Return-Path: <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id h8OKm1V10105; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 16:48:01 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 16:48:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <004501c382de$dde57960$6401a8c0@pp200> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: "Dottie Shattuck" <dottie@shattuck.net> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-ESL:9502] Re: reading X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; Status: O Content-Length: 2128 Lines: 74 Jennifer -- I got it as a "forwarded" email. I've since gotten it 2 or 3 more times; one said that it was from Cambridge U (UK, I suppose). I've no idea if the "research" is true or not. I posted it here because I thought it presented an interesting theory & might be a fun exercise for ESL students & instructors. Dottie Shattuck Charlotte, NC dottie@shattuck.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jennifer Morrow" <jmorrow@jcplin.org> To: "Multiple recipients of list" <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 2:59 PM Subject: [NIFL-ESL:9500] Re: reading | I have gotten this exercise from four different sources so far. Where did it come from? Who did this study? Where is it published? Any info would be appreciated. | Jennifer | | -----Original Message----- | From: Dottie Shattuck [mailto:dottie@shattuck.net] | Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 3:31 PM | To: Multiple recipients of list | Subject: [NIFL-ESL:9485] Re: reading | | | This might be a fun exercise for upper level students & get their "take" on whether it's true or not. __ | | \ | |__ / ottie dottie@shattuck.net | ----- Original Message ----- | From: "Andres Muro" <AndresM@epcc.edu> | To: "Multiple recipients of list" <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov> | Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 2:19 PM | Subject: [NIFL-ESL:9483] Re: reading | | | | This is cool. I am sure that the phonics advocates will not be able to | | read | this. | | | | Andres | | | | >>> dottie@shattuck.net 09/16/03 12:07PM >>> | | My daughter just sent this to me (forwarded to her). I thought some | | of you | would | | find it interesting. | | | | | | Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in | | waht | oredr | | the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is that frist and | | lsat ltteer is at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and | | you can | sitll | | raed it wiuthoit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey | | lteterby it | slef | | but the wrod as a wlohe. pttrey azamnig Dottie ShattuckCharlotte, NC | | dottie@shattuck.net | | | | | | | | | | | | |
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:16:26 EST