Return-Path: <nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id g3BDgHu07454; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 09:42:17 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 09:42:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3CB647A3.76C502F5@uswest.net> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: Vanessa Vaile <vcrary@uswest.net> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-FAMILY:959] Re: Clips and Cross Posts X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en]C-CCK-MCD {U S WEST.net} (Win95; I) Status: O Content-Length: 914 Lines: 18 Just wanted to say how much I appreciate Jon's clips & cross posts. And thanks to the great responses to my question on tech & PACT. I am still climbing the learning curve here... often huffing & puffing as I go along. I have been teaching too long not to have reservations about "Testing for Results" & testing myths-- wish the view were more balanced. The more complex the skill, the less quantifiable. Tests are useful tools best used understanding their limitations and coldly realizing that test taking is a life skill in todays today's world-- but can lull adminstrators, educators & parents into a false sense of security (we're testing; we're crunching the numbers: we have a handle on learning) Thesiren-call charm of testing should carry a warning label. I wonder if there are any long range studies tracking post-school life successes of successful test-takers. Vanessa Vaile Mountainair NM
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 14:41:00 EST