providing access to this patient information, it is not the intention of NGC to provide specific medical advice for particular patients. Rather we urge patients and their representatives to review this material and then to consult with a licensed health professional for evaluation of treatment options suitable for them as well as for diagnosis and answers to their personal medical questions. This patient information has been derived and prepared from a guideline for health care professionals included on NGC by the authors or publishers of that original guideline. The patient information is not reviewed by NGC to establish whether or not it accurately reflects the original guideline's content.

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on September 16, 2004. The information was verified by the guideline developer on October 14, 2004. This NGC summary was updated by ECRI Institute on January 3, 2008. The updated information was verified by the guideline developer on March 4, 2008.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

With the exception of those portions of this document for which a specific prohibition or limitation against copying appears, the balance of this document may be produced, reproduced, and published in its entirety only, in any form, including in electronic form, for educational or noncommercial purposes, without requiring the consent or permission of the Registered Nurses Association of Ontario, provided that an appropriate credit or citation appears in the copied work as follows:

Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (2004). Assessment and management of venous leg ulcers. Toronto, Canada: Registered Nurses Association of Ontario.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo