[NIFL-ESL:8476] Re: Leave no child behind

From: Kimberly Cartier (cartierkimberly@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Jan 16 2003 - 16:03:40 EST


Received: from hotmail.com (f150.law11.hotmail.com [64.4.17.150]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id h0GL6VP23452 for <nifl-esl@nifl.gov>; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 16:06:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 13:03:41 -0800
Received: from 216.204.11.50 by lw11fd.law11.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 21:03:40 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [216.204.11.50]
From: "Kimberly Cartier" <cartierkimberly@hotmail.com>
To: nifl-esl@nifl.gov
Subject: [NIFL-ESL:8476] Re: Leave no child behind
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 16:03:40 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F1505Hlcn5imbxoozfF0000867d@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jan 2003 21:03:41.0124 (UTC) FILETIME=[BF46E040:01C2BDA2]
Status: O
Content-Length: 5010
Lines: 145

Complaints about "complaints" hardly qualify as "useful discussion."

Kimberly




>From: Lisa Pierce <ldpierce@emlc.org>
>Reply-To: nifl-esl@nifl.gov
>To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
>Subject: [NIFL-ESL:8436] Re: Leave no child behind
>Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 09:46:37 -0500 (EST)
>
>Can we leave this list open to useful discussions rather than take up space 
>as a complaint forum?  Thank you.
>Lisa
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:	Sherry Migdail [SMTP:shermigd@erols.com]
>Sent:	Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:23 AM
>To:	Multiple recipients of list
>Subject:	[NIFL-ESL:8435] Re: Leave no child behind
>
>There appears to be a method in this madness i.e., pass legislation but do
>not authorize funding - education has been left very far behind
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Charles Jannuzi" <jannuzi@edu00.f-edu.fukui-u.ac.jp>
>To: "Multiple recipients of list" <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
>Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:21 AM
>Subject: [NIFL-ESL:8434] Leave no child behind
>
>
> > See article below for what is going to get left behind in bilingual and
>ESL
> > education.
> >
> > Charles Jannuzi
> > Fukui, Japan
> >
> > http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/030108/clw022_1.html
> >
> > Press Release Source: Office of Congresswoman Stephanie Tubbs Jones
> >
> >
> > Tubbs Jones Says 'No Child Left Behind' Education Plan 'Left Funding
>Behind'
> > Wednesday January 8, 5:33 pm ET
> >
> >
> > WASHINGTON, Jan. 8 /PRNewswire/ -- On January 8, 2002, President Bush
>signed
> > the "No Child Left Behind Act" with a great deal of fanfare. The
>bipartisan
> > No Child Left Behind Act mandated high expectations that promised
>additional
> > resources to elevate student achievement and the money necessary to 
>raise
> > teacher quality, reduce class sizes, and implement other initiatives
>proven
> > to help children learn.
> > One month after signing into law the No Child Left Behind Act in January
> > 2002, President Bush submitted his FY 2003 budget to Congress, which
> > completely undercut the landmark education act he had just signed.
> > Specifically, the FY 2003 Bush education budget cuts $90 million from 
>the
>FY
> > 2002 enacted level for No Child Left Behind programs.
> >
> > "The No Child Left Behind Act seems to have left behind the funding
> > necessary for every child to receive a quality education," said Rep. 
>Tubbs
> > Jones.
> >
> > The FY 2003 Bush education budget threatens to undermine education 
>reform
>by
> > doing following:
> >
> >     * Cuts Teacher Quality.  The Teacher Quality Initiative helps states
>and
> >       school districts reduce class sizes and better recruit and train
> >       teachers. The Republican budget cuts teacher quality programs by 
>4%,
> >       eliminating high-quality training for 18,000 teachers.
> >     * Falls Short on Title I.  The Bush budget falls more than $4 
>billion
> >       short of the No Child Left Behind Act's authorization level for
>Title
> > I.
> >       As a result of growing demand, an estimated 250,000 more eligible
> >       children would be left behind by Title I next year than were this
> > year.
> >     * Fails Promise to Fully Fund Special Education.  The President's
>budget
> >       includes only a $1 billion increase for the long under-funded
>special
> >       education program (IDEA).  At this rate, it will take another 15
>years
> >       to reach the level of funding promised by the Congress 27 years 
>ago.
> >     * Freezes After-School Programs. The No Child Left Behind Act 
>promised
>a
> >       $500 million increase for after-school programs in FY 2003.  By
> > instead
> >       freezing the budget for this initiative at $1 billion, the
>Republican
> >       budget denies 33,000 children safe places to learn after school.
> >     * Cuts Safe and Drug-Free Schools by $103 Million.  The Republican
> > budget
> >       cuts funding for this program by 14%.  This program helps make our
> >       schools safe by supporting comprehensive, integrated approaches to
> > drug
> >       and violence prevention.
> >     * Fails to Increase Bilingual Education.  Finally, the Republican
>budget
> >       freezes Bilingual Education - a cut after inflation - even though
> >       schools must teach 300,000 more students with limited English
> >       proficiency next year.
> >
> >
> > One of the first orders of business of the 108th Congress will be 
>passing
> > the remaining appropriations bills for FY 2003. During this process,
> > Democrats will fight for adequate funding for No Child Left Behind
> > programs -- resisting the inadequate funding provided in the Republican
> > budget.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>--
> > ----
> > Source: Office of Congresswoman Stephanie Tubbs Jones
> >
> >


_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:16:03 EST