Security Enhanced Linux
What's New
Frequently Asked Questions
Background
Documents
License
Download
Participating
Mail List
Archives
Remaining Work
Contributors
Related Work
Press Releases
Information Assurance Research
NIARL In-house Research Areas
Mathematical Sciences Program
Sabbaticals
Computer & Information Sciences Research
Technology Transfer
Advanced Computing
Advanced Mathematics
Communications & Networking
Information Processing
Microelectronics
Other Technologies
Technology Fact Sheets
Publications
Related Links
|
SELinux Mailing ListRe: 2.6.26 Debian kernel panic
From: Russell Coker <russell_at_coker.com.au>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 11:38:42 +1100
The evidence seems quite clear that it was not a SE Linux problem. It was suggested that the problem could be related to dodgey RAM, a memtest86+ run for 6 hours did not find any errors. While this is not conclusive evidence of a lack of a problem, it's a strong indication that when a problem is reproducable quickly and easily when running a kernel but not over the course of 6 hours of memtest86+ then it's not faulty RAM. The DomU in question is now running a CentOS (2.6.18) kernel with no problems. http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/10/22/upgrading-a-server-to-64bit-xen/ The machine in question is not entirely a standard configuration. I am running a CentOS 5 kernel with Debian user-space as described in the above blog post.
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 14:10, Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au> wrote:
-- Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au> http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/category/security/ My Security blog posts http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/play.html My Play Machine, root PW "SELINUX" -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.Received on Fri 14 Nov 2008 - 19:38:55 EST |
|
Date Posted: Jan 15, 2009 | Last Modified: Jan 15, 2009 | Last Reviewed: Jan 15, 2009 |