[NIFL-ESL:9331] Re: Accept English Only donation?

From: Ken Todd (kentodd@UDel.Edu)
Date: Fri Aug 29 2003 - 16:21:36 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id h7TKLa721148; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 16:21:36 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 16:21:36 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <3F4FB4CC.4D49597@udel.edu>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: Ken Todd <kentodd@UDel.Edu>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-ESL:9331] Re: Accept English Only donation?
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
Status: O
Content-Length: 2291
Lines: 47

For instance, the parents of President van Buren almost 200 years after
the Dutch had arrived?

ttweeton wrote:
> 
> Being Bi-lingual  Ken is a golden opportunity for those who are able to
> remain so but this is not the problem. The problem stems from those certain
> individuals who don't think learning English is that important,  if they can
> get by with not doing so. And many get by with not doing so in Miami.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ken Todd" <kentodd@UDel.Edu>
> To: "Multiple recipients of list" <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 11:21 AM
> Subject: [NIFL-ESL:9312] Re: Accept English Only donation?
> 
> > I would like to know the source of this myth. I have never heard it
> > before. "myth" understates its distance from historical fact. As I have
> > commented before on this list, until WWI immigrant communities
> > throughout the United States freely and happily maintained their
> > languages in theur schools, their press and their local public affairs.
> > At that time the grotesque chauvinistic campaigns for mandatory English
> > and statutorily defined patriotism. Recently I came across another
> > example. Martin van Buren, 11th president, grew up in a Dutch speaking
> > household. Now of course, he obviously learned English. But he didn't
> > have to, and his parents and town were able to sustain the Dutch
> > traditions, which like those of Spanish speakers in the Southwest,
> > preceded those of the Anglos who had taken power over them. Somehow the
> > fact of intrusive government and ramified technologies of administration
> > does not strike me as a sound reason for reducing the rights and
> > freedoms once enjoyed by linguistic minorities.
> >
> > Joe Little wrote:
> > >
> > > >  I'd like to see some of us survive in places where no one speaks any
> > > >  languages that we know... not as vacationers, but as immigrants
> trying
> > > >  to make a living.  We'll probably complain why no one knows any
> English
> > > >  in that backwards country!
> > >
> > > Albert & all,
> > >
> > > Learning the local language would shoot to the top of the list of
> "things to do", as-- unless it's a myth-- in olden times. No complaints.
> It's would be my choice--by hook or crook--to be there.
> > >
> > > Joe



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:16:20 EST